Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is Matthew 24:34 grounds for skepticism?

Hi Wheat Field
Just to be clear - are you saying that the great distress of Mat. 24:21 has already occurred? Jesus clearly links the abomination with such a calamity - he tells Israeli's to flee. If the worst has already happened then what of the end of the age? Surely that will be when the worst will happen?
No, the end of the age is still to come. What I'm saying is that Jesus talked about the temple being torn down and as regards the tearing down of the temple, he warned those in Judea to flee. That ends the discussion regarding the question of 'when' the temple was going to be destroyed that the disciples had asked him.

1 Jesus left the temple and was walking away when his disciples came up to him to call his attention to its buildings.
2 “Do you see all these things?” he asked. “Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.” (this is a comment that Jesus made to his disciples as they walked out of the temple heading towards the Mount of Olives)

3 As Jesus was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately. “Tell us,” they said, “when will this happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” (This is a later time then the first comment that Jesus made to his disciples.)
4 Jesus answered: “Watch out that no one deceives you. (Now Jesus begins telling them of many things that are going to be happening up to the end of the age.)
5 For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Messiah,’ and will deceive many.
6 You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come.
7 Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places.
8 All these are the beginning of birth pains.
9 “Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me.
10 At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other,
11 and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people.
12 Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold,
13 but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.
14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.


15 “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand— (Now Jesus has come back to answer the questions asked and he begins by telling them more specifically about the destruction of the temple that came in 70 A.D.)
16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.
17 Let no one on the housetop go down to take anything out of the house.
18 Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak.
19 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers!
20 Pray that your flight will not take place in winter or on the Sabbath.


21 For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now—and never to be equaled again. (Jesus is now moving to what will be the sign of his coming.)
22 “If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened.
23 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it.
24 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.
25 See, I have told you ahead of time.
26 “So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it.
27 For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man.
28 Wherever there is a carcass, there the vultures will gather.
29 “Immediately after the distress of those days “ ‘the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’
30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.
31 And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other. (this is the end of the age)

32 “Now learn this lesson from the fig tree: As soon as its twigs get tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near. (Here, he circles back around to the destruction of the temple and notes that it is the beginning of all of this times of trouble and great tribulation to come.)
33 Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it is near, right at the door.
34 Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.
35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.

Three questions. Three answers.

But look, you've read the Scriptures through and you 've come to this one point of which you don't seem to be able to understand what Jesus meant when he said it, and on that you're basing the fact that it's good for you to not have fallen into the trap all those others who say they are christians have fallen into. You know! The blind leading the blind and all that, right?

I've offered you now a perfectly logical and completely sensible explanation. That this passage shows Jesus answering three question asked of him by his disciples. One of those answers was something that was going to happen before the generation standing before him had all passed away. That did happen. As I explained Antichus Epiphanies desecrated the temple and then destroyed it with his armies. The rest of Jesus' response was to answer the other two questions. And they do. He tells them of the signs that they should keep watch for that would bring on his return and then tells them the signs they will see of the end of the age.

It's all really very plain and simple. Although, even us believers have made this passage tougher than it needs to be. Jesus doesn't lie. He could not have lied to us. If he did he would not be the Messiah and Daniel's prophetic account would not have been fulfilled.

If you would like to know more about 'who' Jesus is, I'll be happy to help. But if you're intent is to continue living in ignorance because you believe that you have found a piece of God's word that denies the truth of God's word? Naaaah! That ain't happenin'.

God bless,
Ted
 
I am pretty sure we are on the same page (in the sense that this is the only way to uphold Jesus's divinity and not render him a false prophet).

Even so, every time I get to v.34 - Truly, I tell you, this generation shall certainly not pass until all these things have happened - my logical mind seems to flick back to the disciples as the ones he is addressing. I think this is because otherwise his words seem ambiguous. We have to infer 'this' generation' as the generation that sees the abomination and then infer that 'all these things' is all the rest of what follows the abomination - the great distress, the sun darkening etc, the coming of Jesus and the gathering of the elect.

