The Return of Christ

I do understand, I've made my argument about two parallel accounts of the 3.5 year tribulation. There're plenty of such examples in the bible, Gen. 1 and 2 are two parallel accounts of the creation, the synoptic gospels and John are two parallel accounts of Jesus's ministry, the two Kings and the two Chronicles are two parallel accounts of Israel's history, Jospeh's two dreams, Pharaoh's two dreams, king Nebuchadnezzar's dream of the metallic statue and Daniel's vision of the four beasts, and so on. This is based on the "two or more witnesses principle" from the bible itself, that by the testimonies of two or more witnesses, a case is established.
In saying this you've undone your own argument, that the Revelation is chronological, and supported my notion that the Revelation cannot be completely chronological. If there are "parallel accounts" then you substantiate what I've said, that saying John sees something "next" has nothing to do with the chronology of the fulfillments, but only with his own time in seeing these visions.
For the record, I had argued repeatedly that the great tribulation is only 3.5 years, not 7 years, because I understand it's not one 3.5 year period after another as in a chronological order. When I read Rev. 11:15 where Christ's kingdom has already come, then it shifted from heaven to earth in the following chapters, I hypothesized that there might be parallel accounts, contrary to the seven year tribulation narrative; then I discovered the chiastic structure in the book that the second half mirrors the first half, which corroborated my hypothesis, then I drew my conclusion. You may dismiss "parallel accounts" and "chiastic structure" as irrelevant, but these are the key to bible study, they help connect the dots and show you the bigger picture, as shown in the summary below - not my opinion or some wild theories, but a simple summary of the book's contents.
I've not at all dismissed "parallel" prophecies, but have, in fact, established them as my own position, that some visions represent the same timeframe. I agree with you that there is not a 7 year Tribulation (supposedly based on Daniel's "70th Week") but see the Reign of Antichrist (not "the Tribulation") as only a 3.5 year period, based on Dan 7 (not Dan 9).

Jesus defined the "Great Tribulation" not as the Reign of Antichrist, but rather, as the Punishment of national Israel over the entire NT era. This is clearly set forth in Luke 21, which explains Matthew's account and Mark's account, as well. The Olivet Discourse is all about Israel's NT punishment for rejecting their Messiah and their Kingdom (with the exception of the Christian remnant).
A: Prologue 1:1-1:11
B: First Septet – Seven Churches 1:12-3:22
C: Second Septet – Seven Seals 4:1-8:1
D: Third Septet – Seven Trumpets 8:2-11:19
E: Fourth Septet – Seven Signs 12:1-15:1
D′: Fifth Septet – Seven Bowls 15:2-16:17
C′: Sixth Septet – Seven Condemnations of Babylon 16:18-19:10
B′: Seventh Septet – Seven sights of the victory of Christ’s Kingdom (I saw xyz ...) 19:11-22:5
A′: Epilogue 22:6-22:21

You on the other hand have just refuted the possibility of chronological order, while you've offered no other viable alternative. If these apocalyptic events are supposed to happen randomly or simultaneously, you haven't made any argument, so far you've just speculated.
Not at all. What I've said is that because Revelation does not specify that these sets of 7 represent consecutive periods of time we should not declare they are! Revelation says we should not "add" to the words of this book, and I'm complying with that--far from only "speculating."

The fact that they are sets of 7, 1 taking place after the other, may indicate a set, rather than a timing order. They may all take place in the same general time period. And that would be a healthier kind of "speculation," should you want that.
 
I'm not talking about the whole Bible being in a chronological order, but that of the book of Revelation and the order of end time events as one following after another. Revelation consist of every prophecy from Genesis to Revelation being fulfilled before Christ returns.
Yes, but for me the same argument applies. If we refuse to make the entire Bible chronological, which is one book made up of many books, why would we make Revelation chronological when it is one revelation consisting of many revelations?

Of course, Revelation took place at a single sitting, whereas the entire Bible was done by various authors over a long period of time. But the point is, there is no necessity for a single work to place every chapter in chronological order--no more so than movies have to take place chronologically. Obviously, there are flashbacks, jumps to the future, and repeat scenes in many movies.

