Nathan
Member
- Sep 1, 2010
- 5,084
- 565
Yes. Before the foundation of the earth. Because God is omniscient.
Do you believe their names can be blotted out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Yes. Before the foundation of the earth. Because God is omniscient.
To leave on your own, God would first have to losen His grasp. Can you show if He is willing to do that, or where He has done that?Can we jump out of His hand ? Leaving on our own is not being 'plucked'
This is a very serious issue. If one can "leave on their own", that would mean that they are more powerful than God. For it is God who saves us, and holds us in His hand. Since Jesus made the point twice that no one is able to snatch a recipient of eternal life out of either His or His Father's hand, that has to include the recipient as well. Because "no one" means "no person", and probably even includes the idea of "no entities", such as fallen angels.To leave on your own, God would first have to losen His grasp. Can you show if He is willing to do that, or where He has done that?
Judas. God chose him, gave him to Christ, and Judas chose to betray Jesus - Jesus let him, and it was a fulfillment of prophesy.To leave on your own, God would first have to losen His grasp. Can you show if He is willing to do that, or where He has done that?
What did God choose Judas for? To betray the Christ. Election is being chosen for service, not salvation, as the Calvinists misunderstand.Judas. God chose him, gave him to Christ, and Judas chose to betray Jesus - Jesus let him, and it was a fulfillment of prophesy.
Then how can anyone know "the way it was intended"? That's a pretty broad brush to be painting with.While it's nice to take things like no man 'snatching' us out of His hand literal, that's not the way it was intended to be read.
There is nothing here to suggest being stolen or taken by force. Jesus' words are quite plain; no person can remove the recipient from His or His Father's hand. And recipients of eternal life are PERSONS, so Jesus was including them as well.It is a statement of God not allowing us to be unknowingly taken away from Him - it's saying we cannot be stolen, taken by force.
Of course. God owns all recipients of eternal life. As owner, He has sealed all of them, placed them IN CHRIST, and guarantees their inheritance for the day of redemption, just as Eph 1:14 says plainly.It's a description of ownership, not of control.
The key here is that context shows this is about the Great Tribulation. And v.9 shows that physical death is being described.Matthew 24
9 Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and put you to death, and you will be hated by all nations for my name's sake.
10 And then many will fall away and betray one another and hate one another.
11 And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray.
12 And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold.
13 But the one who endures to the end will be saved.
Thinking / believing one can Jump, leave, fall out of His hands gives credence to the warnings of the Scripture..reba said: ↑
Can we jump out of His hand ? Leaving on our own is not being 'plucked'
This is a very serious issue. If one can "leave on their own", that would mean that they are more powerful than God. For it is God who saves us, and holds us in His hand. Since Jesus made the point twice that no one is able to snatch a recipient of eternal life out of either His or His Father's hand, that has to include the recipient as well. Because "no one" means "no person", and probably even includes the idea of "no entities", such as fallen angels.
If a recipient of eternal life could leave on their own, and ultimately perish, what does that do to Jesus' promise that recipients of eternal life will never perish? It would make His promise untrue.
I continue to wonder why anyone would argue for such a conclusion.
What did God choose Judas for? To betray the Christ. Election is being chosen for service, not salvation, as the Calvinists misunderstand.
Then how can anyone know "the way it was intended"? That's a pretty broad brush to be painting with.
The ONLY WAY we can know what was intended is by reading the ACTUAL WORDS. And the actual words say "no one" which can just as easily be rendered "no person" or "no entity" can remove us from His hand.
That would even include the recipient (context, remember?).
There is nothing here to suggest being stolen or taken by force. Jesus' words are quite plain; no person can remove the recipient from His or His Father's hand. And recipients of eternal life are PERSONS, so Jesus was including them as well.
Of course. God owns all recipients of eternal life. As owner, He has sealed all of them, placed them IN CHRIST, and guarantees their inheritance for the day of redemption, just as Eph 1:14 says plainly.
The key here is that context shows this is about the Great Tribulation. And v.9 shows that physical death is being described.
The word for "save" in the Greek is 'sozo' and does NOT default to "eternal soul salvation", though commonly is assumed as much.
The word simply means "to deliver from danger, to rescue".
If enduring to the end is the requirement for eternal soul salvation, then Paul's answer to the jailer was false, and Jesus' promise to recipients of eternal life would be untrue, and I could go on and on about all the verses that would be rendered untrue.
