• CFN has a new look, using the Eagle as our theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • CFN welcomes a new contributing member!

    Please welcome Beetow to our Christian community.

    Blessings in Christ, and we pray you enjoy being a member here

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Tasted Death for every Man !

Abraham's seed are heirs according to the promise. What is the promise?
The (singular) Seed of Abraham is Christ, as Galatians 3:16, quoting Genesis 12:7, says, “The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. Scripture does not say ‘and to seeds,’ meaning many people, but ‘and to your seed,’ meaning one person, who is Christ.” The passage goes on to explain that an inheritance was promised to Abraham’s Seed (Christ) apart from the Law. Later, the Mosaic Law was introduced, but it did not annul the promises made to Abraham or to Abraham’s Seed (Christ). Gotquestions.org
 
Now you're saying the elect? You're using terms without explaining what they are. What is a "spiritual" seed? Paul didn't use this language.

You're points are moot. No one denies that He came for the seed of Abraham. However, that doesn't exclude everyone else. In order to make your case you need to show where everyone else is excluded. As I've point out twice now, the argument you're making ignores the context in which Paul made the statement. "What is man"? Why don't you address that instead of just saying I disagree?

As I said before, Christ tasted death for all so tjat He might bring many sons to glory.
The whole context is about the elect, If you dont agree thats fine, Im going to continue to show exactly who the all or every man is from the context.
 
Yeah I used to think that too, and maybe still do. The problems I'm having though are these: 1) why then did God choose to include (through David) that David's soul went to Hell but that it was not to be left there; 2) why were those saints brought to life only after Christ gave up the ghost and, 3) of course, your point about the names written in Heaven (Lamb's book of life ?), before completion of Christ's offering.
Not asking you to provide answers (unless you want to, that is) but I feel like I need to find a common thread to harmonize them. Anyway, I'll keep looking.
May God help you with your quest, all i can say for sure is that those whom Christ died for were not ever under His condemnation or Wrath for their sins. There sins were never charged to them, but to Christ. Even the Old Test Saint David know about it Ps 32:1-2

Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered.

2 Blessed is the man unto whom the Lord imputeth not iniquity, and in whose spirit there is no guile.

Rom 4:6-8
6 Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

7 Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.


8 Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.
 
The whole context is about the elect, If you dont agree thats fine, Im going to continue to show exactly who the all or every man is from the context.
Where is the context about the elect? What is man? That's the passage Paul quotes. Is all of mankind the elect?

It seems to me that you're not really interested in addressing the weaknesses in your argument, but would rather just continue on your course. To me this doesn't suggest one is serious about getting to the truth
 
The (singular) Seed of Abraham is Christ, as Galatians 3:16, quoting Genesis 12:7, says, “The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. Scripture does not say ‘and to seeds,’ meaning many people, but ‘and to your seed,’ meaning one person, who is Christ.” The passage goes on to explain that an inheritance was promised to Abraham’s Seed (Christ) apart from the Law. Later, the Mosaic Law was introduced, but it did not annul the promises made to Abraham or to Abraham’s Seed (Christ). Gotquestions.org
Hi Fastfredy0, I'm not a fan of Gotquestions. I find that sight contains a lot of error. However, they are right that Christ is the seed that the promise refers to. However, that doesn't tell us what the promise is.
 
The (singular) Seed of Abraham is Christ, as Galatians 3:16, quoting Genesis 12:7, says, “The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. Scripture does not say ‘and to seeds,’ meaning many people, but ‘and to your seed,’ meaning one person, who is Christ.” The passage goes on to explain that an inheritance was promised to Abraham’s Seed (Christ) apart from the Law. Later, the Mosaic Law was introduced, but it did not annul the promises made to Abraham or to Abraham’s Seed (Christ). Gotquestions.org
In Gal 3:16 seed is singular and refers to Christ, but its Christ Mystically as the Head of His Body the Church, who is One with Him, because a few verses later Paul say Gal 3:29

29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
 
In Gal 3:16 seed is singular and refers to Christ, but its Christ Mystically as the Head of His Body the Church, who is One with Him, because a few verses later Paul say Gal 3:29

29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Mystical? I think this is one of the biggest reasons Christian's struggle to understand the Bible. What is mystical? It seems to me that it's a way for people to explain things in a way that aren't necessarily realistic. No one knows what is "mystical" therefore one can make just about any claim and claim its mystical.

The Bible is rooted in reality, not mysticism.
 
Where is the context about the elect? What is man? That's the passage Paul quotes. Is all of mankind the elect?

It seems to me that you're not really interested in addressing the weaknesses in your argument, but would rather just continue on your course. To me this doesn't suggest one is serious about getting to the truth
Elect is Man, they are the Men God is so Mindful of .
 
