Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jn 3:5

Really nothing to do with water!
Then they are led by us to a place where there is water
Nothing to do with water?
Nothing to do with BAPTISM.
Now you change the question to be about water and not baptism.
Please stick to the topic at hand.
and they are reborn in the same kind of rebirth in which we ourselves were reborn: In the name of God, the Lord and Father of all, and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit, they receive the washing of water.
Nothing to do with water?
I explained this already.
Not about baptism doing the work but with baptism being the outward performance of a God work on the inside.

Nothing to do with being reborn?
Now you want to talk about being reborn.
Why are you shifting the sights every time I make a post you don't like.
For Christ said, 'Unless you be reborn, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven.'...The reason for doing this, we have learned from the Apostles".
Nothing to do with nothing reborn?
And they learnt of this from the apostles.
Again you are shifting things away from how you originally posted them.
This quote is about being reborn.... and baptism is not mentioned.
So a swing and a miss again.
 
John 3:6 says you are wrong.

No it doesn't.
John 3:6... two births. John 3:5 separates water from Spirit as well.
No, Jesus is talking about one new birth - born again by water and spirit

No. No. No.
Unless you can actually show your work.
Did your math teacher never teach you to show your work?

Yes, Yes, Yes.
Nope. I just poked holes in every argument you made.
And I am binge watching an old series on the computer.
This argument does not even take a fraction of my energy.
So not very strong argument.
Address my argument. Instead of just screaming that you are right.... prove me wrong... using my argument and references.

You are deluding yourself.
Your argument is false.
 
I showed you how one of your references backs my position and not yours.
So your cache of sources against me grows smaller every time you bring them up.
So I guess you can bring up another and I could shoot it down for you... if you wish.

No you didn't shoot anything down.
 
Nothing to do with BAPTISM.
Now you change the question to be about water and not baptism.
Please stick to the topic at hand.

Yes it is about baptism. It is in baptism with water that our sins are forgiven and we are born again/anew.
That is why they were led to a place where the was water.

I explained this already.
Not about baptism doing the work but with baptism being the outward performance of a God work on the inside.
Of course the water itself isn't doing anything. The Holy Spirit does the renewal when we are baptised in water.


Now you want to talk about being reborn.
Why are you shifting the sights every time I make a post you don't like.

I'm not shifting.
The whole is in John 3:5 - which is the topic is about being reborn.
Again you are shifting things away from how you originally posted them.
This quote is about being reborn.... and baptism is not mentioned.
So a swing and a miss again.
You are still not understanding.
It is when we are baptised in water that we are renewed by the Holy Spirit.
Titus 3:5 he saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit,
 
But Nicodemus makes absolutely no mention of baptism, John or Jewish washing ceremonies.
Nicodemus only references birth... so the water is natural birth.
This is your own logic working against your argument.
Not at all. Nicodemus is trying to understand what Jesus meant by being "born again." Nothing more. It is Jesus who brings up "born of water."

Jesus first expands on what he means by being "born again" in verse 3, with being "born of water and the Spirit" in verse 5. Then, in verse 6 he addresses more directly the questions of Nicodemus in verse 4. Jesus cannot be saying that "born of flesh" refers to "born of water," since both "born of water and Spirit" are what it means to be "born again." To say that "born of water" refers to physical birth is to limit being "born again" to only being "born of the Spirit."

The word is water not the water is the word.
So this does not refer to baptism.

Washing of regeneration. Not the washing with water.
Again this is not about baptism but the work of the Holy Spirit which baptism indicates to others.

And here we have the work of God not the washing by the hands of man.
And, what did I say? That being born of water points to repentance and purification, but that it is pointless (useless and ineffective) if not done by the Holy Spirit. I was not saying that those verses refer to water baptism per se, but rather to the work of the Holy Spirit.

Here part of what M. R. Vincent states on John 3:5:

"Thus Jesus' words included a prophetic reference to the complete ideal of Christian baptism - “the washing of regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Ghost” (Tit_3:5; Eph_5:26); according to which the two factors are inseparably blended (not the one swallowed up by the other), and the new life is inaugurated both symbolically in the baptism with water, and actually in the renewing by the Holy Spirit, yet so as that the rite, through its association with the Spirit's energy, is more than a mere symbol: is a veritable vehicle of grace to the recipient, and acquires a substantial part in the inauguration of the new life. Baptism, considered merely as a rite, and apart from the operation of the Spirit, does not and cannot impart the new life. Without the Spirit it is a lie. It is a truthful sign only as the sign of an inward and spiritual grace."

Sure baptize disciples but there is no reference to baptism doing anything... other than be a symbol.
Where does Matt 28:19 refer to baptism only being a symbol? Don't overlook the fact that Jesus is commanding his followers to go baptize more followers, which is irrelevant as to whether or not baptism actually does something.

