Eventide
Member
- Jul 31, 2010
- 3,477
- 2
- Thread starter
- #101
Eventide, one cannot hold the Truth in unrighteousness and not hold a false image of god since they are the same thing.
No, holding the truth in unrighteousness is holding the truth in unrighteousness.. that's why it says that, and not what you say..
Moreover this happened long ago and I get the impression you think you would not have been like those men.
This happened long ago..? Where do you come up with these things..
The word of God is living and powerful.. it's just as true today as when it was first scripted. And nobody is exempt.. MYSELF INCLUDED.
So if they were not fools in their vanity as you seem to claim but knew exactly what they were doing in being unthankful to God and imagining God as what He is not, why does Romans two say this?
1Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
I'm not judging anyone.. I'm simply telling you what the scriptures say.. they say that men hold the truth in unrighteousness and that men are without excuse.. you believe otherwise.. so be it. I can't make you believe the simple truth of scripture.
You seem to want to condemn yourself in hypocrisy as if you would have done better. I admit they were, we are, fools for taking God for granted in vanity, but I will not say I knowingly want to be a fool and remain blind to vanity because that is a lie. I do not want to esteem God falsely. Do you even know what such vanity is?
Like I said.. nobody is exempt.. myself included.. it's possible for any man to hold the truth in unrighteousness and not glorify God as God.. do YOU think that you're exempt from this ?