Women teachers can only try to explain things, and only repeat what they have heard.I would say that Paul is addressing a people in a particular culture with particular habits and beliefs and Paul didn't want the early Church to have disruptions. It was culture. Also, the Church was to separate itself from the worldly systems and the pagans adorned themselves with jewelry and fancy clothes.
Nothing wrong with looking nice but don't wear a formal dress to church. IMO that draws attention to oneself and away from more important matters. A humble heart seeks to be invisible and not flaunt. Just my opinion.
Can women teach men? Well, yes. I had women teachers from kindergarten through to my Master's degree program. I have had more women teachers then men. And I learned a lot from them. So yes they can teach. And IMO, they should. They have a gift from God and should exercise it.
But should they be a preacher? Well, many are. I"m not going to judge. I'm not a legalist. If you don't like women teaching men, don't go to those churches. And if you're not loving God and your neighbor, if you're not helping the poor, orphans, widows, then hush it up. God says a lot in His word and he's commanded us in the above.
But as always, I could be wrong. I'm probably not too far off I'll bet. ;)
Remember, in 1 Tim. 2:11-14 Paul gave his rationale for not allowing women to teach in the Church which comes directly from the fact that "the woman transgressed," not Adam. Within her uncorrupted nature, before sin had entered into her, she was entirely gullible to Satan's temptation. Today, her sinful daughters are even more gullible.
This is God's Word.