Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is it Possible for a True Christian to lose their Salvation.

And remember, to change Revelation to something different so it doesn't say that is, IMO, the equivalent of taking away and/or adding to Revelation--the very thing that will cause a person to have their part in eternal life taken away.

Completely irrefutable!



JLB
 
As harsh as these Biblical words are, I'm also convinced, GOD WILL IMMEDIATELY PARDON THE PERSON WHO HAS BEEN DOING THIS MISLEADING OF PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN HIM INTO THE FIERY HELL. The question is, will these people have the humility to acknowledge what the scriptures above plainly say and repent of this stumbling and destroying of believers? God's forgiveness for doing so is not is what is in question here. Whether or not people will repent of telling believers they are still saved and have eternal life if they deny Christ is what remains in question.

Amen!
 
No believer should stand before God in Christ, trying to justify or excuse or cover up the "evil present" with them because IT CAN'T BE DONE. It is impossible to justify evil present just as it is equally impossible to remove this fact from our present construction.


I have yet to see anyone claim this, and I have yet to see you provide a quote from a post where anyone has claimed this.

Yet you continue to fill up page after page, ranting about how impossible it is cover up, or excuse, that sin resides in our flesh.

Not one person disagrees with this because it in written in the bible.

What is also written in the bible is how to crucify, and put to death the deeds of the flesh.


I say then: Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. Galatians 5:16

and again

And those who are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. Galatians 5:24

and again

12 Therefore, brethren, we are debtors—not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. 13 For if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. Romans 8:12-13

...if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live.


I have good news for you, today.

You don't have to put up with the sinful desires that reside in your flesh.

You can crucify them.

Do you believe you can crucify the sinful desires that are in your flesh, that entice you to sin?

...those who are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.

12 Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in its lusts. 13 And do not present your members as instruments of unrighteousness to sin, but present yourselves to God as being alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God. Romans 6:12-13


...present yourselves to God as being alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God.



JLB
 
The very best any of us hope for in this present life is to keep the "evil present" with us from over running and over ruling us. But it is there, regardless. Romans 7:21.

Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God. 2 Corinthians 7:1


JLB
 
Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God. 2 Corinthians 7:1

JLB

I'll ask once again: Do you believe that a believer MUST believe they could potentially "lose" their salvation in order to be saved?

Simple question, might help establish just how "critical" your position on this particular matter really is.
 
I'll ask once again: Do you believe that a believer MUST believe they could potentially "lose" their salvation in order to be saved?

No.

Do you understand we are to cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of flesh?

Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God. 2 Corinthians 7:1

You can claim over and over about the sin within our flesh, and the evil present with us, but that won't do a thing to "cleanse yourself" from all filthiness of flesh and spirit.


What is also written in the bible is how to crucify, and put to death the deeds of the flesh.


I say then: Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. Galatians 5:16

and again

And those who are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. Galatians 5:24

and again

12 Therefore, brethren, we are debtors—not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. 13 For if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. Romans 8:12-13

...if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live.


I have good news for you, today.

You don't have to put up with the sinful desires that reside in your flesh.

You can crucify them.

Do you believe you can crucify the sinful desires that are in your flesh, that entice you to sin?

...those who are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.

12 Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in its lusts. 13 And do not present your members asinstruments of unrighteousness to sin, but present yourselves to God as being alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God. Romans 6:12-13


...present yourselves to God as being alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God.



JLB
 
I said this:
"My point remains: The Bible does NOT say that Christians can end up in hell for any reason. And no one has shown otherwise from Scripture."
Then your pet doctrine is in direct conflict with Paul and Jesus.
No one has shown that my understanding of either Paul or Jesus is in conflict. I've shown that your understanding of both Paul and Jesus is in direct conflict with what they have said.

Paul wrote these words to born again, Spirit filled Christians, teaching them the way to avoid fulfilling the lust's of the flesh, is to walk in the Spirit.

The Christian
has the choice to walk in the Spirit, or not.

The way we are to have victory over the lustful desires of the flesh, is to walk according to the Spirit.

16 I say then: Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. 17 For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish. 18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law. 19 Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery,fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, 21 envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, just as I also told you in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. Galatians 5:16-21

I say then: Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh.

Paul plainly says those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
I've already proven from the other 2 parallel passages that to "not inherit the kingdom" is equal to "have no inheritance IN the kingdom". There is nothing here about not getting into the kingdom.

The only question is: what does "will not inherit the kingdom of God" actually refer to?
I've already explained what it means. It's parallel to Eph 5:5 and "have no inheritance IN the kingdom".

