Paul could lay claim that he had the entire OT memorized verbatim... Can you stake that claim?
I don't have to, it has no relevance to the dishonesty of his statement about knowing what others think.
Along with that claim, Paul could state that he was fluid in all of the Oral traditions that surrounded the text as well. Can you stake that claim?
So? It dosen't validate his claim. To me this makes it more obvious that what he said was dishonest. He went around and learned the ways of other people, yet still claims they don't actually believe what they believe. No, any one who has taken the time to observe anyone else of another religion, you will see they actually believe what they believe. Paul's little statement that everyone truly believes in his God, is what we call a lie.
Paul received his religious training from a very prestigious school (shemi), which by the way Jesus sided with on all occasions except divorce. What religous school have you advanced in?
Sorry, I'm not falling for your smoke screen. I know what Paul said was dishonest because I know how I think. I don't have to go get a degree in theology to know that Paul is making a claim he can't back up. He claims to know what I think, I say he is wrong because I don't believe him. He claims I'm lying, I roll my eyes because its just a cheep ploy. That's it.
Paul was very well versed in the various cultures and religions to the point where the could quote their own prophets, Can you stake that claim?
Prove his statement true. What do I actually think, and please demonstrate how I secretly believe in your God. Do it. All these other points are nothing but the fallacy argument from authority. So what if Paul went to a school that taught him theology, it still dose not validate his claim that everyone secretly believes him. There is this thing in debate and philosophy called sophistry, its where one arguer is not interested in actually learning from the other person, but just dose what ever they need to, to win an argument even if they are wrong. Paul is evangelizing, and what dose he do, he claims everyone already believes him and those that don't are the bad people. That's sophistry because it already refuses someone else point before its even made.
This what we call in modern times, Propaganda.
But more to your point... Are you saying that humans have never worshiped idols or false God's?... Even an atheist believes this much which is clearly seen.
I never made this statement, and I won't answer your loaded question.
Paul asserts, much in the same way that he does at Mars Hill, that all men have a desire to worship which is evidenced not only in scripture, but also now in archeology. Unfortunately, they've missed the mark.
You have still not shown how Paul's claim is true. Unless you want to claim that all God's are the same, so what if people wanted to worship something, it dosen't prove that everyone wanted to worship Yaweh.
What it shows is that we are social beginnings that seek a leader. Like most social mammals. We seek an alpha whether it be a God or just a leader.