Gods creation was good because it ALL came from Gods Own Hands. Trying to remove Gods Hands from the equations of His creation isn't possible. IN and of themselves many things in the Garden are "not good." That doesn't mean in Gods Hands 'all things' in creation can not work for good, as the scripture tells us, here:
Romans 8:28
And we know that
all things work together
for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
But we know this is ONLY possible with Gods Hands on "all things." Things in and of themselves are not necessarily "good."
Mark 10:18
And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good?
there is none good but one, that is, God.
That's part of the problem of "sin" in the flesh of man. It tries quite vainly to make 'things' in and of themselves "good and evil." Good comes from God. So does Evil. But all things including evil are USED for good in Gods Hands.
If the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil was only good, or very good, God would not have given His Word of warning and promise of death to disobedience. But Gods Words of warning and promise of death of the flesh to disobedience is actually VERY GOOD in the Eyes of God as well. That was entirely in His Plan. All of it. Not one move in the Garden was a random act of any of the components therein. None of what existed there or in creation doesn't have a Divine Purpose and impetus behind it. Which is the general point.
Satan was in the Garden. Was Satan in the garden, in and of himself "very good?" Of course not. It's absurd to make that claim. We did this drill before. Potential disobedience was in the Garden. Was potential disobedience good? The knowledge of evil was in the Garden. Was the knowledge of evil, good? Deception was in the Garden. Was deception good? The LAW OF GOD was in the Garden. We know the LAW is for lawless sinners. 1 Tim. 1:9. On this basis alone, the delivery of LAW, we know Adam was already, internally, a LAWLESS SINNER. When we see this fact, then we ask "why" is this so? Because 'Satan enters the heart' where The Word is sown. Mark 4:15. Was all of the above made by God, part of His Plan, all in His Hands?
Absolutely it all was predestined to transpire.
And that is a false claim, already isolated. Paul tells us that Adam
was MADE according to the features stipulated in 1 Cor. 15:42-46. And every one of those features are available to see in THE GARDEN.
I use it so people who are failing in their reasoning can use that to blame lack of reasonable "exchange."
Let's trot out the written evidence again. And I'd like to note that
it was not a pile of dust taken from outside the Garden that was given life from God's breath. That pile of dust was only a "God formed" container. That container was dust/clay/earth nevertheless. Without Gods Forming Hands it would be dust, which dust God made also, but I hope you understand that Adam was not the "same as" his dust container. That "container" without the LIFE of God breathed into it was DEAD. It was only 'animated' by the Spirit of God within it. I hope you understand the difference between Gods son, Adam, and the container that God Made to contain Adam, His son.
Adam was Gods son who was PUT into or "birthed" and breathed into that container. Luke 3:38.
I'm going to put the "summation" Paul makes at the end of his statements of facts about
how the CONTAINER of Adam was MADE at the beginning below, because some miss the point when reading the features of Adam's 'container making.' I'll put the 'made features' in red/bold, for highlighting:
45
And so it is written, The first man Adam was made
42 So also is the resurrection of the
dead. It is sown
in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
The above shows the conditions of Adam's CONTAINER. Into which Gods Breath was put, making 'a son.' It was the BREATH of God that made Gods son, Adam. But without that BREATH that container was nothing but dead fading dust. In that dust was "corruption."
That dead dust was NOT the inheritor of eternity. It was corrupt and corruptible.
43 It is sown in
dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in
weakness; it is raised in power:
Again, that dust was not honorable. That dust was quite purposefully weak. Dust and the life of Adam therein are NOT the same. This is not a hard place of understanding.
44
It is sown a
natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
I would hope that anyone could perceive that the dust body of Adam was not Adam. It was a "natural, temporal, corrupt, weak, dead" container into which Adam was breathed/born by Gods Breath.
Differentiate the son from the container.
No, the lack of simple insight abounds. Some people see Adam as "his container." Adam was not "the container." The container contained Adam, but that was never Gods Long Term Plan for His son, Adam. Period. As Paul tells us here:
45 And so it is written, The first man Adam
was made a living soul; the last Adam
was made a quickening spirit.
In both cases
THE MAKER MAKES.
Adam did not "make" himself.