J
jocor
Guest
Yeshua passed it and set the example for us.The entire Law of Moses was a test designed to lead people to Christ. It was a "test" with a built in "trick": no one could ever pass it.
iakov the fool
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Yeshua passed it and set the example for us.The entire Law of Moses was a test designed to lead people to Christ. It was a "test" with a built in "trick": no one could ever pass it.
iakov the fool
Paul is addressing man made commandments that caused a hatred between Jew and Gentile.
If Yeshua broke the Sabbath, then he sinned. Since he was sinless he could not have broken the Sabbath. He broke the distorted Jewish interpretation of the Sabbath. They thought it was not lawful to heal on that day, but Yeshua taught that it was (Mt 12:10-12).John 5:18.
So, what you are trying to teach is that this passage is referring to Yahweh's commandments? That means Yeshua abolished the commands against idolatry, adultery, stealing, murder, etc??? "Ordinances" (Greek - "dogma") refers to man-made laws, not Yahweh's ordinances which are called "dikaioma" as in Luke 1:6 and Hebrews 9:1. Yeshua abolished all man-made laws that cause believers to transgress Yahweh's laws such as the man-made command to kill any Gentile that passes over the wall that men commanded to be built separating the court of the Jews from the court of the Gentiles.He Himself abolished in His flesh the law of commandments contained in ordinances...
There are no made made laws of commandments that He is involved in , contained in His Covenant.
Why would the Lord Jesus need to abolish man made ordinances that were never in His Covenant to begin with.
You might as well say He died on the cross to abolish Hinduism.
The law of Moses forbade the children of Israel to intermingle with the Gentiles, but rather, they were to be separate from them.
as it is written -
And you shall be holy to Me, for I the Lord am holy, and have separated you from the peoples, that you should be Mine.
Leviticus 20:26
They were not to mingle with them in such a way that they would learn their works and do them, but they could mingle with them and have them learn Yahweh's ways and do them.and again the Psalmist says -
Because they rebelled against His Spirit, So that he spoke rashly with his lips.
34 They did not destroy the peoples, Concerning whom the Lord had commanded them,
35 But they mingled with the Gentiles And learned their works;
36 They served their idols, Which became a snare to them.
37 They even sacrificed their sons And their daughters to demons,
38 And shed innocent blood, The blood of their sons and daughters, Whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan; And the land was polluted with blood. Psalm 106:33-38
JLB
So, what you are trying to teach is that this passage is referring to Yahweh's commandments? That means Yeshua abolished the commands against idolatry, adultery, stealing, murder, etc??? "Ordinances" (Greek - "dogma") refers to man-made laws, not Yahweh's ordinances which are called "dikaioma" as in Luke 1:6 and Hebrews 9:1. Yeshua abolished all man-made laws that cause believers to transgress Yahweh's laws such as the man-made command to kill any Gentile that passes over the wall that men commanded to be built separating the court of the Jews from the court of the Gentiles.
This verse does not mean they were to kill Gentiles or have a total physical separation from them.
count to 10 guys
1, 2, 3, 5, 6.. oh wait.
Let me start over.
1, 2, 3, 45678910.
Hey I got it.
I am sure this post will test the boundaries between discussion and debate.. lets remember we are in the Bible Study forum..
I believe a sound discussion can be held here without debate or rancor entering into the conversation.
Great topic, JohnDB
"noo" or "false"? Sabbath starts and ends at sundown, not 6:00 PM.
Lev 23:3 Six days shall work be done: but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, an holy convocation (miqra); ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of YHWH in all your dwellings.miqrâ'
BDB Definition:
1) convocation, convoking, reading, a calling together
1a) convocation, sacred assembly
1b) convoking
1c) reading
Strong's Definition:
From H7121; something called out, that is, a public meeting (the act, the persons, or the place); also a rehearsal: - assembly, calling, convocation, reading.
I know you meant "new". I meant that you weren't learning something noo/new, but something false (6:00PM start for Sabbath).Oh sorry, that's not no it was posed to be new spelled slang.
