Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Grailhunter's Classroom

I'd like to explore this meaning more since I think it's important to understand.
It comes up in Christian conversation (theology) a lot.

This is from Wiki, what do you think of it?

For the word ALMAH

despite its importance to the account of the virgin birth of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew, scholars agree that it refers to a woman of childbearing age and has nothing to do with virginity.[2][3][1] It occurs nine times in the Hebrew Bible[4] and in every usage the word is either used for a woman who is indicated to be a virgin or as indeterminate.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almah#:~:text=The Hebrew Bible uses an,, betulim (‏בְּתוּלִים).

Then there's the word BETULAH:
The Hebrew Bible uses an unrelated word, betulah (‏בְּתוּלָה), to refer to a virgin,[12] as well as the idea of virginity

So almah is any woman of child-bearing age.
Betulah is what we would understand as "virgin" in our time.


Do you agree with the above?
In simple terms please.
Why all the problems and complexities with understanding virgin and virginity?

The problem is because it is wrong thinking from the get-go. Because it is wrong thinking it is going to be confusing and wrong all the way around. Kind of like nailing Jell-O to the wall.

A woman's genitals are her business and her business alone. To try to make it a public display of it is wrong. To try to make it a public proclamation is wrong. To try to make it religious is wrong thinking. To try to define purity by the status of the genitals is wrong. To try to make her self worth either good or bad based on the status of her genitals is wrong.

Because there is so much wrongness here and so much wrong thinking you cannot expect things to make sense.
 
I don't remember talking with you before. I noticed you talking about the devil and I think you might enjoy it. Oease syop by and we can fellowship about ut.
It's a bit unirthodox so if you do comment be sure to bring a microscope. 😊
You are going to have to come up with better sentences than that.
And the thing about the devil....I am not sure what you are trying to imply.
 
I'm linking Satans' rebellion in Heaven to mans' fall.
You have to be careful of assumptions.
The scriptures do not give a time frame for the rebellion or the fall.
As far as conclusions go, Christ said He saw Satan fall like lightening, so we can conclude that it happened some time before that statement.
 
You have to be careful of assumptions.
The scriptures do not give a time frame for the rebellion or the fall.
Time isn't the issue my friend. It's how..
As far as conclusions go, Christ said He saw Satan fall like lightening, so we can conclude that it happened some time before that statement.
I kniw. did you read my pos in the Satan thread. I answered all this.

Woukd you read my post in that thread snd comment there?
 
Why all the problems and complexities with understanding virgin and virginity?

The problem is because it is wrong thinking from the get-go. Because it is wrong thinking it is going to be confusing and wrong all the way around. Kind of like nailing Jell-O to the wall.

A woman's genitals are her business and her business alone. To try to make it a public display of it is wrong. To try to make it a public proclamation is wrong. To try to make it religious is wrong thinking. To try to define purity by the status of the genitals is wrong. To try to make her self worth either good or bad based on the status of her genitals is wrong.

Because there is so much wrongness here and so much wrong thinking you cannot expect things to make sense.
It's important in hermeneutics.
Mary is called a virgin. It only means a young girl.
However, when Joseph learned that she was expecting a baby,
he would have had the right to have her stoned to death.
But, as we know, he didn't.

I think when speaking about biblical terms, it IS important to understand what they mean.
I do believe the above (what I posted) is sufficient for my needs.
 
It's important in hermeneutics.
Mary is called a virgin. It only means a young girl.
However, when Joseph learned that she was expecting a baby,
he would have had the right to have her stoned to death.
But, as we know, he didn't.

I think when speaking about biblical terms, it IS important to understand what they mean.
I do believe the above (what I posted) is sufficient for my needs.
In the post that you replied to.....I was rationalizing that we can understand what the words mean and how they apply to the storyline in the OT....but in the broader sense of right and wrong and fairness the whole focus on virginity is wrong, unfair, and generally wrong thinking. Not to mention women as property!

And as far as Miriam, she testified to the angel of her own status.....she had not known a man.
And virgin as a young lady that had not had a baby also fits.
That is all clear.

There are other issues but Miriam not knowing a man is not one of them.
 
