Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hey You Pre-Tribbers!!!

veteran said:
archangel_300 said:
I do agree that Christ's true Body cannot be corrupted but let's face it not everyone that attends church is Christ's true body. Wherever there are the body of believers there will also be people who are unsaved as well.

False messiahs have come and false Christs already do exist are they not in the midst of the body of believers in Christ already?

In Matt.24, our Lord warned of many coming in His Name. That's the "many antichrists" idea. But in Matt.24:23 through 26, He was warning of a particular false messiah. The KJV term "false Christs" there is the sole Greek word 'pseudochristos', made up from two Greek words 'pseudo' (fake) and 'Christos' (Christ singular). The DIRECT translation is 'a pseudo Christ', singular. The context of Matt.24:23 and 26 is also singular. Our Lord Jesus gave that warning in relation to the "abomination of desolation" event in Jerusalem.

archangel300 said:
Please prove using scripture that a temple is supposed to be rebuilt and it will be in Jerusalem.
Because this seems to be a inference into the scriptures. I can say that a temple will be rebuilt in America or for any other country for that matter and this is the place where the anti christ will sit.

Look at Rev.11:1-2 again, closely. Look at Matt.24:26 about those who claim Christ is in the "secret chambers". That's in reference to those who will declare the pseudo Christ is inside... what? What was our Lord pointing out to His disciples while overlooking the existing Temple complex when He said that? And how does that relate also to the "abomination of desolation" standing in the "holy place"? Is that not enough to understand what He was warning concerning a false messiah inside the temple in Jerusalem setting up idol worship? Go study the Daniel 11 prophecy our Lord quoted from, about the placing of the abomination that maketh desolate; it's involving Jerusalem and not anywhere else on earth.

Also, Daniel 11 shows sacrifices going on in Jerusalem just prior to the placing of the abomination that maketh desolate. What is required for the Jews in Jerusalem to start up Old Covenant animal sacrifices again? A temple! Many of our Christian brethren either don't know about that requirement of a temple, but I guarantee the orthodox Jews in Jerusalem well know it (see their website, do a search on the term Temple Mount Faithful). They are petitioning help from Christian Churches to help in the rebuilding of another temple, and many Churches today are sending funds, some even heifers in prep for sacrifice. In 1997, a company in Tennessee called Jesus, Inc. was sending heifers to the orthodox Jews in Jerusalem. So the Jews there have already been practicing apparently. The wife of a Christian friend of mine returned from a trip to Jerusalem years ago, and said the mollusks required for the purple dye of temple cloth had showed up, something that has not happenned in over 2,000 years.

archangel said:
So let's take a look at Revelation 13

Revelation 13:11 Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns like a lamb and spoke like a dragon. 12 And he exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence, and causes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. 13 He performs great signs, so that he even makes fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men. 14 And he deceives those[e] who dwell on the earth by those signs which he was granted to do in the sight of the beast, telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast who was wounded by the sword and lived.

Horns typically represent power and seeing that they are like the lamb they have power like that of Christ because Christ is known as the "Lamb". This beast comes deceptively looking like and having the power of Christ. He speaks like a dragon meaning the doctrines that come out of the mouth of this beast is from Satan. NOTICE this beast PERFORMS SIGNS AND WONDERS and DECEIVES people BY THESE SIGNS.

Yes, horns are symbolic of powers, and the "another beast" is not plural there, for the Rev.13:11 verse is referring to one who speaks as the "dragon". That is the "little horn" and "vile person" of Daniel. It's the beast king our Lord showed in Rev.17. It's about a certain entity who is to come and take over power of the first beast kingdom, and work miracles to deceive. Our Lord and Apostle Paul both warned of one coming to work great signs and wonders, i.e., miracles. It is that one who speaks as a dragon but has two horns like Christ that sets up the "image" to the beast, the same type as what Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon did with the golden image. That's the same 'pseudo Christ' our Lord showed in Matt.24:23-26.


archangel said:
Going to Matthew 24 and the other gospels there is coming a time when false prophets and false Christs will arise with SIGNS AND WONDERS. This is the BEAST.

