The covid injections don't work

[Norman]

Yeah, that the love of most would grow cold, that people would be lovers of self...sounds accurate to me!

 

[christian1724]

Now that nearly all of 'vaccinated' are essentially back in the ranks of the 'un-vaccinated', does that mean that we might expect a full retraction from their Faucian programming. I'm hoping so, it is so un-Godly.

I hope they won't simply double-down on their misery-loves-company insistence that everyone now get on board with the sleek new model 'boosters' that are coming to the health-clinic/showrooms.

 

[Christ the King]

Now that nearly all of 'vaccinated' are essentially back in the ranks of the 'un-vaccinated', does that mean that we might expect a full retraction from their Faucian programming. I'm hoping so, it is so un-Godly.

I hope they won't simply double-down on their misery-loves-company insistence that everyone now get on board with the sleek new model 'boosters' that are coming to the health-clinic/showrooms.

In the state of Victoria in Australia, the premier has already said that boosters will be required every 6 months to keep your vaccine passport valid...

In New Zealand their prime minister has said that these va cines are never going to end...

We have totalitarian leaders down here and they just tell it how it is...

Just look at Europe now... Their using the fear of omicron to jab everyone with boosters and go door to door to hunt down the unvaxef

 

[Free]

Now that nearly all of 'vaccinated' are essentially back in the ranks of the 'un-vaccinated', does that mean that we might expect a full retraction from their Faucian programming. I'm hoping so, it is so un-Godly.

What is "Faucian programming"? Why should there be a "full retraction"? What makes it "so un-Godly"?

 

[Norman]

Latest peer-reviewed research: Immediate global ivermectin use will end COVID-19 pandemic – CLINICALNEWS.ORG

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Peer reviewed by medical experts that included three U.S. government senior scientists and published in the American Journal of Therape

clinicalnews.org

 

[JLB]

Already asked and answered.


I made up nothing. I quoted your post, word for word, but it was conveniently deleted by another administrator. Kind of strange that it was since it didn’t violate the ToS.

You quoted one of my posts, but not the post I referred to.


JLB

 

[JLB]

In the state of Victoria in Australia, the premier has already said that boosters will be required every 6 months to keep your vaccine passport valid...

In New Zealand their prime minister has said that these va cines are never going to end...

We have totalitarian leaders down here and they just tell it how it is...

Just look at Europe now... Their using the fear of omicron to jab everyone with boosters and go door to door to hunt down the unvaxef

That is truly sad.

 

[JLB]

Already asked and answered.


I made up nothing. I quoted your post, word for word, but it was conveniently deleted by another administrator. Kind of strange that it was since it didn’t violate the ToS.

Please present the post where I said… “getting the vaccine directly violates the words of Christ.”




JLB

 

[Norman]

Today in Ontario, the premier just said that since the omicron variant is the fastest-spreading one yet, the jab will be provided to everyone 18 and older and they have shortened the time between jabs to 3 months.
No mention was made about it being the mildest variant as fear was once again used to the optimum. The You Tube response was unanimous...it's a scam!

 

[Free]

Please present the post where I said… “getting the vaccine directly violates the words of Christ.”




JLB

I clearly said that the post was deleted. This is what you said:

“Why would people who are perfectly well go and have an experimental, unapproved vaccine injected into their body in direct violation of the words of Christ?”

Do you deny that you said this?

 

[WIP]

I clearly said that the post was deleted. This is what you said:

“Why would people who are perfectly well go and have an experimental, unapproved vaccine injected into their body in direct violation of the words of Christ?”

Do you deny that you said this?

Free and JLB
Out of curiosity I painstakingly skimmed through all 18 pages of posts in this discussion thread to locate any deleted post containing the question, "Why would people who are perfectly well go and have an experimental, unapproved vaccine injected into their body in direct violation of the words of Christ?”

There were no posts of JLB's that were deleted in this thread at all and there were no posts deleted that contained this question. I then searched the entire discussion thread for the phrase, "direct violation of the words of Christ" and there only three posts where it was found, post 335 by Free, post 337 by JLB, and post 350 by Free.

It was in your post #335, Free, where it was first introduced in this thread. Are you sure you aren't mistaken?

 

[JLB]

I clearly said that the post was deleted. This is what you said:

“Why would people who are perfectly well go and have an experimental, unapproved vaccine injected into their body in direct violation of the words of Christ?”