Did I miss this?
Some times in my effort to be accurate it gets complicated.
Most of the internet agrees with the definitions you presented.
But like I said scholars have been debating this for centuries.
And some of the confusion has to do with the Septuagint.
And as the Dead Sea scrolls are translated they may shed some light on this.

But....to keep it simple and in general between you and me and the fence post.
I mostly agree with the definitions of the words that you presented.
So almah is any woman of child-bearing age.
Betulah is what we would understand as "virgin" in our time.

Yes. Our Time.
Understanding a culture is very important in understanding practically any part of the bible.
(not that I understand all that much).

But....I want you to be knowledgeable of the topic.....so let me correct them a little bit.
Trying to keep it simple here.....
So almah is any woman of child-bearing age that has not had a baby.

Good.

Betulah is what we would understand as "virgin" in our time. But keep in mind we are thinking of hymens....they are thinking of penetration of any orifice, maybe not even a kiss. It is a definition of a word and a concept and then you have to deal with how it is used. If the scriptures use the word betulah it would imply that she had not known a man in any way. But the sticky wicket is....how did they verify that? Is it they, or is God saying it....God would know.
And then you put these terms in motion....even the phrase "has not known a man" can have different meanings in different contexts. For example.....
At times this becomes a very loose concept.

Understood.
Certainly "knowing a man" in our time has a specific meaning,
but in Jesus' time it meant having any involvement with a man that might have been
considered intimate AT THAT TIME.

Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves.
Numbers 31:17-18
At times they are verifying thousands of women. How did they do that? How they did this was not only the way of the Israelites but other cultures also. They would look at their breasts and look for signs of suckling. And as I have explained not all women show signs of suckling when they have and some look like they have suckled when they have not. It is not an accurate method of verifying “virginity”

Correct.
No way to know for sure in such a context.

And I think that for the scholars it is not the definitions of the Hebrew words that throw them off it is how they are applied and actually what physical aspects they are referring to and which words actually appeared in the original scriptures
This would go back to not having the original scriptures for the NT.
Original, meaning the very first writings, or the ACTUAL writings of all the NT writers.
It does seem to be very important to know what the writer's of the gospels and letters meant instead of having the writings of those that came many years later (even hundreds of years) and who knows what was changed.
(certainly not anything that would change salvation economy, but other customs perhaps were changed by even adding or subtracting a word or two).

I also agree with you that the Dead Sea Scrolls will probably shed some light on this and other matters.
Thanks for the reply.
 
In the post that you replied to.....I was rationalizing that we can understand what the words mean and how they apply to the storyline in the OT....but in the broader sense of right and wrong and fairness the whole focus on virginity is wrong, unfair, and generally wrong thinking. Not to mention women as property!

And as far as Miriam, she testified to the angel of her own status.....she had not known a man.
And virgin as a young lady that had not had a baby also fits.
That is all clear.

There are other issues but Miriam not knowing a man is not one of them.
It's important in that it fulfills a prophecy which was a shadow of Jesus' birth.
Isaiah 7:14

It would be interesting to go through the other issues about Mary.
 
It's important in that it fulfills a prophecy which was a shadow of Jesus' birth.
Isaiah 7:14
If you read the whole storyline that Isaiah 7:14 is in, it will not say that it is a prophecy. Messianic or not
It is a test of faith.
And it does not fit. The virgin is 7:14 is married.
What Matthew was referencing said they would call Him Immanuel.
But no one called Yeshua Immanuel.

Yeshua is the Son of God....the Messisah......Savour, Redeemer......None of this could He tell the Jews until it was time to die. And the Apostles were not giving up the secret either.
 
If you read the whole storyline that Isaiah 7:14 is in, it will not say that it is a prophecy. Messianic or not
It is a test of faith.
And it does not fit. The virgin is 7:14 is married.
What Matthew was referencing said they would call Him Immanuel.
But no one called Yeshua Immanuel.

Yeshua is the Son of God....the Messisah......Savour, Redeemer......None of this could He tell the Jews until it was time to die. And the Apostles were not giving up the secret either.
Most of the prophecies are just a foretelling or a shadow of Jesus.
They could be taken literally or to represent Jesus.
Doesn't Immanuel mean GOD WITH US?
It's not a name perhaps, but a title.
So you think that the Apostles went to their horrible deaths hiding some secret?
It seems improbable.
 
