No where in the Renewed Covenant

[Elteqay]

Still no evidence to backup your opinions.
Still no attempt to address all the scriptures I gave you that show you are wrong.


Irrelevant to the topic.
Just an attempt to divert from your failure.

The nikkudoth proves me right...

The Sabbath is still in effect as is the Feast, and the dietary instruction.

The OP states where did the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob recant His Sabbath and His Feast in the Renewed Covenant? As Josef said, in post #2 it's not the there.....

 

[Mungo]

The nikkudoth proves me right...

The nikkudoth proves nothing.
You have proven nothing

The Sabbath is still in effect as is the Feast, and the dietary instruction.

No, the sabbath was part of the Old Sinai Covenant that has ended.

The OP states where did the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob recant His Sabbath and His Feast in the Renewed Covenant? As Josef said, in post #2 it's not the there.....

I showed you where the NT shows that the Old Sinai Covenant, which includes the sabbath has ended, - see posts #6, #24, #32, #34, #36 none of which you have addressed.

 

[Elteqay]

The nikkudoth proves nothing.
You have proven nothing


No, the sabbath was part of the Old Sinai Covenant that has ended.


I showed you where the NT shows that the Old Sinai Covenant, which includes the sabbath has ended, - see posts #6, #24, #32, #34, #36 none of which you have addressed.

The nikkudoth you say proves New Covenant is the same nikkudoth that proves Mary was not a virgin....now I don't believe the nikkudoth as you do.

 

[Mungo]

The nikkudoth you say proves New Covenant is the same nikkudoth that proves Mary was not a virgin....now I don't believe the nikkudoth as you do.

Now you getting incomprehensible.

You have no scriptures to prove your claims.

Mary being a virgin or not is irrelevant to this discussion. You are just trying to divert the discusssion.

Try answering the scriptures I give you.

The Old Siniai Covenant is no more.

Paul is quite clear that the Jews are no longer under that Lawso why do you think we are?.
Galatians 3:
Before faith came, we [Jews] were held in custody under law, confined for the faith that was to be revealed. Consequently, the law was our disciplinarian for Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a disciplinarian. (Gal 3:23-25).
We (Jews) are not under the Law

Col 2 says much the same:
And you, who were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, having cancelled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2:14)

The Book of Hebrews makes this replacement of the Old Covenant by the New very clear.
On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness, for the law brought nothing to perfection; on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God. (Heb 7:18-19)

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well. (Heb 7:12)

For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second one. But he finds fault with them and says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will conclude a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. (Heb 8:7-8)

When he speaks of a “new” covenant, he declares the first one obsolete. And what has become obsolete and has grown old is close to disappearing (Heb 8:13)

He takes away the first to establish the second (Heb 10:9)

 

[Elteqay]

Now you getting incomprehensible.

You have no scriptures to prove your claims.

Mary being a virgin or not is irrelevant to this discussion. You are just trying to divert the discusssion.

Try answering the scriptures I give you.

The Old Siniai Covenant is no more.

Paul is quite clear that the Jews are no longer under that Lawso why do you think we are?.
Galatians 3:
Before faith came, we [Jews] were held in custody under law, confined for the faith that was to be revealed. Consequently, the law was our disciplinarian for Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a disciplinarian. (Gal 3:23-25).
We (Jews) are not under the Law

Col 2 says much the same:
And you, who were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, having cancelled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2:14)

The Book of Hebrews makes this replacement of the Old Covenant by the New very clear.
On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness, for the law brought nothing to perfection; on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God. (Heb 7:18-19)

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well. (Heb 7:12)

For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second one. But he finds fault with them and says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will conclude a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. (Heb 8:7-8)

When he speaks of a “new” covenant, he declares the first one obsolete. And what has become obsolete and has grown old is close to disappearing (Heb 8:13)

He takes away the first to establish the second (Heb 10:9)

No, that's not what I am doing, I am making a point concerning the nikkudoth, which you fail to recognize. James Strongs in his concordance which you have used to say the Renewed Covenant which is chadash spelled; hey....dalet...shin is the word new because of the nikkudoth vowel points. The Jewish anti- missionaries use the same nikkudoth to make the claim that Mary wasn't a virgin. That is the point.

All you want is to win an argument and you will continue to do so for the next ten pages. But the word chadash spelled; hey, dalet, shin is the word Renew as in Renewed Covenant.

Sin was nailed to the cross !