I keep finding myself asking - could Jesus have been clearer - could he not have anticipated the confusion this verse has caused (as in C. S. Lewis as mentioned in the OP).

Do we infer that Jesus knew his words would be recorded and therefore anticipated that anyone who should read them could possibly be one of those to whom he was really addressing when he said, 'this generation'? Thinking in this way adds a degree of complexity to what would otherwise be a straightforward understand of grammar. Further, Jesus could not exclude those alive at the time he delivered this Olivet discourse - he says in v.36 that ONLY the father know the day and the hour.

I still can't quite fathom all these threads; it should be the case that Jesus used just the right form of words to effectively convey his meaning - otherwise my charge (and others) that they leave room for skepticism is a valid one.
The only reason verses become confusing is that many teach with a logical jump on the money bandwagon for self gain. I have sat under so many teachings in my 69 years as I had to get to the place where I threw all those teachings in the garbage and prayed asking the Holy Spirit teach me. If one is not called and anointed by the Holy Spirit than all they are teaching is that of a carnal mind of things that make sense to them. Many use only one verse and take it out of context with the whole of scriptures and that only leads to the various teachings that are out there that are not of God.
 
You said that, 'rejecting what Christ taught is the abomination that causes desolation.' How does Matthew 24:15 still make sense if that is correct?

“So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand— "
The High Priests' office was between God and man, not against God.
Why would Jesus make reference to 'the holy place' if the abomination is his own rejection?
Because the Most Holy was behind the veil,

he opened for us through the curtain, that is through his flesh Heb.10:20 ESV

The imagery is of God Himself behind the veil. He soeaks of how Aaron and all others had to leave, but after the Eternal High Priest sprinkled His blood on His Throne... He sat down. And Annas and/or Caiaphas stood in the holy place after sinning against Him.
If we assume you are right then Jesus is telling his disciples to flee to the mountains immediately at the moment he is rejected. It was really then that occurred the most awful distress that will never be repeated?
I believe Jesus was making reference to this,

And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah and the LORD my God shall come and all the saints with thee. Zech.14:5 KJV

Azal can be thought of as the height of the mountain. The idea is the valley or low position was filled until it reached the top. It's also true that the Messiah leveled "mountains" in the sense of the temple hierarchy.
Again, please correct me if I am wrong for this makes no sense to me.
It makes no sense to anyone who isn't astounded by Jesus defeating death. If anyone is looking for a sign to top that forget it.
 
It makes no sense to anyone who isn't astounded by Jesus defeating death. If anyone is looking for a sign to top that forget it.
I'd say that's an accurate statement.

Faith comes from believing. And for the Gentile, that belief starts with Jesus. Find out who he is first, then a lot of what you don't understand will be made plain.

God bless, and if I can help in that, please let me know.
Ted
 
I'd say that's an accurate statement.

Faith comes from believing. And for the Gentile, that belief starts with Jesus. Find out who he is first, then a lot of what you don't understand will be made plain.

God bless, and if I can help in that, please let me know.
Ted
Thanks Ted.
For many years I sat in church never really understanding Gods' grace. I look at how ungracious Jesus was treated and can't believe I ever thought a God of grace would approve of such evil. And it wasn't until God showed me how proud He was that His Son chose not to annihilate miserable useless liars speaking in His name.
Attempting to call God a liar?

These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: Pro.6:16 KJV
 
Hi journeyman

Well, the greatest example that God has ever given us of His pure love for us, is that while we were yet sinners, He gave the life of His one and only Son that we might be saved from the consequences of our sin. That's a power of love that most of us humans wouldn't even consider for someone else. He allowed His Son, the Son of the living God, to be humiliated, beaten, spat upon and jeered in front of crowds of people and watched as we carried him out to Golgotha and took his life. That God loves us!

God bless,
Ted
 
Hi journeyman

Well, the greatest example that God has ever given us of His pure love for us, is that while we were yet sinners, He gave the life of His one and only Son that we might be saved from the consequences of our sin. That's a power of love that most of us humans wouldn't even consider for someone else. He allowed His Son, the Son of the living God, to be humiliated, beaten, spat upon and jeered in front of crowds of people and watched as we carried him out to Golgotha and took his life. That God loves us!