If you read the whole storyline that Isaiah 7:14 is in, it will not say that it is a prophecy. Messianic or not
It is a test of faith.
And it does not fit. The virgin is 7:14 is married.
What Matthew was referencing said they would call Him Immanuel.
But no one called Yeshua Immanuel.

Yeshua is the Son of God....the Messisah......Savour, Redeemer......None of this could He tell the Jews until it was time to die. And the Apostles were not giving up the secret either.
The shewbread always reminded me of Jesus.
Just an example.
It was to thank God for the food received because there were so many times of hunger.
But it certainly seem to be a foreshadowing of Jesus.
It's close to the Holy of Holies,
it nourishes Christians - Jesus said to eat His body...
Certainly seems to be the Eucharist.
 
If you are talking about Calvary.....does the Bible call that a defeat of Satan?
Absolutely and agaun, this us all explained in my thread on Satan, which I've asked you to look at three times, which I did because you asked me two other questions that are answered there also.
If I may ask do you post in the Calvanism thread under another screen name?

I love fellowshipping with other believers. I also love to study the Bible. If someone told me they had the answers to my questions I'd run over there. I would put their interpretation under a microscope.
I've told people to do that with my post because if by chance I did make an error I want to know about it. I think that post I wrote is bulletproof. Go take a look at it. if I don't see any kind of inquiry from you in my thread you don't need to respond to this because I won't see it.
God bless you Grailhunter and all those you hold dear.
 
Most of the prophecies are just a foretelling or a shadow of Jesus.
They could be taken literally or to represent Jesus.
Doesn't Immanuel mean GOD WITH US?
It's not a name perhaps, but a title.
So you think that the Apostles went to their horrible deaths hiding some secret?
It seems improbable.
Immanuel means GOD IS WITH US.
Secrets....yep I do believe that.
But that is not what I am talking about here.
Yeshua walking with the Apostles.....God walking among us.
If the Jews understood that in the OT.....would they bother to write about
Anything else....

I am thinking that they would to busy dancing in streets!.....praising the Lord!....shouting from the mountain tops.....and telling the Kings that there daddy was coming to kick their butt.

But instead they believed the messiah would be a human warlord king that would take out their oppressors in what is called "the terrible day of the Lord"
But instead of a warlord they got "the Lord" Love peace and forgiveness.

Yeshua could not tell them He was the Son of God or the Messiah....
Things had changed the Jews were not going catch on.
And the secret, the Apostles did not tell anybody either.....during His ministry.
 
Absolutely and agaun, this us all explained in my thread on Satan, which I've asked you to look at three times, which I did because you asked me two other questions that are answered there also.
If I may ask do you post in the Calvanism thread under another screen name?

I love fellowshipping with other believers. I also love to study the Bible. If someone told me they had the answers to my questions I'd run over there. I would put their interpretation under a microscope.
I've told people to do that with my post because if by chance I did make an error I want to know about it. I think that post I wrote is bulletproof. Go take a look at it. if I don't see any kind of inquiry from you in my thread you don't need to respond to this because I won't see it.
God bless you Grailhunter and all those you hold dear.
I read your posts.....good enough.
God bless you to.
Now go find the real name of the Garden of Eden.
 
Christian Holidays are Christian Holidays…

I could leave it at that. But you know me…..I think Paul Harvey and I were cut from the same tree. So….Stay tuned for the rest of the story…..

Who is in charge of Christian Holidays?
There are Christians that have issues with Christian Holidays. False beliefs and misconceptions….there is a difference. False beliefs….most false beliefs can be traced back to the efforts of men….women do not have any influence in this ….Boys will be boys. Then again, most honest misconceptions or perceptions can be traced back to the concept of beliefs based on the Bible Only way of understanding Christianity without taking in consideration the time period, culture, and circumstances.

