At the risk of butting heads again Free, I've gotta say that your statement below is really very superficial at best.
Free said:
Whether or not Christ's birth was the 25th of December is irrelevant. The fact is that that was the day chosen to remember it.
Crock.
Firstly, nothing is "irrelevant" to God.
A person is either for God or against God. No gray, no inbetween, no irrelevant actions/activities/participation.
Everything counts,... punto finale.
Secondly,...... the fact that it was choosen? By who pray tell?
God? Or men?
And why?
A very specific and detailed-oriented God did not see it necessary to give us a specific date, yet "choosing men" thought it necessary.
And not just necessary to attempt to push this on God, but also to attempt to find some sort of righteous justification in doing so.
Free said:
That Dec. 25th was a pagan day of celebration is of importance, but not for the erroneous reasons Imagican gives.
Hmmm,... I'm not so sure about that.
Free said:
It is about "redeeming the time" (Eph. 5:16).
Baloney.
Christmas trees and all the other foolishness we have come to associate with this corruption is "redeeming the time"? Paul would laugh in your face. Or maybe cry.
Fact is, the scripture is very specific about what redeeming the time is and there is no mention of this false and wicked tradition.
Free said:
There is nothing wrong with making holy what is not, turning a pagan celebration into a celebration of the birth of our Lord and God. Any link between Mithraism and Christianity is pure speculation.
Nothing "wrong" with "making" holy what is not holy?
Are you for real?
Who has "made" this wickedness "holy",..... men,..... because they "choose" to?
Free? What does "born-again mean?
What is it to be resurrected?
Believers are unable to "make" their daily living as a born-again, resurrected person a holy daily living, but you proffer here that men can "make" that which is unholy holy.
This is the ridiculousness of Christianity at its best/worse.
Free said:
The interesting thing is that it is increasingly becoming unredeemed, being turned once again into a pagan celebration of materialism and consumerism.
Just as a dog returns to its vomit, a hog to the muck.
You know the tree by its fruit.
Birds of a feather flock together (not scripture, but I'm sure if I look hard enough I can find the equivalent).
How much more do you want from God regarding the opening of your eyes Free?
"Christmas" is simply expressing its innate corruption.
Free said:
I strongly suggest, Imagican, that you quit trying to prove orthodox Christian belief and practice wrong, especially by your continual appeal to non-Christian sources.
"Orthodox",.... you're kidding right? Ain't nothing orthodox about Christmas Free.
Free said:
Of course these sources are going to claim such-and-such about Christianity. You would do well to search inside and find out why you dislike Christ's Church so strongly. Stick to Scripture.
No problem, for the scriptures are absolutely and completely against Christianity.
In love,
cj