I see it quite the opposite. Such thinking renders the clear promises of eternal security as untrue.Thinking / believing one can Jump, leave, fall out of His hands gives credence to the warnings of the Scripture..
How is one led to think they can lose salvation from this verse?2Ti 3:6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
Same question here.Luk_21:8 And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them.
1Co 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
There are 3 parallel passages; this one, Gal 5:21 and Eph 5:5. Similar lists of sin in all of them, and Eph 5:5 says "no inheritance IN the kingdom". So "no inheritance IN the kingdom" is equivalent to "not inherit the kingdom". All 3 passages are warning of loss of inheritance IN the kingdom. Or loss of reward, since Paul taught that one who endures will "reign with Christ" in 2 Tim 2:12. Only those who have an inheritance IN the kingdom will reign with Christ. That's why we need to endure.1Co 6:10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Yet, Jesus promised recipients of eternal life that they will never perish. That's quite permanent.Rev_21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
Tit 1:15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
Tit 1:16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
Not expecting a change of heart here just not willing to let what i see as a partial truth go without being answered with His Word.
This is a strange comment, given what was posted by you in #566:James 1:13 (ESV)
Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am being tempted by God," for God cannot be tempted with evil, and he himself tempts no one.
You have zero basis for saying God chose Judas to betray Christ. That goes against who God is on so many levels.
Judas absolutely did serve a purpose in betraying Jesus. And another statement in your own post:Do you believe that God chose Judas to serve Him by sinning?
This takes the metaphor way too far. Jesus' promise was to recipients of eternal life, not sheep. Human beings. Surely no one would conclude that Jesus gave eternal life to sheep, right?I am talking context. Jesus was talking to the Jewish leaders who did not believe in Him. He was talking about sheep. In those days people 'snatched' sheep. He was not saying that the sheep could not wonder away.
I'm not interested in stretching metaphors way beyond their use.Ask yourself this question - how did the sheep become lost if the Father would not let it leave His hand?
I see it quite the opposite. Such thinking renders the clear promises of eternal security as untrue.
How is one led to think they can lose salvation from this verse?
Same question here.
There are 3 parallel passages; this one, Gal 5:21 and Eph 5:5. Similar lists of sin in all of them, and Eph 5:5 says "no inheritance IN the kingdom". So "no inheritance IN the kingdom" is equivalent to "not inherit the kingdom". All 3 passages are warning of loss of inheritance IN the kingdom. Or loss of reward, since Paul taught that one who endures will "reign with Christ" in 2 Tim 2:12. Only those who have an inheritance IN the kingdom will reign with Christ. That's why we need to endure.
Yet, Jesus promised recipients of eternal life that they will never perish. That's quite permanent.
So none of the verses above can be about losing salvation. Or Jesus' promise cannot be true.
Either recipients will never perish, or some recipients will perish.
The Bible does not teach both of these ideas. Only one can be true. Jesus promised recipients of eternal life that they will never perish.
That's NOT what He promised in John 10:28. He promised RECIPIENTS of eternal life that they will never perish.No one found in Christ when He returns will perish.
John 10:28 is a promise of eternal security. All recipients of eternal life will never perish.That is eternal security.
Certainly not. What Jesus promised in Jn 10:28 is that recipients of eternal life will never perish.I dont believe the Scriptures say the unbelieving will not parish ...
Of course not. The Bible only uses the term "unbeliever" for one who has never believed.Is there a Scripture/passage that tells us the unbelieving will not parish?
Is this an accusation?Cherry picking Scriptures leads to cults
What scripture says that ?Of course not. The Bible only uses the term "unbeliever" for one who has never believed.
nope just an observation of a life timeIs this an accusation?
This is a strange comment, given what was posted by you in #566:
"Judas. God chose him, gave him to Christ, and Judas chose to betray Jesus - Jesus let him, and it was a fulfillment of prophesy."
So, the basis for my saying so came directly from your own post.
Judas absolutely did serve a purpose in betraying Jesus. And another statement in your own post:
"Jesus let him, and it was a fulfillment of prophesy."
This takes the metaphor way too far. Jesus' promise was to recipients of eternal life, not sheep. Human beings. Surely no one would conclude that Jesus gave eternal life to sheep, right?
I'm not interested in stretching metaphors way beyond their use.
But I do have a question: If any recipient of eternal life CAN perish, what does that do to Jesus' promise in John 10:28?