God bless,
Ted
I understand how our Savior chose to endure sin against Himself, rather than destroy sinners. All sin against Him must be repented of,

When the sentence for a crime is not quickly carried out, people’s hearts are filled with schemes to do wrong. Although a wicked person who commits a hundred crimes may live a long time, I know that it will go better with those who fear God, who are reverent before him. Yet because the wicked do not fear God, it will not go well with them, and their days will not lengthen like a shadow. Eec.8:11-14 NIV
 
Interesting thanks - but that still leaves us with no answer, surely? The skeptic will continue to point to these verses and claim them as reason for doubt. Jesus predicted more than the destruction of the temple - he specifically references his return.

On Mark

The difficulty is analysing into the C21 Western pattern, what Jesus in a C1 Jewish, had said about what. It can help to note that Lk.21:7 removed Mark’s all (παντα). Thus Mk.13:4 ταυτα/παντα ταυτα (these things/all these things) is Heb. parallelism, reducing in common speech to ταυτα/ταυτα—ie not a different set of things but things about the geographic temple, the things they had asked about per Mark's account. Thus, Mk.13:29-30 (Mark’s ταυτα/παντα ταυτα) likewise reduces in common terms to ταυτα/ταυτα.

The disciples’ ταυτα Q was about the geographic temple: when and what forewarnings? They were ethnocentric, parochial, unable to see spiritual hope if the Sinai temple and national centre were destroyed. Jesus expanded their concerns, wherein lies our problems. He spoke of two age-ending events: the ethnic Jerusalem’s demise now past; his return still future.

After various general warnings of the future (13:5-13)—deceptions, calamities, persecutions—Jesus returned to the forewarning of the temple’s fate (and Jerusalem’s) in 13:14-23 and 28-31. Once the temple was defiled (14), its fate (its τελος/end: 7) and that of its city, was sealed.

The expanded point beyond Jerusalem’s tribulation (24), was of Jesus’ (son of man) return (24-7).

He returned to their Q (Fig Tree illustration: 28-31), with ταυτα/ταυτα being “these things you have asked about”, a not insignificant event sparked by Ethnic Israel’s failure to read that messiah had come and by fulfilment had obsoleted their city and temple. Seeking to uphold both, Ethnic Israel hacked off Rome (as Ukraine has Russia?) and bore its vengeance. God helped a bit, even as he has done in many a war (18—it happened in Summer; 20), but he had removed his special covenant and special protection. And thus desacralised, Roman politics rolled over Ethnic Israel’s.

As to the wider theme of his return, 32-7 speaks beyond that C1 generation (30) into church history: as C S Lewis put it, sentries should always be on guard and ready for inspection.

In short, the Q was about the temple’s demise (these things: ταυτα). Jesus followed the Q with more important and general warnings about persecution against his disciples up to and also beyond the then soon fate of Jerusalem which their generation witnessed.

Mt.24:3 combines another theme the disciples had asked, but Mark’s rendering, written before AD 70 (temple’s end), focused his readers on the soon-to-be demise of the temple, and some related and beyond issues up to messiah’s return. Jesus did not predict a C1 return; Jesus did predict a C1 temple demise.

This is but a sketch, and really digging deeper verse by verse, is something you could well do on your own. Among the many good and bad commentaries, I’d suggest such as R H Stein on Mark, and D A Carson on Matthew (Kindle is a handy format). Any good commentary will exhibit and analyse alternative ideas.
 
I would also point out the fact that just because you and C.S. made a mistake with regard to that particular passage it in no way negates the fact that the disciples had good information to believe that Christ's return for them was a
separate event not connected to the pre-end of the age, and prior to a third temple being constructed .
 
Matthew 24:34
Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.
He is speaking of the generation in which these signs unfold.

Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it is near, right at the door. 34 Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.