References required.
Act 2:38 And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Act 2:39 For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.”
Act 2:40 And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.”
Act 2:41 So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. (ESV)

Act 8:12 But when they believed Philip as he preached good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.
Act 8:13 Even Simon himself believed, and after being baptized he continued with Philip. And seeing signs and great miracles performed, he was amazed.
Act 8:14 Now when the apostles at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent to them Peter and John,
Act 8:15 who came down and prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit,
Act 8:16 for he had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Act 8:17 Then they laid their hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit. (ESV)

Act 8:35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning with this Scripture he told him the good news about Jesus.
Act 8:36 And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?”
Act 8:38 And he commanded the chariot to stop, and they both went down into the water, Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him. (ESV)

Act 9:17 So Ananias departed and entered the house. And laying his hands on him he said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus who appeared to you on the road by which you came has sent me so that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.”
Act 9:18 And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes, and he regained his sight. Then he rose and was baptized; (ESV)

Act 10:45 And the believers from among the circumcised who had come with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out even on the Gentiles.
Act 10:46 For they were hearing them speaking in tongues and extolling God. Then Peter declared,
Act 10:47 “Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?”
Act 10:48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to remain for some days. (ESV)

Act 16:14 One who heard us was a woman named Lydia, from the city of Thyatira, a seller of purple goods, who was a worshiper of God. The Lord opened her heart to pay attention to what was said by Paul.
Act 16:15 And after she was baptized, and her household as well, she urged us, saying, “If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come to my house and stay.” And she prevailed upon us. (ESV)

Act 18:8 Crispus, the ruler of the synagogue, believed in the Lord, together with his entire household. And many of the Corinthians hearing Paul believed and were baptized. (ESV)

Act 19:3 And he said, “Into what then were you baptized?” They said, “Into John's baptism.”
Act 19:4 And Paul said, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.”
Act 19:5 On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. (ESV)

Act 22:16 And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name.’ (ESV)

Note that in the last verse, where Paul is describing his conversion, baptism was to "wash away [his] sins." Taking water baptism as being the physical, symbolic act that describes the already completed inner work of the Holy Spirit, and being that Jesus commanded his followers to be baptized in water, this fully supports that being "born again" is to be "born of water and the Spirit."

If the Acts references are as weak as the references in this post, I do not predict much success for you.
You can stop with the snide remarks.

You are welcome to your personal beliefs but please don't teach them as doctrine.
It's the logical outcome of your position. All unborn human persons who fail to be born by water will not enter the kingdom of God. So, where do they go?
 
Not at all. Nicodemus is trying to understand what Jesus meant by being "born again." Nothing more. It is Jesus who brings up "born of water."
Your point is lost at sea.

Let's paraphrase the conversation.
Jesus says "be born again"
Nic says "how... I can't be naturally born twice." (note the idea of twice... or born another time)
Jesus says "be born of water then of Spirit"(Jesus addresses the again question that is stumping Nic)
Nic looks confused.
Jesus says "flesh gives birth to flesh"(that is one birth) "Spirit gives birth to spirit"(that is second birth)

Jesus first expands on what he means by being "born again" in verse 3, with being "born of water and the Spirit" in verse 5. Then, in verse 6 he addresses more directly the questions of Nicodemus in verse 4. Jesus cannot be saying that "born of flesh" refers to "born of water," since both "born of water and Spirit" are what it means to be "born again."
Now you are re-writing Jesus words.
You are reading your ideology into the passage.
To say that "born of water" refers to physical birth is to limit being "born again" to only being "born of the Spirit."
Now you are starting to understand what Jesus was saying.
That is a very accurate restating of the John 3 discussion with Nicodemus.
Physical birth is of no big deal(being a son of Abraham is not salvational).
Spiritual birth is the very idea Jesus was trying to communicate.
Very well put.
And, what did I say? That being born of water points to repentance and purification, but that it is pointless (useless and ineffective) if not done by the Holy Spirit. I was not saying that those verses refer to water baptism per se, but rather to the work of the Holy Spirit.
That is what the entire discussion is about.
Please read past posts to get up to speed.
Here part of what M. R. Vincent states on John 3:5:

"Thus Jesus' words included a prophetic reference to the complete ideal of Christian baptism - “the washing of regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Ghost” (Tit_3:5; Eph_5:26); according to which the two factors are inseparably blended (not the one swallowed up by the other), and the new life is inaugurated both symbolically in the baptism with water, and actually in the renewing by the Holy Spirit, yet so as that the rite, through its association with the Spirit's energy, is more than a mere symbol: is a veritable vehicle of grace to the recipient, and acquires a substantial part in the inauguration of the new life. Baptism, considered merely as a rite, and apart from the operation of the Spirit, does not and cannot impart the new life. Without the Spirit it is a lie. It is a truthful sign only as the sign of an inward and spiritual grace."
More extra Biblical teaches will not help our discussion.
People misinterpret the Bible all the time and then write a book about it.
The fastest way for you to lose respect in a discussion is to appeal to authority that is not authoritative.
Where does Matt 28:19 refer to baptism only being a symbol? Don't overlook the fact that Jesus is commanding his followers to go baptize more followers, which is irrelevant as to whether or not baptism actually does something.
When did Matt28:19 enter into the conversation.
Please stick to the topic at hand.
John 3:4-6.