If a person does not inherit the kingdom of God, then whose kingdom do they inherit?
I've already shown the question is based on a false premise. As if "not inheriting" God's kingdom, one will inherit some other kingdom.

Once again, to "not inherit" means to "have no inheritance", proven from Eph 5:5, a parallel passage to both Gal 5 and 1 Cor 6.

3 But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as is fitting for saints; 4 neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. 5 For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. 6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.7 Therefore do not be partakers with them.
Ephesians 5:3-7
There is it: "not have any inheritance IN IN IN the kingdom of Christ and God". It's NOT about not getting into the kingdom, but rather, getting IN IN IN, but having no inheritance IN IN IN the kingdom.

Why would Paul warn these Churches not to be a partaker of God's wrath with them, if it wasn't possible?
Of course it's possible, because the Bible warns against it. But what does that have to do with loss of salvation?

Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. Therefore do not be partakers with them. Ephesians 5:6-7
Certainly you're aware of the fact that God's discipline (judgment) on His children involves His wrath? Or not?
 
Yes, these Christians who practice these things will have no part, no inheritance, in God's Kingdom.
That's what I've been saying all along. They will be IN IN IN God's kingdom, but have NO NO NO part, NO NO NO inheritance IN IN IN His kingdom.

Don't forget verse 6 and 7.

Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. Therefore do not be partakers with them. Ephesians 5:6-7
JLB
Yes, God's wrath does come upon those children who are disobedient. But no one has shown that God will remove or revoke eternal life from anyone who has been given that irrevocable gift. So, don't forget that.
 
You're clinging to a very weak argument.
Pardon while I chuckle, but no one has refuted any of my points, or explained any of the verses I've provided in support of my points. So how's that weak?

otoh, those who claim loss of salvation cannot show any verse that out and out makes that claim.

So how's that strong?

The point is, if you are not in the City of God you are outside of it. And those outside of it are in the Lake of Fire, not simply being refused the optional reward of having access to the tree of life.
Thank you for your opinion, but please explain how the lake of fire can be ANYWHERE on the new earth.

There is no need to define the distance between the two.
Yes, there is. Your claim makes no sense. And your view cannot be explained or defended, which is why the "need" to claim there is no need to define distance. Of course there is.

Your claim demands that the lake of fire is outside the city. If the lake of fire is now anywhere on the new earth, then John wouldn't have written v.15 the way he did.

iow, words mean things.

Here's the argument again. Let's see if you can refute it. Read it again:

Here we have a plain statement that God himself will take away a person's part in the tree of life and the holy city--the very thing you say is impossible:
"...if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book." (Revelation 22:19 NASB bold and underline mine)

Your argument is the the tree of life and the holy city are not eternal life, but the optional rewards that a saved person may or may not have.

No, that's NOT my argument. Sorry that you've failed to follow any of my argument. It appears from your statement that the "tree of life" somehow maintains one's eternal life. But that doesn't make sense because those who will live on the new earth already HAVE eternal life, which is irrevocable, and NOT in danger of being lost.


But you say they are outside of the city and away from the river and tree of life because those things are only rewards and not eternal life and are still saved and have eternal life. How is that possible if it is the Lake of Fire these people are in outside of the city? Obviously, it's not possible. A person will lose their part of the "tree of life and from the holy city" (Revelation 22:19 NASB) if they take away from the prophecy of Revelation. And we know the tree and river of life is talking about eternal life, not just rewards, because those who aren't in the city are in the Lake of Fire.
No one has proven your claim here about the river being eternal life and those not in the city are in the lake of fire. Opinions need support from Scripture, which hasn't been given.


If one who believes in Jesus Christ can never lose his salvation, why does Christ refer to the person who stumbles doing so as to be cast into the fiery hell?
Please provide an actual verse, so I can know what you're referring to. Then I'll answer your question.

As harsh as these Biblical words are, I'm also convinced, GOD WILL IMMEDIATELY PARDON THE PERSON WHO HAS BEEN DOING THIS MISLEADING OF PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN HIM INTO THE FIERY HELL. The question is, will these people have the humility to acknowledge what the scriptures above plainly say and repent of this stumbling and destroying of believers? God's forgiveness for doing so is not is what is in question here. Whether or not people will repent of telling believers they are still saved and have eternal life if they deny Christ is what remains in question.
The only question that remains is why the Bible NO WHERE states that salvation can be lost for any reason, if that is true.
 
No.

Do you understand we are to cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of flesh?

