I made it clear that the person who has believed has eternal life, right now. That is not in contention. The contention is that eternal life can be lost through a subsequent unbelief.
I see no "contention" because there are NO verses that say such a thing. None at all.
And if there were any such verses, then what Jesus said in John 10:28 would be a lie. Is that your argument? Because He SAID that those to whom He gives eternal life (and we know that is WHEN they believe), He promises that they WILL NEVER PERISH.
But your claim is that IF a believer ceases to believe, they lose eternal life, which goes directly AGAINST what Jesus has promised to those who have believed in Him.
It's interesting that 'eternal life' in your doctrine means fellowship with God in passages about being cut off from God, but then suddenly means salvation in the passages about possessing it forever.
I've NEVER said what you are claiming here. I AM claiming that the word "abide" refers to fellowship, not relationship.
Do you understand the difference or not? If not, there is no use for more discussion. It will be over your head.
That duplicity is unacceptable. You can't have it both ways. You can't suddenly change the definition of eternal life to get around the passages that explain the 'if' attached to salvation/eternal life.
And I've never done what you are claiming.
I understand it very well. It's the person who is 'believing', not the person who 'used to believe' that has eternal life.
So, I take this to mean that you have rejected what Jesus said about those to whom He gives eternal life; that they WILL NEVER PERISH.
Your view is that IF they cease to believe, they WILL PERISH.
So, how do you justify your direct contradiction with Jesus?
Believing is the condition for entering into salvation. Unbelievers are not going to be saved as you are trying to insist.
You seem to keep missing the point. When one believes, they HAVE eternal life. And those to whom Jesus gives eternal life (which is WHEN they believe - Jn 5:24) they WILL NEVER PERISH. From the moment they have believed and are saved, THEY WILL NEVER PERISH. That's what Jesus actually said.
From
http://ezraproject.com/id27.html
"The Greek present tense indicates continued action, something that happens continually or repeatedly, or something that is in the process of happening. If you say, for instance, "The sun is rising," you are talking about a process happening over a period of time, not an instantaneous event. The Greeks use the present tense to express this kind of continued action."
Even in the following passage that you isolate all by itself to show that there is no condition of continued believing on having eternal life the word 'believing' is in the present tense and signifies
continued believing, not one time, past believing, and it certainly in no way suggests a cessation of believing as you insist it can:
"24“Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life." (John 5:24 NASB bold mine)
Your argument is refuted by the FACT that Jesus used the present tense in Luke 8:13 when He described the 2nd soil as "believe for a while", proving that the present tense doesn't just continue indefinitely, as you keep presuming.
Further, Paul used the aorist tense in his answer to the jailer who asked him what he MUST DO to be saved.
So your analysis is flawed.
The parable is about the Jews. The son who returns is representative of Isreal. Any Isrealite who left God was indeed very lost. They did not remain saved while living in their rebellion. The 'sons' of Isreal that will one day return to the Father are another generation of the 'sons of God', not the same ones who were cut off centuries ago.
This is your opinion. And this doesn't in any way refute my explanation at all.
The father continued to be the father and the son continued to be the son. That NEVER changed.
What changed was the fellowship between them. It died, as the father noted. His son didn't literally die. The fellowship ceased to exist, which is why Jesus used the word "dead" in regard to his son. The fellowship died.
But the fellowship was RESTORED when the son returned to the father.
The parable is a perfect analogy to the believer who gets out of fellowship and then returns to fellowship.
But as I just said, if you do not understand the difference between fellowship and relationship, further discussion along these lines will be fruitless. We'll just be talking over each other. I'm sorry.