The Old Testament is fascinating and for some people captivating….to the point that they want to mix the beliefs and applications of Judaism and Christianity. Most have heard the term Judaizers. The Apostle Paul was dogged by these groups during his ministry which was the reason for the first Christian council…stand-off, around 50 AD, Acts Chapter 15. In which they came to an agreement that the Gentile-Christians only had to observe a few of the Jewish laws-customs. The chapters that precede this explain why this occurred and Acts 13:43-49 tells of Paul’s decision to focus on the Gentiles. From this point on Christianity had two distinct sects-groups, the Jewish-Christians and the Gentile-Christians. Then the rest of the New Testament is mostly about the Gentile Christians and the beliefs of the Gentile-Christians, and were mostly written by the Apostle Paul.

All 13 Apostles were of Jewish backgrounds and then Paul and then Peter focused their ministry on the Gentiles (Pagans that had converted to Christianity.) The Jewish-Apostles were mixing Jewish beliefs and customs with Christian beliefs. For example, still observing the Saturday Jewish Sabbath, the Temple, and sacrifices, and Jewish dietary restrictions, etc. And even at that we know very little of their beliefs and what they were actually doing. If they went to the Temple to worship but refused to sacrifice to Yahweh, they probably would have been taken out and stoned. But again we only know so much.

The Jewish-Christian sect did not last long. Mostly it ended with the Roman siege of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Temple in 69-70 AD. We do not have any surviving Jewish-Christians writings after that point and most of the Jewish-Christian and Gentile-Christian Apostles were killed off pretty quickly. From there all we have is Gentile-Christian writings. So for those that would like to practice Christianity as the Jewish-Christians did, we just do not have enough information or a Jewish Temple to do so. Even if you are of Jewish heritage you would not know how to be a Jewish-Christian.

And besides Christ warned of even attempting to do so. Luke 5:36-38 and the Apostle Paul warned of this during his ministry, and had this to say about the Mosaic Law… But if the ministry of death, in letters engraved on stones, came with glory, so that the sons of Israel could not look intently at the face of Moses because of the glory of his face, fading as it was, how will the ministry of the Spirit fail to be even more with glory?
2nd Corinthians 3:7-8 and he said that Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us— for it is written, “CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE “— Galatians 3:13

And as the Apostle Paul explained several times, Christians are not under the Law and should not observe the Law. Circumcision like Baptism for Christians, is considered to be the entry into Judaism, and of it he had this to say….I’ll say it again. If you are trying to find favor with God by being circumcised, you must obey every regulation in the whole law of Moses. You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by the Law; you have fallen from grace. Galatians 5:3-4 Now for those that think they can have a partial connection to the Mosaic Law and not violate this, find the scripture.

So again, since we do not know enough about the Jewish-Christian sect to apply it, then for all practical purposes the only surviving Christian sect is the Gentile-Christian sect. And for the most part it is best not to dabble with Judaism.

Now we must assume that Yahweh and Yeshua knew all along that most of the Jews would reject Christianity and the definition and form of Christianity would be set by the Gentile-Christians. From the very beginning….For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son, so that everyone who believes in Him will not perish, but have eternal life. John 3:16…Not….For God so loved the Jews…

It was the plan of God all along for the Pagans from all over, even the world, to convert to Christianity. And although they were changing their religious beliefs, that did not mean that they would abandon their customs and cultures. Yahweh, and Yeshua and the Holy Spirit knew this would happen and never spoke against it. This was all happening during Paul’s ministry and Paul had plenty of time to speak against it if he did not approve.
(Now God’s plan for the Jews? That is another topic.)

And then came Constantine’s vision from Christ and the message that occurred, IN THIS SIGN YOU WILL BE VICTORIOUS. So then Emperor Constantine, stopped the persecution of Christians (Edict of Milan 313 AD) And there are three major players here for setting up and standardizing Christianity, Emperor Constantine, his mother St. Helena and the series of Ecumenical Councils. Emperor Constantine limited public displays of Paganism and started the process of destroying Pagan temples, rededicating Pagan temples to Christian churches and building new Christian churches. For the first time a Christian church meant a building, before that a Christian church meant a congregation. Constantine’s son Emperor Constantius II outlawed Pagan animal sacrifices 354 AD and Emperor Theodosius I officially made Christianity the state religion 380 AD and in 390 AD outlawed all Pagan religious activities and open hostilities towards Paganism begins.

