S
Find out how Christians are supposed to act in the following study
https://christianforums.net/threads/charismatic-bible-studies-1-peter-2-11-17.109823/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
way
Its heresy to think otherwise !
I don't understand how it is heresy to think that Christ was at one time a finite man.
He never at anytime was an finite man
I don't understand how it is heresy to think that Christ was at one time a
finite man.
Interesting, and a question that has come up more than once, for sure!
Let me throw in my
Two things:
1. God can not be tempted by sin. (Correct)
2. Christ was tempted in all ways as we are. (Also correct)
However, I do not think that there is a contradiction here...and I think that the Bible itself holds the answer to what seems a conundrum.
We have to (I think) keep in mind Christ's purpose, and His method of accomplishing this purpose.
We know that Jesus was fully God and also fully man (Hypostatic Union). In order for Christ to be our "kinsman redeemer", in order for Him to be "our High Priest and Mediator", in order for Him to "fulfill the law and the prophets", He had to live as a human being among us.
I believe that the key is found in Philippians 2:5-10 where we see that Jesus:
...made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross.
Jesus never "gave up" any attributes of deity, for then He would not be God. What He DID do was willingly operate within the limitations of being a man.
Therefore He became subject to the "Human Condition". He experienced sadness, pain, hunger, thirst, fatigue...and yes, temptation. I might point out that God does not experience pain, hunger, thirst or fatigue in the same way that God can not be tempted by sin.
Speaking of sin...Jesus never sinned. Temptation is not sin; yielding to temptation is sin which is ultimately disobedience to God. The desire to be obedient to the Father was the driving force with Jesus, therefore He did not succumb to any temptation that was offered to Him.
In overcoming all temptation, He became our Great High Priest and Mediator...and one who can sympathize with our weaknesses.
Anyway...my take on the subject.
In Him is no sin.
Spin it however you please from there. The fact will not change.
s
small said:These things often deteriorate to 'rookie' clubbing tactics don't they?
This is heresy - sorry to be blunt - it's an important issue and one which makes Christianity more like fantasy as anything else.
If Jesus was not fully human as you and I then his birth and death mean nothing - our salvation is worthless.
The Nicene Creed makes it clear than Jesus was both fully human as he was fully divine.
If you don't accept Jesus was fully human then you are following Docetism which also effected Marcion and the gnostics.
Evil intent is the impetus or 'starting point' to evil actions, the fact of internal evil becoming external of what is already evil within
Finally, something we agree on!
You seem to be saying that we give in to temptation because we are already evil anyway?
Well, was Eve internally evil before the Fall, since she succumbed to temptation?
I always thought that her evil choice is what gave her an evil nature. Not the other way round.
What do you think?
So there was no temptation? There was no pull to do wrong, to sin? Then it was not a temptation at all and the Bible cannot be trusted because it says He was tempted...
Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.
So this is not really true? He was not tempted to take a short cut, not tempted to do it the easy way, not tempted to...
One can be tempted without sinning, if being tempted is sin, then you might as well go ahead and sin...
Jas 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
And sin all you want for you are already guilty before you ever commit an act just because the pull was there to do it.
The Lord Jesus said: 'The prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me' (John 14.30).
There was nothing in the Lord Jesus to respond to sin. But the temptations/testings were real.
'O Savior Christ, thou too art man,
Thou hast been tempted, tested, tried,
Thy kind but searching gaze would scan
The very wounds that shame would hide.'
eng
Thats the problem, you do not understand, I cannot give you understanding !
So there was no temptation? There was no pull to do wrong, to sin? Then it was not a temptation at all and the Bible cannot be trusted because it says He was tempted...
Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.
So this is not really true? He was not tempted to take a short cut, not tempted to do it the easy way, not tempted to...
One can be tempted without sinning, if being tempted is sin, then you might as well go ahead and sin...
Jas 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
And sin all you want for you are already guilty before you ever commit an act just because the pull was there to do it.
You didn't address any of the points I made. Instead, you simply attacked me as a person. That isn't very conducive to dialogue..