francisdesales
Member
- Aug 10, 2006
- 7,793
- 4
Yes, satan did quote a Inspired promise from the Lords Word to Christ Himself in the Matt. 4:6 from Psalms 91:11,
Which insinuates that even you can incorrectly cite Scriptures for your own deviant purposes...
yet, as your two [posts] do, the required Condition for any promise is Omitted, as Christ quoted the condition for the promise back to satan from Deut. 6:16.
How am I tempting the Lord by my posts??? I am not making any sort of presumptions that the Lord must do anything unconditionally...
What does this have anything to do with what we are talking about? Elijah, to be better understood, you'll have to explain your citations, rather than just posting a series of Bible verses without any explanation. As usual, your ambiguous ramblings are not clear to us here.
We see that the Word of God NEVER Changes in Eternity! Heb. 13:8 (and forum read the next verse!)
Refering to Jesus Christ, not the Bible. Anyone who has actually read the Bible's various translations can tell you words and meanings are changed or muted from the original.
Anyway, rome never was a 'house of God to begin with!' (Rev. 17:1-5)
This is called "stubborn obstinance" in the face of friendly correction. Who exactly is Paul writing to in the "letter to the Romans", kido? Is he writing to the Legions? Perhaps Nero himself??? This is a nice example of a person who cannot admit they are wrong...
![174_screwloose2 :screwloose :screwloose](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/screwloose2.gif)
Clearly, you are confused between the Church located AT ROME and the secular society located at Rome, being the center of the "world". It is not difficult to surmise that since the Roman Empire covered the "known world", reference to the ways of the world could be spoken of in reference to Rome, the "center of the world". Obviously not refering to the Church at Rome, since Paul states they are following the ways of God. One would have to state that the Bible is disagreeing with itself, otherwise.
It is clear that there is a contast between the Church at Rome and the ways of the world centered at the capital of the world, Rome. In addition, there is further reference to Emperor worship, common during the time John wrote Revelation. Another contrast between WHO is worshipped by the Roman Church vs those not of the Church worshiping the Emperor...
But Forum, here is the same God of Eternity Giving a ETERNAL CONDITION to His True Virgin Fold in Joshua 7 (note that ALL THE HOUSE were guilty because of this one sin & that 36 men died because of it! Also note Matt. 23:38 & Rev. 3:9 for a whole perverted house that are SPEWED OUT! and have a closed door.. Matt. 25:10)
This is simply babble that can just as easily be refering to you personally. YOU are the one making the senseless connection, not the Bible. Joshua is not refering to the Catholic Church, except in the furtile minds of people who are unfamiliar with the Bible beyond a few proof texts.
And again, this is not rome with her many false 'teachings' of garbage, + her openly documented filth seen daily in print!
--Elijah
I have already cited two separate occasions where Paul says the opposite in Sacred Scriptures. The Church AT ROME was highly regarded for their maintenance of the true faith and their obedience.
Feel free to disagree with God, but don't be a hypocrite, please. A simple reading of the Bible will point out your error.
Regards