Emperor Constantine had worked with Ecumenical Councils to combine the Christian and Pagan Holydays on the same days so as not to shutdown the empire so many times. And it was not just Rome, the Gentile-Christians had been observing various Holidays and customs from their own regions all along….over time these Holidays were Christianized. And there was no part of this that surprised the Trinity, so what we have today are the Holidays that Christians observed, and neither God nor the series of Christian Ecumenical Councils ever spoke against them.
(Now as far as the character of King David and King Solomon and Emperor Constantine goes and why God picked them to be champions…that is another topic.)

Continued on next post…..
 
Last edited:
Christmas and Saturnalia
The Pagans celebrated seasons and celestial movements, which was common in that era even the Hebrews tracked the moon and seasons. For Saturnalia it was the winter solstice… the shortest day of the year. The celebration was about surviving winter and that the days would get longer from that point on looking foreword to Spring. This holiday goes back several hundred years. The Romans celebrated it as Saturnalia, a festival held between the 17th and 23rd of December, which was the holiday to worship the god Saturn. In 336 AD the date for Christmas was set on December 25th. Now Emperor Constantine definitely picked this date but the Ecumenical Counsels showed no disapproval.

The custom of decorating homes with evergreen branches and decorative trees goes back before Christ and was the most popular with the northern Pagans. The Christmas tree as we know it comes out of Germany, the exact date is debated, but it evolves from the Paradise Tree to the Christmas Tree between the 14th and 16th century.

The Christmas tree was first recorded to be used by German Lutherans in the 16th century and is sometimes associated with the German Protestant reformer Martin Luther, who is said to have first added lighted candles to an evergreen tree.

The evergreens
As far as Christianizing Pagan customs, the holly stands out as a very good example. The Romans used the holly in different ways, including offerings it during the festival of Saturnalia which fell around the time of the winter Solstice. The Druids regarded the holly as sacred. (Greenery in the winter) A very hardy plant, it held it vibrant colors in the harsh winters. The holly symbolized fertility and eternal life and was thought to have magical powers …good luck.

Christians in Rome snagged this custom up quickly and adapted it to Christian
symbolisms and produced legends. The red holly came to represent the blood of Christ and the pointed ends of the leaves symbolized the crown of thorns. There are Christian legends that tell of the holly berries originally being white, but the blood of Christ stained them forever red. Something similar to the legends of the dogwood trees.

Mistletoe much like the red hollies except the berries are white and yes it has several Pagan associations….ladies cover your eyes ….it is a fertility symbol, and the white berries represented semen. Ergo its connection to romance.

Christians took this custom and added their own playful spin to it. The decoration customarily hung in doorways, under which lovers are expected to kiss. Mistletoe continued to be associated with fertility and vitality through the Middle Ages, and by the 18th century it had also become incorporated into Christmas celebrations around the world. The custom of kissing under the mistletoe was popular among servants of nobility in late 18th century England. The servants are credited with perpetuating the tradition. The tradition dictated that any man catching a lady under a mistletoe was entitled to a kiss and it was bad luck to refuse. Of course those that are single were thought to be likely to marry and have healthy children. Keep in mind that mistletoe and hollies are to some level poisonous. Keep them away from kids and pets.

Then you have the laurel wreath and the evergreen wreaths that are used as decorations. All were used by the Pagans in their celebrations of the winter solstice holidays. Olympian gods were depicted wearing laurel wreaths. The Christians adopted the design of the evergreen wreaths and were used to decorate and dedicate….for example the wreath of the unknown soldier ….and the wreath on your door…has a variety of Christian symbolisms around the world. In the most simplest of terms, a wreath on your door and everything on it represents everything Christ, his birth to His death….and placed on you door it means “This house celebrates Christ.” You can look this up, there is a lot of known history.

The Yule Log
The idea of burning a Yule Log during the winter solstice is believed to date all the way back to early Germanic or Scandinavian paganism. The Yule Log was a specially selected fragrant wood that they burned during the winter solstice period. The Christians adopted this custom around the 18th century and modified its meaning to symbolize the birth of Yeshua, but others claimed it symbolizes Yeshua’s triumph over sin and burnt it during the 12 days of Christmas. And eventually the Yule log was symbolized by a sweet chocolate roll, that is a log shaped roll.

