Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I am starting to REALLY like the Catholics (OC plz read)

StoveBolts said:
Trust me, I will try harder in the future and when I make a formal reply to your illicit, ravenous replies to me, they will be well thought out and not some whim such at this.

My brother, don't fall prey to the enemy's ploy.

He who has already defeated this adversary of God, dwells in all His fullness within our regenerated spirit.

A believer need only turn to his spirit with a humble disposition, and allow the living water contained therein to flood forth,.... sweeping away every negative thing in its path.

You don't need to try,....... just turn and be open.

In that time He will give us all the words.

Just believe,.... and speak.

In love,
cj
 
cj said:
Name calling, personal attacks, liberal use of the words 'apostate,' leaven,' and gratuitous use of Elizabethan adjectives.

In love,
cj
Until you inevitably leave this forum, I am going to deal your disruptive behavior with this neat little function called 'ignore.' There are serious issues at hand here that are more important than your disruptions.

And now, back to the topic at hand.
 
Orthodox Christian said:
Name calling, personal attacks, liberal use of the words 'apostate,' leaven,' and gratuitous use of Elizabethan adjectives.

I'll state it more clearly and honestly,

"Name calling"....... You I love OC, what you represent (in accordance with the Lord's speaking in the scriptures) I hate, and thus call it what it is.

"Personal attacks"....... This is simply not true. As far as I can tell you seem to be a wonderful and caring person, one who is upright, holding to good moral precepts. Therefore, concerning your "person" I have no ground to "attack" and thus won't; but concerning your being used as an anti-Christ mouthpiece, in this I most certainly have the right to vigorously contend for the truth.

"liberal use of the words 'apostate,' leaven,' and gratuitous use of Elizabethan adjectives."....... Get a life OC, your whining again.

Orthodox Christian said:
Until you inevitably are banned from this forum,.....

Read the above as........ The enemy's not so subtle attempt to influence the powers that be on these boards.

Orthodox Christian said:
I am going to deal your disruptive behavior with this neat little function called 'ignore.' There are serious issues at hand here that are more important than your ego.

Yes there are serious issues at hand that need speaking to.

But the burden is released by first being brought into the truth, something the folly doctrine of the apostate institution you hold to is unable (actually, not intended) to do.


OC, because one does not bow at the approach of your worshipped altar, and kiss the hand of the spirit behind this altar (but boldly speaks against its very presence and the disposition of worship some believers have towards it), you would seek to declare that it is "disruptive behavior".

Well, praise the Lord for His disruptive behavior,....... for there is nothing more "disruptive" to a person's life than the coming of the Lord's salvation into one's life.


The fact is, perhaps a comparison can be found in the use of the "ignore" button to Satan's "leaving" the Lord for a time.


Really, wasn't it just a further display of Satan's vanity, him thinking that he could actually "leave" Jesus?

He might have left the scene, but Jesus didn't. Nor did Jesus ever forget just whom He had come to defeat. Praise the Lord.


In love,
cj
 
stovebolts, you said:
your illicit, ravenous replies to me...

Your kiddiing, right? :lol:
Your not going to last long here if you are this thin skinned.
 
StoveBolts said:
First off buddy, you assume that you know where I stand when I veiw the Orthodox faith. In fact, I hold a high regard for anyone whom the Lord has called. (Ohh, did I say Jesus or is that all you hear? My, and what of this trinity?? Certainly this is no mystery to you!)

You have labled me unjustly and trust me, it takes more than backbone to hold one's silence and keep ones composure.

But to be fair, I give you the benifit of the doubt that it was I , that has entered the lions den and perhaps... I have come unprepared, as I seem to lack in the art of articulating myself clearly at times... Trust me, I will try harder in the future and when I make a formal reply to your illicit, ravenous replies to me, they will be well thought out and not some whim such at this.

You addressed me. I answered your queries. Just answer the questions placed before you and stop making ignorance an excuse for your mis judgement of the Orthodox Christian Faith.

Orthodoxy
 
StoveBolts said:
Orthodoxy,

Wait in line my friend...


StoveBolts
123 Christian Pro
Joined: 04 Nov 2004
Posts: 1222
Location: Michigan
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:42 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OC and Orthodoxy.....

You addressed me. I answered your questions. The fact you are avoiding the direct questions I asked and those questions that supported the Church's postition can only mean you dont know. I can live with that fact.
Apparently you can also live with that lack of knowledge. I will let the readers of these posts judge who is and who is not being coy and evasive in the context of the "christian faith".

Orthodoxy
 
It appears that I have ruffled some feathers unintentionally more so by what I failed to say, than what I actually said. James, thank you for your wisdom, patience and understanding.

Orthodoxy, I am only your enemy by your own declaration and not of my own. May you find your peace, my fellow warrior.

2 Peter 1:1-5 Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Savior Jesus Christ: Grace and peace be multiplied unto you through the knowledge of God, and of Jesus our Lord, According as his divine power has given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who has called us to glory and virtue: By which are given unto us exceedingly great and precious promises: that by these you might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. And for this reason, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;

Pay close attention to the mechanics. One fruit is simply a manifestation of another. If one has no self control, then one has no brotherly kindness. (Philadelphia)
2 Peter 1:5 And for this reason, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
2 Peter 1:6 And to knowledge self control; and to self control patience; and to patience godliness;
2 Peter 1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness love.
Make note of the if.
2 Peter 1:8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that you shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Now get this…
2 Peter 1:9 But he that lacks these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and has forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.
How quickly and easily it is for us to forget at times… Orthodoxy, feel free to continue reading at your convenience.

Orthodox Christian said:
StoveBolts said:
OC and Orthodoxy...

I am simply amazed... Please know that I respect your knowledge and your walk with our Lord. Also know that I call you Brother, and not enemy.

That being said... I'd like to touch base on a few things that have been said in regard to Peter, if I may be so obliged.

Matthew 16:18 And I say also unto you, That you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hades shall not prevail against it.

Who builds His Church? It is Him who builds... and it is Him who protects, not Peter.
(side note, here's some historical value)

Hello my friend:
it puzzles me why an undeniable truth-
that it all begins and ends with Jesus-
must be appended with "not." (as in not Peter, or not Stove Bolts)

The Head directs, and the Body labors. Paul referred to himself as a master builder. Of course he knew that ultimately it was God who built, but he, Paul, and us, are co-laborers.

Yes, perhaps in my quest to give the Glory to God, I failed to mention that we are mighty servants. I have the utmost respect for the ancient apostles and for the saints that are among us today.

StoveBolts said:
And I believe Peter understood this.
2 Peter 1:2 Grace and peace be multiplied unto you through the knowledge of God, and of Jesus our Lord,

It is not of HIMSELF, but Through God and Jesus! We do not get our knowledge from ourselves let alone the Church, we receive it from God for it is all in God's Grace... and this Grace, brings about peace.
Here again is this dichotomy that I cannot understand. Do we not learn from one another? Are we not 'living letters?'

Absolutely, yet to learn, one must admit that he does not know…

And would you say we do not get our knowledge from the bible, but from Him alone? If so, as spiritual as that sounds, and as true as it is at one level, how profoundly dangerous does it sound as well.

Yes, I see the danger. But I also see the danger of being indoctrinated into some rote religion. (and I could give examples from all faiths that know not what they do or why they do it…) Now, that being said, I am talking about ALL religions. I am not targeting the Orthodox Faith. I have been blessed, but I have also been cursed. To one degree each and every one of us has. For me, it is important that we don’t get too comfortable wherever we are because God still has work for us to do.

You see, our relationship with Christ has a quality control lab, and within that lab are certain instruments by which we can check the quality of our revelation. I assure you, in your lab are instruments which your hands did not design.

A friend of mine described sin as a big stick that hits us. Sooner or later we get tired of being hit and figure out that it hurts. Quality control… ouch!

God gave the specifications, Moses and Israel built the Tabernacle. God gave the specifications, the Apostles and their progeny have built the Church.

Here’s a trivial quiz. Tell somebody next to you something, then, have him tell somebody… do that for over 2000 years and lets see if it comes back 100 %. When you found the Orthodox faith, it was a journey for you. Something inside you told you that you had landed where God wanted you. I’d call that faith. Now I ask; where is the danger in that? When you read scripture, do you trust the commentary next to it or do you listen for the spirit to open your eyes and show you the truth?
It’s almost ironic. 2 Peter was written when? Around 60 ish AD?? That’s around 20 or 30 years after Christ had died. Now, notice the context of Chapter 2. My, how quickly the wolves move in.
For the sake of what I have not said, I did not say that the Orthodox Church is a wolf or is full of false teachers. That being said, there are wolves and false teachers in the Orthodox Church. But then again, there are wolves and false teachers in all denominations so don’t feel like I’m attacking the Orthodox.

StoveBolts said:
2 Peter 1:3 According as his divine power has given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who has called us to glory and virtue:

I'd like to stop and look at this verse a tad differently than most might expect. Note, Peter is saying that His divine power gives us all things that pertain to life! Not just Godliness, but Life itself! I've said it before, I'll say it again. Sin and suffering is no accident.
Now, did we, you, I come to this knowledge on our own? Certainly not for we were CALLED... and each of us has a different calling... a different role... and we as children of God, brothers and sister IN Christ make up the body of Christ.
Absolutely- now we are beginning to discuss the human participation in the building of the Church. This is something we all participate in in our weakness, and in our faith. We celebrate the faith of the Canaanite woman in her suffering and in her weakness, but she- a "dog"- was strong in faith, and in humility.

I’m glad you brought up the Canaanite woman. It’s funny that the only two times recorded where Jesus complements anyone’s faith, are to the ones that were never in the “Promiseâ€Â. Yes, they were dog’s… infidels… and look how the disciples mocked her… My god, My jesus… My… church… Yet upon this petra , I will build my ekklesia
With your own words I have heard that the Orthodox do not limit God’s ability or desire. God will save whom He chooses to save. Would the Orthodox now stake claim that the “Orthodox†Church is the only ordained institution in which salvation can be obtained? Would the Orthodox go as far as to say the true ekklesia can only be found in the Orthodox ekklesia?


When you say "came to this knowledge" you call upon the experience of Christ in the Church and in our lives over time even to this day. Since the Apostles did not simply repeat the words of the four gospels to the people, but taught them and helped them with their misinterpretations, how shall we believe that this generation can read the gospels with the epistle/study guides and not suffer misinterpretation as did the early Christians?
We cannot- but the testimony of the whole Church over time can certainly help to keep individuals on track.
Jesus has many faces.

There are many faucets of God, one being the Christ. Rogerian doctorate and other false teachings would have us believe that one needs to find his own way… To come to his own conclusions. This simply is not true, nor is it biblical by set examples or standards found within the Bible. As a result, what you say is also true and in alignment with the word of God to my current understanding.
Now, here is the fun part… The “Mysterious†part… Yes, we do need to teach each other, but we also need to know how to discern things for ourselves so that we aren’t led astray by our fleshly desires. So, when we teach each other, are we teaching worldly things that come from our flesh? Or, are we allowing Christ to manifest himself in us? When Christ is made manifest in us, yes, we are doing the “workâ€Â, but Christ is guiding our actions. This, is in my opinion, is but one of many aspects of being a co-author with our creator. Collectively doing should in essence unite the ekklesia. Which brings me to this point. Why, after 2000 years hasn’t the ekklesia succeeded into one united body? Actually, the answer is quite simple… Fleshly desires.


StoveBolts said:
For any prot to claim ownership of this 'jesus' or the orthodox, catholic, mormon etc to do the same, is to limit Christ and chimerically elevate ones sense of piety and in doing so, fails to appreciate the fullness of God and the wonderful mysteries fullfilled through His Son.
I think that we Orthodox claim fealty to the teaching of Christ through the Church, not ownership of Christ. In fact, I am certain of this, for we do not claim to know God's judgement of those who are not in communion with us. We do not limit God's sovereignty, nor His mercy.

If this is entirely true, which from you O.C. I believe, then why is it that we have such divisions amongst ourselves? This is not directed at you OC, but to those that limit the sovereignty of God by claiming that this ‘different jesus’ isn’t the same Jesus… The same God? Now, doctrine and theology are important. I’m not saying that it isn’t, so everyone, don’t freak out and read into this what is not there. DOCTRINE IS IMPORTANT.
Let me give an overly simple example for those who are having a tough time following. I view my wife in a different manner than my children view her. Additionally, my children know my wife as ‘Mom’. Now, are we really limiting God or in our theology, or, is it our limitations that keep us from God hence creating all these divisions?
I tell you the truth, I love God with all my heart, soul and mind. Everything that I have, everything that I am, I continually try to give, and do God’s will to the best that I can. In my quest, I am not perfect and I make mistakes... Many mistakes. Now, who calls me brother? Who calls me enemy?

StoveBolts said:
2 Peter 1:4 By which are given unto us exceedingly great and precious promises: that by these you might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.

Great and precious promises... so simple, yet so misunderstood. For it is through the Promise that God had made with Abraham.. Moses... Noah... and yes, YOU and I... that His son was slain... and it was through that act, that God has shown us that he is a God that keeps his promise. From this aspect, we can begin to see how divine God's true nature is.
But what is this lust that is spoken about? I believe (and I'm far from knowing greek), but I believe that the greek word used for lust here is
epipotheô
which, simply put is to yearn after.

So, I beg the question, do you yearn after Christ, or do you yearn after your tradition? Do you yearn that other know Christ, or the Orthodox tradition? Tradition in and of itself is not a bad thing for we are commanded to keep the traditions that we have been taught (2 Thessalonians 3:6) but in all due respect, we must keep in mind that God does work in mysterious ways... 1 Peter 1:18 Since you know that you were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain manner of life received by tradition from your fathers;
and not from the traditions of the Church.
On one level, you ask an excellent question, which I sum thusly:
"What or whom do you ultimately desire?"
This question is rightly asked of all traditions, non-traditions, and so forth.

On another level, you have added a dichotomy which makes no sense to me. When you ask "do you desire Jesus or your tradition" I am inclined to remind you that our tradition is to desire Christ more than anything.

And as such, all tradition, all doctrines, all sects, all of the ekklesia should follow suit. There are some among the flock that do not hold your understanding that mistake tradition, for Christ.

But let me apporach this in another way, so that you will understand what Tradition is to us: "do you desire Christ or your tradition" is akin to asking me "do you wish to see, or think?" For it is with the eye that the mind sees, and with the mind that the eye finds its focus. Now we all see the world through our experiences, prejudices, hurts, hopes, culture, and influences. Each of these conduct themselves concurrently as the Light of Christ passes through our human eyes. Tradition is a guide to know what one is seeing.

Within Tradition there remains a certain diversity of thought (sight), just as within each of us remains a certain amount of contrasting thoughts. I said contrasting, for 'haste makes waste' and 'he who hesitates is lost' are both true, at some level. Wisdom and experience help the young mind to come to understand how both of those statements can be true, and wisdom and experience tell us how to reconcile these seeming contraditions, paradoxes, and mysteries.

That was very well put. I wish I had your gift of articulation OC. Let me just make a comment and seek your wisdom. You can bring a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink. The road ahead is long and weary, should we shoot the horse?

A different metaphor
As it is written: "How shall they hear without a preacher?" We all hear preachers. I prefer the concordant voice of the preacher we call Tradition over the many voices of individual interpretation. I would not prefer a concordant voice that did not ring true, such as the concordant voice in this culture of death that says that a woman's "right to choose" nulls and voids the right of the child within her to live. Or, for that matter, that 15 dollar pants at Walmart will please my pocketbook well enough to forget that prisoners and children are sewing the slacks. Or, that my children are less important than the square footage of my house.

I do not have any problem with any of the traditions that the Orthodox hold if done in the proper manner. (and no, I am not called as some others to be an enforcer, I am only a servant placed exactly where God wants me) Again, tradition is a good thing when it’s taught properly. But (and there is usually a but), but, what irks me is when somebody is laden in tradition and they don’t know why... and the next thing you know you’ve got (and I know your not a part of the RCC) people praying to some water stain under an underpass.
There is a gal (29) I work with that was raised Orthodox and still shows up every week. Her parents came from Macedonia. Yet, she cannot tell me why she fasts the way she does... She cannot tell me a lot of anything about the Orthodox, like why they have pictures of Christ in Mary’s lap. Now, I also know some prots that I could say the same about so I won’t make a heavy case here. If anything, I could say that the fundamental prots throw so much away out of fear or conservatism they really cram God into this nice neat little box and the war begins all over again. We talk about the Muslems and the Jews and how there will always be bloodshed. How about the Prot’s and the Orthodox?

Matthew 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, You fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

And so we fight with our brothers, not calling them brothers justifying our actions. So tell me, who here is worthless? Who here would call another a fool?

I know the Voice of My Shepherd, and I hear it resonating within the Holy Orthodox Tradition- and I am assured that He has built His Church on the foundation of Apostles and Prophets- not upon the arguments of so-called scholars or people who have had unique spiritual experiences.

One thing I really respect about you is this. You have heard your calling and you are listening to the voice of our Lord. None of God’s children are worthless, no, not one and I honestly believe that you believe this.
Each person around has a story to tell and each person is called for a different purpose.


One last thing: By pitting Church Tradition against Christ, as in desiring one or the other, you have revealed a bias that you may have, which you may not been aware of:
You hold it to be true that tradition is something other
than straight up, pure Christ. This Reformed view has a foundational assumption that one can hear God apart from the influence of culture, experience, bias, prior teaching, and so forth. This is, of course, incorrect.
The Reformers assured their students that they could hear the Lord for themselves from scripture sans tradition- and then immediately began establishing other traditions upon this first axiom.

Perhaps pitting is a harsh word… But it is plausible and holds merit. As far as the reformers who have ‘snared’ (yes, I’m being facetious) me and brought me to know Christ,(probably not worded well, but it’s late and my time is expired) I give my thanks that God was moving in their lives.
For those in the Orthodox faith, is it better to have the prot’s out banging on doorsteps to show what they know about Christ, or, is it best that all the prots die and leave the face of the earth? Prots, how about the Hari Krishna or the ‘mormons’?


Orthodox Tradition is completely and unabashedly Christocentric. If I didn't desire Christ more than my own breath, I'd have never signed up for the Orthodox way- for we take the words of Christ "take up your cross (daily) and follow me" to heart and quite literally.

OC, I believe you. And you know what? It would do us all well to desire Christ more than our own breath. Perhaps then, we would be lights of the world for all to see.

Thanks for the post, SB. You have brought some important points to the table, and I hope we can continue this dialogue.
James

Thank you James. I look forward to our dialog.

Jeff
 
Orthodoxy said:
You addressed me. I answered your questions. The fact you are avoiding the direct questions I asked and those questions that supported the Church's postition can only mean you dont know. I can live with that fact.
Apparently you can also live with that lack of knowledge. I will let the readers of these posts judge who is and who is not being coy and evasive in the context of the "christian faith".

Orthodoxy

Patience grasshopper... Patience.
 
StoveBolts said:
It appears that I have ruffled some feathers unintentionally more so by what I failed to say, than what I actually said. James, thank you for your wisdom, patience and understanding.

Orthodoxy, I am only your enemy by your own declaration and not of my own. May you find your peace, my fellow warrior.

You ruffled my feathers by being coy, evasive and insinuating I am a Roman Catholic. If you had any knowledge what so ever of the nature of God you would soon see the Roman confession of dual procession (ie procession of the Holy Spirit from the Son as well as the Father) is error ridden trash. You are to busy being a flame thrower however sutble you make it. At least cj and heidi are gutsy enough to admit it. Kissing up to James is not going to make me look bad so stop your brown nosing. He is quite aware of what I am saying. Why dont you stop these attacks and attempts to discredit me by a brothers words and answer my questions?

[quote:53ec5]2 Peter 1:1-5 Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Savior Jesus Christ: Grace and peace be multiplied unto you through the knowledge of God, and of Jesus our Lord, According as his divine power has given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who has called us to glory and virtue: By which are given unto us exceedingly great and precious promises: that by these you might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. And for this reason, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;

Pay close attention to the mechanics. One fruit is simply a manifestation of another. If one has no self control, then one has no brotherly kindness. (Philadelphia)
2 Peter 1:5 And for this reason, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue knowledge;
2 Peter 1:6 And to knowledge self control; and to self control patience; and to patience godliness;
2 Peter 1:7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness love.
Make note of the if.
2 Peter 1:8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that you shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Now get this…
2 Peter 1:9 But he that lacks these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and has forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.
How quickly and easily it is for us to forget at times… Orthodoxy, feel free to continue reading at your convenience
[/quote:53ec5].

That diatribe is merely an attempt to discredit me by judging my fruits. Who assigned you as friut detector? Using the bible in an attempt to manipulate is plain and simple protestant christian witchcraft. Peter is talking to the Church not loose cannons making up their own religion then calling it "christianity". Save your witchcraft for someone that does not know any better.

Now, will you please answer my questions.

Orthodoxy
 
James,

I agree with your statement to Jeff. Obviously I do not have the style to win him over as it seems you have since he whole heartedly indorses the words you have posted and I should be more like you. Apparently he thinks siding with you will pit me against you. Not likely.

I will say however that I find it interesting that this is true in the heterodox world (when I say heterodox I mean both the Roman Catholic Faith and the Protestant faith that is rooted in the RCC):

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"

What I mean is we can have one person say "Jesus is God" and one person that says "Jesus is not God but a creation of God" both come together to join forces to attack the Church. I see protestants team up with Roman Catholics to defend the "filioque" addition to the creed. How ecumenical is that? Ecumenicalism in the heterodox faith is:

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"

interesting

In Christ,

Kyril
 
Orthodoxy said:
James,

I agree with your statement to Jeff. Obviously I do not have the style to win him over as it seems you have since he whole heartedly indorses the words you have posted and I should be more like you. Apparently he thinks siding with you will pit me against you. Not likely.
Hello my brother: from what I have observed and know of both of you, I think we are standing in the midst of a very unfortunate misunderstanding.

Orthodoxy said:
I will say however that I find it interesting that this is true in the heterodox world (when I say heterodox I mean both the Roman Catholic Faith and the Protestant faith that is rooted in the RCC):

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"

What I mean is we can have one person say "Jesus is God" and one person that says "Jesus is not God but a creation of God" both come together to join forces to attack the Church. I see protestants team up with Roman Catholics to defend the "filioque" addition to the creed. How ecumenical is that? Ecumenicalism in the heterodox faith is:

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"

interesting

In Christ,

Kyril
On this particular forum, I've seen more of the pairing of Protestant antagonists against the RCC- but we see this phenomenon also in the unholy pairing of the Liberal elite and the Muslim world (strrrrange bedfellows).

Anyone who is taking this tact is preparing a very difficult future for themselves- consider our WWII alliance with the USSR and Stalin- boy, did that ever backfire. Our brothers in Eastern Europe were thrown to the wolves by the Western powers, as they were after WWI (think Macedonia, Armenia, and Asia Minor).

You raise a vital point for all to consider in the pursuit of truth, rather than the pursuit of victory: whatever binds us ought be transcendant of situation.

James
 
Orthodoxy,

You throw me into the lump with the rest of the worlds offal. If I be offal, then I stench on my own and not of, or from my brothers, sisters, cousins or any other relatives that I may have. You really need to stop linking what I don't say, with what others have said or what you thought I might have said.
On that same note, when Jesus was taken in front of Harod, why would Jesus not answer his questions?

You call my coy and evasive... Your bad here, not mine. Look at my patterns, most of my posts are in the mornings around 8 EST... around lunch... and shortly after or around 4. My job is dynamic and I post from work. What you call evasive, I call time managament. What you call coy, I call not feeding your flesh with my flesh. You say BB and Heidi have courage, I say that I have given you what I have... My name is Jeff, not Robert or Heidi. Lastly, you say that I attack the RCC and the Orthodox, I say that I test the scriptures for the truth always bubbles to the surface.

You say that I pit you against James. I do not pit you against anyone for I have no control of your tongue or your ears, nor anyone elses for that matter. If anything, it is my desire to unite, not divide. Believe what you wish to believe. I will not engage your anger and I will not sort out your abberations for you.

Now, back to the topic of the Church.

Matthew 16:18 And I say also unto you, That you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hades shall not prevail against it.

Is this Church built on Peter? With all due respect the answer is simply no. We see this not only in the book of acts with Peter's own words, but we see it in 1 and 2nd Peter as well. Is the Church built on confession(Matthew 16:16)? Partially, but let us look at this verse.

1 Corinthians 3:9 For we are laborers together with God: you are God's field, you are God's building.

So yes, we do have a part in it, but what about the foundation?

1 Corinthians 3:11 For no other foundation can a man lay than what is laid, which is Jesus Christ.

Christ is, and has always been the foundation. The Cornerstone...

Ephesians 1:21-23 Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age, but also in that which is to come: And has put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church, Which is his body, the fullness of him that fills all in all.

Peter, was a stone. We, are called to be living stones.

1 Peter 2:5 You also, as living stones, are built up into a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

And now, that I be tagged a liberal elite... Let me ask this. Who appointed Samuel? Was it God's will that the Isrealites have a King?

Now, so that some may not think me coy or evasive... I will try hard to respond accordingly today. That being said, it is my birthday Saturday and I am taking a four day holiday starting tomorrow... Just so we don't have any misunderstandings on my absense.
 
The delusion within the delusion.......... oh what a web Satan weaves.


Orthodoxy, you've simply given up one form of apostasy for another.


After reading your last post I was moved to go back and read some of your previous posts and in doing so I saw something that I hadn't before. Lord Jesus,..... forgive me, sometimes we become more narrow than we should be and thus miss important things.


Orthodoxy, you want to know Christ. Amen, its the only way to grow in God, the only growth of God.

And this is the Lord's mercy, for none come to Him of their own accord. It is Jesus who has turned you towards Himself.

Yet there is more, as what the Lord desires is our cooperation from the inward parts of our being, as this is where His work begins.


There is a terrible lack of Christ in the corridors of Christianity. And it has been this way for centuries. In fact, the slide away from Christ began back in the first century, even from the time when Paul was still alive. This is what I believe you sense in your being, a lack, a dryness,.... and this is a good thing, for we must become desperate before we become truly dependant. And Christ can only be received by one who is utterly dependant on Him.

Are you utterly dependant on Christ?

Tell me, when you "left" the Protestant environment were you in a completely defeated state? Were you empty, alone, filled thoughts of "What now,.... where do I go from here?"

You know, even Paul made the mistake of going back into that which he had left, causing God to take drastic measures to counter Paul's actions.

On reading your posts I wonder just how "emptied" you were at the point of leaving the Protestant environment, as you seemed to have had some strong concepts/opinions regarding what believers need. But I was not there with you so I don't know. Yet, if you did have concepts and opinions about such things these are what may have lead you into the reliogion of the Orthodox institution,.... and not the Spirit.

See, the Spirit gives life, and there is no life to be found in religion, only more death.

Which though can be a good thing in a negative way, for one day you will come to see that for all the forms, traditions, doctrines, and human history, still there is little or no Christ. And you will find yourself as dry and thirsty as you were before.


Tell me Orthodoxy, where does the bible tell us that Christ is found today?

And this Christ, what is found in Him?


Lets address some of your concerns below,....

Orthodoxy said:
Very Good. However, I submit the heterodox world cannot be humble because they will not "obey and submit to those in authority over them".

True,.... but why?

Are you saying its because of the environment they are in? Is it the teaching they are receiving?

And the disciples, were they not in the presence of God on the earth? Shouldn't this have been the best environment possible? Yet, did they not fail to "obey/submit" to Him who had declared God's authority to them?

What were they missing?

Tell you what, why not allow the bible to give us the answer.

LEPROSY,...... the outward issue/manifestation of of disobedience/rebellion.

Matthew  8 : 2, "And behold, a leper, coming near, worshipped Him, saying, Lord, if You are willing, You can cleanse me."

The first class of people saved by the kingly Savior to be the people of the kingdom is represented by a leper. According to the examples in the Scriptures, leprosy results from rebellion and disobedience. Miriam became leprous because of her rebellion against God's deputy authority (Num. 12:1-10). Naaman's leprosy was cleansed because of his obedience (2 Kings 5:1, 9-14).

All fallen human beings have become leprous in the eyes of God because of their rebellion. The kingly Savior came to save men from their rebellion and to cleanse them from their leprosy that they might become His kingdom people.


THE HOLY SPIRIT,.....

Acts  5 : 32, "And we are witnesses of these things, and so is the Holy Spirit, whom God has given to those who obey Him."

Obedience is the way and the condition for one to receive and enjoy the Spirit of God.


So, in a simply sense, God gives leprosy to the disobedient, and the Holy Spirit to those who are obedient.