Matthew 24:23 “Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There!’ do not believe it. 24 For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you beforehand.

Not quite, for there are TWO SEPARATE BEASTS mentioned in Rev.13. The first beast is a kingdom beast that comes up out of the "sea", and involves peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues per Rev.17:15 about the "waters". But in Rev.13:11 forward, that is about "another beast" that comes up out of the "earth", and is a specific entity. It's that "another beast" that takes over power of the first beast kingdom. It's about a kingdom and a king, albeit both are pseudo or false.

ALSO, did you take time to note the "false Christs" phrase in the Greek? Our Lord's Name 'Christos' in the Greek is singular. Don't be confused by the 's' the KJV translators gave in the "false Christs" phrase, because the tense of Matt.24:23-26 is SINGULAR.
Don't forget that last part of our Lord's warning in that...

Matt 24:25-26
25 Behold, I have told you before.
26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, "Behold, he is in the desert"; go not forth: "behold, he is in the secret chambers"; believe it not.
(KJV)

That is SINGULAR TENSE, not plural. Those preaching our Lord was talking about many there is a lie from the enemy, trickled down to many Church leaders by various seminaries who are bent on trying to hide our Lord's warning of 'a pseudo Christ' coming to play Him. Whether you believe me is not important, for when you begin actually hearing many say Christ has come, He's there, or in the "secret chambers", you'll know about the false messiah for sure then.


archangel said:
2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, 10 and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie,

I also have problems with the interpretation of 1260 days being part of the 7 year literal tribulation period. But i'll discuss this later.

II Th 2:3-9
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

All the above underlined words are in the SINGULAR TENSE also. Per 1 John 3:8 the devil sinned from the beginnng. In Isaiah 14 God called Lucifer "a man", because God also created him with the outward likeness of man, as also the angels. This working of wanting to sit in the sides of the north, which is God's Place, and be worshipped as God, was what the very first sin was about, and was done by the devil at his original rebellion (Isaiah 14; Ezekiel 28-31). Apostle Paul is actually referring here to that very type of act by Satan. That's what the "man of sin" is about, and is a special pointer to what Satan did of old when he first rebelled against God. Ezekiel 31 is a special parable about it.

The "son of perdition" phrase is another pointer to the devil, because the word 'perdition' is from the Greek word 'apollumi', which is where Satan's title of "Apollyon" in Rev.9 comes from. It is because ONLY the devil and his angels have ALREADY been judged and sentenced to perdition in the "lake of fire". It's link to Judas is because of what he did in following the devil, and our Lord Jesus called Judas "a devil" in John 6:70. Yet even Judas has not been judged yet, and he was already dead when Paul gave this prophecy.

5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?

Paul was having to remind those what he had already told them about this matter, because there were false ones among them confusing the time of Christ's coming and our gathering by passing letters claimed to be from the Apostles (see 2 Thess.2:2 "nor by letter as from us").

6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.

That "he" of verse 6 about the son of perdition and man of sin is singular, not plural. Paul's talking about a specific entity here, just as our Lord Jesus was also.

8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming:
9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,(KJV)

Note the KJV translators capitalized "Wicked" in that to show a proper name. When that happens it's showing a singular entity. That Wicked's working is according to ("after") the working of Satan. All this is pointing to the same false messiah our Lord Jesus warned of in Matt.24 and Mark 13. It's the same one that is the "another beast" of Rev.13:11 forward. It's the "vile person" and "little horn" of Daniel. It's the beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit per Rev.11. It's the beast king that is to be over the ten kings of Rev.17.

So if someone told you to figure out for yourself what the subject is while telling you it has four wheels, an engine, a steering wheel, front seats and back seats, a hood and a trunk, safety belts, air bags, bumpers and headlights, they certainly don't have to tell you it's a car. That's exactly what our Lord has done in His Word on this matter. He has given us ALL the clues to put it all together while not actually telling us directly. He shouldn't need to tell us directly, He's already revealed all things, IF we would only listen to Him.