The legend of Santa Claus can be traced back over a thousand and a half years to a man named Nicholas. It is believed that Nicholas was born sometime around 280 AD in Patara, near Myra in modern-day Turkey. The traditions admired his piety and kindness toward children. Nicholas became the subject of many legends and was actually sainted. He is also known as Father Christmas, Saint Nicholas, Saint Nick, Kris Kringle, Santa Claus, or simply Santa. This legendary figure was cultivated from various European traditions to the image and traditions we have in the Western cultures and along with that is the tradition that he brings gifts during the late evening and overnight hours on Christmas Eve. He is said to accomplish this with the aid of Christmas elves, who make the toys at his North Pole workshop, and with the aid of flying reindeer who pull his sleigh through the air he delivers the presents to boys and girls all over the world….down chimneys! Don’t forget to set out the milk and cookies! Santa Claus and the Christmas Tree started it popularity in North America in 1773 and 1830 respectively.

The Christmas Eve midnight Mass or Service for the observance of the story of the Nativity that many times includes the Ritual of the Bread and Wine started as a sporadic custom. The practice / custom seems to have started in the 4th century in Jerusalem. But that does not mean that it was not observed before that and in the early American Colonies it was observed and by the 18th century it was very popular among Protestants and Catholics alike.

Every year the discussion occurs if Christmas or Easter are Pagan holidays? Or if Christians should observe Christmas or Easter? Beliefs, Truths, Facts, ….This is a fact, if we were to trace our ancestry back to the 1st century AD 99.999% of our ancestors were Pagans. When our Pagan ancestors converted to Christianity they brought these holidays and customs into Christianity and God never disapproved. The Trinity is the foundation of Christianity, from there the Gentile-Christians formed what we know as Christianity today.

The Holiday season, Thanksgiving and Christmas are a time of joy and rejoicing in the Lord. A time for Christians to get together and fellowship and worship the Lord. For decorating things up for the Holidays and feel the ambience of the season with friends and family. It’s a time to teach our kids the meaning of these Holidays. It’s a time for Holiday meals and over eating ….Whoopee!

But also it is the season to not forget the less fortunate in our communities, the Christian Spirit. The elderly that live in your neighborhood….check in on them maybe invite them in for your Holiday festivities and dinner. And don’t forget the nursing homes during the Holidays….even if you do not have people in the nursing homes. The elderly in these nursing homes could use a little company during the Holidays. You can bring them stuffed animals and Christmas novelties and sing Christmas carols. Do what you can to bless the Holidays for them.
 
Last edited:
Polycarp AD 69 – 155 was a epískopos -- Christian Christian leader of Smyrna. epískopos in greek and episcopus in Latin and vescovo in Italian.

Bishop is an English Catholic term….Polycarp was not Catholic. And if you told him to go see the Pope he would not know what you were taking about ….person, place, or thing. No central Christian authority at this time.

According to the Martyrdom of Polycarp, he died a martyr, bound and burned at the stake, then stabbed to death when the fire failed to consume his body.

Polycarp is regarded as a saint and Church Father by the Catholic Church, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Anglican, and Lutheran churches.

Both Irenaeus and Tertullian said that Polycarp had been a disciple of John the Apostle. In “On Illustrious Men” St. Jerome also writes that Polycarp was a disciple of John the Apostle and that John had ordained him as the epískopos of Smyrna. He was also well versed on the teachings of the Apostle Paul. Polycarp is regarded as one of three early Apostolic Fathers, along with Clement of Rome  35/ 99 AD and Ignatius of Antioch 108/140 AD.

I am presenting this as an example of early Gentile Christian writings. There is not going to be a test, basically it is to give a feeling of the era at the turn of the 1st century and what was on their minds. And of course it will lead to other topics.

Polycarp discusses the sins of Valens…..He appeared to have been a wishy washy Roman Christian that was dishonest?

It’s a little rough so here is the site…

The Epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians
Polycarp, and the elders with him, to the Church of God sojourning at Philippi: Mercy to you, and peace from God Almighty, and from the Lord Jesus Christ, our Savior, be multiplied.