Mystical? I think this is one of the biggest reasons Christian's struggle to understand the Bible. What is mystical? It seems to me that it's a way for people to explain things in a way that aren't necessarily realistic. No one knows what is "mystical" therefore one can make just about any claim and claim its mystical.

The Bible is rooted in reality, not mysticism.
I stated what Mystical meant, Christ and His Body the Church are One 1 Cor 12:12

12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.

The Promise to Abraham seed Christ means Christ is Heir and His Body is Heir, Joint Heirs with Christ . Rom 8:17



And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.
 
Is all of mankind the elect?
Of course not. The Non elect arent considered here. Just the Heirs of Salvation, the Elect Heb 1:14
14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?

The Mindfulness of Man here is Salvaic concern.
 
I stated what Mystical meant, Christ and His Body the Church are One 1 Cor 12:12

12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.

The Promise to Abraham seed Christ means Christ is Heir and His Body is Heir, Joint Heirs with Christ . Rom 8:17



And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.
But that's not mystical. It's metaphorical. Christ and his body are one, simply means they are unified. They are of the same mindset. There's nothing mystical about that. It's just how we use language.

Yes, we are joint heirs with Christ. Heirs according to the promise. But, again, what is the promise?
 
But that's not mystical. It's metaphorical. Christ and his body are one, simply means they are unified. They are of the same mindset. There's nothing mystical about that. It's just how we use language.

Yes, we are joint heirs with Christ. Heirs according to the promise. But, again, what is the promise?
I see you cant understand.
 
Of course not. The Non elect arent considered here. Just the Heirs of Salvation, the Elect Heb 1:14
14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?

The Mindfulness of Man here is Salvaic concern.
Ok, if it's not all mankind, then the whole context isn't about the elect. As I've pointed Paul quotes David, "what is man".

<To the chief Musician upon Gittith, A Psalm of David.> O LORD our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth! who hast set thy glory above the heavens.
2 Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength because of thine enemies, that thou mightest still the enemy and the avenger.
3 When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained;
4 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?
5 For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour.
6 Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet:
7 All sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts of the field;
8 The fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea, and whatsoever passeth through the paths of the seas.

9 O LORD our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth! (Ps. 8:1-9 KJV)


This is what Paul is quoting from. The context here is not the elect. It is mankind. God put all things under Adam. thus all things are under man. This is Paul's point. Adam was given charge of keeping the creation. However, Adam sinned, the land was cursed, and fell under the control of Satan. Paul calls him the god of this world. Then goes on to explain how Christ came to remedy this situation. How He became a man so that man could once again rule over the creation. The context is mankind, not the elect.
 
I see you cant understand.
I understand. I used to be Reformed. I know the arguments, I used to use some of them. However, I learned from deeper study that those arguments don't hold water. I learned that Reformed theology is simply built on proof texts. When I pressed the Reformed pastors that were teaching these things they couldn't answer the questions. I have no problem believing things. However, I don't believe things that are contradictory or don't make sense.

I was taught all of the proof texts that are supposed to support the theology. However, when I studied them deeper and in context I quickly learned they weren't saying what I was taught they said. However, when I was faced with passages that caused difficulties for the theology, I questioned the theology, I didn't try to make the Scriptures fit.
 
I understand. I used to be Reformed. I know the arguments, I used to use some of them. However, I learned from deeper study that those arguments don't hold water. I learned that Reformed theology is simply built on proof texts. When I pressed the Reformed pastors that were teaching these things they couldn't answer the questions. I have no problem believing things. However, I don't believe things that are contradictory or don't make sense.

I was taught all of the proof texts that are supposed to support the theology. However, when I studied them deeper and in context I quickly learned they weren't saying what I was taught they said. However, when I was faced with passages that caused difficulties for the theology, I questioned the theology, I didn't try to make the Scriptures fit.
Butch5,
Okay, so just to be clear about your bottom-line belief regarding the point of points of the Gospel, you are saying
that a work (of any kind) to become saved is required?
 
Ok, if it's not all mankind, then the whole context isn't about the elect. As I've pointed Paul quotes David, "what is man".

<To the chief Musician upon Gittith, A Psalm of David.> O LORD our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth! who hast set thy glory above the heavens.
2 Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength because of thine enemies, that thou mightest still the enemy and the avenger.
3 When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained;
4 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?
5 For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour.
6 Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet:
7 All sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts of the field;
8 The fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea, and whatsoever passeth through the paths of the seas.