Veteran, you're a godsend! :pray

By far the most educated in the Word of anyone I have seen on this site. I have two questions, are you pre-trib? And do you think that the "he" that will be taken away is the Holy Spirit with the church at the rapture? And if so, without the Holy Spirit on the earth, how will men be saved?
 
Ya'll I may have to repent for this later, but I'm gonna call this over spiritualizing of biblical prophecy exactly what it is: NEW AGE. I know there were spiritualizers in the early church, but new age is rooted in the occult and the occult has been around since the fall of man.

It hit me like a ton of brinks in the car on the way to the store just now, I discerned the spirit of this over spiritualization attempting to enter into my mind. I was tempted for a moment to entertain the idea. Then I recognized it, it is the same spirit that works in the New Age movement today. Having come from a new age/occult background, I am well acquainted with this spirit. I cast it down right away and took it captive to the obedience of Christ.

These things are literal people. Beasts with horns and things no. But literal anti-christ, literal temple, literal two witnesses, literal new Jerusalem...you better believe it!
 
veteran said:
In Matt.24, our Lord warned of many coming in His Name. That's the "many antichrists" idea. But in Matt.24:23 through 26, He was warning of a particular false messiah. The KJV term "false Christs" there is the sole Greek word 'pseudochristos', made up from two Greek words 'pseudo' (fake) and 'Christos' (Christ singular). The DIRECT translation is 'a pseudo Christ', singular. The context of Matt.24:23 and 26 is also singular. Our Lord Jesus gave that warning in relation to the "abomination of desolation" event in Jerusalem.

Look at Rev.11:1-2 again, closely. Look at Matt.24:26 about those who claim Christ is in the "secret chambers". That's in reference to those who will declare the pseudo Christ is inside... what? What was our Lord pointing out to His disciples while overlooking the existing Temple complex when He said that? And how does that relate also to the "abomination of desolation" standing in the "holy place"? Is that not enough to understand what He was warning concerning a false messiah inside the temple in Jerusalem setting up idol worship? Go study the Daniel 11 prophecy our Lord quoted from, about the placing of the abomination that maketh desolate; it's involving Jerusalem and not anywhere else on earth.

Ok.. perhaps there is one false Christ who claims he is Christ and he rises above all the others that claim they are Christ. That I'm not sure of and I'll need to do more thinking on this.

However, I think it is wrong to infer that the "secret chambers" is referring to a temple in Jerusalem.
The Bible doesn't say that at all it just states "secret chambers"... that can be anywhere for that matter. Behold the Messiah is in the secret chambers of the Vatican or the secret chambers of our church. It can be anywhere and it doesn't state a "temple in Jerusalem".

The "holy place" is a reference to the body of believers in Christ.

veteran said:
Also, Daniel 11 shows sacrifices going on in Jerusalem just prior to the placing of the abomination that maketh desolate. What is required for the Jews in Jerusalem to start up Old Covenant animal sacrifices again? A temple! Many of our Christian brethren either don't know about that requirement of a temple, but I guarantee the orthodox Jews in Jerusalem well know it (see their website, do a search on the term Temple Mount Faithful). They are petitioning help from Christian Churches to help in the rebuilding of another temple, and many Churches today are sending funds, some even heifers in prep for sacrifice. In 1997, a company in Tennessee called Jesus, Inc. was sending heifers to the orthodox Jews in Jerusalem. So the Jews there have already been practicing apparently. The wife of a Christian friend of mine returned from a trip to Jerusalem years ago, and said the mollusks required for the purple dye of temple cloth had showed up, something that has not happenned in over 2,000 years.

Let me refresh on the book of Daniel and get back to you.
I'm not convinced that the establishment of the "abomination of desolation" is referring to a future event. I think it may have already passed but I'm not sure about this.
 
archangel_300 said:
It's not spiritualizing. We are the body of Christ and this is referring to the church. The church is to God today what the Old Testament temple was to God back then. God no longer dwells in any physical temple he now dwells in us through the Holy Spirit. We are now the temple that carries the light of the gospel to the world. Wherever the body of Christ is gathered together to worship, there is the temple.