Sorry, but you are taking it out of context. In fact, you are taking it out of the verse itself. "Holy convocation" is used in verse 3 to specifically refer to the Sabbath. The purpose of the "rest" from work is not only to rest physically from our labors, but to allow time to meet with Yahweh, pray, worship, study His Word, fellowship with brethren of like faith, etc. The Feasts are also holy convocation because we are to gather together and meet with Yahweh on those days as well.Your understanding of "convocation" is correct.
Your understanding of every Sabbath as a day of "holy convocation" is incorrect because you have taken the verse out of its context.
Here is the context:
Lev 23:2 Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, Concerning the feasts of the LORD, which ye shall proclaim to be holy convocations, even these are my feasts.
Lev 23:3 Six days shall work be done: but the seventh day is the Sabbath of rest, an holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the Sabbath of the LORD in all your dwellings.
Lev 23:4 These are the feasts of the LORD, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons.
There follows the list of feasts which are "holy convocations."
The FEASTS are the "holy convocations."
The weekly Sabbath is NOT a "holy convocation;" it is a day of rest.
iakov the fool
That man was not put to death for merely picking up sticks, but for doing it "with a high hand" (willfully despising Yahweh's word). Here is how the Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge comments on it:I'm teaching what was added to the Abrahamic Covenant was ordinances, such as stoning to death a person who picked up sticks on the Sabbath.... Work shall be done for six days, but the seventh is the Sabbath of rest, holy to the Lord. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death. Exodus 31:15
As you can plainly see, Jesus nor the Apostles taught any such commandment to put to death a person for picking up sticks to kindle a fire on the Sabbath.
.Feast days, clothing laws, food laws, ceremonial washing's... were all ordinances that were not required in the Abrahamic Covenant
Among the laws that he obeyed were laws against murder, adultery, idolatry, and stealing. All Ten Words given at Sinai were once oral commandments passed down since Adam's day. Even laws concerning clean and unclean animals existed orally.Abraham obeyed God's laws and commandments 430 years before the law was added, without the fanfare of the ordinances required by the law of Moses.
The law of Moses was added, until the Seed should come.
You are adding "of Moses" into the text which then makes it seem as though it is referring to the entire law. I believe it is referring to a part of the law.19 What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; Galatians 3:19
The law of Moses was temporary.
JLB
My comment was referring to Lev 20:26, not Psalm 106:33-38. Mingling with Gentiles was permissible as long as those Gentiles were joining themselves to Israel and learning their ways and not Israel joining themselves to Gentiles by learning their ways.Because they rebelled against His Spirit, So that he spoke rashly with his lips.
34 They did not destroy the peoples, Concerning whom the Lord had commanded them,
35 But they mingled with the Gentiles And learned their works;
36 They served their idols, Which became a snare to them.
37 They even sacrificed their sons And their daughters to demons,
38 And shed innocent blood, The blood of their sons and daughters, Whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan; And the land was polluted with blood. Psalm 106:33-38
They did not destroy the peoples, Concerning whom the Lord had commanded them...
JLB
My comment was referring to Lev 20:26, not Psalm 106:33-38. Mingling with Gentiles was permissible as long as those Gentiles were joining themselves to Israel and learning their ways and not Israel joining themselves to Gentiles by learning their ways.
Explain to me how Yahweh's holy, just and good commandments caused a hatred (enmity) between Jew and Gentile. You included the Feasts among those "ordinances" that were abolished. How did they cause a hatred if they have absolutely no affect on Gentiles unless they were proselytes? Do you include the Ten Words in those ordinances?Then they would be referred to as proselytes.
The Lord abolished in His flesh the law... Not man's law, but the law of commandments contained in ordinances... Not man's ordinances but the ordinances that were added to the Covenant of Abraham until the Seed should come.
For what would God have to do with removing some laws He never added.
What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made... Galatians 3:19
JLB