Thank you for the links Hitch. In one of the links someone said "Again, while I don't approve of burning Korans, I find appeasement of Muslims to be culturally suicidal. And we either take a stand now, and insist that Muslims assimilate into our culture and our way of life, or we wait until its too late and we end up under their faith and culture. " I think that sums it up. Americans more and more are giving up our own rights to appease muslims.
Sorry, I`m not sure if it was Hitch or Jason that made this point but I think it is significant. If there has been any inciting, really the one that is guilty is the media. If it were not for the media, I never would have known that this pastor burned a koran. It is the media that has stirred the pot and sensationalized the story. It is the media that reported this to the muslims all the way across the world. If the media had ignored the story, probably no one would have been killed.
As for burning Bibles, I`m not sure of the time line. Was that before or after the pastor threatened to burn a koran? I am just wondering if this is a retaliation tactic from Obama? Anyway, it sickens me that the Bible is called trash and burned, but the President actually used his power as President and his legal knowledge to try and seek a way to prosecute the pastor the first time he threatened to burn korans. Of course, all Obama could come up with was maybe some city ordinance with fires. Constitutually and legally the man was free to burn his own property. There was absolutely nothing Obama could do, but he did try. Yet, where is his outrage at burning a Christian Holy Book? Why is he not looking to denounce these people and see if there is a way to prosecute them?
If Christians owning a Bible and sharing their faith becomes "a threat to national security", do others not see the problem with this? I say being in Afghanistan is a much bigger threat to national security so why do we stay? It is okay to have our own men killed there but it is not okay to distribute Bibles. Bibles are more of a threat? Stories like this are very revealing to the situation at hand, and makes this pastor`s message even more important and relevant. He had a point to make. Christian liberties are at stake because of islam.
Finally, Hitch is right. This pastor was not going into muslim territory provoking muslims. He was on US soil, a predominantly Christian nation with a Christian heritage and culture. He did not even go to a muslim neighborhood or mosque. He stayed at his church so this message was clearly not to muslims. He was not talking to muslims. He was in a free country that protects freedom of speech and the right to protest. As for being a Christian, he was delivering a Christian message to not meddle with other gods or religions. But as Christians we are getting so politically correct we don`t want to hurt any other religions feelings so we embrace them all. This is Biblically wrong.
Sorry, I`m not sure if it was Hitch or Jason that made this point but I think it is significant. If there has been any inciting, really the one that is guilty is the media. If it were not for the media, I never would have known that this pastor burned a koran. It is the media that has stirred the pot and sensationalized the story. It is the media that reported this to the muslims all the way across the world. If the media had ignored the story, probably no one would have been killed.
As for burning Bibles, I`m not sure of the time line. Was that before or after the pastor threatened to burn a koran? I am just wondering if this is a retaliation tactic from Obama? Anyway, it sickens me that the Bible is called trash and burned, but the President actually used his power as President and his legal knowledge to try and seek a way to prosecute the pastor the first time he threatened to burn korans. Of course, all Obama could come up with was maybe some city ordinance with fires. Constitutually and legally the man was free to burn his own property. There was absolutely nothing Obama could do, but he did try. Yet, where is his outrage at burning a Christian Holy Book? Why is he not looking to denounce these people and see if there is a way to prosecute them?
If Christians owning a Bible and sharing their faith becomes "a threat to national security", do others not see the problem with this? I say being in Afghanistan is a much bigger threat to national security so why do we stay? It is okay to have our own men killed there but it is not okay to distribute Bibles. Bibles are more of a threat? Stories like this are very revealing to the situation at hand, and makes this pastor`s message even more important and relevant. He had a point to make. Christian liberties are at stake because of islam.
Finally, Hitch is right. This pastor was not going into muslim territory provoking muslims. He was on US soil, a predominantly Christian nation with a Christian heritage and culture. He did not even go to a muslim neighborhood or mosque. He stayed at his church so this message was clearly not to muslims. He was not talking to muslims. He was in a free country that protects freedom of speech and the right to protest. As for being a Christian, he was delivering a Christian message to not meddle with other gods or religions. But as Christians we are getting so politically correct we don`t want to hurt any other religions feelings so we embrace them all. This is Biblically wrong.