I'm assuming this whole post was tongue-in-cheek. But in case anyone took it seriously, for the record I have had a paper copy of the book of Enoch for about 30 years now long before Internet was a common household service. As a matter of fact, the book is starting to fall apart. Yes, the Internet has Enoch on it for newer (younger) people who maybe did not have opportunity to read older paper copies already in circulation, but the Internet was not the initial source of people's awareness about the book. Some groups, such as the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church, still accepts it as canon. Other Christian groups, while saying it is not inspired, value it for it's religious content. That's the stance I take. I sheds more detailed light on the passages of Genesis 6 and the angels involved. The bible seems to consider the reader just being made aware of the occurrence, but not to place excessive emphasis on it. However, in end times this seems to occur again as evidenced by so-called "extraterrestial" sightings, and will have a role in the Satanic inspired characters in the end of days.
The book takes what the bible did not mention, and suggests the Son's of God means angels despite the Holy Spirit not using the Word messenger and these spirits created as servants are somehow able to have children with humans.
Also the Word Giant is a definition carry over from the Arabic language. So missing in Gen are Angels, and Giants.
Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
(Luk 3:38)
The Line of Seth, were the Sons of God, coming from Adam, Adam from God.The Line that should have been serving God, did not.
naphal.: means to fall, which the men did who should have been serving God. The Giant part came from a definition out of the Arabic language, not belonging to the original Hebrew. God said all flesh had been corrupted before me, God never said a blessed thing about created servants, angels, or anything else.
Angels would need DNA, they would need to be created flesh and blood as each seed produces after it's own kind.
Men are called Sons of God, not angels.
Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be said unto them,
Ye are the sons of the living God.
(Hos 1:10)
The Holy Spirit even knowing ahead our crazy doctrines gave us Word to stop the folly of this thinking.
For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee?
And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?
(Heb 1:5)
At no time would God have mentioned Angels are his son, Job is the only place it's not very clear who Satan presented himself with, or where He was at.
Enoch might be great fantasy reading, but it certainly does not have a place understanding scriptures.
Mike.