 

[Mungo]

No, that's not what I am doing, I am making a point concerning the nikkudoth, which you fail to recognize. James Strongs in his concordance which you have used to say the Renewed Covenant which is chadash spelled; hey....dalet...shin is the word new because of the nikkudoth vowel points. The Jewish anti- missionaries use the same nikkudoth to make the claim that Mary wasn't a virgin. That is the point.

All you want is to win an argument and you will continue to do so for the next ten pages. But the word chadash spelled; hey, dalet, shin is the word Renew as in Renewed Covenant.

Sin was nailed to the cross !

You just give me opinions without evidence.
I give you scripture that shows you are wrong - and you do not even try to address..

The Old Siniai Covenant is no more.

Paul is quite clear that the Jews are no longer under that Law so why do you think we are?.
Galatians 3:
Before faith came, we [Jews] were held in custody under law, confined for the faith that was to be revealed. Consequently, the law was our disciplinarian for Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a disciplinarian. (Gal 3:23-25).
We (Jews) are not under the Law

Col 2 says much the same:
And you, who were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, having cancelled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2:14)

The Book of Hebrews makes this replacement of the Old Covenant by the New very clear.
On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness, for the law brought nothing to perfection; on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God. (Heb 7:18-19)

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well. (Heb 7:12)

For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second one. But he finds fault with them and says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will conclude a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. (Heb 8:7-8)

When he speaks of a “new” covenant, he declares the first one obsolete. And what has become obsolete and has grown old is close to disappearing (Heb 8:13)

He takes away the first to establish the second (Heb 10:9)

 

[donadams]

can you name book, chapter, or verse where the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob changed His Sabbath or His Set Apart Times also known as His Feast Times.

Yah's Feast are His Prophetic calendar as is His Sabbath !

Matt 28:18 “all authority” belongs to Christ, by the word “go” vs 19 Christ transferred His authority to His apostolic church!

The apostolic church has authority!
Matt 16:18-19 & 17:17-18

We must hear the apostles 1 Jn 4:6

There is a new covenant, and new creation, the Saturday sabbath was of the old covenant and old creation!


Are we really just Relying on our own private judgement of scripture?

Instead of Christ the light of the world, and the way, the truth, and the Life!

And Christ and His church are one unity in all truth and grace!

Really we are just believing in our own private fallible judgment!

When Christ established the church to teach and sanctify all men unto eternal salvation! Matt 28:19

Christians must be taught or instructed by the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church! Lk 1:4
Matt 28:19, Lk 10:16, Jn 20:21
Acts 8:31, Colossians 2:7

Our understanding, study, interpretation, judgment, are all adding to scripture!


Truth known by “hearing” the apostles not the “Bible alone”!

1 John 4:6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

The apostles in person:

2 John 1:12
Having many things to write unto you, I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, and speak face to face, that our joy may be full.

Doctrine of the apostles: acts 2:42

And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

Matt 5:14 the apostles are the light of the world until Christ returns in glory!


Where in the Bible does it say that everything Christ did and taught, or everything we are to believe is restricted to the Bible. (read John 21:25, that says that not everything Christ did and taught is in the Bible. Yet Matt. 28:20 has Christ commanding the Apostles to teach all that He taught them. In fact, the New Testament wasn't decided until the late 4th century, when the Catholic Church went through over 300+ documents, praying to the Holy Spirit for guidance, and coming up with the 27 books we all agree on are the New Testament.

Christ didn't write a book to spread His truths, He founded a (one) Church, the Catholic Church, to do so. It would have been useless to found a Church based on a book, since the vast, vast majority of humanity was illiterate for the first 18+ centuries of Christianity. That would have effectively eliminated 95+% of humanity from learning Christ's message.

You might also review 2 Peter 1:20-21, where St. Peter warns against personal interpretation of Scripture.

Thanks

 

[Elteqay]

Matt 28:18 “all authority” belongs to Christ, by the word “go” vs 19 Christ transferred His authority to His apostolic church!

The apostolic church has authority!
Matt 16:18-19 & 17:17-18

We must hear the apostles 1 Jn 4:6

There is a new covenant, and new creation, the Saturday sabbath was of the old covenant and old creation!


Are we really just Relying on our own private judgement of scripture?

Instead of Christ the light of the world, and the way, the truth, and the Life!

And Christ and His church are one unity in all truth and grace!

Really we are just believing in our own private fallible judgment!

When Christ established the church to teach and sanctify all men unto eternal salvation! Matt 28:19

Christians must be taught or instructed by the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church! Lk 1:4
Matt 28:19, Lk 10:16, Jn 20:21
Acts 8:31, Colossians 2:7

Our understanding, study, interpretation, judgment, are all adding to scripture!