I don't think the Revelation is any different, unless of course the book itself declares itself to be so. And it does not! So unless you want to go against what the Scriptures themselves say, you should not! Otherwise you're going to end up somewhere in Left Field (no insult to baseball players).

How many times is Jesus' Coming played out in the book of Revelation? Once at the end? No--several times. And why should a set of 7 be viewed a consecutive fulfillments chronologically when John is only saying that he sees one after the other?

It's probably fair for you to say that "it seems" that a set of 7 is representative of a chronological history. But I would not personally sanction claiming the Bible is actually saying that explicitly. But it's up to you and God.

The real problem here, as I see it, is that we confuse John's record of seeing these things, one after another, as an implied chronological sequence. But the only chronology is in his own time in seeing these things--not in their fulfillment.
 
John's Revelation is said to take place on the "Lord's Day." I think this may refer back to a strange, mystical sort of day, simlar to how Zechariah described it...

Zech 14.7 It will be a unique day—a day known only to the Lord—with no distinction between day and night. When evening comes, there will be light.

This indicates to me that the book of Revelation is to be viewed as John saw it, as visions not necessarily in any kind of chronological sequence. Surely there are sequences involved, but the notion of many visions put together in a single narrative does not appear to require a single precise sequence chronologically, from one vision to the next.

John describes each vision as "I saw this now," "I saw this next," "and afterwards I saw," etc. But this just describes his own time frame in seeing the visions, one after another.

But to say this represents a chronology from one vision to the other in terms of their fulfillment goes beyond what I think John is saying. He is seeing things in a "unique day," with all of the visions and all of the truths put together in the context of Christ's Coming and Kingdom. My view only...
 
The fifth seal shows John a vision of all those who have already been slain for the word of God that are asleep in the grave waiting for God to avenge them as their spirits have returned back to God who preserves their spirit until the day of redemption when Jesus returns, Ecclesiastics 12:7; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18. They are told to rest a little while until their fellow servants that will be killed needs to be fulfilled. These fellow servants are those who have the witness and testimony of Jesus that will be preaching salvation throughout the world during the time of great tribulation until the great and terrible day of the Lords return, Joel 2:31; Matthew 24:29-31.
This I completely agree with.
And you prove the truth; that Seals 1 to 5, were opened by Jesus at His Ascension.

We now await the Sixth Seal world changer which will commence all the rest of what must happen before Jesus Returns.
 
In saying this you've undone your own argument, that the Revelation is chronological, and supported my notion that the Revelation cannot be completely chronological. If there are "parallel accounts" then you substantiate what I've said, that saying John sees something "next" has nothing to do with the chronology of the fulfillments, but only with his own time in seeing these visions.
Not really, the seven trumpets are still chronological, following the seven seals which are also chronological, the seventh seal being the prelude to the first trumpet. Same for the seven bowls following the seven signs.
I've not at all dismissed "parallel" prophecies, but have, in fact, established them as my own position, that some visions represent the same timeframe. I agree with you that there is not a 7 year Tribulation (supposedly based on Daniel's "70th Week") but see the Reign of Antichrist (not "the Tribulation") as only a 3.5 year period, based on Dan 7 (not Dan 9).

Jesus defined the "Great Tribulation" not as the Reign of Antichrist, but rather, as the Punishment of national Israel over the entire NT era. This is clearly set forth in Luke 21, which explains Matthew's account and Mark's account, as well. The Olivet Discourse is all about Israel's NT punishment for rejecting their Messiah and their Kingdom (with the exception of the Christian remnant).
Quite the contrary, the church age is the punishment of Israel, it's called "times of the gentiles" because Israel is being dominated by other nations, and Israel is being spiritually blind to the gospel. In the Great Tribulation, though, Israel is being sealed, they finally shouted, "blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!" as Jesus lamented at the end of Matt. 23. Also, it is mentioned that the fig tree is shaking off its figs, this is a contrast to the fig tree judgement during Jesus's ministry where Jesus found the fig tree barren and fruitless. Fig tree is Israel, figs are spiritual fruits. The fig tree withered at first, then it puts forth leaves near the end, and in the end it bears fruits, the symbolism is consistent.
Not at all. What I've said is that because Revelation does not specify that these sets of 7 represent consecutive periods of time we should not declare they are! Revelation says we should not "add" to the words of this book, and I'm complying with that--far from only "speculating."

