[_ Old Earth _] Disputed Origins of Evolution By Natural Selection

[SyntaxVorlon]

One of the posters on this board, who shall go unnamed so that this thread isn't disappeared by the 123 gestapo, has posited a belief that evolution by natural selection. This poster has yet to actually give any good coherent arguments on the subject.

Here is where they will do so, or concede.

From which specific religion or ethnic group is the Theory of Natural Selection derived? Which specific religious beliefs directly correlate to the Theory of Natural Selection?

 

[Asimov]

One of the posters on this board, who shall go unnamed so that this thread isn't disappeared by the 123 gestapo, has posited a belief that evolution by natural selection. This poster has yet to actually give any good coherent arguments on the subject.

Here is where they will do so, or concede.

From which specific religion or ethnic group is the Theory of Natural Selection derived? Which specific religious beliefs directly correlate to the Theory of Natural Selection?

In said unnamed persons stead, I shall make a reply:

:B-fly: blah blah blah blah.....

*Useless links*

blah blah blah *lack of logic, reason and coherency*,blah blah blah,blah blah*unnecessary commas*,blah,blah blah, amen.

 

[Vic C.]

Hmm, unnamed person is still a member and this sort of posting violates Rule #2.

Rule 2 - No Flaming:
You will not post any messages that harass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member or guest. This will include misquoting another member out of context. You may discuss another member's beliefs but there will be no personal attacks on the member himself or herself. This includes implied accusations that another member is not a Christian

:-?

 

[SyntaxVorlon]

I am neither harrassing nor insulting, nor belittling. I am creating a thread in the context of a claim that has been made in threads where it is irrelevant. If the poster wishes to have a discussion on such matters, as they brought the matter up I can logically infer this, then they may do so. I am discussing that members belief.

 

[Featherbop]

You two are like a brother and sister who argue all the time.

 

[Vic C.]

I am neither harrassing nor insulting, nor belittling. I am creating a thread in the context of a claim that has been made in threads where it is irrelevant. If the poster wishes to have a discussion on such matters, as they brought the matter up I can logically infer this, then they may do so. I am discussing that members belief.

No.1 the post wasn't directed to you. But if the shoe fits...

No.2 you can 'can' the 123 gestapo nonsense...that IS a rule you are in violation of breaking.

Rule 5 - Respect Site authority:
The word of a moderator or administrator is final and private to the people involved. Do not challenge a moderator or administrator's authority or post publicly objecting to a moderator's act. If you feel that a moderator's actions are completely unacceptable, send the administrator a private message. Of course, the administrator's decision is final.

Ooh, two rules, actually!

Rule 9 - No Public Posts about Specific Moderator Actions:
You will not post questions or comments about the specific actions of a moderator in a public forum (e.g. editing a post, deleting a thread, banning a member), as this remains a private matter between the member and the staff involved. However, members may PM or email a moderator at anytime. General questions about staff and feedback about moderators are allowed, just not specific questions about a particular moderator action.

Just a friendly reminder. :D

 

[Vic C.]

You two are like a brother and sister who argue all the time.

LOL, and you...why the name-change.....again!? :

*edited for spelling*

 

[mh13]

let me tell you, 123 mods ARE NOT gestapo. This is a great forum w/ LOTS of freedom. I was banned again from the cf .com site, (they have it in for fundies and YECs over there) and it really makes me appreciate this forum!

 

[Asimov]

Rule 5 - Respect Site authority:
The word of a moderator or administrator is final and private to the people involved. Do not challenge a moderator or administrator's authority or post publicly objecting to a moderator's act. If you feel that a moderator's actions are completely unacceptable, send the administrator a private message. Of course, the administrator's decision is final.

Respect my authori-TAH!

[quote:f4870]let me tell you, 123 mods ARE NOT gestapo. This is a great forum w/ LOTS of freedom. I was banned again from the cf .com site, (they have it in for fundies and YECs over there) and it really makes me appreciate this forum!

