I said this:
"That's not what's being communicated from your posts. If one does see eternal security in
Eph 1:13,
14 as being claimed, then that one CANNOT believe that those who have been sealed can become unsealed or out of union with Christ.
So, please explain this dichotomy."
Of course I see it. My comment is that from your posts, it seems you're not seeing it.
If you really do see eternal security, why do your posts communicate the possibility of becoming unsealed or out of union with Christ.
If one who has believed and been sealed can become unsealed or out of union with Christ, they have no security.
Well, of course many on this forum deny eternal security. That's the debate we're having. Since John 10:28 is quite clear about eternal security, many are not seeing it.
Of course I understand many have denied it. Burt that is in spite of the extremely clear words about eternal security that Jesus promised.
Sure. Let's say you have a huge pimple on your nose. Of course you can deny it all you want, but the pimple is still there
We're not talking about what has been offered. Jesus was talking about what has been RECEIVED.
Just like your pimple, once a person receives eternal life, it's THEIRS and Jesus promises they will never perish.
[QQUOTE]Yea, I was kind of hoping you could show where in that verse it said salvation cannot be lost.
it's quite clear. The words "WILL NEVER PERISH" means just that. What do you think it means?