I only listen to the word of God, again please support your conclusion with scripture.
Where does it say a temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem? I can't find it in scripture and if it cannot be found God has not stated this. What I need is more validation than 2 Thessalonians 2.
People come to the conclusion that since the temple was destroyed in Jerusalem, 2 Thessalonians 2 means it must be rebuilt and where else could it be but Jerusalem? That's not enough proof for me.


The temple can't be the body of Christ in this instance. Satan does not have access to the "sealed" body of Christ. And false believers are not the temple of God or the body of Christ. It is a bit of a coincidence that Israel was restored as a nation in 1948 and then the six or seven day war (whichever) in 1967 (whatever), and they are working on restoring the Temple Mount. I see Israel as a nation...ever the people known as the people of Jehovah, being involved as the last day comes upon us. :chin
 
faithtransforms said:
Ya'll I may have to repent for this later, but I'm gonna call this over spiritualizing of biblical prophecy exactly what it is: NEW AGE. I know there were spiritualizers in the early church, but new age is rooted in the occult and the occult has been around since the fall of man.

It hit me like a ton of brinks in the car on the way to the store just now, I discerned the spirit of this over spiritualization attempting to enter into my mind. I was tempted for a moment to entertain the idea. Then I recognized it, it is the same spirit that works in the New Age movement today. Having come from a new age/occult background, I am well acquainted with this spirit. I cast it down right away and took it captive to the obedience of Christ.

These things are literal people. Beasts with horns and things no. But literal anti-christ, literal temple, literal two witnesses, literal new Jerusalem...you better believe it!

Unfortunately a pendulum swings both ways....There is an equal amount of literal and "spiritualizing", which doesn't mean it's "New Age" to recognize that's the case. It's as old as the Bible itself. "I am the bread of life", remember? The answer is to be discerning and not throw out everything spiritual or everything literal...especially in a book like Revelation.
 
faithtransforms said:
Ya'll I may have to repent for this later, but I'm gonna call this over spiritualizing of biblical prophecy exactly what it is: NEW AGE. I know there were spiritualizers in the early church, but new age is rooted in the occult and the occult has been around since the fall of man.

It hit me like a ton of brinks in the car on the way to the store just now, I discerned the spirit of this over spiritualization attempting to enter into my mind. I was tempted for a moment to entertain the idea. Then I recognized it, it is the same spirit that works in the New Age movement today. Having come from a new age/occult background, I am well acquainted with this spirit. I cast it down right away and took it captive to the obedience of Christ.

These things are literal people. Beasts with horns and things no. But literal anti-christ, literal temple, literal two witnesses, literal new Jerusalem...you better believe it!

:confused

I didn't know I had that affect on people. I certainly don't have anything to do with the occult.
I was just trying to have a civil debate on end times and show the position I hold and the reasons for it. I'm certainly open to other different positions such as a literal temple and one anti christ who rises above the rest. But in order for me to accept anything as truth it needs to go under intense scrutiny and I need very good scriptural support.

I almost feel like I shouldn't continue onward.
 
archangel_300 said:
faithtransforms said:
Ya'll I may have to repent for this later, but I'm gonna call this over spiritualizing of biblical prophecy exactly what it is: NEW AGE. I know there were spiritualizers in the early church, but new age is rooted in the occult and the occult has been around since the fall of man.

It hit me like a ton of brinks in the car on the way to the store just now, I discerned the spirit of this over spiritualization attempting to enter into my mind. I was tempted for a moment to entertain the idea. Then I recognized it, it is the same spirit that works in the New Age movement today. Having come from a new age/occult background, I am well acquainted with this spirit. I cast it down right away and took it captive to the obedience of Christ.

These things are literal people. Beasts with horns and things no. But literal anti-christ, literal temple, literal two witnesses, literal new Jerusalem...you better believe it!

