I hope you people following this thread have learned something.
If "all" means "all," then Calvinism collapses.
And the Calvinists know it.
Vince, I dont know why I even write, I am convinced you are not reading anyone else's posts. You never respond to arguments offered. For this reason, I will let my tone be a little sharper. You definitely deserve it. You have been trolling in this thread for a long time.
Your understanding of the term "all" (pas pasa pan) is way to shallow to be even in the ball park. No one who is a student of the greek language is going to take you seriously. Your excused for your mistake because you do not know any better. I doubt you could identify the nominative form of pas in the three genders.
But the issue is not just greek. If you had the ability, there are tools that an english bible student could use to get at the meaning of the term "all" (pas). You would have to have a greek concordance and look up the word pas, pasa, pan (answer to previous comment just given!), and its uses in the GNT to establish how the word is used. While you do not need to know greek to do that, I doubt you have any idea of the bible study methods I am referring to right now.
Most vocabulary cards will give the simlistic meaning of "all" or "every" for the term. There are times in the GNT that the word pas is translated "Every." Frequently, in the GNT, when used with a participle it is translated "whosoever" or "whoever."
Lets look at just at one verse and its use of the term "all" ....
Mark 1:5 And there went out unto him all the country of Judaea, and all they of Jerusalem; And they were baptised of him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.
*** The term "all" is used twice in this verse. To be consistent, would you take the view that every man, woman, child, infant, sickly grandparent, that each and every individual without exception came to John at the Jordan, confessed their sins, and was baptised by John in the Jordan? Even if you take the concept that the verse refers only to Judaea and Jerusalem, would you agree that the entire city of Jerusalem was empty? Was all Judaea empty? Did John Baptise each and every infant and person in Judaea and Jerusalem?
If you do not believe in infant baptism, your in trouble in this verse if "all meams all." Of course you can always ignore this argument and continue trolling. So then, the term "all" has shades of different meanings based upon context.
I could also post comments on the verses you posted up the thread. I have done so, several times before. I am not going to the work to type out corrections of those references because you would not approach the subject in an honest, upright fashion anyway. If you actually get to the place where you will be honest and upright in your discussion of some text, I would be happy to discuss the term "all" in one of the texts you post. Let me know (or ignore the content of this post as you have done every time in this thread).