The fact that they are sets of 7, 1 taking place after the other, may indicate a set, rather than a timing order. They may all take place in the same general time period. And that would be a healthier kind of "speculation," should you want that.
We shouldn't add anything, neither should we take away anything. I merely pointed out what's already there, especially some overlooked details, then connected the dots. You can argue about others, but the seven trumpets must chronologically follow the seven seals, the seven plagues must chronologicallyfollow the seven signs, indicated in 8:2 and 8:6, 15:1 and 16:1, respectively. This is not merely an order of what's shown to apostle John, but an internal logical order - how can an angel blow a trumpet without receiving a trumpet first? How can an angel pour out a bowl without receiving a bowl first?

And I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and to them were given seven trumpets. (Rev. 8:2)
So the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound. (Rev. 8:6)

Then I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous: seven angels having the seven last plagues, for in them the wrath of God is complete. (Rev. 15:1)
Then I heard a loud voice from the temple saying to the seven angels, “Go and pour out the bowls of the wrath of God on the earth.” (Rev. 16:1)
 
Not really, the seven trumpets are still chronological, following the seven seals which are also chronological, the seventh seal being the prelude to the first trumpet. Same for the seven bowls following the seven signs.
You're just saying that, and certainly not proving it. I get it--it's your theory.

But you have to admit, John sees the vision of the Scroll with 7 seals. "Then" he sees the vision of the Dragon, Woman, and the 2 Beasts.

The order John sees these visions is clearly *not* in chronological order--not even if John sees one thing, and "then" sees another thing. The order John sees these visions are not chronological because before he sees the vision of the Dragon, the Kingdom has already come in ch. 11.
Quite the contrary, the church age is the punishment of Israel...
Didn't I just say that? Or maybe you just made a typing error?
, it's called "times of the gentiles" because Israel is being dominated by other nations, and Israel is being spiritually blind to the gospel. In the Great Tribulation, though, Israel is being sealed, they finally shouted, "blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!" as Jesus lamented at the end of Matt. 23.
I see the Great Tribulation as being the entire period of the New Testament, in which Israel is punished. And so, it would include the end of the age, as well, when Antichrist rises up and afflicts the world with his abuses.

So I do understand that when many refer to the Reign of Antichrist as the "Great Tribulation," what they're really saying is that the era will be tribulational, as it has been at various times throughout the NT age.

They just think it was be a "greater" tribulation only because the Antichrist will be the worst of them all. But in reality, all of them have been equally bad, as I see it.
Also, it is mentioned that the fig tree is shaking off its figs, this is a contrast to the fig tree judgement during Jesus's ministry where Jesus found the fig tree barren and fruitless. Fig tree is Israel, figs are spiritual fruits. The fig tree withered at first, then it puts forth leaves near the end, and in the end it bears fruits, the symbolism is consistent.
I suppose you've already got your favored interpretation, and are now just trying to fit it into the passage. But as I said, that's not what the text actually says.

The passage does not define the leafing of the fig tree as the rebirth of the State of Israel. Rather, it indicates a time when things look promising, ie when their Messiah has come, and yet they produce no fruit.

Instead, signs of imminent national judgment appear, which Jesus called "birth pains." But the only birth they had as a State was a still birth, and the only real birth they had was Jesus, and they killed him.

And so, the best they produced was a small remnant of believers called "Christians." So, I suppose we can say that the Fig Tree grew leaves and bore some limited fruit?
We shouldn't add anything, neither should we take away anything. I merely pointed out what's already there, especially some overlooked details, then connected the dots.
Yes, you can connect dots if the text actually warrants it. But doctrine is formed from explicit statements in the Scriptures--not just "connecting dots" based on non-explicit supposed "facts."
You can argue about others, but the seven trumpets must chronologically follow the seven seals, the seven plagues must chronologicallyfollow the seven signs, indicated in 8:2 and 8:6, 15:1 and 16:1, respectively. This is not merely an order of what's shown to apostle John, but an internal logical order - how can an angel blow a trumpet without receiving a trumpet first? How can an angel pour out a bowl without receiving a bowl first?
You are confusing the chronology of the imagery with the chronology of what the imagery represented. The picking up of a trump is not fulfilled by a literal trumpet being picked up. It is fulfilled by God's word informing angels to act.