Paul provides understanding in the matters thusly, as sin indwelling his flesh being "no more I." Romans 7:17-20. We've been through this all many times. Paul quite factually stated that "no more I" did what it did, in Romans 7:7-13, Romans 7:15, Romans 7:19 and concluded from this that evil was present with him, Romans 7:21 and warring was "in his members," Romans 7:23, that he was a wretched man because of these facts, Romans 7:24, that his flesh served the law of sin, Romans 7:25 and that sin in the flesh is under the condemnation of God in Christ. Romans 8:3, which condemnation Paul ACCEPTS to these workings as the only logical conclusion.

These all provide more than adequate "divisions" of Paul from that working of sin indwelling his flesh, and evil present with him, neither of which were "removed" after salvation.

What Paul didn't do was to lie about these matters or use a hypocritical double standard about the facts of sin indwelling his own flesh compared to the sin of others, the evil present with him or claim or that he was better than any other sinner. Romans 3:9, 1 Tim. 1:15.
You can claim over and over about the sin within our flesh, and the evil present with us, but that won't do a thing to "cleanse yourself" from all filthiness of flesh and spirit.

And your positions can claim that believers can make themselves sinless and Paul's facts will continue to do the factual smack down on any of those angles of escaping being a sinner saved by faith in Christ through Grace.

The only basis you employ to (potentially) eternally condemn believers is sin. Reality of scriptures say none of us escape the conclusion of being a sinner, saved by faith in Christ through His Grace.
 
Romans 7:25 KJV
I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

Does the sin in this verse have dominion? No! Absolutely Not!

Does the law of God through Jesus Christ guarantee the Lambs book of life? Absolutely!

Romans 7:25 is a verse with two conditions in one sentence.

Why do we have to split the two conditions into two camps and not admitt:
I am a flesh and blood person that sins from time to time.
I have the mind of Christ in me. With dominion over my flesh.

Oh well. Pound the Missisippi Rednecks
eddif
 
The only question that remains is why the Bible NO WHERE states that salvation can be lost for any reason, if that is true.
One reason for losing eternal life that the Bible plainly gives us is that a person adds to, or takes away from the words of Revelation:

"18I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; 19and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book." (Revelation 22:18-19 NASB bold and underline mine)

But you say the Bible no where states that salvation can be lost for any reason, in effect taking away the words of the prophecy of Revelation. You claim that to not be in the city and have no part of the tree of life does not mean loss of eternal life but is rather only a loss of heavenly reward, not a loss of salvation/eternal life. But the whole counsel of Revelation is clear that if you are not in the city you have part in the lake of fire.

please explain how the lake of fire can be ANYWHERE on the new earth.
It makes no difference where it is, or what the concept of it actually is all about. The point is, it is outside of the city, and if you are not in the city of God you are outside of it and have no eternal life:

"14Blessed are those who wash their robes, so that they may have the right to the tree of life, and may enter by the gates into the city. 15Outside (of the city) are the dogs and the sorcerers and the immoral persons and the murderers and the idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices lying."
"8“But for the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.”" (Revelation 22:14-15 NASB, Revelation 21:6-8 NASB bold, underline, and parenthesis mine, italics in original)

But you are claiming that to not be in the city is simply a loss of reward, not a loss of eternal life. But the passages above plainly say that to be outside of the city is to have your part in the lake of fire.

I find it incredibly ironic that claiming to not have access to the city, and the river, and tree of life does not mean you do not have eternal life is actually doing the very thing that will result in one losing their eternal life.


No one has proven your claim here about the river being eternal life and those not in the city are in the lake of fire. Opinions need support from Scripture, which hasn't been given.
The Bible plainly says in the passages I posted above that if you are not in the city with access to the tree of life then you are with those outside of the city whose "part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone" (Revelation 21:8 NASB italics in original). That's not my opinion. It's what the plain words of scripture I quoted above say. Those who take away or add to the words of the Revelation prophecy have their part in the city taken away and instead go outside of the city and have their part in the lake of fire. That is what scripture plainly says.

Please provide an actual verse, so I can know what you're referring to. Then I'll answer your question.
I don't understand how you could have missed them the other times I've posted them, but here they are again:
"8“If your hand or your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it from you; it is better for you to enter life crippled or lame, than to have two hands or two feet and be cast into the eternal fire. 9“If your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out and throw it from you. It is better for you to enter life with one eye, than to have two eyes and be cast into the fiery hell." (Matthew 18:8-9 NASB)

The stumbling Jesus is talking about results in being cast into the lake of fire. But it is claimed that a believer can not stumble so as to lose their eternal life. Obviously, the next argument is going to be that Jesus is not talking about believers. But Jesus himself said in plain words that he is in fact talking about causing believers to stumble:

"6 ...whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea." (Matthew 18:6 NASB bold and underline mine)


The only question that remains is why the Bible NO WHERE states that salvation can be lost for any reason, if that is true.
The question does not remain for the person who acknowledges the plain words of scripture I've been posting. The one who believes in Christ can stumble so as to lose eternal life, and the person who adds to or subtracts from the words of Revelation will have their part of the city taken away and instead have their part in the lake of fire. Eternal life can indeed be lost.
 
