Is Church of Christ A Cult?

  • CFN has a new look, using the Eagle as our theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • CFN welcomes a new contributing member!

    Please welcome Beetow to our Christian community.

    Blessings in Christ, and we pray you enjoy being a member here

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Unfortunately some are "anti" everything but "anti-up''.
If by that, you mean that they are big on collecting money.... Most CoC's I've been involved with take up a collection that is considerably smaller than most other churches. CoC people have never been known for giving a lot of money.
 
If by that, you mean that they are big on collecting money.... Most CoC's I've been involved with take up a collection that is considerably smaller than most other churches. CoC people have never been known for giving a lot of money.

By anti I meant what your father-in-law is. Some are anti giving to a non-Christian out of the church treasury (although they do give liberally to such personally). Some of them do not give to orphan homes from the treasury (although they do liberally personally). Some have no fellowship halls, they rent a site when needed. This is so they may have more for mission work and spread of the gospel. Some use one cup in the communion, and I am not opposed to that providing I am the first to drink from the cup. I have worship with them and can so long as they do not bind on me one of their anti notions. As a rule they are sincere, kind and loving Christians. One thing is absolutely certain, no liberalism will be found among them as in denominations and that is greatly appreciated by me.

As for their giving I have not found them wanting. One may think they do not give much and perhaps the greatest reason why is one may think that is because they do not beg for money as do denominations. They have no car washes, bake sales etc., etc., etc., to raise money. We all believe the Lord's church should be supported by her members and do not expect the visitor to contribute. We give only on the first day of the week as that is the scripture example. Every congregation I have been associated with gives in excess to their budget.

I've made this brief and can enlarge. I appreciate those "of like precious faith" and do feel offended when the uneducated call them a cult.
God bless,
w
Rom.16:16
 
If by that, you mean that they are big on collecting money.... Most CoC's I've been involved with take up a collection that is considerably smaller than most other churches. CoC people have never been known for giving a lot of money.
I tend to be slow with the title, Cult, but like Obidiah, I find the Crossroads movement extremely cult like but then the stock legalism in the Church of Christ is in place in spite of the placement of importance on a never quite understandable scale. I say this because it is recorded three times in the Bible about being cursed for either adding or dismissing any word or words from what God has written.

As a result it is and always has been my view, as led by the Spirit that all scripture carries the same weight. With that view of scripture there are zero conflicts, anywhere, in scripture and when they appear to be conflicting we must submit our wills to that of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, pray and then listen. I have found that when folks fail in the last step, legalism abounds. From my personal experience the legalism in some of their churches does not abound in all of their Churches. Some will stand fast on their legalism and oppose and even condemn others in spite of Paul's instruction that everything is possible for the Christ follower and ignore the teaching of Jesus in Matthew 7 to judge righteously.

I have heard so many times that I am going to Hell because on being a member of a Baptist Church until I just ignore and no longer seek to teach the stiff necked people. All any of us can do is to pray for them along with our stiff necked Baptists.

May God bless.
 
Yes, you did. And I read that statement when you made it. You also stated that perhaps I would like to comment on Deborah13s post and I stated why I saw no need for me to comment on it.[/QUOTE

In your post 135 you among other things wrote: "This is tending to make me see them more as a cult than I did before reading this, to say the least." Your reference was to the website. Deborah 13 later wrote a excellent post detailing rather well the church of Christ of which I belong to showing we were not a "cult". Others on this thread agreed. I did wonder if you also agreed and thus my comment. I still wonder what your thoughts are now after her post.

It is certainly not my desire or intent to have a personal quarrel with you on this or any matter. I am happy however to discuss with you any doctrinal matter. I hope this helps.
God bless,
w
Rom.16:16
Not sure why you added your comments to your quote of my comments, but if you're not trying to quarel with me, why don't you just go and read my statement where I said that after others pointed out that the web site in question was not the same Church of Christ I dropped the subject. What exactly is it you want me to do? Should I flog myself mercilessly in repentance of mistakenly thinking a web site that identified itself as the official Church of Christ web site was actually a different Church of Christ than the Church of Christ being talked about here? Should the rest of us that made that same mistake do so as well? Perhaps I should have just refused to acknowledge it was a different site in the first place? I'm just not sure what it is that you are expecting me to say to you.
 
I tend to be slow with the title, Cult, but like Obidiah, I find the Crossroads movement extremely cult like but then the stock legalism in the Church of Christ is in place in spite of the placement of importance on a never quite understandable scale. I say this because it is recorded three times in the Bible about being cursed for either adding or dismissing any word or words from what God has written.

As a result it is and always has been my view, as led by the Spirit that all scripture carries the same weight. With that view of scripture there are zero conflicts, anywhere, in scripture and when they appear to be conflicting we must submit our wills to that of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit, pray and then listen. I have found that when folks fail in the last step, legalism abounds. From my personal experience the legalism in some of their churches does not abound in all of their Churches. Some will stand fast on their legalism and oppose and even condemn others in spite of Paul's instruction that everything is possible for the Christ follower and ignore the teaching of Jesus in Matthew 7 to judge righteously.

I have heard so many times that I am going to Hell because on being a member of a Baptist Church until I just ignore and no longer seek to teach the stiff necked people. All any of us can do is to pray for them along with our stiff necked Baptists.

May God bless.

I have never met any of the Crossroad group. However from what I have heard of them from reputable witnesses I agree they are cultish. As I have stated in a previous post we have no fellowship with them. They went out from us. As the apostle of Christ wrote: ''THEY WENT OUT FROM US, BUT THEY WERE NOT OF US; FOR IF THEY HAD BEEN OF US, THEY WOULD NO DOUBT HAVE CONTINUED WITH US: BUT THEY WENT OUT, THAT THEY MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST THAT THEY WERE NOT ALL OF US" 1Jn. 2:19.

BTW, I appreciate your military service. I'm a combat veteran of the United States Marine Corps, Korean vintage.

God bless,
w
Rom.16:16
 
Not sure why you added your comments to your quote of my comments, but if you're not trying to quarel with me, why don't you just go and read my statement where I said that after others pointed out that the web site in question was not the same Church of Christ I dropped the subject. What exactly is it you want me to do? Should I flog myself mercilessly in repentance of mistakenly thinking a web site that identified itself as the official Church of Christ web site was actually a different Church of Christ than the Church of Christ being talked about here? Should the rest of us that made that same mistake do so as well? Perhaps I should have just refused to acknowledge it was a different site in the first place? I'm just not sure what it is that you are expecting me to say to you.


As I said I have no desire to quarrel with you. If I misunderstood you I apologize. I do stand ready to discuss any doctrinal subject with you which you feel we disagree on.
God bless,
w
Rom.16:16
 
This looks like one of those threads that ends up in the well you know.. today i found this a yes or no answer is all that's required.. it has to do with water baptism in order to be saved

Some other denominations and if they believe water baptism is needed for salvation:

Wesleyans: not needed
Church of Christ: needed
Free/United Methodists: not needed (I’m not 100%sure, but confident)
Catholics: needed

tob

*edit: this is from Yahoo answers..

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110328214523AAfDSFe
 
This looks like one of those threads that ends up in the well you know.. today i found this a yes or no answer is all that's required.. it has to do with water baptism in order to be saved

Some other denominations and if they believe water baptism is needed for salvation:

Wesleyans: not needed
Church of Christ: needed
Free/United Methodists: not needed (I’m not 100%sure, but confident)
Catholics: needed


Mk.16:15,16; Acts 2:38; Acts 22:16; I Pet.3:21. The Bible: needed.
tob

*edit: this is from Yahoo answers..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I failed to hit the right key to show that the bottom of the above post was mine, beginning with the list of scriptures. Sorry for the mistake.
God bless,
w
Rom.16:16
 
maybe i missed it i was looking for yes or no.. is water baptism necessary for salvation there are a list of denominations that say yes or no and all i see is:

I failed to hit the right key to show that the bottom of the above post was mine, beginning with the list of scriptures. Sorry for the mistake.
God bless,
w
Rom.16:16

tob

:stupid

*edit:wrong thread
 
Last edited:
sorry i missed it Webb?

tob

Hi TOB
I listed several passages from the NT teaching the essentiality of baptism such as Mk.16:15,16; Acts 2:39; Acts 22:18; Rom.6:1-about 19; Gal.3:26,27 and I Pet. 3:21.
God bless,
w
Rom.16:16
 
I attended the church of Christ for about 5 years, many years ago. Since all congregations are autonomous, and there is no central headquarters, some congregations may differ from others. The one I attended did believe that adult baptism by immersion is necessary for the remission of sins, based on the scriptures quoted by Webb. So yes, this is a difference to what most mainstream denominations believe.

Other than that, there is no great difference in beliefs between them and any other church I have attended.

They were good people and I have happy memories of them and their simple faith. I would definitely not class them as a cult.

It is unfortunate that one of the Mormon churches has chosen to give themselves the same name and post a prominent website, as this is very misleading.

Someone asked how you would know whether a particular congregation is or is not Mormon. Very simple. Ask them if they accept the book of Mormon. The church of Christ as I knew it would answer with a definite No!
 
I think I once was told that baptism is supposed to be done before a person can be saved in the coC? Not sure though?
 
I attended the church of Christ for about 5 years, many years ago. Since all congregations are autonomous, and there is no central headquarters, some congregations may differ from others. The one I attended did believe that adult baptism by immersion is necessary for the remission of sins, based on the scriptures quoted by Webb. So yes, this is a difference to what most mainstream denominations believe.

Other than that, there is no great difference in beliefs between them and any other church I have attended.

They were good people and I have happy memories of them and their simple faith. I would definitely not class them as a cult.

It is unfortunate that one of the Mormon churches has chosen to give themselves the same name and post a prominent website, as this is very misleading.

Someone asked how you would know whether a particular congregation is or is not Mormon. Very simple. Ask them if they accept the book of Mormon. The church of Christ as I knew it would answer with a definite No!
Thank you Granny J
w
Rom.16:16
 
some of these denominations I would hesitate to call cults but would call them pharisaical legalists from some of the descriptions in this thread. Cults use the same techniques of intimidation, information and emotional control and leader worship. If there is intimidation applied if we disagree with the church leadership or want to leave and leaders have control over the people's everyday lives and families, then it is a cult
 
Webb
Brother, your doing a fantastic job representing the churches of Christ.
GrannyJ , thank you for your wonderful post.

My wife has roots dating back to her great grandfather who was a preacher for the church of Christ, as was her grandfather. While Webb will do a better job than I, what I can say is that one of the things that I enjoy the most about being a member is that each church is autonomous, which means each church can meet the specific physical and spiritual needs of the local community and congregation. Another thing that I love would be how many of our members actually study their bibles.

I've argued right here on this forum and have been called a member of a cult, and honestly it doesn't feel very good. But what I can say for those who think we are a cult, you highly misunderstand us or put words into our mouths and then insist that we've said them, much in the same manner JLB kept insisting that a mormon site was our site even after repeated attempts to assure him that it wasn't.

There are some push button topics that everyone seems to target, mainly the absence of musical instruments in our worship and baptism. I know that the absence of musical instruments really sounds odd for some, but it's not wrong not to have them. Actually, it's even refreshing. One of the driving factors to support the non-use of musical instruments in our worship derives from the absence of musical instruments in the New Testament. I know members who will argue this point to division. I am not one of them. However, I would never advocate for them either and I do feel that not using them in worship lends to a purer form of worship.

The second big issue most have a hard time with is our view on baptism. John Mark Hicks, professor of theology at Lipscomb University wrote an excellent book on the topic specifically for the churches of Christ, and I ascribe to his views.
http://www.amazon.com/Down-River-Pray-Revisioning-Transforming/dp/0972842535

Here is his outline:
http://johnmarkhicks.faithsite.com/content.asp?CID=53318

Baptism is more important than you think, but not for the reasons you suppose.

Many believe baptism is simply the sign of salvation already received. Others believe it is an indispensable command that legally divides those heading to heaven from those going to hell. Baptism is more important than either think.

Baptism is a performative, or effectual, sign through which God works by his Holy Spirit to forgive, renew, sanctify and transform. It is a symbol by which we participate in the reality that it symbolizes. We must not reduce it to a mere symbol or sign that only looks to the past without any present power or reality. Baptism is more important than that.

Neither is baptism, however, the technical line between heaven and hell. It is not primarily a loyalty test or a command satisfied by legal performance of the rite. We must not reduce baptism to a line in the sand. Such a reading of baptism’s function reduces its significance to a technical legal requirement. Baptism is more important than that.

While baptism is both a sign and a command, it is more. While it signifies participation in the gospel and submission to it is obedience to the divine will, baptism points beyond itself and effectually participates in God’s transforming work. God is at work through baptism to transform fallen humanity into his own image, to transform the fallen human community into a people who share the life of the divine, triune community.

God’s goal is to conform humanity to the image of his Son (Romans 8:29-30). Transformation is God’s fundamental aim. Everything God does, everything God commands, serves that goal. Baptism serves that end. Baptism must never trump, negate or simply point to a faint testimony of transformation, but transformation must always shape and determine baptismal theology.

Baptism is important because it serves the end of God’s transforming work. It is more important than a sign or a command because its significance lies in its function as a means of transformation into the divine image and inclusion in the divine community where divine presence empowers transformation. It is not simply one among many commands, but neither is it the command. Baptism is God’s transforming work and serves the divine goal of transformation.
 
some of these denominations I would hesitate to call cults but would call them pharisaical legalists from some of the descriptions in this thread. Cults use the same techniques of intimidation, information and emotional control and leader worship. If there is intimidation applied if we disagree with the church leadership or want to leave and leaders have control over the people's everyday lives and families, then it is a cult
A fair assessment, I'd say.
 
some of these denominations I would hesitate to call cults but would call them pharisaical legalists from some of the descriptions in this thread. Cults use the same techniques of intimidation, information and emotional control and leader worship. If there is intimidation applied if we disagree with the church leadership or want to leave and leaders have control over the people's everyday lives and families, then it is a cult

yes, that is so. the one world church is very much that way, but usually either denies it if confronted, or justifies it using their own authority to back it up, instead of obeying Scripture. oh, they (all?) claim to believe in Jesus, with their lips.... but anyone actually serving Jesus as Lord is told they are out of order and better submit.(to the one world church rules).