The trumpet is imagery designed to show us God's intention, which was to declare an event should take place. Determining the importance of picking up a trumpet before blowing it is irrelevant to the point of the passage, which was simply having angels blow trumpets to represent events God has decreed.
And I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and to them were given seven trumpets. (Rev. 8:2)
So the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound. (Rev. 8:6)

Then I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous: seven angels having the seven last plagues, for in them the wrath of God is complete. (Rev. 15:1)
Then I heard a loud voice from the temple saying to the seven angels, “Go and pour out the bowls of the wrath of God on the earth.” (Rev. 16:1)
As I said before, there surely is some chronological sequence taking place. But we need to separate the chronology of the imagery from the chronology of the events that imagery represents.

The imagery of 7 trumpets may suggest that they all are blown at once, even if for John's sake they are separated into 7 trumpets to show John the significance of each one separately.

Or, there may be more of an intensification of these judgments in progression--I can't say I know since much symbolism is being used. The Egyptian plagues took place sequentially and chronologically. The typology of the Last Plagues is formed after the type of the Egyptian plagues, but does not have to immitate its literal order and sequence.

But I'm glad you're working on these things, trying to understand them--just as I am. They represent our future. And we're told we're blessed in trying to "do them."

But more than just try to interpret them, we need to follow any righteousness implied by them! And I believe that message is that we need to stand fast against satanic opposition, and opposition from the ungodly world. Take care, and stay on the alert.
 
You're just saying that, and certainly not proving it. I get it--it's your theory.
That's not my theory, please read 8:2, 8:6, 15:1 and 16:1. You accuse me of making theory, yet I always back my argument some scripture verses, you come up with nothing.
But you have to admit, John sees the vision of the Scroll with 7 seals. "Then" he sees the vision of the Dragon, Woman, and the 2 Beasts.

The order John sees these visions is clearly *not* in chronological order--not even if John sees one thing, and "then" sees another thing. The order John sees these visions are not chronological because before he sees the vision of the Dragon, the Kingdom has already come in ch. 11.
If it were narrated from God's perspective, then nothing is chonological since God is not bound by time or space; but as long as it's narrated from man's persepctive, everything is chronological since man is bound by time and space.
Didn't I just say that? Or maybe you just made a typing error?
No, you said the great tribulation in particular is a punishment for Israel, but it's actually Israel's spiritual awakening to Jesus.
I see the Great Tribulation as being the entire period of the New Testament, in which Israel is punished. And so, it would include the end of the age, as well, when Antichrist rises up and afflicts the world with his abuses.
No, it's only the 3.5 years, the tail end of the church era, not anytime before that.

Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed. (2. Thess. 2:3)
So I do understand that when many refer to the Reign of Antichrist as the "Great Tribulation," what they're really saying is that the era will be tribulational, as it has been at various times throughout the NT age.

They just think it was be a "greater" tribulation only because the Antichrist will be the worst of them all. But in reality, all of them have been equally bad, as I see it.
You've seen it wrong, you're contradicting the bible. The great tribulation will be unfolded on an unprecedented scale that no other tribulation can compare.

For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be. And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved; but for the elect’s sake those days will be shortened. (Matt. 24:21-22)
 
I suppose you've already got your favored interpretation, and are now just trying to fit it into the passage. But as I said, that's not what the text actually says.

The passage does not define the leafing of the fig tree as the rebirth of the State of Israel. Rather, it indicates a time when things look promising, ie when their Messiah has come, and yet they produce no fruit.
Nonetheless there are fruits produced in the sixth seal, leafing of the fig tree must precedes that.

And the stars of heaven fell to the earth, as a fig tree drops its late figs when it is shaken by a mighty wind. (Rev. 6:13)
Instead, signs of imminent national judgment appear, which Jesus called "birth pains." But the only birth they had as a State was a still birth, and the only real birth they had was Jesus, and they killed him.

