I was only pointing out what I see. But I don't take anything personal. Just posting a FYI.
OK. What's wrong with any of this?
The 2 questions dealt specifically with the first 5 points. Since 2 Tim 3:16 says that all Scripture is profitable for 1 of 4 categories: teaching, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness, then what category to the verses in EACH point fit into?
Secondly, if any of the verses fit into the teaching (doctrine) category, just what do they teach, if not eternal security?
I really have no idea what "applying conjunctions" has to do with the OP. Please clarify.
I addressed the word for "hold fast". And the "if" happens to be a Greek 1st class condition, which means that the statement is considered TRUE from the perspective of the writer. iow, Paul was acknowledging that his audience HAD believed the gospel and did possess it.
The error comes when one treats the English translated word in today's usage. We must understand how the Greek was understood THEN. Some on this forum will not do that.
I am looking forward to anyone who will address the first 5 points of the OP and answer the 2 questions.
If my view on eternal security is wrong, it should be rather easy to answer the questions and show me what all those verses are really teaching, if not eternal security.
I've always been able to explain the verses given by the conditional security side to show that they don't teach that savation can be lost. But I've not had the "favor" returned.
Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is very relevant to the issue of eternal security for it will cause one to lose that security forever, even more so during the time of the seventh trumpet as many will denounce the Holy Spirit and take the mark of the beast in order to save their life as they will not stand in the Holy place which is our faith in Christ, but in the end will lose eternal life with the Father, 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
Next, you can not ask two questions and not expect an answer that you will not agree with especially when you do not understand what conjunctions are or maybe you do. Conjunctions are the "and's, if's and but's" written in scripture as you find them from Genesis to Revelations. These are what God has spoken like: if you do this, or if you do that, or if you do this or if you don't do this. These are Gods conditions, not ours. This makes the point for eternal security and conditional eternity.
Most of us are not Hebrew, Latin or Greek students, but do use the Hebrew and Greek Concordances to look up the meaning of certain words.The scriptures were first written in Hebrew as letters to the Churches by the Apostles. When they were translated especially to the Old English none of us today could ever read it as it is pretty hard to read or understand the old language. In the KJV we use today the letters have a clearer English language for us to understand the words. These started out to be letters and it was man that added the book names, chapter and verses numbers.
I already told you I agreed with what you posted in your five points for eternal security in your OP, but the difficulty lays in point number six where you said there is no scripture to support us losing our eternal security. This is what we are trying to show you in scripture what conditional security means and that one can lose their eternal security.
Last edited: