I'm watching this thread very closely, for 49 pages and 975 posts.
According to some of you, we are all going to hell.
That's not what the Holy Spirit has put in my heart.
So we are not all going to hell, just some of you.
OSAS.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I'm watching this thread very closely, for 49 pages and 975 posts.
According to some of you, we are all going to hell.
That's not what the Holy Spirit has put in my heart.
So we are not all going to hell, just some of you.
OSAS.
This sounds very clearly as if you are responsible for your own salvation. That wasn't what Paul taught.I'm with you. I'm not going to hell either. I've heard the gospel and have received it, and I am standing on it, and am saved by it, if I hold fast that which I have heard.
I would suggest that it is God who holds onto us, not the other way around as you have described.Otherwise, all the believing I have done will have been in vain. But as it is, I'm holding fast to the gospel.
It doesn't matter what the Greek word for 'hold fast' means. The point is, it is what you must do in order to stand in, and by saved by the gospel:The Greek is clear. It is 1 word, and means to possess. iow, those who have believed the gospel possess it. It does not suggest that one must keep holding onto something, like a lifeline or something.
No, that doesn't cause the analogy to fail because the person who believes is indeed saved in the moment they believe. What is ignored in OSAS doctrine is the plain scripture I cited that says the salvation they most certainly have is conditioned on them continuing in the faith that secured it for them in the first place.Since believing the gospel results in being saved WHEN one believes (Jn 5:24), this analogy fails.
Paul plainly said that they heard/received/believed/and were saved by the gospel.One who never believed, obviously.
But this passage I quoted is the scripture that says that.Not true, because there are no verses that tell us that one can give back, lose, or otherwise "no longer have" the free gift.
Paul plainly said to saved people that you are saved IF you 'do' what he said to do. And if you don't do that then the believing you have done has been done in vain.Eternal life isn't like a coin or some object that can be lost, misplaced, etc.
Here it is again...There simply are no verses that teach that salvation can be lost. Or we'd have seen the verses by now. But we haven't seen any such verses.
Who did your believing for you?This sounds very clearly as if you are responsible for your own salvation. That wasn't what Paul taught.
Just as you refuse to see the truth of 1 Corinthians 15:1-2 NASB so it is that you refuse to see the context of Romans 11.He did teach that eternal life is a gift of God in Rom 6:23 and that God's gifts are irrevocable in Rom 11:29. How about that!! All in one epistle. The context cannot be denied.
I believe it too. Keep believing and you can take this one to the bank. Faith is what makes God's gift of salvation sure. Faith is not work that it should somehow be considered 'works' and, therefore, can not be an ongoing condition for salvation.I believe what Jesus said here:
28 and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand.
29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand.
Actually, you haven't show any proof from Scripture that anyone ever has been "removed from Christ". What verse tells us that one can be removed from Christ. I don't find such language or wording anywhere in the Bible.
Sorry, but I don't see anything funny in my comment or ib Rom 11:29.
Therefore, Paul clearly taught eternal security in Ephesians.
What is it about Paul's 'if' that you do not understand?
1 Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain." (1 Corinthians 15:1-2 NASB)
Is the problem that these are plain words of scripture that grate against a preconceived belief that insists one will still still 'stand' in and be 'saved' by the gospel despite the 'if' of their unbelief? Explain why Paul's 'if' doesn't really mean what it so plainly says above.
I guess one can hold to that opinion. But it is the Greek that came from the Holy Spirit, not our English or any other translation.It doesn't matter what the Greek word for 'hold fast' means.
The point is that one must possess it. Not hold onto it. And I proved that it is God who holds onto us, not the other way around as you seem to suggest. John 10:28,29The point is, it is what you must do in order to stand in, and by saved by the gospel:
So, then, what Jesus said isn't true in your view?? He said He gives them (believers) eternal life and they will NEVER PERISH. How do you get around that?No, that doesn't cause the analogy to fail because the person who believes is indeed saved in the moment they believe. What is ignored in OSAS doctrine is the plain scripture I cited that says the salvation they most certainly have is conditioned on them continuing in the faith that secured it for them in the first place.
Sure did.Paul plainly said that they heard/received/believed/and were saved by the gospel.
Say what??!! Paul's plain statement has nothing to do with continuing to "do something"."...the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2 by which also you are saved..." (1 Corinthians 15:1-2 NASB)
Paul's plain statement that it is 'if' one continues to do something they will be saved instantly destroys a far lesser compelling argument that Paul was supposedly saying salvation is an irrevocable gift by virtue of it being a gift in Romans 11.
No, what you said is not what Scripture says.But this passage I quoted is the scripture that says that.
I'm using Scripture. Which you've admitted doesn't matter to you. Remember?Using your logic we could not believe the sky is blue from a statement that says the sky is blue because there is no statement that says the sky is blue.
Please quote whatever verse says that. And it isn't 1 Cor 15:1-3.Paul plainly said to saved people that you are saved IF you 'do' what he said to do.
I know the Greek doesn't matter to you, but "in vain" means "without reason" in the Greek. That means believing without reason. iow, not believing in the actual real reason we need to believe in Him: which is for eternal life. For that is what He promises to give those who believe in Him.And if you don't do that then the believing you have done has been done in vain.
My action of believing in Christ does NOT in any way make me "responsible for my salvation". Why would anyone think such a thing? God alone is responsible for saving those who believe.Who did your believing for you?
Paul was very clear about the difference between faith and works in Rom 4:4,5 and Eph 2:8,9.You're probably afraid to take any credit whatsoever for your believing because you think that doing that is somehow the equivalent of the works gospel that Paul said can not justify a person.
Not in my view. Faith is non meritorious.Somehow 'faith' got moved over to the side of works in Paul's works vs. faith teaching in Romans.
I don't think you could be further from the truth.Just as you refuse to see the truth of 1 Corinthians 15:1-2 NASB so it is that you refuse to see the context of Romans 11.
I'm not interested in the bank. It's heaven that I'm interested in. And Jesus promised that those to whom He gives the irrevocable free gift of eternal life WILL NOT PERISH. In fact, He is quoted saying that twice: In John 3:16 and John 10:28. Is twice not enough to believe it?I believe it too. Keep believing and you can take this one to the bank.
What verse says so? It is God who makes salvation sure. The promise comes from Him alone. That is enough for me.Faith is what makes God's gift of salvation sure
You haven't shown any evidence for your claims.Faith is not work that it should somehow be considered 'works' and, therefore, can not be an ongoing condition for salvation.
Dodging my questions seems to be your MO. I asked for a verse that supports your claim that one can be "removed from Christ", but all you can do in response is change the subject to a false idea. My question was not denying Scripture, but rather, asking you to show how Scripture supports your claim. Which you failed to do.Denying what the scriptures says, seems to be your MO.
Another empty claim.It's extremely funny, that you just reject what the scriptures say, when you have been proven wrong.
He described both justification and eternal life as gifts of God, and then said that God's gifts are irrevocable. So who's denying Scripture? Not me.Therefore Paul never taught eternal security.
Except you have never proven this from Scripture. It remains an unsubstantiated opinion.People who believe for a while or abide for a while, and are no longer IN HIM, no longer have eternal life.
JLB
I said this:
"Actually, you haven't show any proof from Scripture that anyone ever has been "removed from Christ". What verse tells us that one can be removed from Christ. I don't find such language or wording anywhere in the Bible."
Dodging my questions seems to be your MO. I asked for a verse that supports your claim that one can be "removed from Christ", but all you can do in response is change the subject to a false idea. My question was not denying Scripture, but rather, asking you to show how Scripture supports your claim. Which you failed to do.
Another empty claim.
He described both justification and eternal life as gifts of God, and then said that God's gifts are irrevocable. So who's denying Scripture? Not me.
Except you have never proven this from Scripture. It remains an unsubstantiated opinion.
Because it was a challenge to you to provide clear verses about loss of salvation. None of your responses include any Scripture that teaches loss of salvation.Another response with no scripture,
Because it's true. Except I have never denied any Scripture. I've explained what they mean. And you've shown no proof in your views.Your whole theology seems to summed up in deny the scriptures I post, and saying I have shown "no proof'.
I fully agree. He taught eternal security in John 10:28 and 29. God holds the believer in His hands. And Jesus said that believers WILL NEVER PERISH. That's very clear.The words of Jesus Christ are the proof.
What you haven't shown or proved is that anyone can be "disconnected from Christ". It's just your theory, and unsubstantiated at that.Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit He prunes, that it may bear more fruit.
“I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned.
John 15:2,5-6
In Christ = Eternal life.
No longer connected to Christ = thrown into the fire and burned.
Oh, so the word 'depart' means 'disconnected', huh. Let's consider the prodigal son. He departed from his father, yet he REMAINED a son. That NEVER changed. And you've never shown that God sends believers who have been born again (so you can stop the example of where fallen angels are called "sons of God", since they have NEVER been born again) to the lake of fire.Disconnected from Him -
12 Beware, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God; 13 but exhort one another daily, while it is called “Today,” lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. 14 For we have become partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end, Hebrews 3:12-14
To be a "partaker of Christ" is not about relationship. It's about fellowship. It's about sharing.People that depart from Him, through becoming hardened by the deceitfulness of sin, are no longer a partaker of Christ.
I've proven it repeatedly.OSAS is no where to be found in the Bible.
Because it was a challenge to you to provide clear verses about loss of salvation. None of your responses include any Scripture that teaches loss of salvation.
Because it was a challenge to you to provide clear verses about loss of salvation. None of your responses include any Scripture that teaches loss of salvation.
He taught eternal security in John 10:28 and 29. God holds the believer in His hands. And Jesus said that believers WILL NEVER PERISH. That's very clear.
What you haven't shown or proved is that anyone can be "disconnected from Christ". It's just your theory, and unsubstantiated at that.
To be a "partaker of Christ" is not about relationship. It's about fellowship. It's about sharing.
Actually your 'action' of believing in Christ DOES make you responsible for your salvation. Not in that you somehow earn that salvation of your own goodness and righteousness, but in the fact that you received the gospel through God's gracious gift of faith.My action of believing in Christ does NOT in any way make me "responsible for my salvation".
Yes, but that does not mean, or have to mean, that people are released from the responsibility of receiving and believing the gospel....through God's gracious gift of faith, which, by the way, violates your insistence that by virtue of something being a gift it can not be revoked. The scriptures teach very clearly about those who believe the gospel (through the gracious gift of faith, for there is no other way to believe the gospel) but who then later don't have that gift. Your whole premise for defending OSAS--gifts are irrevocable and permanent--is horribly flawed and contradictory to plain scripture. The gift of faith being the gift that most easily illustrates the fact that one can lose a gift of God they once had.God alone is responsible for saving those who believe.
If my post above is just an opinion, how come you've NEVER provided any clear verses that tell us that we can lose salvation. All of the verses you love to quote never even mention salvation or eternal life in them.Opinion.
We've already been over your failure to show any evidence of anyone ever being 'disconnected' from Christ.Here is the scripture I posted. It seems you have degenerated into just simple denial of the truth that Jesus taught.
Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit He prunes, that it may bear more fruit.
“I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, bears much fruit; for without Me you can do nothing. If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned. John 15:2,5-6
In Christ = Eternal life.
No longer connected to Christ = thrown into the fire and burned.
It seems very odd that one would make such a claim when a Scripture reference is tagged. That is a provision of Scripture. When you do the same thing (tag a reference), I quote the verse AND then exegete it to show that it doesn't say what you are claiming it says. Unlike your ignoring of my references.No scripture provided, only an opinion tagged with a Scripture reference.
He certainly removes from service. But why would you or anyone else think that the Bible is contradicted? If John 15:2 means what you keep thinking it means, then Jesus was totally internally contradicted. I would reject such an idea.Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit He takes away; John 15:2
The question would be "removes from WHAT? And I don't see any reference to salvation anywhere in the context."Every branch in Me", is a reference to "people" who are in Christ.
"He" in the phrase "He takes away" is a reference to God.
"Takes away" means to remove.
Just more unsubstantiated opinion.These "branches", people who are "in Him" ie; connected to Him, are "taken away", removed, disconnected from Him.
Here is what I said. Now, please prove your claim that I have ignored or disregarded the words of Scripture:Your opinion ignores and disregards what the words of the scripture, so plainly say.
If any of these verses teach loss of salvation (eternal life), then Jesus has lied to us. Is that your opinion? Is that what you keep arguing for? That Jesus has lied to us.12 Beware, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God; 13 but exhort one another daily, while it is called “Today,” lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. 14 For we have become partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end, Hebrews 3:12-14
Departing from the living God because of unbelief, is the very warning Paul gave in Romans 11.
Because of unbelief they were broken off...
19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off that I might be grafted in.” 20 Well said. Because of unbelief they were broken off, and you stand by faith. Do not be haughty, but fear. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, He may not spare you either.
Romans 11:19-21
Departing from the living God, is to depart, disconnect, or be removed from the living God.
Depart - G 868 - Strongs -
1. to make stand off, cause to withdraw, to remove
- to excite to revolt
- to stand off, to stand aloof
- to go away, to depart from anyone
- to desert, withdraw from one
- to fall away, become faithless
- to shun, flee from
- to cease to vex one
- to withdraw one's self from, to fall away
- to keep one's self from, absent one's self from
Departing from the living God because of unbelief, that was brought about by the deceitfulness of sin.
...lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. For we have become partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end.
If a person has departed from the living God, then they have been disconnected from Him and the eternal life that comes from being connected to Him.
It's more than knowledge. It's a free gift (Rom 6:23). It's also irrevocable (Rom 11:29). Yes, I've tagged them, but I've also quoted them so many times, I'm real sure you and everyone else who may be following this thread knows them by heart.Eternal life is knowing God and Jesus Christ whom He sent. John 17:3JLB
None of this supports your claim that my action of believing makes me responsible for my salvation. Unless your opinion can be backed up with Scripture, it remains just that; an opinion.Actually your 'action' of believing in Christ DOES make you responsible for your salvation. Not in that you somehow earn that salvation of your own goodness and righteousness, but in the fact that you received the gospel through God's gracious gift of faith.
And they will end up in the lake of fire.Some people reject that gift of faith and choose to reject the gospel:
Now you're just mixing apples and oranges. Getting saved and producing fruit are 2 separate issues. Totally separate.Some people receive the gospel but later stop believing:
"13“Those on the rocky soil are those who, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no firm root; they believe for a while, and in time of temptation fall away." (Luke 8:13 NASB)
Then there are those who hear the word, RETAIN IT (you know, 'hold fast' the word of the gospel), and produce it's fruit:
Paul said you must be one of those who retains and holds fast the knowledge of the kingdom, bringing it to fruition, as a condition for being saved:
1 Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain." (1 Corinthians 15:1-2 NASB bold and underline mine)
Believing is not a work. I've never argued for that. Paul contrasted faith with works in Rom 4:4,5 and Eph 2:8,9.But you argue that this can't be true since this makes 'believing' the same kind of work that Paul says can't justify--a work born of self-righteous effort.
You, along with multitudes in the church, have misunderstood Paul's argument against works as a way to be justified and have included believing the gospel in Paul's works that can't justify--
the very thing he says a person can and must do to be justified. But you are going to insist that having to believe as a condition to be saved is somehow a work that can't justify? Utterly ridiculous.