Paul stated the one who sits in the temple of God declaring to be God will be destroyed by a coming of Jesus.
Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to Him....

Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction.

He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.
And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming

That didn't happen in the 1st century.

But this will be a sign that can't be mistaken. Rev 11 1260 days as I read.
 
C.S. Lewis, author and lay Anglican theologian wrote the following (from 'The world's last night and other essays' - 1960):

"Say what you like" we shall be told, "the apocalyptic beliefs of the first Christians have been proved to be false. It is clear from the New Testament that they all expected the Second Coming in their own lifetime. And, worse still, they had a reason, and one which you will find very embarrassing. Their Master had told them so. He shared, and indeed created, their delusion. He said in so many words, 'this generation shall not pass till all these things be done.' And he was wrong. He clearly knew no more about the end of the world than anyone else."

It is certainly the most embarrassing verse in the Bible. Yet how teasing, also, that within fourteen words of it should come the statement "But of that day and that
hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are In heaven, neither the Son, but the Father"

I will admit that this issue makes me skeptical about Jesus. What do you say?
What "things" was Jesus talking about.
Mat 24:2 And Jesus said to them, "Do you not see all these things? Assuredly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, that shall not be thrown down."

Sounds like "all these things" meant the stones of the Temple.

Mat 24:3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, "Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?"

When will the stones of the Temple be thrown down, your coming and the end of the AGE happen? Jesus is not talking about the end of the world or His coming back at the "end of the world."

He is talking about something that would happen in around 40 years. The tearing down of the Temple and Jesus rising from the dead was the end of the Old Covenant age and the beginning of the New.

Mat 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.
Again the word there "world" is oikoumenē and basically means all the land or the Roman Empire. Read the book of Acts. This happened before the book of Acts ended.

Mat 24:15 "Therefore when you see the 'ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION,' spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place" (whoever reads, let him understand),
Mat 24:16 "then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.

Gee, I wonder what this means. Luke tells us.
Luk 21:20 "But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near.
Luk 21:21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains,

Apparently the Abomination of Desolation was when Jerusalem was surrounded by Roman soldiers and the Temple tore down "not one stone left upon another." Agaian, 70 AD about 30-40 years after Jesus spoke.

Mat 24:21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be.

Read Josephus' account. If Jesus says it was worst than the Holocaust, you never experienced either of them, how do you know?

Mat 24:29 "Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken.

Oh wow! That's gotta be the end of the universe. Not really. Just apocalyptic language. Read Isaiah 13 about God's prophecies about Babylon long before Jesus came. Then verse 10 says:
For the stars of heaven and their constellations
Will not flash forth their light;
The sun will be dark when it rises
And the moon will not shed its light.


Not the end of the universe yet, just the ending of the Old Covenant age.

This is getting long and most of you will just dismiss it as junk, so I will quit here. But, there are other answers in understanding what Jesus really meant, rather than just saying He was a false prophet because you misunderstand what
 
In looking into this subject I realize I don't know enough
What "things" was Jesus talking about.
Mat 24:2 And Jesus said to them, "Do you not see all these things? Assuredly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, that shall not be thrown down."

Sounds like "all these things" meant the stones of the Temple.

Mat 24:3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, "Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?"

When will the stones of the Temple be thrown down, your coming and the end of the AGE happen? Jesus is not talking about the end of the world or His coming back at the "end of the world."

He is talking about something that would happen in around 40 years. The tearing down of the Temple and Jesus rising from the dead was the end of the Old Covenant age and the beginning of the New.

Mat 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.
Again the word there "world" is oikoumenē and basically means all the land or the Roman Empire. Read the book of Acts. This happened before the book of Acts ended.

Mat 24:15 "Therefore when you see the 'ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION,' spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place" (whoever reads, let him understand),
Mat 24:16 "then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.

Gee, I wonder what this means. Luke tells us.
Luk 21:20 "But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near.
Luk 21:21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains,

Apparently the Abomination of Desolation was when Jerusalem was surrounded by Roman soldiers and the Temple tore down "not one stone left upon another." Agaian, 70 AD about 30-40 years after Jesus spoke.

