- Jan 11, 2020
- 5,827
- 3,486
Does this mean our love affair is over?It all depends on how humble they are, lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Does this mean our love affair is over?It all depends on how humble they are, lol.
Does this mean our love affair is over?
Actually, it was other Christians that came to mind with the one's I mentioned regarding health care and socialism. There are members in my own church that claim socialism is Biblical and I disagree, as I pointed out Jesus never promoted using government to take from the rich and give to the poor or for the government to provide health care to all. Jesus always addressed the individual person. With these two examples I am thinking of both left and right thinkers as well as those of us in the middle.Biden and double standard post is what I saw. I felt some balance required. Almost no one likes sleepy Joe. I'm not sure I do either.
The title of this thread triggered my response as did your mention of Biden. I mean you could have chosen a different example of double standards but you chose him. I think my response was justified under the circumstances.
James .Actually, it was other Christians that came to mind with the one's I mentioned regarding health care and socialism. There are members in my own church that claim socialism is Biblical and I disagree, as I pointed out Jesus never promoted using government to take from the rich and give to the poor or for the government to provide health care to all. Jesus always addressed the individual person. With these two examples I am thinking of both left and right thinkers as well as those of us in the middle.
Interesting post. You might think I'm a closet socialist. But I'm too big a fan of Jordan Peterson to wave that banner. I do think socialism is a kind of evil. But only at the extreme end. I feel sorry for poverty stricken Americans though. Who have little or no free access to health care. Poor Aussies get a much better deal than poor Americans. Health care wise anyway.Actually, it was other Christians that came to mind with the one's I mentioned regarding health care and socialism. There are members in my own church that claim socialism is Biblical and I disagree, as I pointed out Jesus never promoted using government to take from the rich and give to the poor or for the government to provide health care to all. Jesus always addressed the individual person. With these two examples I am thinking of both left and right thinkers as well as those of us in the middle.
I expect we all are guilty.James .
if you see a member in need and neither offered food or need what faith is in you?
im guilty .
I don't know if it is necessarily evil. The concept is good. In fact, if I recall, didn't you recently have a discussion thread about Utopia? In a pure socialist society, assuming all members of the society agree with the ideal, you would have a Utopian society. The problem abounds when not all members favor a socialist ideal because those that don't agree are forced into accepting it.Interesting post. You might think I'm a closet socialist. But I'm too big a fan of Jordan Peterson to wave that banner. I do think socialism is a kind of evil. But only at the extreme end. I feel sorry for poverty stricken Americans though. Who have little or no free access to health care. Poor Aussies get a much better deal than poor Americans. Health care wise anyway.
Jesus was not a socialist. Jesus was /is anti ideaology. Look after the poor sure. But support the small businessman too. The big business is where I worry. admittedly problems can occur in any organisation where power is a factor. Power corrupts. It corrupted me so it can corrupt anyone.
or that human nature for power ,greed is just non existent in govt .I don't know if it is necessarily evil. The concept is good. In fact, if I recall, didn't you recently have a discussion thread about Utopia? In a pure socialist society, assuming all members of the society agree with the ideal, you would have a Utopian society. The problem abounds when not all members favor a socialist ideal because those that don't agree are forced into accepting it.
Also, big and small, rich and poor, are relative terms. In your reply above, if all "big" businesses are eliminated, would that leave the largest small businesses as the new big businesses?
Yes, the greed is in the people of the government and the people of the society as well. We are all greedy to some degree. I have never found anyone that would honestly say they would reject an offer for a higher wage except for greedy reasons. For example, if they do their social benefits might be reduced.or that human nature for power ,greed is just non existent in govt .
self interests is a better word .Yes, the greed is in the people of the government and the people of the society as well. We are all greedy to some degree. I have never found anyone that would honestly say they would reject an offer for a higher wage except for greedy reasons. For example, if they do their social benefits might be reduced.
I can sympathise with small family farmers. Big corporations bully. And will do whatever it takes to get market control.Around here many people blame corporate farmers for driving out the small family farm but I don't think this is necessarily the case. I think it was a matter of survival and the way of business. The larger you get the more volume you use so you gain buying power.
I didn't say get rid of big business. I suggest we limit their power though. Their power to ride roughshod over small business. Checks and balances.Also, big and small, rich and poor, are relative terms. In your reply above, if all "big" businesses are eliminated, wouldn't that leave the largest small businesses as the new big businesses
buy enabling them,to buy beaurcratsI didn't say get rid of big business. I suggest we limit their power though. Their power to ride roughshod over small business. Checks and balances.
This year was not a good year for hay making for us so we had to buy some to get enough to last through the year. You can bet we shopped around. Prices ranged from $3.00 per small square bale up to $6.00 per bale. Some bales were a little smaller or lighter than others plus it is important not to feed moldy hay to horses. Some farmers felt their hay was worth more than we were willing to pay.I can sympathise with small family farmers. Big corporations bully. And will do whatever it takes to get market control.
Example ..we have two big supermarket chains here. They try to dominate on all products. So whether small business is into vegetables, ice cream or peanut butter, they will make their own product and undercut . They won't be happy until they dominate all products. If course, we the customer benefit from price wars. But capitalism at its worst. ( not that I love socialism btw)