But,....... the disobedient issue is not so hard to understand as we are told that we are sons of disobedience (Eph. 2:2), and so our disobedience is a outward manifestation of our fallen nature. But what of our obedience, where does this come from? Certainly it cannot come from our fallen nature?

It doesn't, it comes from something else,..... as the bible tells us,


THE CROSS,.....

Hebrews  5 : 8, Even though He was a Son, learned obedience from the things which He suffered."

God ordained that Christ should die, and Christ obeyed (Phil. 2:8). He learned this obedience through the suffering of death.


And so there we have it, the secret of learning obedience,..... it is found in our experience of the suffering of death. The death of the self.


The truth of obedience finds its beginning in the inward and terrifying sense of not knowing how one will go on. The abject horror of knowing who you truly are in your fallen state. The void that rises up from within as you are mercilessly (it seems) confronted with the meaninglessness of all your past efforts.

Obedience finds its beginnings in the defeated being, the bowed head, the slumped shoulders, the unstopable tears of anguish, the darkness of depression.

Obedience is first encountered in the deepest valley of our life experience. Just as it was for the Lord. For His is our pattern.

2 Corinthians  13 : 4, "For indeed He was crucified out of weakness, but He lives by the power of God. For indeed we are weak in Him, but we will live together with Him by the power of God directed toward you."

"... out of weakness" means weakness of the body; the same as in 10:10. For Himself, Christ did not need to be weak in any way, but for accomplishing redemption on our behalf, He was willing to be weak in His body that He might be crucified. However, after being resurrected, He now lives by the power of God.

This is the pattern for us, we need to be willing to be brought into a weakened state so that we might enter into the killing work of the cross, so that we can be brought into our Lord's resurrection.

But doesn't the bible tell us that an aspect of the experience of the cross is losing the presence of the Father?

Matthew  27 : 46, "And about the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is, My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?"


.... My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?"


This is the valley where obedience to God is first encountered.

When your being knows nothing other than this anguished cry to the One who is over all.


The truth is, every believer will be brought to this point in life-experience, either in this age or the age to come.

There is no other way.

And it has nothing to do with outward things, with traditions, forms, man's doctrines, or human history. It is a matter of divine life, a matter receiving divine life. A matter that requires the full weight of the cross being applied, so that resurrection can be gained.

And this is the work of Christ, through the Spirit, according to the Father's will.

All that is necessary is that we be open to His work in us, according to His present economy.

In love,
cj
 
StoveBolts,

You did not answer my question.

Why did Jesus Christ say "tell it to the Church"? Matthew 18.

I dont not want to hear your rant about Peter and how you think Peter is not the head of the Church. I never said anything about Peter. You have the problem with Peter not I. Peter is not the "head of the Church" Jesus Christ is the Head and the Church is the body. The Father is the head of Christ.

The question is Why did Jesus Christ say "tell it to the Church"? Matthew 18.

Orthodoxy
 
StoveBolts said:
Orthodoxy,

Now, back to the topic of the Church.

Matthew 16:18 And I say also unto you, That you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hades shall not prevail against it.

Is this Church built on Peter? With all due respect the answer is simply no. We see this not only in the book of acts with Peter's own words, but we see it in 1 and 2nd Peter as well. Is the Church built on confession(Matthew 16:16)? Partially, but let us look at this verse.

Can I get in on the fray. :-D SB, is a man his confession? Jesus says "thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church". Now who does he give the keys of the kingdom to "I give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. WHATEVER you bind on earthh...". Who is you here. Surely I can answer for you (being SB). It is Peter. Can it be anyone else. So Christ is talking about Peter in v. 19. Why then would he not be talking about Peter in v. 18. I see no transistion point to where it is obvious that he switched objects of his words. Yes, Peter made a good confession of faith and that is why he says "thou are Kepha and upon this KEPHA I will build my Church." . Certainly Peters confession was a big part of the reason, but the wording is clear. Peter is whom the Church is built upon. Thou that is not dichotomous to Christ being the foundation upon which the Church is built upon. Have you ever seen the striking parrellel between Matt 16:18 and Is 22:22? It's amazing and full of meaning.

1 Corinthians 3:9 For we are laborers together with God: you are God's field, you are God's building.

So yes, we do have a part in it, but what about the foundation?

1 Corinthians 3:11 For no other foundation can a man lay than what is laid, which is Jesus Christ.

Christ is, and has always been the foundation. The Cornerstone...

As I eleuded to above. You think in dichotomies. You must put on the mind of Christ in order to avoid these and understand scripture. Otherwise you will continuously contradict yourself as you have. You imply Peter is not the foundation or a part of it. Well the scriptures say differently.

Eph 2
[19] So then you are no longer strangers and sojourners, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God,
[20] built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone,

So prophets and apostles are the foundation of the house of God, the Church? How can this be. It is because Christ works in and through men to build his kingdom. The prophets and apostles laid the foundation that Christ was laying for the Church through them. There is no dichotomy at all. God works through men. He gives them the grace to do his work. Praise God!


