[__ Science __ ] MUST WATCH: Global COVID Summit - Declaration IV - Restore Scientific Integrity

[T. E. Smith]

Yes, I agree. The main stream media promotes a leftist, socialist narrative.



JLB

First off, it really isn't. Second, even if it were, you're just making an ad hominem argument.

 

[JLB]

Second, even if it were, you're just making an ad hominem argument.

The main stream media does indeed promote a liberal, leftist socialist narrative, and by saying such I am speaking the truth.




JLB

 

[JLB]

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich's Opening Statements at Day 1 of the Grand Jury Proceedings​

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich's Opening Statements at Day 1 of the Grand Jury Proceedings

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich's Opening Statements at Day 1 of the Grand Jury Proceedings gives us an overview and a list of experts that will be testifying later on. Date: February 5th, 2022 LINKS TO THE GRAN

rumble.com

 

[Barbarian]

From rumble.com, a leading authority on all things scientific -- not.

A fake news outlet.

But as vaccinations have become widespread, the pandemic is abating in most countries. One exception; North Korea, which has endorsed the same ideology as those "17, 000 doctors (or whatever)."

And now COVID-19 is burning through the unvaccinated people of N. Korea. It's a disaster that could bring down the regime.

 

[Barbarian]

There is no supply of Comirnaty.

On August 23, 2021, FDA announced the first approval of a COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older.

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccines

Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent

www.fda.gov

It's just a name change. Same vaccine. It's just now fully approved as safe and effective. Before that it was authorized by the FDA

 

[Barbarian]

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich's Opening Statements at Day 1 of the Grand Jury Proceedings​

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich's Opening Statements at Day 1 of the Grand Jury Proceedings

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich's Opening Statements at Day 1 of the Grand Jury Proceedings gives us an overview and a list of experts that will be testifying later on. Date: February 5th, 2022 LINKS TO THE GRAN

rumble.com

From the source:
7-year-old dies 11 days after Pfizer shot, VAERS report shows (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-cdc-child-dies-pfizer-covid-vaccine/ )

Turns out, it's a fake story. Vaccine wasn't even authorized for children when this was submitted by an unknown person. You see, anyone can submit a report to VAERS. There's no screening. They even accepted on report by a man who claimed that the vaccine turned him into the Incredible Hulk.

CDC accepts all manner of reported vaccination effects--even symptoms of the Hulk ​

PolitiFact - CDC accepts all manner of reported vaccination effects--even symptoms of the Hulk

Addressing a physician during testimony about Texas laws affecting vaccinations, state Rep. Bill Zedler said a federal p

www.politifact.com

 

[Northman]

Wow. Not even involved in the discussion and you can do nothing but come in and falsely accuse someone. And you claim to be a Christian. If I have stated a lie, then show us all clearly where I have done so.

Yeah. The one professing to be a young lad had a topic going on about rape. At some point you decided to sally in and drop the lie that the girl had to agree with the marriage. Since I have been here for quite some time, I get to see you do that sort of thing consistently, on both scriptural and secular matters.

Would you like to address how you falsely accused me of falsely accusing you?

 

[Northman]

The vaccine doesn't prevent a person from receiving the disease, spreading the disease, or dying from the disease.

Which makes it NOT a vaccine. Why waste your time with those who clearly worship the state? None of the numbers or fear they parroted/promoted came to pass. What they say isn't worth anything at all.

 

[Free]

Yeah. The one professing to be a young lad had a topic going on about rape. At some point you decided to sally in and drop the lie that the girl had to agree with the marriage. Since I have been here for quite some time, I get to see you do that sort of thing consistently, on both scriptural and secular matters.

Would you like to address how you falsely accused me of falsely accusing you?

Again, I ask that show clearly where I have done anything of the sort. Otherwise, please stop lying. Of course, based on what I’ve see from your posts, you likely have misunderstood what I’ve said or confused me with someone else.

 

[Northman]

Again, I ask that show clearly where I have done anything of the sort. Otherwise, please stop lying. Of course, based on what I’ve see from your posts, you likely have misunderstood what I’ve said or confused me with someone else.

I just told you the when and where. I completely understand you not wanting to deal with it, but that isn't my concern.

 

[Free]

I just told you the when and where. I completely understand you not wanting to deal with it, but that isn't my concern.

No, you didn’t. You claimed something but there is definitely no when and no link as to where.

 

[Northman]

No, you didn’t. You claimed something but there is definitely no when and no link as to where.

Squirm more. Drop another accusation. Something has to work, right?