[/quote:f4870]

Yea...I'd have to agree with mhess on this one, so far I haven't seen any evidence of Getaponess...but I havent' been here that long. It's nothing like the mods over at forums.christianity.com, or the cf.com site....they can be pretty bad sometimes.

 

[mh13]

Oh the .com site those mods are control freaks! if you say one thing about catholicism or theistic evolution, look out!!!it's like you can't even have an opinion there...

 

[destiny]

I was banned again from the cf .com site, (they have it in for fundies

Thats hilarious mhess :

 

[Asimov]

Oh the .com site those mods are control freaks! if you say one thing about catholicism or theistic evolution, look out!!!it's like you can't even have an opinion there...

That's because they're in the pay of the EAC. We give em some money, they ban anyone who doesn't agree with us...didn't you know that's the way things worked?

 

[Quath]

That's because they're in the pay of the EAC. We give em some money, they ban anyone who doesn't agree with us...didn't you know that's the way things worked?

Uh Oh. I am going to have to report you to the EAC headquarters for revealing conspiracy secrets!!! :evil:

Quath

 

[mh13]

Oh the .com site those mods are control freaks! if you say one thing about catholicism or theistic evolution, look out!!!it's like you can't even have an opinion there...

That's because they're in the pay of the EAC. We give em some money, they ban anyone who doesn't agree with us...didn't you know that's the way things worked?

I wouldn't dount it. Ever notice that little "site supporter" icon? Funny how so many atheists and buddists financially support a "christian" forum

 

[ThinkerMan]

Well Syntax...unfortunately, although expected, I don't think we are going to get the information you requested.

I don't doubt, however, that we will continue to see that tired argument with zero supporting evidence for the position.

 

[Vic C.]

Hey guys, have you tried conversing with 'un-named' member via Private messages? Maybe she, er, 'un-named' member would gladly communicate with you that way. Just a thought.

Respect my authori-TAH!

:o LOL, what is THAT supposed to mean?

 

[SyntaxVorlon]

No.1 the post wasn't directed to you. But if the shoe fits...

I've got enough shoes

No.2 you can 'can' the 123 gestapo nonsense...that IS a rule you are in violation of breaking.

I was being tongue in cheek about that, sorry if I was ambiguous.:D

Ooh, two rules, actually!

[quote:80150]Rule 9 - No Public Posts about Specific Moderator Actions:
You will not post questions or comments about the specific actions of a moderator in a public forum (e.g. editing a post, deleting a thread, banning a member), as this remains a private matter between the member and the staff involved. However, members may PM or email a moderator at anytime. General questions about staff and feedback about moderators are allowed, just not specific questions about a particular moderator action.

Just a friendly reminder. :D

[/quote:80150]
Right, well then in response to rule 9. I fully deny the existence of mods, there are no mods, they do not act in the shadows, there are no black helicopters. 8-)

 

[Quath]

Respect my authori-TAH!

:o LOL, what is THAT supposed to mean?

It is from South Park.

Quath

 

[Featherbop]

You two are like a brother and sister who argue all the time.

LOL, and you...why the name-change.....again!? :

*edited for spelling*

Oh, I just thought a more masculine name of another of my fictional characters would be more fitting. I'll probably change back to feather eventually though.. :D

 

[Featherbop]

Syntax: Why did you make another topic for you and blue to argue in? You had Blue Enguarde! last time, it took like a week for blue to start with you. You just like to make doomed to fail topics so you can argue with your sister....I mean blue, right?

P.S. Oh and quit acting like you weild power over others. You play to much like you defeat everyone in debates, and like you can concede their beliefs and arguements for them. Drop the ego, and the attitude, and the childishness, so you can keep more credibility and not appear as a clown to others. Just my advice.

P.S.S. I'm gonna grab some popcorn, and watch this topic go.



COMENCE S vs. B!!!!!!11Hahahaha