That is a modern philosophical idea. Show me where the Bible says that.So, God's will/pleasure is that we love Him and other people. For love to be love, there must be at the ab
Every parent knows what this is like.
ility to choose to love or not.
Yes, and every parent is a fallible, limited created being that does not have the omniscience and eternal existence that BGod has.Every parent knows what this is like.
That second tree was put there precisely so that they would eat of it and fall and start the process of sin that Jesus would come and die and ransom many people and bring them to glory. And there is a difference between what God desires and what He commands. He commanded them to not eat from that tree, but it was His will that they would so that if would effect the whole history of mankind.Notice this was creation, not the dealings of God with moral beings. What did God do shortly after this? He put two trees in the garden and TOLD THE MAN NOT TO EAT of one of them. If God did not give man the right to free choose, why did He give him the choice in the garden? And what God's will done in reference to not eating of the tree?
And you claim to be highly educated? Jews, Greeks, Germans, French, Italians, Japanese, and a thousand other groups and languages.I am curious, how many "kinds of men" are there and what are they?
No it does not.All kinds of people includes all people in all times everywhere.
Act 10:11 and saw heaven opened and an object like a great sheet bound at the four corners, descending to him and let down to the earth. 12 In it were all kinds (pas) of four-footed animals of the earth, wild beasts, creeping things, and birds of the air.
It is clear that when you read on, it was only some unclean animals.
Act 10:14 But Peter said, "Not so, Lord! For I have never eaten anything common or unclean."