Let's please be clear. I KNOW what Paul said; "the gifts and calling of God ARE IRREVOCABLE". So let's not trivialize what Scripture SAYS by trying to insinuate what I only think Paul said.FG
How does, "eternal life is irrevocable" (what you think he said) logically follow, "As regards the gospel they are enemies of God, for your sake; but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. Romans 11:28 (what Paul said)?
v.29 isn't interpreted by only the previous verse. It's interpreted by whatever Paul had previously written about God's gifts in that same letter. So 1:11 is relevant: spiritual gifts. So is justification, in 3:24 and 5:15,16,17. And so is eternal life, from 6:23. All these are gifts of God.
Now, this is very important: nowhere in his letter to the Romans did he write any kind of disclaimer about eternal life NOT being one of the irrevocable gifts of God.
In fact, of the 3 gifts that he did mention, ONLY eternal life was described as being "from God". Yet we clearly understand that both spiritual gifts and justification come only from God as well.
So, there it is: clear as day: spiritual gifts, and justification and eternal life are the giftS of God that are irrevocable.
What continues to puzzle me is the fact that in spite of these undebatable facts, LOS doctrine keeps demanding that Rom 11:29 only refers to the gifts that God "gave to Israel", all the while seemingly unaware of the fact that Paul NEVER ever described anything that Paul wrote about Israel as a gift of God.
So, the idea that Rom 11:29 refers only to gifts that God gave Israel is on its face just an assumption.
Anyone who has read the letter to the Romans can know what Paul meant by "gifts of God", since he plainly described 3 of them before he wrote 11:29.I don't know.
Exactly! Rom 11:29 is a promise: those who HAVE eternal life cannot have it revoked (taken away).Even the word 'irrevocable' demands we see a covenant or a contract or a promise.
Further, there are no verses that teach that one can give the gift away, or lose it like one can lose a coin.
I do say that because that is Paul wrote.Therefore God promised the call and the gifts. You could say he promised eternal life.
But it does not matter. Since the gift of eternal life is irrevocable, what would falling into unbelief have to do with the irrevocable gift of eternal life?That would be ok. But that's not saying anything about unbelief or falling into unbelief.
For it to matter, one must show Scripture that tells us plainly that falling into unbelief results in revocation of eternal life, or loss of salvation, or some such wording to indicate the one falling into unbelief is no longer saved.
I know that there are no such verses. I also know that there is a whole lot of assumption about verses that are being used to teach that idea, even though they clearly are NOT at all clear about it.