The people taking the vaccine don't seem to be terrified. Everyone I know was motivated by the same concern that we have wearing a seat belt in an automobile or keeping our food prep areas clean. Who would be dumb enough to defy the odds? You've confused common sense and fear.
Which invalidates nothing I've said, you are so confident in a shot in which you know nothing about and all you know is of what others told you. And you were too blind to see the inconsistencies of covid pandemic because your infallible resources who are absolutely trustworthy told you so. And your willing to defend it to the death, but spiritual blindness confuses your reasoning and common sense. Your infallible resources lack to tell you that the vaccine doesn't stop the transmission of covid. They don't tell you that vaccines takes years of testing and this one just so conveniently at the right time under a year. Someone who is unbiased in their thinking takes two unadulterated sides of truth and makes their own decision, not just listens to whatever bias he holds. As I mentioned before I was very pro-vaccine and wished I got all the shots out there when I was little, but turning from pro-bias to pro-information combined with spiritual reality showed me that not everything is cut out as it is said to be.
If you think so, you haven't been paying attention. Or do you think citing God's word isn't biblical?
Up to you, of course, but I notice the COVID-19 death rate for the unvaccinated is several times higher than for the vaccinated.
And you've quoted the word in our discourse, when exactly? Or any of our discourses when? I would love to see some examples. Even when we were discussing homosexuality I saw nothing Scriptoral only your personal opinion and political bias.
Maybe you should think about that for a bit. Might be a revelation for you.
It's alright to admit you went for a low blow and went out of character, who am I to judge?
You are also of the world. The major difference is, those doctors, epidemilogists and other scienctists actually know what they are talking about, and show good results from their work.
I am of the world because your baseless, no evidence and opinionated psyche told you so? It's funny how people can demand evidence and proof but lack to do it themselves when it doesn't suit them. Before sin there was truth, no no one needed any evidence for it, but since sin, lies introduced, and since lies and truth were not always needed to be distinguished, evidence was needed in order to make truth stand out. But some use that as a tool to reject truth. All I am saying is, things don't add up, and you negating that and saying well such and such credible source said otherwise. I don't care if Micheal W. Nicholson with his 30 Ph.d's tells me something, if my two eyes see otherwise, I will believe otherwise. You know why I don't care, because I'm not so quick to put my trust in humans especially who have shown to be dishonest.
And I don't care about the status of epidemilogists, scientists, researches, or doctors because under all of that is dirt. From dust we came and dust we return. They may have book smarts, but they still book smart dirt, and have the same tendencies any man or woman on the street, the same very easy fallacy of being manipulated by mammom, the same temptations and human flaws, and proven to be bias and let politics and money distort their science and work.
Because the data show that it's much safer to have the vaccination than not to have it. Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
I've had covid, and even was bed ridden. You know what took it away? Not a vaccine, not even a hospital or venilator. Nope after 2 weeks of ginger and tumeric shots with water and rest it went away, same for the whole household and other members of my family who instead of recieving an unknown substance actually use their brains. But if I ever bring that up to a so-called credible source I will be discredited, called to be a liar, and maybe even have the FBI at my door like they did to Judy Mikovits.
Because you let yourself get carried away emotionally, you suppose that evidence is thought to be "infallible", at the same time you fall into the very delusion you've accuses others of having:
Why do this statements that make no sense keep coming up? This doesn't negate your near-pompous superiority complex that you've been showing the whole time, and for a person that demands evidence I'm surprised that you make another baseless accusation that I'm being a hypocrite. Come'n man. I don't need emotionalism and you have no substance to prove otherwise. NEXT
Because you're infallible, right?
Nothing better to conclude? Never said that nor asserted that, if you read the context of the discourse, I've been seggusting that we not be so quick to believe in the world, but no one wants to acknowledge that and automatically generated the oh-so-predictable conspiracy theorist and misinformation response, without taking the time to actually think and use their own brains instead of letting a political pundit being their brain for them.
When you guys come up with these conspiracy stories, isn't that what you're claiming? C'mon.
Seriously? When someone calls another a conspiracy theorist usually what their asserting is a professional term for basically someone who's making up baseless fairy tales. When conspiracy has nothing to do with that. Many political pundits have an extreme habit of calling any information that threatens them, their pockets, or their credibility a conspiracy theorists, or someone who believe something that doesn't align with the generally accepted (not truth, it can be true or false as long as it's accepted) theory about any subject. Who doesn't conform to the patterns of this world, that's what is labelled as a conspiracy theorist. (Btw many "conspiracies" were right after all), you can research it yourself if you want.
For example:
Many suspect Micheal Jackson of pedophilia, but it wasn't until he stepped out of line and started calling out people in the industry, that shade was brought down on him.
Many suspected the existence of UFO's, which the government denied for years and discredited anyone who said they existed, finally they admit to it.
People thought the government was stealing dead bodies to do radioactive testing, and then it was found that they were using dead body parts from babies and children from over 1500 grieving families without their consent.
Another one, some suspected the CIA was testing LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs on Americans in a top-secret experiment on behavior modification. And they were true, the program was known as MK-ULTRA, and it was real. The CIA started by using volunteers; the novelist Ken Kesey was one notable subject. But the program heads soon began dosing people without their knowledge; MK-ULTRA left many victims permanently mentally disabled.
Many also believe the government is using its vast resources to track citizens, and it's true, in 2016, government agencies sent 49,868 requests for user data to Facebook, 27,850 to Google, and 9,076 to Apple, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (the EFF), a major nonprofit organization that defends civil liberties in the digital world and advises the public on matters of internet privacy.
One more, it was suspected that the Gulf of Tonkin incident on August 2, 1964, was faked to provoke American support for the Vietnam War. And in fact declassified intelligence documents have since revealed that the
Maddox had provided support for South Vietnamese attacks on a nearby island and that the North Vietnamese were responding in kind, according to the U.S. Naval Institute. The event “opened the floodgates for direct American military involvement in Vietnam.”
There are a few more but I'll pause and see how you respond to these and see if you want more.
What was the point of that? Not everything labelled as a conspiracy theory is fallacious. I'll pause for now.
)
