tessiewebb
Member
It's all for us. It's not all to us or about us. ...He then goes on to make a specific statement as to how this should apply in church to which he was writing:
{4} Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. {5} But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved. 1 Corinthians 11:4-5 (NASB)
Today we see churches where men pray with baseball and cowboy hats on while women pray wearing no head cover at all and yet very few consider these things a disgrace, especially women praying with uncovered heads.
Clearly, Paul was using a general observation about authority to make a specific point about prayer to a given church at a given time: a point he didn't repeat in any other epistle (that I'm aware of.)
I guess I'd just like to know how you reached this conclusion. If today we differ from the early church, do the current modes determine whether he was writing to a given church or to all believers? I realize, for instance, that it is "common" understanding that Paul was not telling all believing women they had to remain silent within the church service. I just do not see how that ever became the "common" interpretation. I'd really like to know how the Scripture can be divided up into "for us" and "not for us" passages. It troubles me deeply that others seem to have no problem with the division and I do. Feels like I'm missing something vital to Bible study.
(I certainly would like to agree wholeheartedly that he was just speaking to those troublesome women in the Corinthian church who were disrupting the preaching with their questions, esp since I are one of those "troublesome" women who believe there is no male nor female in Christ Jesus and that we are all to speak during services..n order that all might be edified.)