Do you deny that you said this?

Here is what I said —

Why would people who are perfectly well go and have an experimental, unapproved vaccine injected into their body in direct violation of the words of Christ?


Here is what you said I stated —

• getting the vaccine directly violates the words of Christ.

Obviously I asked a question.



My question remains unanswered —

Why would people who are perfectly well go and have an experimental, unapproved vaccine injected into their body in direct violation of the words of Christ?


Can you answer the question?








JLB

 

[christian1724]

What is "Faucian programming"?

Thank you for asking. Faucians tend to place the mutterings of 'Dr.' Fauci ahead of scientific research or independent thinking.

 

[Free]

Here is what I said —

Why would people who are perfectly well go and have an experimental, unapproved vaccine injected into their body in direct violation of the words of Christ?


Here is what you said I stated —

• getting the vaccine directly violates the words of Christ.

In the context of what you said, for people who are “perfectly well” (which is almost no one, so it is meaningless without qualifications) it would violate Jesus’s words to get one of the COVID vaccines. That is as erroneous an interpretation as it is dangerous. You are implying that people who are “perfectly well” would violate Jesus’s words if they went to a doctor.

My question remains unanswered

No, I was attempting to get to answer by first asking you some questions in reply, which you didn’t answer. But I have already given the answer to which I was heading: your interpretation is deeply flawed because you are divorcing it from the context and using it as a pretext to support your position on the COVID vaccines. Very erroneous; very dangerous.

 

[christian1724]

Why should there be a "full retraction"?

Thank you again for asking. Finding themselves again among the inappropriately vaccinated, I expect that there will be many asking why they were tricked into believing that previous jabs would remove them and society from harms way. I also expect there will be a few who will reject the new sleeks because they still have a bad taste in their mouths from the previous ones and some of the dangers that they brought with them.

 

[christian1724]

What makes it "so un-Godly"?

Trying to force the syringes into people. First by scare tactics, later by thread of oppressive treatment, even to the point of making it difficult for those who reject the injections to live by denying them goods and services. Thanks for asking that question though, I believe that many would not need to.

Do you plan on re-upping to the new models? I hope not.

 

[Free]

Thank you again for asking. Finding themselves again among the inappropriately vaccinated, I expect that there will be many asking why they were tricked into believing that previous jabs would remove them and society from harms way. I also expect there will be a few who will reject the new sleeks because they still have a bad taste in their mouths from the previous ones and some of the dangers that they brought with them.

As I stated to someone else, a little thinking on these matters goes a long way into understanding why things haven’t turned out the way they first were hoping. I would enlighten you but you need to think better about these things yourself.

Trying to force the syringes into people. First by scare tactics, later by thread of oppressive treatment, even to the point of making it difficult for those who reject the injections to live by denying them goods and services. Thanks for asking that question though, I believe that many would not need to.

Well, the consequences for those who do not want to get their vaccination are inevitable. It isn’t oppression and it isn’t discrimination. It’s people, businesses, and institutions each exercising their rights, as they should be able to.

Do you plan on re-upping to the new models? I hope not.

I already have three, so I figure it will be six months or so before I am able to get another, if it’s needed at that time.

 

[christian1724]

Well, the consequences for those who do not want to get their vaccination are inevitable. It isn’t oppression and it isn’t discrimination. It’s people, businesses, and institutions each exercising their rights, as they should be able to.

Do you think that people should have to pay taxes only to have their portion of the privileges that these taxes provide taken removed from them and used against them?

 

[daninthelionsden]

I hope and pray they do find an antidote because a lot of good people have taken the vaccine, and God only knows what the long term effects will be.

The American vax is "unique" in that is just uses virus parts. The Chinese vax went traditional and used suspended virus. I wish we knew the Chinese vax efficacy, but we will probably never receive the truth about it....only propaganda from both sides.

 

[eddif]

The American vax is "unique" in that is just uses virus parts. The Chinese vax went traditional and used suspended virus. I wish we knew the Chinese vax efficacy, but we will probably never receive the truth about it....only propaganda from both sides.

Is this what you are referring to?

How the Sinopharm Vaccine Works (Published 2022)

Using inactivated coronaviruses to train the immune system.

www.nytimes.com

eddif