:confused

I didn't know I had that affect on people. I certainly don't have anything to do with the occult.
I was just trying to have a civil debate on end times and show the position I hold and the reasons for it. I'm certainly open to other different positions such as a literal temple and one anti christ who rises above the rest. But in order for me to accept anything as truth it needs to go under intense scrutiny and I need very good scriptural support.

I almost feel like I shouldn't continue onward.
Of course you should. No one has it 100 percent correct. None.

It's a balance...the Word is filled with spiritual applications and symbols and allegories. If everything was taken literally, we'd be in a world of hurt. It's simply not true to say everything is literal...and way too easy to prove that's not the case. Hang in there...you make people think and have to support all those positions they hang onto despite evidence to the contrary. :thumb
 
glorydaz said:
The temple can't be the body of Christ in this instance. Satan does not have access to the "sealed" body of Christ. And false believers are not the temple of God or the body of Christ. It is a bit of a coincidence that Israel was restored as a nation in 1948 and then the six or seven day war (whichever) in 1967 (whatever), and they are working on restoring the Temple Mount. I see Israel as a nation...ever the people known as the people of Jehovah, being involved as the last day comes upon us. :chin

Hmm... not sure about this but I will give it more thought.
I agree with you that Satan does not have access to the "sealed" body of Christ. But remember the "sealed" body of Christ on this earth worships in an area where the tares are also. Counterfeit christs and prophets can arise in places where true worshippers worship.
 
glorydaz said:
Of course you should. No one has it 100 percent correct. None.

It's a balance...the Word is filled with spiritual applications and symbols and allegories. If everything was taken literally, we'd be in a world of hurt. It's simply not true to say everything is literal...and way too easy to prove that's not the case. Hang in there...you make people think and have to support all those positions they hang onto despite evidence to the contrary. :thumb

Thanks Glory! :)
 
archangel_300 said:
glorydaz said:
The temple can't be the body of Christ in this instance. Satan does not have access to the "sealed" body of Christ. And false believers are not the temple of God or the body of Christ. It is a bit of a coincidence that Israel was restored as a nation in 1948 and then the six or seven day war (whichever) in 1967 (whatever), and they are working on restoring the Temple Mount. I see Israel as a nation...ever the people known as the people of Jehovah, being involved as the last day comes upon us. :chin

Hmm... not sure about this but I will give it more thought.
I agree with you that Satan does not have access to the "sealed" body of Christ. But remember the "sealed" body of Christ on this earth worships in an area where the tares are also. Counterfeit christs and prophets can arise in places where true worshippers worship.

Sure they can...they've always been there. But they aren't the Body of Christ or the Temple of God.
 
glorydaz said:
archangel_300 said:
glorydaz said:
The temple can't be the body of Christ in this instance. Satan does not have access to the "sealed" body of Christ. And false believers are not the temple of God or the body of Christ. It is a bit of a coincidence that Israel was restored as a nation in 1948 and then the six or seven day war (whichever) in 1967 (whatever), and they are working on restoring the Temple Mount. I see Israel as a nation...ever the people known as the people of Jehovah, being involved as the last day comes upon us. :chin

Hmm... not sure about this but I will give it more thought.
I agree with you that Satan does not have access to the "sealed" body of Christ. But remember the "sealed" body of Christ on this earth worships in an area where the tares are also. Counterfeit christs and prophets can arise in places where true worshippers worship.

Sure they can...they've always been there. But they aren't the Body of Christ or the Temple of God.

Yeah you might be right about that.
I interpret "sits in the temple of God" meaning to reside along side with... but if this means sitting in as in "possessing" then its clearly not referring to the body of Christ.

If this is not the body of Christ, how would you explain these verses below? It seems like the "mystery of lawlessness" is already at work but is being restrained? What does this actually mean then?
2 Thessalonians 2:6 And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time. 7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He[d] who now restrains will do so until He[e] is taken out of the way. 8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming.