And so, the best they produced was a small remnant of believers called "Christians." So, I suppose we can say that the Fig Tree grew leaves and bore some limited fruit?
You're being antisemetic. You don't see that while gentiles are departing from Jesus, Jews are embracing Jesus, messianic ministries are gaining momentum.
Yes, you can connect dots if the text actually warrants it. But doctrine is formed from explicit statements in the Scriptures--not just "connecting dots" based on non-explicit supposed "facts."
No, doctrines are formed from overarching biblical narrative, not one or two "explicit statements". Anybody can selectively pick an "explicit statement" to back their own doctrine, that's taking God's name in vain. Didn't you lecture on me about the importance of "context"? To get the context of Revelation or any book in the bible correctly, a holistic approach is required - first, what the WHOLE book is about, in what historical context was it written by who; then in what structure is it written, breaking it down to sections, what is each section about, how it may harken back to any previous books or themes; only when you have figured out the context of the whole book and then the context of each section do you narrow down to specific verses, and your understanding of the verses must fit into the general context of the book. If you go verse by verse, you're doomed to get lost.
You are confusing the chronology of the imagery with the chronology of what the imagery represented. The picking up of a trump is not fulfilled by a literal trumpet being picked up. It is fulfilled by God's word informing angels to act.

The trumpet is imagery designed to show us God's intention, which was to declare an event should take place. Determining the importance of picking up a trumpet before blowing it is irrelevant to the point of the passage, which was simply having angels blow trumpets to represent events God has decreed.
You're spiritualizing and contradicting the Scripture. God didn't order the angels to blow trumpets they'd already had, He GAVE them trumpets to blow, it is absolutely relevant as long as it's explicitly written.
 
As I said before, there surely is some chronological sequence taking place. But we need to separate the chronology of the imagery from the chronology of the events that imagery represents.

The imagery of 7 trumpets may suggest that they all are blown at once, even if for John's sake they are separated into 7 trumpets to show John the significance of each one separately.

Or, there may be more of an intensification of these judgments in progression--I can't say I know since much symbolism is being used. The Egyptian plagues took place sequentially and chronologically. The typology of the Last Plagues is formed after the type of the Egyptian plagues, but does not have to immitate its literal order and sequence.

But I'm glad you're working on these things, trying to understand them--just as I am. They represent our future. And we're told we're blessed in trying to "do them."

But more than just try to interpret them, we need to follow any righteousness implied by them! And I believe that message is that we need to stand fast against satanic opposition, and opposition from the ungodly world. Take care, and stay on the alert.
No we don't. With absolute certainty, the seven trumpets are blown in chronological order. If the seven trumpets were blown simultaneously, it'd be impossible to have three REMAINING blasts that are ABOUT to sound, three woes decalred, one woe relased in the fifth, and then two other woes coming AFTER that. These angels blow the seven trumpets in a particular order, none of them told John that they've got three remaining trumpet blasts to show him, but three remaining blasts about to SOUND. You're ignoring all of these.

And I looked, and I heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, “Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth, because of the remaining blasts of the trumpet of the three angels who are about to sound!” (Rev. 8:13)
One woe is past. Behold, still two more woes are coming after these things. (Rev. 9:12)
 
Last edited:
No we don't. With absolute certainty, the seven trumpets are blown in chronological order. If the seven trumpets were blown simultaneously, it'd be impossible to have three REMAINING blasts that are ABOUT to sound, three woes decalred, one woe relased in the fifth, and then two other woes coming AFTER that. These angels blow the seven trumpets in a particular order, none of them told John that they've got three remaining trumpet blasts to show him, but three remaining blasts about to SOUND. You're ignoring all of these.

And I looked, and I heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, “Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth, because of the remaining blasts of the trumpet of the three angels who are about to sound!” (Rev. 8:13)
One woe is past. Behold, still two more woes are coming after these things. (Rev. 9:12)
I can't discuss this with you any longer--not because we disagree but because there is no understanding coming out of our discussion between us. And calling me "antisemtic" is over the top.
 
