Do you think you are a Prophet?
Do you think Christians should be studying and then obeying Old Testamnet written law? I'd appreciate just a simple yes or no just so I can figure out your position.
Friend: Never would I baptise one who would not accept the Lords Everlasting Gospel of Rev. 14:6 & His Eternal Covenant of Heb. 13:20. Psalms 19:7-10 finds the ones not ready as of yet when they flunk this test!
I think that what he is saying is that the Gospel has been the same since the beginning of time. And the fact that the Law of Faith that is written on our hearts, in and of itself, fulfills the written law of the Old Testament.
Christ came not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it. God is love. The whole of the written law could be summed up into those two commandments that deal with love. The Law of Faith that is written on our hearts at new birth, contains the fulfillment of the written law of the Old Testament. Is this making sense?
So I think, but by all means let him be the final word, but I think that what he is saying is that when a person does not desire the things of God DEEP within them, there is something wrong.
We being a trinity in ourselves; our heart/soul, our mind/spirit, and our body/flesh. When we just see the drive to do things in our mind/spirit, that does not mean that the heart/soul has been changed. Many people can "be" one thing and "do" another.
God instantaneous changes our hearts/soul. Then the process begins in our minds/spirit through the Holy Spirit, and our body/flesh is gradually changed even though it will one day perish. What Elijah is saying, I think, is that a person can "profess" to believe and follow the commandments of God, but if their heart has not been changed they really have no desire for it, and therefore they will not follow it.
But...I might be wrong. He might be indicating that we have to follow the written law of the Old Testament. But I think that he is simply[in his cryptic way] trying to say that if there is no love for ALL of God's commands, old or new, then the change has not happened in the heart, and we should not try to convince a person who really has not had the change happen that the change has happened.
How many times, in how many churches, have we only given part of the Gospel, and then convince people that they have heard the full Gospel, and that although they might not understand it, a change has happened?
I am sorry, well no I am not sorry, but I am sickened that people think that a new heart can be put into someone and they not know it. If God does a work inside of you...you will know it. There is no way a Holy and Living God can REMOVE a heart of stone, and REPLACE it with a heart of flesh that has His Law of Faith written on it, and the person not know it. They might not understand what happened, I did not at first, but they will know it!
I would like to ask Elijah to list the differences between the gospel that is preached by "the Rev. 17:1-5 ones" and the Eternal Gospel of Rev. 14:6?
I would also like him to expound on;
Lets see Peter with his THREE TIME VISION mind you, and still he would not accept it as it sounded! Why?? And how did he put God FIRST as above, and that was mandatory?? Read it & see if you can see why Peter did not believe that it meant what most of the Rev. 17:1-5 ones even teach & believe today about the 'common or unclean' beasts & creeping things. Sure Peter [saw these prohibited things in the vision], (and you can only read of them in Lev. 11) But why was he not going to eat them??