raoul duke
Member
Sounds like the mounting evidence against his belief systems was finally pushed over the top by a false history. Nevertheless, were it not this false history, it could be any number of true histories about early Christianity formation that toppled his religious holdings.
And there absolutely is reason to believe that Christianity is wrong concerning the historicity, authenticity, inspiration, and authority of the NT, not mention the entirety of the Bible (at least depending on your version of Christianity). I mean my goodness, the literalist view of the bible makes the world exist for 6,000 years when we can see stars of far greater light-year distances than 6,000 (thus showing the universe is much older than the historicity and authority of the hebrew bible's narrative).
only 35% of bible prophecies are to be taken literally, it makes me wonder if we're all missing the boat. churches teach every word of the bible is to be taken literally, while anybody that studies Jewish history and rabbinical tradition sees that most of the bible is symbolism, parable, and allegory. no wonder we have such conflict with science, we don't know how to properly interpret scripture and we are expecting the bible to be a physics textbook when it's only written to be a guideline to morality and salvation through Jesus Christ.
bottom line is everybody's faith is a matter between them and God, we may not feel God is there or listening, but He is always there whether we feel Him or not. How else would he test our faith? We all feel like we have to go through life alone, but that is the test. Matthew 24:13 tells that he who endures to the end, will be saved