This I completely agree with.
And you prove the truth; that Seals 1 to 5, were opened by Jesus at His Ascension.

We now await the Sixth Seal world changer which will commence all the rest of what must happen before Jesus Returns.
Where do you read in scripture or what I said that Jesus has already opened the seals 1-5 at His ascension?
 
Yes, but for me the same argument applies. If we refuse to make the entire Bible chronological, which is one book made up of many books, why would we make Revelation chronological when it is one revelation consisting of many revelations?

Of course, Revelation took place at a single sitting, whereas the entire Bible was done by various authors over a long period of time. But the point is, there is no necessity for a single work to place every chapter in chronological order--no more so than movies have to take place chronologically. Obviously, there are flashbacks, jumps to the future, and repeat scenes in many movies.

I don't think the Revelation is any different, unless of course the book itself declares itself to be so. And it does not! So unless you want to go against what the Scriptures themselves say, you should not! Otherwise you're going to end up somewhere in Left Field (no insult to baseball players).

How many times is Jesus' Coming played out in the book of Revelation? Once at the end? No--several times. And why should a set of 7 be viewed a consecutive fulfillments chronologically when John is only saying that he sees one after the other?

It's probably fair for you to say that "it seems" that a set of 7 is representative of a chronological history. But I would not personally sanction claiming the Bible is actually saying that explicitly. But it's up to you and God.

The real problem here, as I see it, is that we confuse John's record of seeing these things, one after another, as an implied chronological sequence. But the only chronology is in his own time in seeing these things--not in their fulfillment.

Revelation was given to John in visions as prophecies that had their beginnings in the Old Testament, being fulfilled in the New Testament and yet much to be fulfilled in future events before the great and terrible day of the Lords return. You can't have a series of numbers taking them out of order like that of the seven seals, seven trumpets and seven vial judgements. It would be like mixing up the numbers like 3 7 2 5 1 4 6 instead of chronologically 1-7.​
 
No we don't. With absolute certainty, the seven trumpets are blown in chronological order. If the seven trumpets were blown simultaneously, it'd be impossible to have three REMAINING blasts that are ABOUT to sound, three woes decalred, one woe relased in the fifth, and then two other woes coming AFTER that. These angels blow the seven trumpets in a particular order, none of them told John that they've got three remaining trumpet blasts to show him, but three remaining blasts about to SOUND. You're ignoring all of these.

And I looked, and I heard an angel flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice, “Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth, because of the remaining blasts of the trumpet of the three angels who are about to sound!” (Rev. 8:13)
One woe is past. Behold, still two more woes are coming after these things. (Rev. 9:12)
You had mention the three woes and I would like to take this a little further.

There are three woes in Revelations as each one is worse than the other. The first one starts with the opening of the seventh seal in Rev 8:1 through Rev 9:12 that include the first five trumpets. The second woe starts in Rev 9:13 with the sixth trumpet and ends in Rev 11:14. The third woe starts with the seventh trumpet in Rev 11:15 ending in Rev 20:15.

It's during the sounding of the seventh trumpet as being the last trumpet mentioned in 1 Corinthians 15:52 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16 that during this last trumpet mystery Babylon being the mother of harlots will be revealed as the son of perdition will be exposed, 2 Thessalonians 2:3. This is the false prophet as he forces all to bow down to him and take the mark of the beast or face persecution even to death as many saints of God at this time will die a martyr's death for their witness and testimony of Christ. Many who are weak in faith will fall away from Christ as they accept this mark as they fear for their own lives as this is the falling away the scriptures speak of in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 and Hebrews 6:4-6 as many will be deceived as even now by all the false doctrines that are being taught by man.

It's not until after the seven vial judgements, Rev 16, that mystery Babylon the great is exposed, Rev 17, and then destroyed, Rev 18, as Christ returns in the air with His army of angels, Rev 19:11-21, being only the heavenly host (angels) as no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven, John 3:13. At this time on the last day, John 6:40, Christ will destroy the beast and the false prophet, being the son of perdition, casting them into the lake of fire and slaying the remnant, possibly being the leaders of every nation that the beast out of the sea in Rev 13 controls and gives power to as they rule over the nations.