Truth known by “hearing” the apostles not the “Bible alone”!

1 John 4:6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

The apostles in person:

2 John 1:12
Having many things to write unto you, I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, and speak face to face, that our joy may be full.

Doctrine of the apostles: acts 2:42

And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

Matt 5:14 the apostles are the light of the world until Christ returns in glory!


Where in the Bible does it say that everything Christ did and taught, or everything we are to believe is restricted to the Bible. (read John 21:25, that says that not everything Christ did and taught is in the Bible. Yet Matt. 28:20 has Christ commanding the Apostles to teach all that He taught them. In fact, the New Testament wasn't decided until the late 4th century, when the Catholic Church went through over 300+ documents, praying to the Holy Spirit for guidance, and coming up with the 27 books we all agree on are the New Testament.

Christ didn't write a book to spread His truths, He founded a (one) Church, the Catholic Church, to do so. It would have been useless to found a Church based on a book, since the vast, vast majority of humanity was illiterate for the first 18+ centuries of Christianity. That would have effectively eliminated 95+% of humanity from learning Christ's message.

You might also review 2 Peter 1:20-21, where St. Peter warns against personal interpretation of Scripture.

Thanks

Matt 28:18 “all authority” belongs to Christ, by the word “go” vs 19 Christ transferred His authority to His apostolic church!

The apostolic church has authority!
Matt 16:18-19 & 17:17-18

We must hear the apostles 1 Jn 4:6

There is a new covenant, and new creation, the Saturday sabbath was of the old covenant and old creation!


Are we really just Relying on our own private judgement of scripture?

Instead of Christ the light of the world, and the way, the truth, and the Life!

And Christ and His church are one unity in all truth and grace!

Really we are just believing in our own private fallible judgment!

When Christ established the church to teach and sanctify all men unto eternal salvation! Matt 28:19

Christians must be taught or instructed by the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church! Lk 1:4
Matt 28:19, Lk 10:16, Jn 20:21
Acts 8:31, Colossians 2:7

Our understanding, study, interpretation, judgment, are all adding to scripture!


Truth known by “hearing” the apostles not the “Bible alone”!

1 John 4:6 We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

The apostles in person:

2 John 1:12
Having many things to write unto you, I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, and speak face to face, that our joy may be full.

Doctrine of the apostles: acts 2:42

And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

Matt 5:14 the apostles are the light of the world until Christ returns in glory!


Where in the Bible does it say that everything Christ did and taught, or everything we are to believe is restricted to the Bible. (read John 21:25, that says that not everything Christ did and taught is in the Bible. Yet Matt. 28:20 has Christ commanding the Apostles to teach all that He taught them. In fact, the New Testament wasn't decided until the late 4th century, when the Catholic Church went through over 300+ documents, praying to the Holy Spirit for guidance, and coming up with the 27 books we all agree on are the New Testament.

Christ didn't write a book to spread His truths, He founded a (one) Church, the Catholic Church, to do so. It would have been useless to found a Church based on a book, since the vast, vast majority of humanity was illiterate for the first 18+ centuries of Christianity. That would have effectively eliminated 95+% of humanity from learning Christ's message.

You might also review 2 Peter 1:20-21, where St. Peter warns against personal interpretation of Scripture.

Thanks

And who deemed Philemon as inspired ? Why was the gospel of Nicodemus excluded....from the same misguided trinitarians. Paul taught the Sabbath and taught the Feast. That is plain from the Greek.

Neither you or your RCC buddy will convince me of the Catholic churches false hoods.... even the eastern Orthodox don't believe catholic falsehoods.

The Renewed Covenant stands.

 

[Mungo]

And who deemed Philemon as inspired ? Why was the gospel of Nicodemus excluded....from the same misguided trinitarians. Paul taught the Sabbath and taught the Feast. That is plain from the Greek.

Neither you or your RCC buddy will convince me of the Catholic churches false hoods.... even the eastern Orthodox don't believe catholic falsehoods.

The Renewed Covenant stands.

There is no Renewed Covenant. There is a New Covenant. The Old Covenant that included sabbath keeping is no more.
You have no scripture for your claims.
I have several that prove mine.

