I really don't know what you're saying here.No , I saw that. You attempted to add from Williamsons website to add fuel to Allen's fire in the OP. I simply informed you that what was being discussed was what you added at the end of your fuel.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I really don't know what you're saying here.No , I saw that. You attempted to add from Williamsons website to add fuel to Allen's fire in the OP. I simply informed you that what was being discussed was what you added at the end of your fuel.
Yes, it is the wrong forum. It should be in Apologetics or Theology.I'm going to leave this post now because of the content and motive of this thread appearing in the Christian advice and talk forum. No advice is being sought.
And would you discuss things and actually address points being made if this was moved to an appropriate forum?You all just want to talk about a Christian who doesn't meet the criteria you all think fits what is approved by you all as the type Christian that doesn't deserve to be talked about.
And that a member here happens to have one of Williamson's quotes in her signature just so happens to be what is the actual purpose of all this. When the OP observed that no Christain quotes Williamson.
But certain Christians talk about other Christians not appearing to be Christian. Because those certain not appearing to be's think differently than Christians that think to call certain not appearing to be Christians not Christian. Because of how they think, while in line with the scriptures, but yet are not approved by some Christians to think that way because the scriptures can only be thought of their way so as not to warrant from them being talked about as not Christian.
I've read of that kind of behavior and attitude before. Not conforming to what is expected and to be approved thought concerning scriptures and one's faithfulness to and within them. AH yes, that's right. Jesus! When he was dragged before the Pharisee's who did not approve how he read the scriptures and lived and taught the life within them was contemporary, alive, and real for anyone who held faith. Because the scriptures are God's personal communication to each one of his sheep who know his voice. And he knows each of their names. Individuals who know the father as daugher or son. And like in human familial relationships those are intimate bonds of knowing unique between each child and each parent. They talk to one another and understand as individuals not as robots the message of family and love for one another.
But some think everyone has to read the same scripture the same way or else they're not a Christian. There is more alive in the words of The Word that is God than writing on the page.
Ta.
Exactly. There is just so much wrong in there that isn't even remotely Christian, not even remotely an acceptable understanding of Jesus.What Marianne Williamson Believes About Jesus
A conversation between an itinerant writer and a spirituality guru. Subject? Jesus.
Spiritual pilgrim and psychotherapist Bill Elliott travelled the country in a motor home, interviewing believers about what Jesus means to them. The result is "A Place at the Table," a new book of 24 interviews with scholars, evangelists, and mystics. One of his most arresting conversations was with New Age guru Marianne Williamson, author of "A Return to Love," which is based on the teachings of A Course in Miracles.
Who was/is Jesus?
Jesus was a human being who while on earth completely self-actualized and fulfilled in all ways the potential glory that lies within us all. He became one with the Essence and Christ Spirit that is in all of us. In that sense, he is our evolutionary elder brother. He demonstrated our destiny. He displayed for all to see the destination of this journey that we are on. The only thing lacking in any situation is our own awareness of love, and Jesus realized and taught that.
Jesus is a personal symbol of the Holy Spirit. Having been totally healed by the Holy Spirit, Jesus became one with him. Every thought, action, and deed of Jesus was guided by the Holy Spirit instead of ego. He's not the only face the Holy Spirit takes on - he is a face. To think about Jesus is to think about and bring forth the perfect love inside us. Jesus actualized the Christ mind, and was then given the power to help the rest of us reach that place within ourselves.
He was sent down by God - as we all are. We are all extensions of the mind of God. We all contain nuggets of glory. Recently, I was interviewed on a television program about miracles and they talked about what constituted a miracle. They said the birth of a child was not a miracle. A miracle they asserted was this or that, and was an extraordinary occurrence, but the birth of a child was not. My nine-year-old daughter was very bothered by that statement, and for the right reasons. The issue here is not that a miracle is something more extraordinary that the birth of a child. The issue here is that the birth of a child is a miracle - and that we are surrounded by the miraculous, but we don't have miracle-minded perception.
Do you know if she identifies as a Christian? I mean, do you know if she has ever called herself a Christian, or does she just pull out of the Bible what she wants?Free said:Completely wrong. One simply cannot be a Christian and have such a view of Jesus.
Our culture has a profound impact both on our lives and how we view the world around us. It is nearly impossible to read the scriptures without our cultural lens.For me, the advice would be not to read and support these persons with New Age ideas.
It's almost idolatry...maybe I wouldn't go that far, I'm sure they're not read with that intent, but I think everything we read influences us.
SBFree In post 35, you wrote:
Do you know if she identifies as a Christian? I mean, do you know if she has ever called herself a Christian, or does she just pull out of the Bible what she wants?
I personally know very little about her, and since you have made the charge against her, I'd like to hear otherwise from her.
Without a citation to prove the matter, it is merely your opinion.
Well, if you actually read the quote I was addressing, you would see that the user I quoted identifies Williamson as a Christian. That is the point I was addressing.Free In post 35, you wrote:
Do you know if she identifies as a Christian? I mean, do you know if she has ever called herself a Christian, or does she just pull out of the Bible what she wants?
I personally know very little about her, and since you have made the charge against her, I'd like to hear otherwise from her.
Without a citation to prove the matter, it is merely your opinion.
That begs the question: what is a Christian.Well, if you actually read the quote I was addressing, you would see that the user I quoted identifies Williamson as a Christian. That is the point I was addressing.
Not that I understand what your point is. If Williamson isn't a Christian, then my point stands. If she does claim to be a Christian, my point still stands--one cannot be a Christian and have such a view of Jesus.
How so, exactly? What is your point?That begs the question: what is a Christian.
Mar 9:38 John said to him, “Teacher, we saw someone casting out demons in your name, and we tried to stop him, because he was not following us.”Yeah, and I know people who hang out in barrooms drinking and preach Jesus the drunker they get.
Doesn't mean there aren't better ways to share the Gospel with people.
I wonder, why is a Christian reading what an atheist has to say to begin with?
Well, according to what you've said, one person identifies her as a Christian, and you identify her otherwise. I know little to nothing on this woman. I see she talks about God and Jesus. But that doesn't tell us if she is, or isnt.How so, exactly? What is your point?
Well, if you had followed the discussion, you would see I gave ample evidence as to what she teaches, and what she teaches regarding Jesus is quite unbiblical, quite anti-Christian. It is indeed what she says about God and Jesus that tells if she is or isn't a Christian, or at least likely or unlikely a Christian. I laid it all out quite clearly and plainly, based on what she has said and what her website says (which, too, by extension is what she says).Well, according to what you've said, one person identifies her as a Christian, and you identify her otherwise. I know little to nothing on this woman. I see she talks about God and Jesus. But that doesn't tell us if she is, or isnt.
So I am curios what your view is on what makes one person a Christian, and another not. This begs the question: what is a Christian?
Ohh, I've been following the discussion, so please don't assume that I haven't.Well, if you had followed the discussion, you would see I gave ample evidence as to what she teaches, and what she teaches regarding Jesus is quite unbiblical, quite anti-Christian. It is indeed what she says about God and Jesus that tells if she is or isn't a Christian, or at least likely or unlikely a Christian. I laid it all out quite clearly and plainly, based on what she has said and what her website says (which, too, by extension is what she says).