Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

In Today's News

That's a shame. The working man deserves a place to call his own too.
These are owned by a few left ,the homes are razed by the property owner an identical mcm type are worth much more on the barrier island .

In have photos to edit to show or take .
 
These are owned by a few left ,the homes are razed by the property owner an identical mcm type are worth much more on the barrier island .

That's fine, the owner can do what he likes. As long as Joe working man down the road can build a modest home on his own land. Central planning McMansions is not fair to working people of modest means.

Doesn't seem to be a significant factor in your venue though, as Habitat can still build. In some places, the central planners will only allow $400,000 mansions to be built. Working class people have nowhere to go.
 
That's fine, the owner can do what he likes. As long as Joe working man down the road can build a modest home on his own land. Central planning McMansions is not fair to working people of modest means.

Doesn't seem to be a significant factor in your venue though, as Habitat can still build. In some places, the central planners will only allow $400,000 mansions to be built. Working class people have nowhere to go.
Aint no habitat house gonna be built on the beach ,too much for them to try to do that and well if I own a million house and a habitat is built next to me home values just dropped.a million dollar home need not be big.I have seen old mcm homes be sold and were not razed ,those aren't big .
 
Aint no habitat house gonna be built on the beach ,too much for them to try to do that and well if I own a million house and a habitat is built next to me home values just dropped.a million dollar home need not be big.

Yes, this is what central planners are thinking. Maximize revenue by only zoning mansions. Older homes already existing can stay, but no new modest homes are allowed to be constructed.

It still gives honest working people nowhere to go in many areas. Its not right. The millionaire in his mansion has a right to put whatever house he wants on his own property, but no right to tell other people what to build on their own property. That other property doesn't belong to the millionaire. The millionaire has no right to use his influence to get central planners to keep working guys from building.
 
I'm calling it now.

England - 19
New Zealand - 7

Congratulations England. Well played and well done Knocking out New Zealand in the world cup Semi Finals.

As I said quoted

"England is a good team and the Kiwis need to be on form if they want to take it. I'm going New Zealand for the win as always, but I think the game will be tight. England is playing well and they have the potential to take it."

And I know the English have respect , ask any Pom what rugby team is the best and hardest to play and beat and they will always say it's New Zealand.

Well deserved win to England they played 80 and we were playing messy.

Well Done England. Good luck in the Finals for the World Cup after we won the last two. My guess is you will be playing South Africa. They will beat Wales.

I'm a Kiwi and im not a sore loser or going to have a cry. When the better team in the day wins they win, and England deserved that win.
 
Last edited:
Yes, this is what central planners are thinking. Maximize revenue by only zoning mansions. Older homes already existing can stay, but no new modest homes are allowed to be constructed.

It still gives honest working people nowhere to go in many areas. Its not right. The millionaire in his mansion has a right to put whatever house he wants on his own property, but no right to tell other people what to build on their own property. That other property doesn't belong to the millionaire. The millionaire has no right to use his influence to get central planners to keep working guys from building.
This isnt central planners,I know two local member of the p and z board.

So a bunch of barns you can buy made with wood should be next to a 23 million dollar home ?that should be allowed to devalue by the state the others guys house ?

See where this goes,if I buy land and I invest its a return that goes up not down .if I sell my,house I expect a return greater then what I paid .your idea would cost jobs and force the wealthy investor to eschew doing that.they raze houses because it increase the value of their lots.

It was being done during the depression .plenty of waldo sexton antiques were from that.
 
This isnt central planners...

Central planning by any other name is still central planning.

I know two local member of the p and z board.

Yes, I've talked to various central planners too. I know how they think. In many areas, central planners are abusing the position to prevent average working people from building abodes that they can afford. Its not right.

A free market would build homes that match the income of locals. Everyone with a job would be able to afford at least a modest abode.

your idea would cost jobs and force the wealthy investor to eschew doing that.they raze houses because it increase the value of their lots.

If the wealthy want to buy the land near them and raze the buildings, that is their business. The wealthy still have no right to use their influence with central planners to prevent the non rich from building affordable abodes on their own land.

I disagree about the jobs. There would be additional construction jobs building modest abodes that would compensate for jobs building mansions for the rich.

Free market capitalism, that's the way to go. Not inefficient central planning by the rich and their lobbyists. Have mercy on the non rich.
 
Last edited:
Central planning by any other name is still central planning.



Yes, I've talked to various central planners too. I know how they think. In many areas, central planners are abusing the position to prevent average working people from building abodes that they can afford. Its not right.

A free market would build homes that match the income of locals. Everyone with a job would be able to afford at least a modest abode.



If the wealthy want to buy the land near them and raze the buildings, that is their business. The wealthy still have no right to use their influence with central planners to prevent the non rich from building affordable abodes on their own land.

I disagree about the jobs. There would be additional construction jobs building modest abodes that would compensate for jobs building mansions for the rich.

Free market capitalism, that's the way to go. Not inefficient central planning by the rich and their lobbyists. Have mercy on the non rich.
Less money in building small homes.most large scale of that type of communities use out of town workers and construction companies.

That isnt clearly understood ,land selling because of market value undeveloped for 5 million per a few acres isn't gooing to for workers .inagjbe building mega homes next to a sewer plant and it was after your home ,let the market decide that?

What about noise abatement,industry,I can go back when we had much farming on the shore,citrus.or power plants still .

It not against people building ,but I'm,against your idea,I do plan to leave my state .should I loose money in my house for a barn?

My moms house way older then me during the boom was as expensive to buy,its now lower then mine or equal.hers is a wood frame stucco,she paid 90 grand after interest for it,she should only get 30 grand should she sell?
 
The market decided what was built on the beach save the two towers ,a height limit was instituted.

In sure if something historic was gonna be razed ,you,would be against it.
 
Central planning by any other name is still central planning.



Yes, I've talked to various central planners too. I know how they think. In many areas, central planners are abusing the position to prevent average working people from building abodes that they can afford. Its not right.

A free market would build homes that match the income of locals. Everyone with a job would be able to afford at least a modest abode.



If the wealthy want to buy the land near them and raze the buildings, that is their business. The wealthy still have no right to use their influence with central planners to prevent the non rich from building affordable abodes on their own land.

I disagree about the jobs. There would be additional construction jobs building modest abodes that would compensate for jobs building mansions for the rich.

Free market capitalism, that's the way to go. Not inefficient central planning by the rich and their lobbyists. Have mercy on the non rich.
Here in Honolulu the rich snatch up what little property is available then turn around and rent the property back out at very high rental rates. Rent can easily be $2k mo. for a 2 bedroom while a mortgage for same property $1350. Long term leasing makes the property almost affordable, but own nothing after years of paying rent. Honolulu needs rent control.
 
...sewer plant...

I said allow the market to build Habitat type homes for honest working people, not sewer plants. In any case, its mostly government that builds sewage treatment facilities. That's not usually free market. Except for factories treating their own stuff.

Keeping people safe is good. Preventing honest people from owning homes with absurd prices isn't.
 
Back
Top