Your claim appears to be that had Paul not affirmed his experience, that his blinding encounter with Christ would have been ineffective.
Wrong. My only point was that Paul, like all the other Pharisees, faced a decision. He chose to accept the truth that Jesus is the Messiah and Deity.
I would submit that the encounter itself based on the sufficiently of Him who imposed it was sufficient to perform Divine Intentions regardless of Saul.
I reject that God causes anyone to believe. There is no Scripture that says so, so there is no reason to assume so.
Why did God create the human race with an intellect AND "the Law written on their hearts" (Rom 2:14)? To have the innate ability to evaluate God's promises and to decide for themselves whether or not to believe them.
And you merely fail to perceive that the god of this world BLINDED them and place the entire onus on man when that's never been the case:
Totally wrong. I'm fully aware of 1 Jn 5:19. Of course satan blinds people.
You on the other hand present that people blind themselves and that, only of and by themselves.
Actually, Scripture also says so. Which is why I say so.
Acts 28:27 - For the heart of this people has become dull, And with their ears they scarcely hear, And
they have closed their eyes; Otherwise they might see with their eyes, And hear with their ears, And understand with their heart and return,
And I would heal them.”’ NASB
So, why "closed their eyes"? They did. To themselves.
And, of course, satan is right there blinding people's eyes. How? Providing false doctrine that sounds good to the hearers, but isn't Biblical.
I would suggest that it's a continuing spiritual issue, to fail to perceive the enemy, BECAUSE that enemy does not allow the matters to be seen.
I think you give the enemy way too much credit.
What does 2 Cor 3:16 say?
"but whenever a person turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away."
So, WHEN is the veil of blindness taken away? WHEN a person turns to the Lord. Not before, as Calvinism believes.
You could ask yourself if internal temptation in mind is only of you, or is it of Satan, the tempter?
I don't have to ask myself. Both is the answer, of course.
I'd suggest the later, and if you suggest the former, I'd suggest that sight is void of scriptural insight to the matters of temptation.
Well, you'd be wrong in your suggestion, for both are in play.