I do not believe in a literal 1000 year reign of Christ when He binds Satan, but it being figurative in its numbering as in Deuteronomy 7:9; 1Chronicles 16:15; Psalms 50:10; 90:4; 105:8 Ecc 6:6; 7:28; Daniel 5:1; 2Peter 3:8. I believe at this time of Satan being bound the events of John 5:28, 29, 1 Corinthians 15:51-57; and 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 will occur quickly as there is only one resurrection, but two separate judgements. all who are in their graves will hear the voice of Christ to rise as we who are of Christ., alive and in the grave, will be caught up and gathered to Him and will then be judged and given our rewards, 2 Corinthians 5:10, 11. Those of the second death, Revelation 2:11, 20:6, who have rejected Christ will be judged at the Great White Throne judgment as their names are not found in the Lamb's Book of Life. They are cast into the lake of fire where Satan and his army that he gathered from all nations to battle against the camp of the saints, but have been consumed by the fire sent down from heaven and Satan cast into the lake of fire. God then proceeds to renew the heaven and earth and ushers down the New Jerusalem where we will be with the Lord for all eternity.
 
Where do you read in scripture or what I said that Jesus has already opened the seals 1-5 at His ascension?
It is a self evident truth, the historical record proves it.
Seal 5, must be open for all the Christian martyrs to have their souls placed under the Altar in heaven.
 
Revelation was given to John in visions as prophecies that had their beginnings in the Old Testament, being fulfilled in the New Testament and yet much to be fulfilled in future events before the great and terrible day of the Lords return. You can't have a series of numbers taking them out of order like that of the seven seals, seven trumpets and seven vial judgements. It would be like mixing up the numbers like 3 7 2 5 1 4 6 instead of chronologically 1-7.​
Well no, not really. One may list 7 things, and list it in order, one, then two, then three, then four, etc. The fact they are counted out one at a time has nothing to do with the things that are listed.

It could be a list of 7 facets of a tornado, or a list of 7 problems happening in our country right now. Seeing them separately and in a particular order is simply the result of the need to speak of each one separately.

The order may be given due to importance, or some other element that makes listing them in a particular order memorable. I could mention 7 things that we can expect to happen during the reign or Antichrist, or at the Battle of Armageddon.

The list does not require a particular order chronologically, since the order could be determined by the enormity of the judgment, or by a progressive set of features leading from plants to man, or from a village to a metropolis or to a country.

But all of these things can be associated with a single event without any necessary chronological order. They're called a "list."

The visions themselves are given in chronological order because they are a progressive vision being seen by John in real time. But that doesn't necessarily mean that the visions he sees are *fulfilled* in chronological order. We aren't going to see 7 literal trumpets being blown one after another, or 7 plagues poured out in bowls one after another. Those are just symbols contained in the visions that John is seeing take place one after another in front of him.

But what they represent is another thing entirely, and may have their own chronology, quite different from how the visions are playing out as John sees them. I'm just asking the question, because I don't really know. It's just something that I've come to think about as I've contemplated a timing scheme for these things over many years. We'll just have to keep praying about it, that we learn something vital for our spiritual lives.
 
Last edited:
It is a self evident truth, the historical record proves it.
Seal 5, must be open for all the Christian martyrs to have their souls placed under the Altar in heaven.
Sorry, but without scriptural proof this is only your opinion.

Rev 6:9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
Rev 6:10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
Rev 6:11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.

The fifth seal shows John a vision of all those who have already been slain for the word of God that are asleep in the grave waiting for God to avenge them as their spirits have returned back to God who preserves their spirit until the day of redemption when Jesus returns, Ecclesiastics 12:7; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18. They are told to rest a little while until their fellow servants that will be killed needs to be fulfilled. These fellow servants are those who have the witness and testimony of Jesus that will be preaching salvation throughout the world during the time of great tribulation until the great and terrible day of the Lords return, Joel 2:31; Matthew 24:29-31.
 
Well no, not really. One may list 7 things, and list it in order, one, then two, then three, then four, etc. The fact they are counted out one at a time has nothing to do with the things that are listed.