Can you also prove using scripture that a literal physical temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem? I know that veteran had an explanation but do you have any other scriptural support?
 
archangel_300 said:
glorydaz said:
Sure they can...they've always been there. But they aren't the Body of Christ or the Temple of God.

Yeah you might be right about that.
I interpret "sits in the temple of God" meaning to reside along side with... but if this means sitting in as in "possessing" then its clearly not referring to the body of Christ.

If this is not the body of Christ, how would you explain these verses below? It seems like the "mystery of lawlessness" is already at work but is being restrained? What does this actually mean then?
2 Thessalonians 2:6 And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time. 7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He[d] who now restrains will do so until He[e] is taken out of the way. 8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming.

Can you also prove using scripture that a literal physical temple will be rebuilt in Jerusalem? I know that veteran had an explanation but do you have any other scriptural support?
You're right, and one of Paul's main goals is not so that we have a time-table of the second coming of our Lord and the "gathering" of the saints, but that we be prepared spiritually to meet all persecutions. He says, 'Remember I told you these things'. The Word is replete with how we're to test and try every spirit for antichrists will arise. We're seeing that today with false teaching in the churches. "The lawless one is already at work" is simply a statement of fact. As the day approaches, satan will be loosed for a short time to deceive the nations. That's when the persecution of the church will reach it's culmination. The labor pains increase to the point of birth. We're to be ready. I don't know if there will be a literal temple or if it's just the world system somehow. I lean toward a literal temple just because of the current events in Israel, and their being a central focus of so much hatred in the Muslim World. We have the sons of Cain and the sons of Abel, the sons of Israel and the sons of Esau, coming to heads and a major battle is bound to ensue. Jerusalem has been the golden thread that runs throughout history and, so far, it's all in agreement with God's Word.
 
faithtransforms said:
Shilohsfoal said:
What makes me crazy is people saying the antichrist claims to be God.The king of the north doesnt claim to be God,He shows himself that he is God.Two completly different acts.
If you wanted to show yourself that you are God then you would do the works of God.
You would put your mark in man.
You would deliver Israel from her enemies.

You would want to be like the most High.

Wow, if that's not splitting hairs I don't know what is. :screwloose
The things Ive said are in the bible and I can quote those.But you cant find the antichrist claiming to be God.You are the one misleading.If you can prove the antichrist will claim to be God ,then prove it with scripture.
 
archangel_300 said:
faithtransforms said:
Ya'll I may have to repent for this later, but I'm gonna call this over spiritualizing of biblical prophecy exactly what it is: NEW AGE. I know there were spiritualizers in the early church, but new age is rooted in the occult and the occult has been around since the fall of man.

It hit me like a ton of brinks in the car on the way to the store just now, I discerned the spirit of this over spiritualization attempting to enter into my mind. I was tempted for a moment to entertain the idea. Then I recognized it, it is the same spirit that works in the New Age movement today. Having come from a new age/occult background, I am well acquainted with this spirit. I cast it down right away and took it captive to the obedience of Christ.

These things are literal people. Beasts with horns and things no. But literal anti-christ, literal temple, literal two witnesses, literal new Jerusalem...you better believe it!

:confused

I didn't know I had that affect on people. I certainly don't have anything to do with the occult.
I was just trying to have a civil debate on end times and show the position I hold and the reasons for it. I'm certainly open to other different positions such as a literal temple and one anti christ who rises above the rest. But in order for me to accept anything as truth it needs to go under intense scrutiny and I need very good scriptural support.

I almost feel like I shouldn't continue onward.
archangel
Sounds to me your on a path of knowledge.The things these people are telling you ,they have learned from other people and so on but those things are not in scripture.Perhaps you have a different teacher than they and thats why you question the things they say .You cant hear thier voices because you are listening to someone else perhaps., :nod
 
Shilohsfoal said:
archangel
Sounds to me your on a path of knowledge.The things these people are telling you ,they have learned from other people and so on but those things are not in scripture.Perhaps you have a different teacher than they and thats why you question the things they say .You cant hear thier voices because you are listening to someone else perhaps., :nod

Thanks Shilohsfoal.
I appreciate your kind comments!
 
archangel_300 said:
faithtransforms said:
Ya'll I may have to repent for this later, but I'm gonna call this over spiritualizing of biblical prophecy exactly what it is: NEW AGE. I know there were spiritualizers in the early church, but new age is rooted in the occult and the occult has been around since the fall of man.

