So they didnt lay hands on anyone to give them miraculous gifts?
That is besides the point. Yes, God gifted people for certain tasks, but that was only part of it. There were still writings, teaching, and training.
Peter, Paul, and others who had received the miraculous working of the Spirit listed in 1 Cor 12. There were gifts of knowledge and discernment, wisdom, etc. How about Stephen..
And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and miracles among the people. Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen. And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the spirit by which he spake.
Acts 6:8-10
Where did Stephen get this ability and info? It wasn’t from a book. We do see this..
And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch: Whom they set before the apostles: and when they had prayed, they laid their hands on them.
Acts 6:5-6
Philip too went out preaching and working miracles. Was he reading from a book or did he have miraculous memory through the spirit.
What is the gift of ‘knowledge’ if its not miraculous revelation?
Right. So, there were a number of individuals through whom God spoke and gave revelation. Yet, you originally stated, "In Jn 12-16 we have Jesus at the final supper speaking DIRECTLY to the apostles. He was not speaking to you."
If Jesus was "speaking directly to the apostles" and that is used as an argument that "He was not speaking to you," what of all the others you listed that aren't apostles?
The fact is Jesus promised this to the apostles and not to you.
But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you.
Matthew 10:19-20
It doesn’t matter under what condition they were currently in. Peter wasn’t being persecuted in Acts 2 but I don’t think anyone would doubt that it was the Spirit speaking directly through him.
It's a promise for all believers, not just the apostles.
You are correct.
Lk 24 is another part of the great commission just like Mt 28 and in this text he said…
Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behooved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things.
Luke 24:45-48
This isn’t spoken to us today. You havent been a witness to anything. We aren’t beginning in Jerusalem. Can we learn from it? Absolutely. What did Jesus want preached? His death and resurrection, repentance, and remission of sins (which comes through baptism).
But just because he wasn’t speaking directly to us in the great commission doesn’t mean we cant learn from what he said. There are many other passages that tell Christians to spread the word of God.
So, the apostles took the great commission, which Jesus supposedly only commanded them to do, and used it to command other Christians to do. That is essentially what you are saying, correct? Kind of makes your argument that it is only for the apostles rather moot, since the apostles apparently didn't see it that way.
Just like in Jn 16. Are we guided into all truth today? Absolutely.
Through a direct miraculous operation of the Spirit? No. When we read what they wrote we too are being guided into all truth.
Just how are we guided into all truth today if it isn't a direct miraculous operation of the Spirit? Is it all intellect and reasoning?
Looking at the context:
1Co 13:8 Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away.
1Co 13:9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part,
1Co 13:10 but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away.
1Co 13:11 When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways.
1Co 13:12 For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known. (ESV)
Prophecies, tongues, and knowledge will cease. When? When the perfect comes. Clearly for Paul, the perfect had not yet come--"For we know in part and we prophesy in part." But what will be the result of the coming of that which is perfect? The result will be seeing "face to face" and "then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known."
There are a couple of observations worth making in regards to "when the perfect comes": 1) Paul says that everyone will see "face to face" and 2) Paul says that
he will "know fully."
So, how could Paul say to believers back then that they will see "face to face" with the completion of the NT, when that wasn't for some time yet? And what does it even mean to see "face to face" when the NT is completed? Similarly, how could Paul say that he will know fully at the completion of the NT, if the NT was completed until long after he died? How is it that no believer ever since the completion of the NT has known fully?
The argument that "perfect" refers to the completion or compilation of the NT just doesn't make sense given the context. What makes much better sense is the coming of Christ--we can state with certainty that all believers will
then see face to face and know fully, even as each of us have been fully known.