Mat 24:21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be.

Read Josephus' account. If Jesus says it was worst than the Holocaust, you never experienced either of them, how do you know?

Mat 24:29 "Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken.

Oh wow! That's gotta be the end of the universe. Not really. Just apocalyptic language. Read Isaiah 13 about God's prophecies about Babylon long before Jesus came. Then verse 10 says:
For the stars of heaven and their constellations
Will not flash forth their light;
The sun will be dark when it rises
And the moon will not shed its light.


Not the end of the universe yet, just the ending of the Old Covenant age.

This is getting long and most of you will just dismiss it as junk, so I will quit here. But, there are other answers in understanding what Jesus really meant, rather than just saying He was a false prophet because you misunderstand what
Jesus includes his return in the 'all these things' - but you didn't mention it - can I ask why?

Matthew 24:30
“Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth[c] will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory."
 
Jesus includes his return in the 'all these things' - but you didn't mention it - can I ask why?
Your jumping from verse 2 clear to verse 30.
Mat 24:1 Then Jesus went out and departed from the temple, and His disciples came up to show Him the buildings of the temple. 2 And Jesus said to them, "Do you not see all these things? Assuredly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, that shall not be thrown down."

He says "do you see all these things" then he talks about stones being thrown down.
Then the next verse sounds like something that happened at a different time.
Mat 24:3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying . . .
So this seems to start a whole new conversation.

But notice verse 30: Mat 24:30 Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven . . .
It doesn't say anything about His return. It you will see the sign of the Son of Man.

Mat 26:64 Jesus said to him, "It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven."

Jesus told the High Priest standing right before Him 2,000 years ago these things. The High Priest was supposed to see these things hereafter. Again, the "coming on the clouds of heaven" is an Old Testament use of God coming in judgment on a nation.

Isa 19:1 The burden against Egypt. Behold, the LORD rides on a swift cloud, And will come into Egypt; The idols of Egypt will totter at His presence, And the heart of Egypt will melt in its midst.

The Egyptians never saw God riding down on a cloud.

Psa 68:4 Sing to God, sing praises to His name; Extol Him who rides on the clouds, By His name YAH, And rejoice before Him.

It is also possible that the "sign" the High Priest saw was probably just a little ways away
Mat 27:51 Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split,

Heb 9:7 But into the second part the high priest went alone once a year, not without blood, which he offered for himself and for the people's sins committed in ignorance;
Heb 9:8 the Holy Spirit indicating this, that the way into the Holiest of All was not yet made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing.

The tearing of the veil showed that the way into the Holiest is now open. That should have been a sign for the High Priest
 
? Could you explain please Consecrated Life?
If your understanding of Matthew 24:34 is correct , why would the tiny nation of Israel have eyes of the whole world fixed upon it and it's violence today in 2024 ?
How could we be watching the table being set between Israel and the whole hateful world against it perfectly for everything that Christ said was to follow , if He was wrong ?
Somebody lacks understanding , and for me the world aligned against Israel in 2024 tells me it is not Jesus who lacked understanding.
 
If your understanding of Matthew 24:34 is correct , why would the tiny nation of Israel have eyes of the whole world fixed upon it and it's violence today in 2024 ?
How could we be watching the table being set between Israel and the whole hateful world against it perfectly for everything that Christ said was to follow , if He was wrong ?
Somebody lacks understanding , and for me the world aligned against Israel in 2024 tells me it is not Jesus who lacked understanding.
I do NOT assert that Christ was wrong. I am merely asking for a satisfactory explanation of Matthew 24:34, Mark 13:20 and Luke 21:32.

I do think and agree there is a significance to the fact that Israel is surrounded by enemies and that the whole world may end up siding with them if they haven't already.

That Jews exist, that Israel even exists is extremely significant I would say. It would have been very possible for Jews to have disappeared forever as a recognisable people and for Israel to have never become a nation again. That didn't happen and the Bible could easily have become meaningless if it had.
 
Back
Top