The command to repent only applies to doing evil, not to doing good. Sons of God are made all new and pure from lust of heart and sin and trespass. Sons are commanded to continue in the faith of obedience to the Son and the Father, and fall not to temptation and sin as the children of disobedience.
1 John{2:29} If ye know that he is righteous, ye know that every one that doeth righteousness is born of him.
3 John{1:11} Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God: but he that doeth evil hath not seen God.
No man doing unrighteousness and evil is born of God, whether Jew or Greek.
As the Bible plainly shows, the born-again person is placed in a new spiritual position "in Christ" the moment they are saved. But this
spiritual position doesn't translate into an instantly perfected practical condition. It is the project of spiritual maturation, of spiritual growth, to bring the believer's spiritual position and their daily condition closer and closer together. But there will never be, this side of the grave, perfect alignment of these two things.
As a baby grows, it learns to walk, and enlarges, changes what it eats, what interests it and begins to talk, etc. But, as a baby, it will clamor and complain, poop its pants, barf on others, scream if it doesn't get its way, and carry on in a selfish, messy, noisy manner. This doesn't mean the baby isn't a human being that will,
in time, grow into a mature, self-sufficient, strong adult. No, it just means the baby is just at the front end of the continuum of change it will pass through to adulthood.
You, though, seem to think the spiritual newborn ought to be carrying on exactly like a spiritual adult, that the spiritual baby ought to be eating meat, and walking about stably and strongly, as a spiritual adult does, without the stumbling, messy process - especially early on - that is an
unavoidable part of the growth process. But just as it is irrational to expect a human baby to behave as an adult, it is irrational to expect a spiritual baby to carry on as a spiritual adult. Before maturity, there is a necessary maturation process in both cases. As I've shown from God's word, this is the normal state-of-affairs for a child of God. Why are you denying what Scripture so plainly and repeatedly indicates?
Fair enough. Sinners that blame their flesh, or hold it in part responsible for their sinning, but never give their bodies any credit, nor responsibility for when they do something good.
When they sin, they say the flesh is sinful and to blamed, but when they do good, they do not say the flesh is good and to be thanked.
??? But what does the Bible say?
Galatians 6:7-8
7 Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap.
8 For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption...
Galatians 5:17
17 For the flesh sets its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; for these are in opposition to one another, so that you may not do the things that you please.
Romans 7:18
18 For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh; for the willing is present in me, but the doing of the good is not.
Romans 8:8
8 Those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
Philippians 3:3
3 ...have no confidence in the flesh.
It's the soul-separation doctrine of some Christians justifying themselves by faith alone.
Christians are justified by faith
in Jesus Christ. It is
the object of their faith, not their faith itself, that justifies them. This, the Bible makes crystal clear.
1 Corinthians 1:30
30 And because of him you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, justification and sanctification and redemption,
Romans 3:23-24
23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus,
Romans 3:25-28
25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins.
26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.
27 Then what becomes of our boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? By a law of works? No, but by the law of faith.
28 For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law.
Romans 5:8-9
8 but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.
9 Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God.
1 Corinthians 6:11
11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
It is neither the believer's works nor their faith that justifies them but the One in whom they trust: Jesus Christ.
They say the body is the old man that does all the sinning, and the believer is no more the one committing the sins, and so are not condemned for the sins of the body.
Well, some may say this, but I'm not. The Old Self is the ultimate source of all a believer's sin, as Paul explained in
Romans 6:6, but this fact doesn't mean the believer is not responsible for their sin. They most certainly are. But their sin doesn't fracture or dissolve their
relationship to God, only their
fellowship with Him. This is the terrible price the born-again person pays when they sin. They aren't, though,
condemned to hell by their sin, as the non-believer is; the sinning Christian doesn't stand under the wrath of God under which the unredeemed person stands (
John 3:36). They will be hardened by sin (
Hebrews 3:13), yes, and blinded and deafened by it, too, and they cannot enjoy intimate communion with God while caught in sin (
1 John 1:6), but their adoption into God's family is inviolate, grounded in Christ, as it is (
Hebrews 13:5; Romans 8:31-39; John 10:27-29).
Romans 7 is revealing the inner wretchedness of the double hearted in the faith.
This statement here just ignores everything I pointed out from the grammar of the passage. Why is this? It seems to me, your talking past what I showed, tacitly acknowledges that it's true but you have no answer except to resort to contradiction again.
Continued below.