Chapter 1 Praise of the Philippians
¹I have greatly rejoiced with you in our Lord Jesus Christ, because ye have followed the example of true love [as displayed by God], and have accompanied, as became you, those who were bound in chains, the fitting ornaments of saints, and which are indeed the diadems of the true elect of God and our Lord; ²and because the strong root of your faith, spoken of in days long gone by, endures even until now, and brings forth fruit to our Lord Jesus Christ, who for our sins suffered even unto death, [but] “whom God raised from the dead, having loosed the bands of the grave.” ³“In whom, though now ye see Him not, ye believe, and believing, rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory;" into which joy many desire.

Chapter 2 An Exhortation to Virtue
¹“Wherefore, girding up your loins,” “serve the Lord in fear” and truth, as those who have forsaken the vain, empty talk and error of the multitude, and “believed in Him who raised up our Lord Jesus Christ from the dead, and gave Him glory,” and a throne at His right hand. To Him all things” in heaven and on earth are subject. Him every spirit serves. He comes as the Judge of the living and the dead. His blood will God require of those who do not believe in Him.

²But He who raised Him up from the dead will raise up us also, if we do His will, and walk in His commandments, and love what He loved, keeping ourselves from all unrighteousness, covetousness, love of money, evil speaking, false witness; “not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing,” or blow for blow, or cursing for cursing, ³but being mindful of what the Lord said in His teaching: “Judge not, that ye be not judged; forgive, and it shall be forgiven unto you; be merciful, that ye may obtain mercy; with what measure ye measure out, it shall be measured to you again; and once more, “Blessed are the poor, and those that are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of God.”

Chapter 3 Expressions of Personal Unworthiness
¹These things, brethren, I write to you concerning righteousness, not because I take anything upon myself, but because ye have invited me to do so. ²For neither I, nor any other such one, can come up to the wisdom of the blessed and glorified Paul. He, when among you, accurately and steadfastly taught the word of truth in the presence of those who were then alive. And when absent from you, he wrote you letters, which, if you carefully study, you will find to be the means of building you up in that faith ³which has been given you, and which, being followed by hope, and preceded by love towards God, and Christ, and our neighbor, “is the mother of us all.” For if any one be inwardly possessed of these graces, he hath fulfilled the command of righteousness, since he that hath love is far from all sin.

Chapter 4 Various Exhortations
¹ “But the love of money is the root of all evils.” Knowing, therefore, that “as we brought nothing into the world, so we can carry nothing out,” let us arm ourselves with the armor of righteousness; and let us teach, first of all, ourselves to walk in the commandments of the Lord. ²Next, [teach] your wives [to walk] in the faith given to them, and in love and purity tenderly loving their own husbands in all truth, and loving all [others] equally in all chastity; and to train up their children in the knowledge and fear of God.

³Teach the widows to be discreet as respects the faith of the Lord, praying continually for all, being far from all slandering, evil-speaking, false-witnessing, love of money, and every kind of evil; knowing that they are the altars of God, that He clearly perceives all things, and that nothing is hidden from Him, neither reasonings, nor reflections, nor any one of the secret things of the heart.

Chapter 5 The Duties of Deacons, Youths, and Virgins
¹ Knowing, then, that “God is not mocked,” we ought to walk worthy of His commandment and glory. ²In like manner should the deacons be blameless before the face of His righteousness, as being the servants of God and Christ, and not of men. They must not be slanderers, two-faced, or lovers of money, but temperate in all things, compassionate, industrious, walking according to the truth of the Lord, who was the servant of all. If we please Him in this present world, we shall receive also the future world, according as He has promised to us that He will raise us again from the dead, and that if we live worthily of Him, “we shall also reign together with Him,” provided only we believe.

³In like manner, let the young men also be blameless in all things, being especially careful to preserve purity, and keeping themselves in, as with a bridle, from every kind of evil. For it is well that they should be cut off from the lusts that are in the world, since “every lust warreth against the spirit; “ and “neither fornicators, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, shall inherit the kingdom of God,” nor those who do things inconsistent and unbecoming. Wherefore, it is needful to abstain from all these things, being subject to the presbyters and deacons, as unto God and Christ. The virgins also must walk in a blameless and pure conscience.

Continued.....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top