Paul is quite clear that the Jews are no longer under Old Covenant Law so why do you think we are?.
Galatians 3:
Before faith came, we [Jews] were held in custody under law, confined for the faith that was to be revealed. Consequently, the law was our disciplinarian for Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a disciplinarian. (Gal 3:23-25).
We (Jews) are not under the Law

Col 2 says much the same:
And you, who were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, having cancelled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2:14)

The Book of Hebrews makes this replacement of the Old Covenant by the New very clear.
On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness, for the law brought nothing to perfection; on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God. (Heb 7:18-19)

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well. (Heb 7:12)

For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second one. But he finds fault with them and says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will conclude a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. (Heb 8:7-8)

When he speaks of a “new” covenant, he declares the first one obsolete. And what has become obsolete and has grown old is close to disappearing (Heb 8:13)

He takes away the first to establish the second (Heb 10:9)

 

[Elteqay]

There is no Renewed Covenant. There is a New Covenant. The Old Covenant that included sabbath keeping is no more.
You have no scripture for your claims.
I have several that prove mine.

Paul is quite clear that the Jews are no longer under Old Covenant Law so why do you think we are?.
Galatians 3:
Before faith came, we [Jews] were held in custody under law, confined for the faith that was to be revealed. Consequently, the law was our disciplinarian for Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a disciplinarian. (Gal 3:23-25).
We (Jews) are not under the Law

Col 2 says much the same:
And you, who were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, having cancelled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2:14)

The Book of Hebrews makes this replacement of the Old Covenant by the New very clear.
On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness, for the law brought nothing to perfection; on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God. (Heb 7:18-19)

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well. (Heb 7:12)

For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second one. But he finds fault with them and says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will conclude a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. (Heb 8:7-8)

When he speaks of a “new” covenant, he declares the first one obsolete. And what has become obsolete and has grown old is close to disappearing (Heb 8:13)

He takes away the first to establish the second (Heb 10:9)

Why would anyone take advice from a Scripture twister and his Scripture twisting catholic church ?

Colossians 2 is a favorite with Scripture twisters to rail against Yah's Holy Word.....Paal said, he was a Pharisee of Pharisee's and well versed in Torah which he called Holy, Just, and Good and also Love (Romans7:12-13)(Romans 13:8-10 Loving your neighbor is Torah)...

So it is your opinion that Torah is dogma and hostile to the True Called Out Assembly that Walk in the Way ? That is rhetorical question, we already know you do.

Psalm 19:7-8...The Torah of Yahuah is PERFECT, restoring the soul: the Instruction of Yahuah is sure, making wise the simple. The Torah/Instructions of Yahuah are right, rejoicing the heart: the Commandments of Yahuah are PURE, enlightening the Eyes.

 

[Mungo]

Why would anyone take advice from a Scripture twister and his Scripture twisting catholic church ?

I haven't twisted anything. Just quoted scripture.
As I have pointed out before, Bible Gateway gives 61 different English translations. Not one them say Renew. That translation only exits in your head.

Colossians 2 is a favorite with Scripture twisters to rail against Yah's Holy Word.....Paal said, he was a Pharisee of Pharisee's and well versed in Torah which he called Holy, Just, and Good and also Love (Romans7:12-13)(Romans 13:8-10 Loving your neighbor is Torah)...

If Paul is a Pharisee and well versed in the Law why do you not believe him when he writes:
Galatians 3:
Before faith came, we [Jews] were held in custody under law, confined for the faith that was to be revealed. Consequently, the law was our disciplinarian for Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a disciplinarian. (Gal 3:23-25).
We (Jews) are not under the Law

Col 2 says much the same:
And you, who were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, having cancelled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2:14)

So it is your opinion that Torah is dogma and hostile to the True Called Out Assembly that Walk in the Way ? That is rhetorical question, we already know you do.

Psalm 19:7-8...The Torah of Yahuah is PERFECT, restoring the soul: the Instruction of Yahuah is sure, making wise the simple. The Torah/Instructions of Yahuah are right, rejoicing the heart: the Commandments of Yahuah are PURE, enlightening the Eyes.

Psalm 19:7-8 is referring to the Covenant Law that was given to the Jews. It was never given to the gentiles.

But that Covenant is now obsolete as the writer of Hebrews writes:
On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness, for the law brought nothing to perfection; on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God. (Heb 7:18-19)

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well. (Heb 7:12)

For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second one. But he finds fault with them and says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will conclude a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. (Heb 8:7-8)

When he speaks of a “new” covenant, he declares the first one obsolete. And what has become obsolete and has grown old is close to disappearing (Heb 8:13)

He takes away the first to establish the second (Heb 10:9)

 

[Elteqay]

I haven't twisted anything. Just quoted scripture.
As I have pointed out before, Bible Gateway gives 61 different English translations. Not one them say Renew. That translation only exits in your head.



