Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
These are owned by a few left ,the homes are razed by the property owner an identical mcm type are worth much more on the barrier island .That's a shame. The working man deserves a place to call his own too.
These are owned by a few left ,the homes are razed by the property owner an identical mcm type are worth much more on the barrier island .
Aint no habitat house gonna be built on the beach ,too much for them to try to do that and well if I own a million house and a habitat is built next to me home values just dropped.a million dollar home need not be big.I have seen old mcm homes be sold and were not razed ,those aren't big .That's fine, the owner can do what he likes. As long as Joe working man down the road can build a modest home on his own land. Central planning McMansions is not fair to working people of modest means.
Doesn't seem to be a significant factor in your venue though, as Habitat can still build. In some places, the central planners will only allow $400,000 mansions to be built. Working class people have nowhere to go.
Aint no habitat house gonna be built on the beach ,too much for them to try to do that and well if I own a million house and a habitat is built next to me home values just dropped.a million dollar home need not be big.
This isnt central planners,I know two local member of the p and z board.Yes, this is what central planners are thinking. Maximize revenue by only zoning mansions. Older homes already existing can stay, but no new modest homes are allowed to be constructed.
It still gives honest working people nowhere to go in many areas. Its not right. The millionaire in his mansion has a right to put whatever house he wants on his own property, but no right to tell other people what to build on their own property. That other property doesn't belong to the millionaire. The millionaire has no right to use his influence to get central planners to keep working guys from building.
Any interesting news?
This isnt central planners...
I know two local member of the p and z board.
your idea would cost jobs and force the wealthy investor to eschew doing that.they raze houses because it increase the value of their lots.
Less money in building small homes.most large scale of that type of communities use out of town workers and construction companies.Central planning by any other name is still central planning.
Yes, I've talked to various central planners too. I know how they think. In many areas, central planners are abusing the position to prevent average working people from building abodes that they can afford. Its not right.
A free market would build homes that match the income of locals. Everyone with a job would be able to afford at least a modest abode.
If the wealthy want to buy the land near them and raze the buildings, that is their business. The wealthy still have no right to use their influence with central planners to prevent the non rich from building affordable abodes on their own land.
I disagree about the jobs. There would be additional construction jobs building modest abodes that would compensate for jobs building mansions for the rich.
Free market capitalism, that's the way to go. Not inefficient central planning by the rich and their lobbyists. Have mercy on the non rich.
Here in Honolulu the rich snatch up what little property is available then turn around and rent the property back out at very high rental rates. Rent can easily be $2k mo. for a 2 bedroom while a mortgage for same property $1350. Long term leasing makes the property almost affordable, but own nothing after years of paying rent. Honolulu needs rent control.Central planning by any other name is still central planning.
Yes, I've talked to various central planners too. I know how they think. In many areas, central planners are abusing the position to prevent average working people from building abodes that they can afford. Its not right.
A free market would build homes that match the income of locals. Everyone with a job would be able to afford at least a modest abode.
If the wealthy want to buy the land near them and raze the buildings, that is their business. The wealthy still have no right to use their influence with central planners to prevent the non rich from building affordable abodes on their own land.
I disagree about the jobs. There would be additional construction jobs building modest abodes that would compensate for jobs building mansions for the rich.
Free market capitalism, that's the way to go. Not inefficient central planning by the rich and their lobbyists. Have mercy on the non rich.
Here in Honolulu the rich snatch up what little property is available...
...sewer plant...