9 O LORD our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth! (Ps. 8:1-9 KJV)


This is what Paul is quoting from. The context here is not the elect. It is mankind. God put all things under Adam. thus all things are under man. This is Paul's point. Adam was given charge of keeping the creation. However, Adam sinned, the land was cursed, and fell under the control of Satan. Paul calls him the god of this world. Then goes on to explain how Christ came to remedy this situation. How He became a man so that man could once again rule over the creation. The context is mankind, not the elect.
Yeah its about the Elect, so is Ps 8. Back in Heb 2:6 the word for visiteth

6 But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that thou art mindful of him? or the son of man that thou visitest him?

Its the greek word episkeptomai and it actually means, to choose or to select like in Election. Its used in Acts 6

Wherefore, brethren, look ye out among you seven men of honest report, full of the Holy Ghost and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business.

Brothers and sisters, choose seven men from among you who are known to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will turn this responsibility over to them NIV
 
butch5

God put all things under Adam. thus all things are under man.

Yes who was the Natural Head of the Elect, the Sons of God. He was called the Son of God Lk 3:38

38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Adam was a figure of Christ in his headship Rom 5:14


14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

The Elect bare his Image first, then Christs Image 1 Cor 15:49


And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
 
Butch5,
Okay, so just to be clear about your bottom-line belief regarding the point of points of the Gospel, you are saying
that a work (of any kind) to become saved is required?
Hi Roger,

The no works argument, like so much else is built on a false premise. Ephesians 2 is taken out of context to create a doctrine that says nothing a person does contributes to their salvation. However, that is demonstrably wrong. To answer your question, yes, people must do things to be saved.

If we read Ephesians in context we see that Paul isn't saying a person does nothing to be saved. What he is arguing is that keeping the Law of Moses doesn't save people.

11 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;
12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;
15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;
16 And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:
(Eph. 2:11-16 KJV)


When we read on past verses 8 and 9 we see that Paul argues that Christ has broken down the wall of partition. This is a reference to a wall in the temple. There was a wall past which the Gentiles couldn't pass. Only the Jews could pass beyond this wall. Thus this was a division between the Jew and the Gentile effectively letting the Jew get closer to God. Paul argues that in Christ this wall has been torn down and now both Jew and Gentile have equal access to God. He goes on to explain how Christ has abolished the law contained in commandments. That's the Mosaic Law. In verse 8 He was telling the Gentiles that they wouldn't be saved by keeping the Mosaic Law.

You see, Paul had a problem during his ministry. There were Jews going behind him telling his converts that in addition to faith they also had to keep the Law of Moses. This can be seen in Acts 15.

And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.
2 When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question. (Acts 15:1-2 KJV)


Paul eventually went to Jerusalem about this. There at Jerusalem there were also believers that said the Gentiles needed to keep the Law of Moses.

5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses. (Acts 15:5 KJV)

This is the basis for the Jerusalem council. Read all of Acts 15. It was determined that it wasn't necessary for the Gentiles to keep the Law of Moses. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that those Jews immediately stopped telling Paul's converts that they needed to keep the Law of Moses. We see Paul addressing this in his letter to the Galatians also.

O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?
2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?
4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain.
5 He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? (Gal. 3:1-5 KJV)


We see here again, the Galatians were being lead to believe that they had to keep the Law of Moses. Paul writes to them showing that what they had heard and seen was heard and done apart from Law. It was done through faith.

If you look through Paul's writings, virtually everywhere you see Paul mention something to the effect that they are not saved by works, you'll find him mentioning the Law of Moses. This is the basis of his arguing that a person isn't saved by works. He isn't saying a person does nothing to obtain salvation. In fact that idea goes against what he stated plainly to the Christians at Rome.

Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
2 But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things.
3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?
5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God;
6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:

7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:
8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,
9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;
10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:
(Rom. 2:1-10 KJV)


Here Paul states plainly that God will judge everyone according to their deeds. He states that those who continue in doing good deeds are seeking eternal life. It doesn't get much clearer than that.

When we understand the context of Paul's argument that people aren't saved by works, and that he is referring to the Mosaic Law, everything fits together. However, when we say that he meant nothing a person does plays a role in their salvation we start running into problems with passages such as this one above.
 
butch5



Yes who was the Natural Head of the Elect, the Sons of God. He was called the Son of God Lk 3:38

38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Adam was a figure of Christ in his headship Rom 5:14


14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

The Elect bare his Image first, then Christs Image 1 Cor 15:49


And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
Every man born has borne the image of Adam. Adam represents all of mankind. Not sure what your point was there. It seems to me that you're associating one being a son of God with one being saved, or of the elect. If that is the case, you need to establish that because Paul also called the unbelieving Greeks children of God.

22 Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.
23 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.
24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
25 Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;
26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:
28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought
not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device. (Acts 17:22-29 KJV)

God also said that Israel was His son.

22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn: (Exod. 4:22 KJV)

Surely not everyone in these two groups were saved. So, we see that not everyone who is called a son of God is someone who is or will be saved.
 
Back
Top