It could be a list of 7 facets of a tornado, or a list of 7 problems happening in our country right now. Seeing them separately and in a particular order is simply the result of the need to speak of each one separately.

The order may be given due to importance, or some other element that makes listing them in a particular order memorable. I could mention 7 things that we can expect to happen during the reign or Antichrist, or at the Battle of Armageddon.

The list does not require a particular order chronologically, since the order could be determined by the enormity of the judgment, or by a progressive set of features leading from plants to man, or from a village to a metropolis or to a country.

But all of these things can be associated with a single event without any necessary chronological order. They're called a "list."

The visions themselves are given in chronological order because they are a progressive vision being seen by John in real time. But that doesn't necessarily mean that the visions he sees are *fulfilled* in chronological order. We aren't going to see 7 literal trumpets being blown one after another, or 7 plagues poured out in bowls one after another. Those are just symbols contained in the visions that John is seeing take place one after another in front of him.

But what they represent is another thing entirely, and may have their own chronology, quite different from how the visions are playing out as John sees them. I'm just asking the question, because I don't really know. It's just something that I've come to think about as I've contemplated a timing scheme for these things over many years. We'll just have to keep praying about it, that we learn something vital for our spiritual lives.
All I can see is that it is Jesus who is the only one worthy to open the seven seals (not actual seals) as scripture shows one after the other opening. One is always the first in the numbering just as it will when Jesus sends out the seven angels with the sounding of seven trumpets sounding. Whether these are real trumpets or not that does not make any difference.

IMO, I see the seals, seven trumpets and seven vial judgements coming without any certain amount of time within each one unfolding, but all things according to God's timing. What we truly need to be concerned with is that we are prepared to go be with Jesus when that hour comes.
 
All I can see is that it is Jesus who is the only one worthy to open the seven seals (not actual seals) as scripture shows one after the other opening. One is always the first in the numbering just as it will when Jesus sends out the seven angels with the sounding of seven trumpets sounding. Whether these are real trumpets or not that does not make any difference.

IMO, I see the seals, seven trumpets and seven vial judgements coming without any certain amount of time within each one unfolding, but all things according to God's timing. What we truly need to be concerned with is that we are prepared to go be with Jesus when that hour comes.
Yes, Watchman Nee used to say, when he wrote his commentary on Revelation, that instead of trying to interpret every verse he chose to focus on the ones where he felt the Lord speak to him. He wanted to develop God's revelation, rather than just give a typical commentary.

When we go through all of these scenes, we have to ask ourselves, "How is this helping me live the life of a Christian?" And the answer to me is, Are we standing pat, or holding fast, the word of our confession?

God's judgment is coming to end this present world with all of its temptations, leading us away from His word. We need to keep a loose hold on the things of this world, focusing instead on the things that matter.

I'm not locked into any particular chronology of this book--just recognize there is a particular 3.5 years coming that will be stressful. But the book is for all eras because in all of our eras there are antichrists that confront us, challenge us, and try to steer us away from the only voice that matters.
 
Yes, Watchman Nee used to say, when he wrote his commentary on Revelation, that instead of trying to interpret every verse he chose to focus on the ones where he felt the Lord speak to him. He wanted to develop God's revelation, rather than just give a typical commentary.

When we go through all of these scenes, we have to ask ourselves, "How is this helping me live the life of a Christian?" And the answer to me is, Are we standing pat, or holding fast, the word of our confession?

God's judgment is coming to end this present world with all of its temptations, leading us away from His word. We need to keep a loose hold on the things of this world, focusing instead on the things that matter.

I'm not locked into any particular chronology of this book--just recognize there is a particular 3.5 years coming that will be stressful. But the book is for all eras because in all of our eras there are antichrists that confront us, challenge us, and try to steer us away from the only voice that matters.
Our focus always needs to be about our Fathers business taking his word out into the world and to guard ourselves from the devices of Satan so we are not taken as a thief in the night when Christ returns.
 
Sorry, but without scriptural proof this is only your opinion.
Jesus gave the proof: There will be wars and rumours of wars,,,there will be famines and earthquakes in many places....these are the birthpangs of the new age. [the Millennium] Matthew 24:6-8
 
Back
Top