If Paul is a Pharisee and well versed in the Law why do you not believe him when he writes:
Galatians 3:
Before faith came, we [Jews] were held in custody under law, confined for the faith that was to be revealed. Consequently, the law was our disciplinarian for Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a disciplinarian. (Gal 3:23-25).
We (Jews) are not under the Law

Col 2 says much the same:
And you, who were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, having cancelled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2:14)




Psalm 19:7-8 is referring to the Covenant Law that was given to the Jews. It was never given to the gentiles.

But that Covenant is now obsolete as the writer of Hebrews writes:
On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness, for the law brought nothing to perfection; on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God. (Heb 7:18-19)

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well. (Heb 7:12)

For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second one. But he finds fault with them and says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will conclude a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. (Heb 8:7-8)

When he speaks of a “new” covenant, he declares the first one obsolete. And what has become obsolete and has grown old is close to disappearing (Heb 8:13)

He takes away the first to establish the second (Heb 10:9)

Paal was a Pharisee and the son of Pharisee's... Acts23:6....Paal was well versed in Oral Torah which had been written down and known as Talmud....that is the law Paal spoke against....not the Torah/ Instruction of Yahuah Tsevaoth....but that doesn't fit the RC dogma.



Why do you keep leaving out Hebrews 8:10 ? Doesn't fit your dogma ?

 

[Mungo]

Paal was a Pharisee and the son of Pharisee's... Acts23:6....Paal was well versed in Oral Torah which had been written down and known as Talmud....that is the law Paal spoke against....not the Torah/ Instruction of Yahuah Tsevaoth....but that doesn't fit the RC dogma.



Why do you keep leaving out Hebrews 8:10 ? Doesn't fit your dogma ?

A claim without any evidence; just your opinion.

It seems Law means one thing when it suits you and another when it doesn't.

 

[Elteqay]

A claim without any evidence; just your opinion.

It seems Law means one thing when it suits you and another when it doesn't.

You Do Not Have A Glue what I said about the Torah or about the Oral Law....but you're not alone 95% of christians are completely ignorant of the law Paal is speaking about. And the 95% is my opinion, it's probably closer to 99. Lol !

And hey, dalet, shin still spells Renewed, it is a Renewed Covenant in My Blood.....which we are to celebrate once a year at Passover....not 7 days a week like the RCC.

 

[Mungo]

You Do Not Have A Glue what I said about the Torah or about the Oral Law....but you're not alone 95% of christians are completely ignorant of the law Paal is speaking about. And the 95% is my opinion, it's probably closer to 99. Lol !

I have heard of Oral Torah.
As for opinion - your posts are 100% opinion. No evidence is supplied for your claims.
Why should I, or anyone, believe your opinions?

I supply scripture for my claims. Where is your evidence?

And hey, dalet, shin still spells Renewed, it is a Renewed Covenant in My Blood.....which we are to celebrate once a year at Passover....not 7 days a week like the RCC.

Nope, it doesn't say Renewed. That only exists in your head. None of the 61 English ranslations in Bible Gateway say Renewed.

 

[Elteqay]

I have heard of Oral Torah.
As for opinion - your posts are 100% opinion. No evidence is supplied for your claims.
Why should I, or anyone, believe your opinions?

I supply scripture for my claims. Where is your evidence?


Nope, it doesn't say Renewed. That only exists in your head. None of the 61 English ranslations in Bible Gateway say Renewed.

NOTICE: 61 ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS using the Talmudic nikkudoth. The same Talmud that Paal a Pharisee and the son of Pharisee's taught against throughout the Renewed Covenant Scriptures, that you fail to comprehend because you believe the man of sin that changed the Law, the Sabbath, and the Set Apart Feast of Yahuah Tsevaoth. Daniel 7:25....and who murdered hundreds of thousands of saints in the square of zesus, with the obelisk of the sun god Ra reerected by pope sixtus v during the inquisition....all Christians worship on the day of the sun....which is not what the True Called Out Assembly is doing, they follow and are obedient to the sign of the Covenant and guard the Commandments.

 

[Free]

Discussion of Catholic doctrine is to be done in the Catholic forum only.

 

[Mungo]

Discussion of Catholic doctrine is to be done in the Catholic forum only.

And there is no place in Catholic discussion for the rubbish that Elteqay spews out about the Catholic Church. He only does it to deflect from his inability to refute scripture that shows the falseness of his claims about his invented "Renewed" Covenant.

