I quoted John 5:24-29 and 2 John 1:9, which say they same thing.
Well, let's take a look at them and see if they say the same thing.
John 5:24-29
24 “Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life.
25 Very truly I tell you, a time is coming and has now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live.
26 For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself.
27 And he has given him authority to judge because he is the Son of Man.
28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice
29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned.
Now for 2 John 1:9
Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son.
How can 1 verse "say the same thing" as 6 verses? I don't see how. Maybe you meant "mean the same thing" or "speaks of the same subject".
But one thing is quite sure about 2 John 1:9. It has nothing to do with loss of salvation, or conditional security. In fact, it CAN'T.
Why, some may ask? Because of the plain language of Scripture which describes eternal life as a gift of God in Rom 6:23 and that God's gifts are irrevocable in Rom 11:29. AND the fact that Paul never bothered to exclude the gift of eternal life from God's gifts that are irrevocable.
Further, more plain language in Eph 1:13-14 that says that 'having believed' (point in time initial faith) the person is sealed IN HIM with the Holy Spirit as a deposit, a guarantee for the day of redemption. And Eph 4:30 says that even those who GRIEVE the Holy Spirit are sealed for the day of redemption.
You respond to that post, without ever addressing the language of the scripture, then you switch to another opinion and tag that with a scripture reference that is incomplete.
I always address the language of the Scripture, so this charge is untrue. Second, if any of Scripture references don't match my opinion, then all that one must do is show HOW so. So, please proceed with evidence. Throwing empty claims proves nothing.
If you quote my post, then address what the scripture and the point I make in my post, and I will do the same.
I've been doing that. And in my response to your post here. Right now. I pointed out that 2 John 1:9 cannot be about conditional security, and for the REASONS why it can't.
“Most assuredly, I say to you,
he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life.
John 5:24
What I clearly see in PLAIN LANGUAGE is that the one who hears and believes HAS eternal life. Are you reading something different?
These verses say the same thing, as this same John records both verse's.
- “Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life. John 5:24
- Whoever transgresses and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God. He who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both the Father and the Son. 2 John 1:9
Hears my word is a present tense continual requirement that continues, which John says that word must abide, remain, continue in the person for them to
have [present tense] both the Father and the Son.
Your opinion of the present tense in the Greek isn't even close to what Greek grammar texts say about it.
those who have done good, to the resurrection of life.
those who have done evil, to the resurrection of condemnation.
Please define what is meant by "done good" and "done evil". Then we'll know if we're on the same page or not.
Until that is done, there can be no advancement of any discussion.
You have a choice to post your opinion, then "tag" your opinion which often leaves out parts of the verse or ignores the context.
And what you've NOT DONE is to provide any kind of explanation of HOW that changes the meaning of what I do quote. Just throwing a claim without any explanation or evidence is not helpful.
I also have a choice to no longer respond to your post's that only state your opinion, with no actual scripture.
JLB
No one is required to respond to anyone's posts, and for any reason. But your claim that my posts are "with no actual Scripture" is totally false.