Hi savedbygrave57,
Readers should not be confused when you speak about the 'deity of Christ' or the 'Trinity' because these were articulated in the Early Church Councils - and there is no mention of Jesus being an Archangel. There were however, heretical groups who always managed to twist the Christology by either denying the Divinity of Christ or His humanity. That's why all the alarm bells went off when I examined your statements concerning Christ's human nature.
The Confession of Chalcedon 451AD, provides a clear statement on the human and divine nature of Christ:
We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach people to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body; consubstantial [co-essential] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood; in all things like unto us, without sin; begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; (ἐν δύο φύσεσιν ἀσυγχύτως, ἀτρέπτως, ἀδιαιρέτως, ἀχωρίστως – in duabus naturis inconfuse, immutabiliter, indivise, inseparabiliter) the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person (prosopon) and one Subsistence (hypostasis), not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten God (μονογενῆ Θεὸν), the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ; as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us.
This is what the Church has always believed throughout every age about Christ and His Divine and Human nature. Notice the expression 'born of the Virgin Mary' - as per our previous discussion.
Now I invite you to list men historically who have taught that Christ is the Archangel Micheal. You have claimed the Baptist John Gill did. Really? According to wiki he was Calvinistic in salvation history and affirmed the Trinity which you cannot affirm with your present Christology.
