- Mar 11, 2014
- 48,439
- 10,121
The idea of both predates the Lord.My understanding is that 2 Peter 2:4 IS Tartarus.
??
Remember that gehinnom is a burn pit .it's also a rabbinical teaching.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
The idea of both predates the Lord.My understanding is that 2 Peter 2:4 IS Tartarus.
??
By gehinnom you must mean gehenna.The idea of both predates the Lord.
Remember that gehinnom is a burn pit .it's also a rabbinical teaching.
Jesus strikes me as being a person who was very blunt, speaking truths as they exist.
A lake of fire in any meaningful way destroys that which is thrown into it.
The word destroy means to make into nothing, to pull apart, make as if it was not there.
And Jesus probably did mean cutting off hands and plucking out eyes, to prove a point.
Listen to how easily people compromise their faith. Oh that is just a small lie, that affair I
had was just my flesh running away with itself, that show of anger was totally justified.
We talk as if morals are a moving feast and there are no consequences. A King is condemned
to die, but showing mercy, how can that be a bad thing? Because God commanded death.
PJAfter having discussions with people who say, Christ does everything I just have to believe,
makes me think these are people who turn up to the feast without proper preparation.
It made me think yes we know we are going to the wedding feast of the King, but are we really
part of the Kingdom. So many claim, I am in with God because .... but actually have no respect
for the King at all. So I see this as a warning to say, one might recognise the realities of Jesus,
but if you do nothing about it, it will mean nothing in the end, just window dressing.
When coming out of this world (by death) and meeting God "face to face" one has to be in the same realm as God. This means stepping outside the boundaries of time itself. As a result every time Hell or the unpleasant end awaiting those who never submitted themselves to God is mentioned it is heavily encased in metaphor.
The only reason I can fathom for this is that as good as the rewards are going to be for us an equally bad reward awaits those who didn't submit.
And where we can't really understand what Heaven is going to be like neither can we really understand how bad Hell will be either.
So in the end I can without hesitation say, "I know that I do not know"
Hades is often what Jesus spoke of but both are cast into the lake of fire,gehenna.By gehinnom you must mean gehenna.
So, gehenna is Tartarus
Tartarus is hell.
But 2 Peter 2:4 says it's for the angels.
I'm not saying I don't believe in hell, I'm just saying that maybe the N.T. wasn't translated really well in THIS regard...
People raising from the dead doesn't make sense either.So to torture people for eternity for this does not make sense.
Scripture also says that all of mankind will be resurrected immortal and incorruptible. (1 Cor 15:52-53ff)
Those on the left, but not the blessed on the right.Scripture also says that those who are condemned will be sent to hell. (Mat 25:41)
Hi Jim,
You seem to be taking a universalist interpretation of the resurrection.
I declare to you, brothers and sisters, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. 1 cor 15:50
The argument is only the children of God will experience this transformation into the eternal.
You made a jump of Pauls words and took it to mean that everyone will is now eternal.
But Pauls discussion about the sting of death is now silenced only applies to believers.
His point is faith extinguishes this sting, which obviously does not apply to non-believers.
It is this leap of logic I do not follow. Logically if Paul is saying non-believers are not immortal,
then they are to be destroyed in the lake of fire.
:
Agree, I didn't either until I dug into the scriptres for a few years. It is impossible to see, I bellieve.th1b.taylor , I agree with what you said as people do not have the concept of the world eternal as being either with Christ or the lake of fire.
Interesting idea. But I would contend that Gods eternity is the not the important point about Him,No, God mens there is a element in our bodies that looks like Him. We are Eternal as He is eternal. te body dies but the sirit of every man and woman is eternal, eternally in Heaven or in that other place.
Jhn 5:28-28Hi Jim,
You seem to be taking a universalist interpretation of the resurrection.
You almost got it.I declare to you, brothers and sisters, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. 1 cor 15:50
The argument is only the children of God will experience this transformation into the eternal.
There is nothing in Paul's statement to support that notion.You made a jump of Pauls words and took it to mean that everyone will is now eternal.
But Pauls discussion about the sting of death is now silenced only applies to believers.
His point is faith extinguishes this sting, which obviously does not apply to non-believers.
Scripture please.It is this leap of logic I do not follow. Logically if Paul is saying non-believers are not immortal, then they are to be destroyed in the lake of fire.