 

[Mungo]

NOTICE: 61 ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS using the Talmudic nikkudoth. The same Talmud that Paal a Pharisee and the son of Pharisee's taught against throughout the Renewed Covenant Scriptures, that you fail to comprehend because you believe the man of sin that changed the Law, the Sabbath, and the Set Apart Feast of Yahuah Tsevaoth. Daniel 7:25....and who murdered hundreds of thousands of saints in the square of zesus, with the obelisk of the sun god Ra reerected by pope sixtus v during the inquisition....all Christians worship on the day of the sun....which is not what the True Called Out Assembly is doing, they follow and are obedient to the sign of the Covenant and guard the Commandments.

You only make these false accusations to deflect from your inability to provide any evidence for your claims and your failure to refute scripture that shows the falseness of your claims.

The Old Covenant and therefore the Old Law that goes with that Covenant is obsolete and does not apply to us.

Paul writes
Galatians 3:
Before faith came, we [Jews] were held in custody under law, confined for the faith that was to be revealed. Consequently, the law was our disciplinarian for Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a disciplinarian. (Gal 3:23-25).
We (Jews) are not under the Law

Col 2 says much the same:
And you, who were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, having cancelled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands; this he set aside, nailing it to the cross. (Col 2:14)

Pall also says about himself
To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews; to those under the law I became as one under the law--though not being myself under the law--that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law [Gentiles] I became as one outside the law--not being without law toward God but under the law of Christ--that I might win those outside the law. (1Cor 9:20-21)
Paul himself declares he is no longer under the Law.

But that Covenant is now obsolete as the writer of Hebrews writes:
On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness, for the law brought nothing to perfection; on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God. (Heb 7:18-19)

When there is a change of priesthood, there is necessarily a change of law as well. (Heb 7:12)

For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second one. But he finds fault with them and says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will conclude a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah. (Heb 8:7-8)

When he speaks of a “new” covenant, he declares the first one obsolete. And what has become obsolete and has grown old is close to disappearing (Heb 8:13)

He takes away the first to establish the second (Heb 10:9)

The Old Covenant never applied to gentiles (except those living in the land of Israel)
Paul says:
Therefore remember that at one time you Gentiles in the flesh, called the uncircumcision by what is called the circumcision, which is made in the flesh by hands-- remember that you were at that time separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. (Eph 2:12)
Gentiles were strangers to the covenant.

Paul says to the Galatian Gentiles who were Judaising
Tell me, you who desire to be under law, do you not hear the law? For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a slave and one by a free woman. But the son of the slave was born according to the flesh, the son of the free woman through promise. Now this is an allegory: these women are two covenants. One is from Mount Sinai, bearing children for slavery; she is Hagar. Now Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia; she corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother. For it is written, "Rejoice, O barren one who does not bear; break forth and shout, you who are not in travail; for the children of the desolate one are many more than the children of her that is married." Now we, brethren, like Isaac, are children of promise. But as at that time he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, so it is now. But what does the scripture say? "Cast out the slave and her son; for the son of the slave shall not inherit with the son of the free woman." So, brethren, we are not children of the slave but of the free woman. (Gal 4:21-31)
He is clear. To go back to Judaism (accepting the Law) is to put yourself back into slavery.

He goes on to warn them:.
You are separated from Christ, you who are trying to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace. (Gal 5:4)

Paul says in Romans 7:1-6
Are you unaware, brothers (for I am speaking to people who know the law [i.e. Jews]), that the law has jurisdiction over one as long as one lives? Thus a married woman is bound by law to her living husband; but if her husband dies, she is released from the law in respect to her husband. Consequently, while her husband is alive she will be called an adulteress if she consorts with another man. But if her husband dies she is free from that law, and she is not an adulteress if she consorts with another man.
In the same way, my brothers, you also were put to death to the law through the body of Christ, so that you might belong to another, to the one who was raised from the dead in order that we might bear fruit for God. For when we were in the flesh, our sinful passions, awakened by the law, worked in our members to bear fruit for death. But now we are released from the law, dead to what held us captive, so that we may serve in the newness of the spirit and not under the obsolete letter. (Rom 7:1-6)
We [Jews] are put to death to the Law
We [Jews] are released from the Law

Come on Elteqay - address these scriptures instead of ducking them.

 

[Elteqay]

And there is no place in Catholic discussion for the rubbish that Elteqay spews out about the Catholic Church. He only does it to deflect from his inability to refute scripture that shows the falseness of his claims about his invented "Renewed" Covenant.

You can't refute the history !