Relic said:
Georges said:
Nazarene Judaism is how I percieve "Christianity" should ideally be. That's what it had started out as....
Nazarene Judaism .....
Just curious, and as far as I know, beside the fact that the Messianic Jews do not oppose the teachings of Paul,
Uh...yes they do...that's why Paul was called to the carpet in Jerusalem...that's why Peter wrote his Epstile to James (non cannon Pseudo Clementine) to combat what Paul had been teaching...and historical documents state the Nazarean/Ebionites considered Paul an Apostate....So if he is an Apostate, it would be to Nazarene Judaism..
what is your view on the differences between Nazarene Judaism and the Messianic Jew, if any?
The Nazarene Jews were Messianic Jews....If you are asking by today's standards.....today's Messianic Jew (majority I believe) may accept Paul as a valid teacher (not 100% sure on that) where the Nazarenes (early church and not to be confused with the "modern" Nazarene church of Christ, did not.
Thanks.
.
From....[url]http://www.jewishencyclopedia.c ... =nazarenes[/url]
.....The Nazarenes, then, recognized Jesus, though it appears from occasional references to them that they considered the Mosaic law binding only for those born within Judaism, while the Ebionites considered this law binding for all men (Hippolytus, "Comm. in Jes." i. 12). The Nazarenes therefore rejected Paul, the apostle to the Gentiles. Some accordingly declared even that the Nazarenes were Jews, as, for instance, Theodoret ("Hær. Fab." ii. 2: οἱ δὲ Ναζωραῖοι Ἰουδαῖοί εἰσι); that they exalted Jesus as a just man, and that they read the Gospel of Peter; fragments of this Gospel of Peter have been preserved (Preuschen, l.c. p. 13). Aside from these references, Theodoret, however, makes the mistake of confounding the Nazarenes and Ebionites; he is the last one of the Church Fathers to refer to the Nazarenes, who probably were absorbed in the course of the fifth century partly by Judaism and partly by Christianity.
The Nazarenes, then, recognized Jesus, though it appears from occasional references to them that they considered the Mosaic law binding only for those born within Judaism, while the Ebionites considered this law binding for all men (Hippolytus, "Comm. in Jes." i. 12).
The Nazarenes therefore rejected Paul, the apostle to the Gentiles. Some accordingly declared even that the Nazarenes were Jews, as, for instance, Theodoret ("Hær. Fab." ii. 2: οἱ δὲ Ναζωραῖοι Ἰουδαῖοί εἰσι); that they exalted Jesus as a just man, and that they read the Gospel of Peter; fragments of this Gospel of Peter have been preserved (Preuschen, l.c. p. 13). Aside from these references, Theodoret, however, makes the mistake of confounding the Nazarenes and Ebionites; he is the last one of the Church Fathers to refer to the Nazarenes, who probably were absorbed in the course of the fifth century partly by Judaism and partly by Christianity.
I also comment in red....above.