Romans 7:25 KJV
I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

Does the sin in this verse have dominion? No! Absolutely Not!

Does the law of God through Jesus Christ guarantee the Lambs book of life? Absolutely!

Romans 7:25 is a verse with two conditions in one sentence.

Why do we have to split the two conditions into two camps and not admitt:
I am a flesh and blood person that sins from time to time.
I have the mind of Christ in me. With dominion over my flesh.

Oh well. Pound the Missisippi Rednecks
eddif
Being a weak and/or ignorant sinner growing up into Christ is one thing, but the one thing you can not be is an unbeliever. That is what will cause one to lose their eternal life. That's why we are exhorted to continue in the word of the gospel to the very end (1 Corinthians 15:1-2 NASB), and to exhort others to do the same.
 
Being a weak and/or ignorant sinner growing up into Christ is one thing, but the one thing you can not be is an unbeliever. That is what will cause one to lose their eternal life. That's why we are exhorted to continue in the word of the gospel to the very end (1 Corinthians 15:1-2 NASB), and to exhort others to do the same.
So we believe in the work of Christ to the end and are saved. We do not return again to repentance and depend on our works.

OC we do works (which can never bring righteousness).
NC we confess our sins and depend on Christ Jesus and are saved.

We honestly see through a glass darkly:
Confess we know not how to pray as we ought.
Romans 8:26 KJV
Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.

Depend on spiritual gifts.
Ephesians 4:8 KJV
Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
..........
We do not return to temporal:
II Chronicles 7:14
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

19 But if ye turn away, and forsake my statutes and my commandments, which I have set before you, and shall go and serve other gods, and worship them;
20 Then will I pluck them up by the roots out of my land which I have given them; and this house, which I have sanctified for my name, will I cast out of my sight, and will make it to be a proverb and a byword among all nations.
...........
We do see Jesus saving:
I John 1:9
If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
........

We have weaknesses (we do not wallow in those weaknesses).
We have strengths in Christ Jesus. ( it is not us but Christ that works in us).
........
We preach not ourselves
II Corinthians 4:5 KJV
For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake.

Holiness of Christ

Redneck
eddif
 
The New Jerusalem is not heaven, but is coming down out of heaven.
I should suggest an understanding:
Thy kingdom come thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.......

The New Jerusalem is that in us (IMHO).

And I absolutely see this through a glass darkly.
 
I agree.

I also agree that these discussion's are rough, but at some point Christians must be able to eat "meat" and not just milk only.

I am someone who has been rescued by The Lord Jesus Christ from a back-sliden lifestyle, more than once, not really knowing what the bible said about these things.

Once I began to study the words and meanings, of the language used by Jesus and the Apostles, I realized I had no excuse for the carnal, on again, off again lifestyle as well as the careless immature approach to God's word.

As a new Christian, and later young Christian, I knew about how much God loved me and His grace covered me, just like any baby and toddler would experience.

Later as a "teenager Christian", knowing just enough to be dangerous, I found myself on the receiving end of some bitter correction from the Lord.

Like the story of the Shepherd who must deal harshly with the ever wandering sheep, and ends up breaking the sheep's leg, and then carrying the sheep until his leg heals, is a good description of the Lord "breaking me" from wandering.

He loves us more than we could ever know. His mercy is never ending, and His grace is truly amazing.

However, He is just and righteous, and holy as well.

His word is true, and can not be redefined, or deceitfully tampered with, as if that would somehow make His word change to suit our own belief's, or doctrine, or traditions.

3 But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as is fitting for saints; 4 neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. 5 For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. 6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.7 Therefore do not be partakers with them.

8 For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light 9 (for the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness, righteousness, and truth), 10 finding out what is acceptable to the Lord.11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret. 13 But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the light, for whatever makes manifest is light. Ephesians 5:3-13


Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. Therefore do not be partakers with them.

Paul warns us not to be a partaker of God's wrath, with them.

JLB
Hi JLB,
Thanks for such a wonderful explanation of why you are so insistent with your beliefs, which are correct, of course.

If anyone has any doubt that Ephesians 5:3-5 and more, is speaking to Christians, they are not reading the same epistle as written by Paul.


Wondering
 
Back
Top