The Godhead -- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are eternal, i.e., beyond time.
Was Elohim singular or plural in Gen 1:1 (ESV)?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
The Godhead -- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are eternal, i.e., beyond time.
I've answered that question but you haven't dealt with the bibliology of the KJV, NKJV and Textus Receptus.
Oz
It is plural, which means more than one. Thus plural can mean two, three, four, five, ten, a hundred...a thousand.Is Elohim of Gen 1:1 singular or plural?
What is your answer to the question I asked, because never answered me?
Do you believe the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are One?
Yes or No?
It is plural, which means more than one. Thus plural can mean two, three, four, five, ten, a hundred...a thousand.
It is plural, which means more than one. Thus plural can mean two, three, four, five, ten, a hundred...a thousand.
Don't trust Wikipedia since it is crowd sourced and goes with popular opinion. My congregation is part of what Rabbi Cohn started in the 1890s. How can it be a "different movement?"Different movement...
Not a single prophet; but you can take 2 and put them together. In Daniel chapter 7 we see the "Ancient of Days" which is the Father and the "Son of Man" presented to Him. Son of Man is described in Deity terms, making Him a divine being.Yes, they (Trinitarians) are exclusive to the NT. If you believe otherwise, please provide a name of an OT prophet who taught God is One in Three Persons.
There is one God in 3 persons,
Exactly. Not in biblical Christianity.Not in biblical Christianity!
Once again, the Trinity is a uniquely Christian belief. Thank you for affirming no prophet taught God is a Trinity of Persons. If they did, Jews would be Trinitarians. As I am sure you are aware, the idea that God is Three Persons is anathema to Jews.Not a single prophet; but you can take 2 and put them together. In Daniel chapter 7 we see the "Ancient of Days" which is the Father and the "Son of Man" presented to Him. Son of Man is described in Deity terms, making Him a divine being.
In Psalm 51.11 David (whom Peter said was a prophet in Acts 2) asked the Father " ....do not take Your Holy Spirit from me." Clearly David saw that the Holy Spirit was something or someone that the Father could give or remove; meaning it was separate from Himself.
Between those 2 sources you have Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Trinity.
Ok, even if we go with 1890, that's still a long way away from Abraham and first century Christianity.Don't trust Wikipedia since it is crowd sourced and goes with popular opinion. My congregation is part of what Rabbi Cohn started in the 1890s. How can it be a "different movement?"
Again, plural simply means more than one. What Old Testament context do you get three?There is one God in 3 persons,God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. See my brief exposition:
We know from the biblical context that it means three in one.
Why is having a single Hebrew prophet stating that important? I have shown you in the text that it does not violate what was written in the OT scriptures.Again, plural simply means more than one. What Old Testament context do you get three?
If that is the case, can you provide one single OT prophet who taught God is One in Three Persons?
In order to demonstrate that the Trinity is a uniquely Christian belief.Why is having a single Hebrew prophet stating that important? I have shown you in the text that it does not violate what was written in the OT scriptures.
Why is it important that it be a strictly NT doctrine?
Plural. So what's your point?Was Elohim singular or plural in Gen 1:1 (ESV)?
What's the difference? Three people -- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit -- are one Godhead; one Godhead is comprised of three people.Your statement is opposed to what scripture teaches.
It says these three are one.
It doesn't say this one is three.
JLB
So why does have to be a "uniquely Christian belief?" What would be the result of it NOT being uniquely christian?In order to demonstrate that the Trinity is a uniquely Christian belief.
(I presumed you had been following this thread.)
Some are posters are positing that Jews actually believe in the Trinity. Some posters are citing Genesis 1:1 as support.So why does have to be a "uniquely Christian belief?" What would be the result of it NOT being uniquely christian?
I said I came into the thread late.
You have 3 different issues there. I will deal only with this one.Some are posters are positing that Jews actually believe in the Trinity. Some posters are citing Genesis 1:1 as support.