It hit me like a ton of brinks in the car on the way to the store just now, I discerned the spirit of this over spiritualization attempting to enter into my mind. I was tempted for a moment to entertain the idea. Then I recognized it, it is the same spirit that works in the New Age movement today. Having come from a new age/occult background, I am well acquainted with this spirit. I cast it down right away and took it captive to the obedience of Christ.

These things are literal people. Beasts with horns and things no. But literal anti-christ, literal temple, literal two witnesses, literal new Jerusalem...you better believe it!

:confused

I didn't know I had that affect on people. I certainly don't have anything to do with the occult.
I was just trying to have a civil debate on end times and show the position I hold and the reasons for it. I'm certainly open to other different positions such as a literal temple and one anti christ who rises above the rest. But in order for me to accept anything as truth it needs to go under intense scrutiny and I need very good scriptural support.

I almost feel like I shouldn't continue onward.


I knew I'd have to repent. I'm sorry, I was in rare form at that moment. Please go on as much as you like. It is a free and open forum.
 
Shilohsfoal said:
faithtransforms said:
Shilohsfoal said:
What makes me crazy is people saying the antichrist claims to be God.The king of the north doesnt claim to be God,He shows himself that he is God.Two completly different acts.
If you wanted to show yourself that you are God then you would do the works of God.
You would put your mark in man.
You would deliver Israel from her enemies.

You would want to be like the most High.

Wow, if that's not splitting hairs I don't know what is. :screwloose
The things Ive said are in the bible and I can quote those.But you cant find the antichrist claiming to be God.You are the one misleading.If you can prove the antichrist will claim to be God ,then prove it with scripture.

To claim to be God and to show himself to be God = same thing. I know very well that what you've quoted is from the bible.
 
faithtransforms said:
Shilohsfoal said:
The things Ive said are in the bible and I can quote those.But you cant find the antichrist claiming to be God.You are the one misleading.If you can prove the antichrist will claim to be God ,then prove it with scripture.

To claim to be God and to show himself to be God = same thing. I know very well that what you've quoted is from the bible.

I have to agree. Showing himself to be God doesn't make him God. So it's merely his claim.
 
I don't know of any one on this thread who has said the entire bible is literal. Of course it isn't, and Revelation is filled with symbolism. We all know that. We all just need to pray for discernment. :pray
 
glorydaz said:
The temple can't be the body of Christ in this instance. Satan does not have access to the "sealed" body of Christ. And false believers are not the temple of God or the body of Christ. It is a bit of a coincidence that Israel was restored as a nation in 1948 and then the six or seven day war (whichever) in 1967 (whatever), and they are working on restoring the Temple Mount. I see Israel as a nation...ever the people known as the people of Jehovah, being involved as the last day comes upon us. :chin
This is not a coincidence.It is written the little horn would settle in the pleasant land and it is also written the little horn would subdue three horns.


The following verse tells of the jewish people fleeing out of Europe into the promised land.
Daniel 8;9
And out of one of them came forth a little horn,which waxed exeedingly great,toward the south,and toward the east,and toward the pleasant land.


The following verse tells of this same little horn in the pleasant land subdueing three other horns.
It is speaking of the 6 day war in which Israel humiliated Jordan,Egypt and Syria and removed them from the seven hills.It also speaks of the goverment being different from the other kings (muslim)there.

Daniel 7;24

And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise;and another shall rise after them;and he shall be diverse from the first,and he shall subdue three kings.


It was already prophecied.It is also prophecied that the Israeli goverment shall kill saints.
Its like watching a 2000 year old rerun in which the blind leaders of the blind are going to kill those who have eyes that see and ears that hear.
 
Back
Top