Peter, was a stone. We, are called to be living stones.
Peter was not just any stone. He was one of the foundation stones.
 
The Lord Himself, as the Grand Prophet, represented the state of the church in respect to the Word, is evident from all things of His passion; as that He was betrayed by Judas; that He was taken and condemned by the chief priests and elders; that they buffeted Him; that they smote Him on the head with a reed; that they put on Him a crown of thorns; that they divided His garments, and cast lots for His under vesture; that they crucified Him; that they gave Him vinegar to drink; that they pierced His side; that He was buried; and that He rose again the third day.

That He was betrayed by Judas, signified that He was betrayed by the Jewish nation, among whom at that time was the Word, for Judas represented that nation.

That He was taken and condemned by the chief priests and elders, signified that He was so treated by the whole Jewish Church. That they scourged Him, spat in His face, buffeted Him, and smote Him on the head with a reed, signified that they had done the like to the Word in respect to its Divine truths, all of which treat of the Lord.

That they put on Him a crown of thorns, signified that they had falsified and adulterated those truths. That they divided His garments, and cast lots for His under-vesture, signified that they had dispersed all the truths of the Word, but not its spiritual sense, which His under-vesture signified.

That they crucified Him, signified that they had destroyed and profaned the Holy Word. That they offered Him vinegar to drink, signified that everything had become falsified and false; and therefore He did not drink it, and then said, It is finished.

That they pierced His side, signified that they had completely extinguished all the truth of the Word, and all its good. That He was buried, signified the rejection of the residue of the maternal human. That He rose again the third day, signified His glorification.

Similar things are signified by these things as foretold in the Prophets and in David. And it was for the same reason that, after He had been scourged and brought out wearing the crown of thorns and the purple robe put on Him by the soldiers, He said, Behold the Man! John 19:1,5. This He said because by "man [hominem]" is signified the church; for by "Son of man" is signified the truth of the church, the Word. It is evident then from these things, that to bear iniquities means to represent and effigy in one's self sins against the Divine Truths of the Word. That the Lord endured and suffered such things as the Son of man, and not as the Son of God, will be seen in what follows; for "the Son of man" signifies the Lord in respect to the Word.

Harry
 
Orthodoxy said:
You have the problem with Peter not I.
Orthodoxy

No, you simply have a problem with the way I veiw Peter. You would have others to believe that I view Peter as nothing more than some heathen pagen...

Orthodoxy said:
StoveBolts,
Why did Jesus Christ say "tell it to the Church"? Matthew 18.

I must apologize for the quick and hectic post, but then again, I don't want to be accused of hiding from anyone.

I'm not sure of your point here... and this could go in many different directions depending on what aspect you would like to take. But this I am sure of. We are to resolve our issues on a daily basis. Before the sun goes down if I recall correctly. In other words, if you have a problem with me, then you need to come to me. If I don't listen, then you bring a couple friends. If I still don't listen, then bring it to the church.... In other words, give it to a third party that isn't emotionally connected. Now, which half of the baby would you like?
I believe the purpose and accountability can be summerized in verse 35.

But the topic is "What" is the Church. So in return, I ask you. Who appointed Samuel? Secondly, why didn't God want a King for Isreal?

Thessalonian, you make some good points. I will try to respond to them on Tuesday.
 
Orthodox,

Actually, I just got around to reading your reply on the previous page...

Orthodox said:
The Earthly Church is seen in the Holy Orthodox Church. What happens in the Orthodox Church liturgically happens in heaven eternally. The worship of the Orthodox Church is eternal worship. The Church is the fulness of Jesus Christ on the Earth. You however are free to ignore that and settle for part of the fulness and take your chances on the rest.

Interesting... Then you state in the very next comment to me...

Orthodoxy said:
No problem. God made promises to His Church. I agree. Who defines the Church? You? Me? No Jesus Christ defines His Church.
And folks, here's the but...

Orthodoxy said:
If you bothered to investigate the Orthodox faith you would see Icons of the OT fathers in the Church. We honor those saints before us. The promise is the Holy Orthodox Church. Feel free to squander your inheritance if you truely are a son of God as you claim.

Do you see the irony in your statment? So, what is it? Do you decide that the Orthodox church is the only "True" Church? Tell me again, what does it take to become a member of God's Church??

BTW, I've never had any problem with holy icons, as long as you teach those around you what they represent, lest they becom mere idols of worship.
 
If according to the Catholic Church Peter is the rock, than why did he say these words to the Lord: Peter said to Jesus, "Thou hast the words of eternal life John 6:68." Whose the rock now?

Is there a God besides Me? and a Rock? I know not any Isaiah 44:8. Jesus never said Peter was the rock. He said, upon this Rock, which means, upon this truth, I will built my church. Rock means truth. Truth is of faith, and faith is of truth. Jesus said, "If any man hear my words and does them, he is like a man who built his house on rock." A house built on rock, means faith in the Lord, doing His words, means a life accord to charity and good works.

Harry :fadein:
 
Back
Top