So you say baptism does nothing.
Act 2:38 And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Act 2:39 For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.”
Act 2:40 And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.”
Act 2:41 So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls. (ESV)

Act 8:12 But when they believed Philip as he preached good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women.
Act 8:13 Even Simon himself believed, and after being baptized he continued with Philip. And seeing signs and great miracles performed, he was amazed.
Act 8:14 Now when the apostles at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent to them Peter and John,
Act 8:15 who came down and prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit,
Act 8:16 for he had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Act 8:17 Then they laid their hands on them and they received the Holy Spirit. (ESV)

Act 8:35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning with this Scripture he told him the good news about Jesus.
Act 8:36 And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?”
Act 8:38 And he commanded the chariot to stop, and they both went down into the water, Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him. (ESV)

Act 9:17 So Ananias departed and entered the house. And laying his hands on him he said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus who appeared to you on the road by which you came has sent me so that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.”
Act 9:18 And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes, and he regained his sight. Then he rose and was baptized; (ESV)

Act 10:45 And the believers from among the circumcised who had come with Peter were amazed, because the gift of the Holy Spirit was poured out even on the Gentiles.
Act 10:46 For they were hearing them speaking in tongues and extolling God. Then Peter declared,
Act 10:47 “Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?”
Act 10:48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to remain for some days. (ESV)

Act 16:14 One who heard us was a woman named Lydia, from the city of Thyatira, a seller of purple goods, who was a worshiper of God. The Lord opened her heart to pay attention to what was said by Paul.
Act 16:15 And after she was baptized, and her household as well, she urged us, saying, “If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come to my house and stay.” And she prevailed upon us. (ESV)

Act 18:8 Crispus, the ruler of the synagogue, believed in the Lord, together with his entire household. And many of the Corinthians hearing Paul believed and were baptized. (ESV)

Act 19:3 And he said, “Into what then were you baptized?” They said, “Into John's baptism.”
Act 19:4 And Paul said, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.”
Act 19:5 On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. (ESV)

Act 22:16 And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name.’ (ESV)

Note that in the last verse, where Paul is describing his conversion, baptism was to "wash away [his] sins." Taking water baptism as being the physical, symbolic act that describes the already completed inner work of the Holy Spirit, and being that Jesus commanded his followers to be baptized in water, this fully supports that being "born again" is to be "born of water and the Spirit."
This is not the direction the original thread was going in.
You are doing a Prov 26:17.
And no it does not support the argument.
You can stop with the snide remarks.
You can stop with your silly arguments. The language of the verses in question do not support your position.
I see you have the same understanding as Nicodemus.
It's the logical outcome of your position. All unborn human persons who fail to be born by water will not enter the kingdom of God. So, where do they go?
Now you think I am God?
 
Yes it is about baptism. It is in baptism with water that our sins are forgiven and we are born again/anew.
That is why they were led to a place where the was water.


Of course the water itself isn't doing anything. The Holy Spirit does the renewal when we are baptised in water.




I'm not shifting.
The whole is in John 3:5 - which is the topic is about being reborn.

You are still not understanding.
It is when we are baptised in water that we are renewed by the Holy Spirit.
Titus 3:5 he saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit,
Titus reference is not baptism unless you put baptism into it.
Try reading the Titus passage without the idea of baptism and it holds together just fine.
Water is not mentioned in the passage at all.
It is a work of the Spirit and not the work of water.
 
Titus reference is not baptism unless you put baptism into it.
Try reading the Titus passage without the idea of baptism and it holds together just fine.
Water is not mentioned in the passage at all.
It is a work of the Spirit and not the work of water.
It is about baptism.
You just don't understand baptism.
 
Any further snide remarks or personal attacks will result in being removed from this thread.
 
Titus reference is not baptism unless you put baptism into it.
Try reading the Titus passage without the idea of baptism and it holds together just fine.
Water is not mentioned in the passage at all.
It is a work of the Spirit and not the work of water.
Well you have not done anything to show that the Titus passage is about baptism.
Although baptism is not mentioned nor water you think the reference to washing fits your ideas.

I went through it all in posts #35 & #37.
You just choose to ignore the points I made.

I'm away for the next couple of days so I will leave you in your ignorance.
 
I went through it all in posts #35 & #37.
You just choose to ignore the points I made.

I'm away for the next couple of days so I will leave you in your ignorance.
I debunked all those points.
You fail to see my point.
Try just reading the story without your prejudice getting in the way.
How about you show the Nicodemus discussion to an atheist that has not preconceived religious bias.
Or ask an English teacher which theory is better explained by the text.
 
Baptismal Regeneration is a particular teaching that is taken from the Douay Rheims version : Catholic Bible.

It says. "born again BY water" In John 3

Christianity teaches that we are born again by the : "Holy Spirit".

Catholics, Jehovah's Witness, and a few others believe that "water washes away your sin".

God said that "without the shedding of Blood there is no remission or forgiveness of sin"...

So, it just depends on what you been taught to believe, and by whom.
That never changes.
Why can't the Spirit, the water, and the blood, all be one, like 1 John 5:8 says?
Does Jesus need to bleed every time a new convert is sanctified by His blood?
 
Back
Top