 

[jasonc]

One I'm not a worshiper of state
Two one can be pro vaccine and be nuanced on it .

I'm not for mandates but to weaken the military mandates on vaccines is a bit to far .don't like that don't enlist .there will be some war ,you gear won't protect you .
Case in point Iraq and Afghanistan until about 05 did we start adopting to ieds with up armor vehicles and the hull shaped mrap .

 

[Free]

Squirm more. Drop another accusation. Something has to work, right?

What is wrong with you? Making false, slanderous accusations is something no Christian should be doing.

I’m asking for a link so I can see what you’re talking about as I have no idea. Good grief.

 

[Barbarian]

Which makes it NOT a vaccine.

No, vaccines are to provide immunity to pathogens. Immunity isn't an on or off thing. So in many cases, vaccines prevent illness and death, but don't prevent infection.

There's really no state situation here. Donald Trump did indeed do what he could to encourage vaccine rollout, even if it technically wasn't his doing. And Joe Biden followed up to make the vaccine quickly available. Although we waited too long to take other steps when the pandemic hit, the vaccine rollout saved hundred of thousands of lives in the U.S. alone. I'm no fan of Trump, but give credit where it's due. This was the result of private companies responding to a need quickly; government mostly encouraged and facilitated.

 

[Barbarian]

I'm not for mandates but to weaken the military mandates on vaccines is a bit to far .don't like that don't enlist .there will be some war ,you gear won't protect you .

I ran the flu shot program for 2nd AF. And back then, the flu vaccination, although pretty good, was neither as effective nor as safe as vaccines are today. The AF rationale? Vaccinating everyone would assure that the unit would not be ineffective in the event of an epidemic. And in military, the mission comes before the needs of the individual. As you say, "if you don't like it, don't enlist."

 

[Northman]

No, vaccines are to provide immunity to pathogens. Immunity isn't an on or off thing. So in many cases, vaccines prevent illness and death, but don't prevent infection.

Yes I fully understand what the definition was changed to in order to make the statement correct. The "covid vaccines" are not required to function at the same efficacy rate of previous vaccines such as the ones for hep or tetanus, etc.

My last honest question to you, as a supposed scientist or at least an amateur scientist being a teacher, was "As a scientist, how are you dealing with the definition changes?" to which you didn't answer. After some other things you posted on the issue, your voice, as far as being anything remotely related to credibility in any scientific field, was over.

You and I don't have to speak. I see you as betraying your "office" so there is no need, not even if the powers that be want engagement on the site.

 

[hawkman]

This rate of morbidity increase is not going to do be unnoticed

It is not unnoticed .

Indiana life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64

(The Center Square) – The head of Indianapolis-based insurance company OneAmerica said the death rate is up a stunning 40% from pre-pandemic levels among working-age people.

“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” the company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference this week. “The data is consistent across every player in that business.”

OneAmerica is a $100 billion insurance company that has had its headquarters in Indianapolis since 1877. The company has approximately 2,400 employees and sells life insurance, including group life insurance to employers nationwide.

Fact Checking Dr Malone "Deaths up 40%" Claim

 

[Free]

Yes I fully understand what the definition was changed to in order to make the statement correct. The "covid vaccines" are not required to function at the same efficacy rate of previous vaccines such as the ones for hep or tetanus, etc.

My last honest question to you, as a supposed scientist or at least an amateur scientist being a teacher, was "As a scientist, how are you dealing with the definition changes?" to which you didn't answer. After some other things you posted on the issue, your voice, as far as being anything remotely related to credibility in any scientific field, was over.

Here you are, insulting someone else. Are you even able to post without insulting others?

What is your background that allows you to determine what is truthful or not about these things?

 

[Northman]

What is wrong with you? Making false, slanderous accusations is something no Christian should be doing.

I’m asking for a link so I can see what you’re talking about as I have no idea. Good grief.

I told you where it was. The lad made a thread called "Is God sexist?", and a few of you were discussing rape. You guys were batting around Exodus 22 and Deuteronomy 22 and you asserted that the girl has to agree right here...

2. The father has the right to refuse marriage and demand the payment that would have been required for a bride. The girl has to agree and, again, isn't required to marry the seducer. In this way she will still be treated as a virgin.

Scripture didn't say that, but you went ahead and inserted it anyway. Not a mistake, not a bit of confusion, but a completely added plug. Adding to the Word. A lie. You do this repeatedly. A consequence of this action is getting absolutely no respect for anything you say, which is completely justified.

Do you want to address how you falsely accused me of falsely accusing you or are you going to continue down a different path of the same type of deflection?