Morning Dan. I've got to ask that if this has all occurred why they were not sealed until until chapter seven of Revelation all of Israel, and then they're not caught up until a great multitude come out of great tribulation of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne. And then in Rev 14:1 the 144,000 have already been caught up, the firstfruits (And yes I'll say it; all of Israel) unto God and to the Lamb, but they here again do not precede the four beasts, and the elders again out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation already with Jesus prior to the tribulation.
Hi, Eugene,
I have thought about the "great multitude," as well. Notice they came "out of great tribulation" and "serve him day and night in his temple." Those in the first resurrection have these characteristics:
1) they included the apostles (recall the "thrones and judgement")
2) they included those who had been beheaded for the word of God and had not "worshipped the beast," etc. (which, by the way, included every righteous person who had died prior to the "beast's arrival")
3) they serve as priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
That sounds like it could be the "great multitude." The 144,000 had these characteristics:
1) the servants of our God who were sealed.
2) they sang a new song
before the throne.
3) they were not defiled with "women," whatever that means since marriage is honorable in all.
4) they were the firstfruits
redeemed from among men.
After they were sealed, John saw a great multitude stand before the throne, etc..
I have concluded the "great multitude" is the "144,000." Assume you were at a Michigan-Ohio State football game or the Daytona 500. You would see a "great multitude" of over 100,000 people, as John saw, and you would have no clue how many were in attendance until you read it in the papers.
Another thing: the great multitude came out of "great tribulation" which I believe occurred in 66-70 A.D., and were most likely the "elect" Jesus had sent his angels to gather together (Matt 24:31) They had the same characteristics:
1) they were from all nations (or, as in Matthew, from "the four winds",) which in those days would have meant the Roman Empire (see Luke 2:1.)
2) they were from all "kindreds," which is another word for "tribes," so they would be from the scattered tribes.
Recall from my previous post that Jesus was only sent for the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
These verses are similar:
" . . . then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. (Matt 24:30-31)
"And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.." (Luke 21:27-28)
"And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven." (Mark 13:26-27)
Notice "gathering the elect" and "redemption" coincide. Also notice his elect was gathered from the earth and the heaven (which I assume to mean those "sleeping" were included.)
All three passages were followed by a statement like this:
" Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled."
Which means it occurred during the generation of the apostles, who Jesus was speaking to at the time.
His "Coming" in the gospels is similar to this:
"Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds [tribes] of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen." (Revelation 1:7)
Note the Roman soldiers that pierced him also saw him.
For the record, both Josephus and Tacitus wrote about a strange phenomena during the war of an "army" moving around in the clouds over Jerusalem. There were other very strange phenomena, as well. I really don't know what to think about that, except that Jesus wrote there would be some strange visual clues.
My interpretation of the date, timing and occupants of the first resurrection explains the following oddity:
Moses prophesied in some detail in Deuteronomy 28 about the destruction of Jerusalem; and his prophesy occurred approximately 1500 years prior to the event. Additionally, nearly all, if not all the other prophets foretold the destruction of Jerusalem in one manner or another.
Yet, outside the references to the destruction of Jerusalem by Christ in the Gospels,
there is hardly a whisper about it after Christ's resurrection, either before the destruction or for many years after. This was the most significant, "man-caused" event in the history of the world up until that time--even until this time--and there was nothing written about it by the apostles or followers of Christ? Not even a, "See, I told you so!"? Not even by St. John? Nothing? What happened to the early Christians--those who had received the Holy Ghost on the Day of Pentecost?
Now, let's assume that John did
NOT write the Revelation in A.D. 90-95 (as one person, Irenaeus, and a "bandwagon" implied;) but that John wrote the book earlier during the reign of Nero (as other historians have implied) which was prior to the destruction of Jerusalem.
Now, everything makes sense! Instead of a book that can and does mean anything and everything, depending solely on the imagination of the reader or interpreter; we have a book that provided both general and specific warnings to some of the early Christian Churches in the Roman Empire just prior to the destruction of Jerusalem, which would comply with the angel's instructions to John:
"What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea." (Revelation 1:11)
Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that John was prophesying the destruction of Jerusalem when writing about Babylon the Great. If that be the case, the 144,000 were standing on the heavenly mount Sion in, or just prior to, 70 A.D., shortly after their redemption, which was the first resurrection (or, if you prefer, the Rapture.)
That is not so far fetched if we take the words of Jesus
literally:
"And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other . . . Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled." (Matthew 24:30-31, 34)
Dan