You're making the claim.
The proof is on you.
The proof is on you.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I speak from the recorded Word of God, the Bible, and cannot find, in theit was not I who misled you as just another of the millions who have been misled and now misleading others , known as wolves in christian clothing, down the centuries claiming special H/S inspiration, guidance and indwelling and giving the H/S and Christianity a bad name - just take the good test and be convinced even if not by me - twinc
Are you open to any type of correction at all?being sadly fed a load of garbage - you are determined to spread it around - it seems you have base over apex Christianity - just full stop with you and your Godly counsel crew and full speed ahead with Jesus - btw passwords are not usually freely passed around to one and all - twinc
Hi twincbeing sadly fed a load of garbage - you are determined to spread it around - it seems you have base over apex Christianity - just full stop with you and your Godly counsel crew and full speed ahead with Jesus - btw passwords are not usually freely passed around to one and all - twinc
Ok, fair enough.
The clear picture of two different meanings is seen in John
Jhn 1:33
I myself did not know him, but he who sent me to baptize with water said to me, ‘He on whom you see the Spirit descend and remain, this is he who baptizes with the Holy Spirit.
The two different uses is found in Acts
Act 1:5
for John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.”
Act 19:1-7
And it happened that while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul passed through the inland
And he said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” And they said, “No, we have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.” And he said, “Into what then were you baptized?” They said, “Into John’s baptism.”
And Paul said, “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.” On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
And when Paul had laid his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they began speaking in tongues and prophesying.
There were about twelve men in all.
Paul clearly asked, "Into what then were you baptized?". Now, if they were speaking about water, wouldn't it make sense that the people answering would have said "water"? Seeing how they understood what Paul was asking, about what teaching they were 'immersed' in, they told him the teaching of John's - which was that of repentance.
But we know that repentance is just the first step in becoming a Christ follower, so Paul then "baptized" them - again by teaching - into the the name of the Lord Jesus, which is that of faith in the Savior. This is the most clear example of the two different meanings when you leave the verses in their context. Pulled out and you can make all kinds of different meanings.
Are you saying we could lose our baptism?imho - Baptism is both the passport and password to heaven - we must have both to get in - most do not even really know that a passport has to be authenticated and not lost or surrendered and the password must be remembered which most have already forgotten but God in His infinite wisdom has ensured will be recalled and remembered when and if requested - to get some idea recall what happened when Jesus was identified at His baptism - it seems most have not heard or been told the parable about Bishop John when he died and found himself in a white marble courtroom - twinc
John baptized with water as an external show of repentance. He was sent to prepare the way.
Just as roads were prepared for kings that were to travel them, so the way was prepared for Jesus.
People prepared their hearts for His message of the Kingdom. Maybe they needed this preparation because they had been ignored for hundreds of years, in between the old and the new testament. No important prophets. The rabbis helped the people, but there was no central voice. So John the Batptist was that central voice and gathered all.
He said the one to come, Jesus, would baptize with the Holy Spirit. Why would we need to be baptized in the Holy Spirit if we receive the Holy Spirit at salvation?
In Acts 1:4-5 Jesus tells the disciples to wait in Jerusalem because they would be baptized with the Holy Spirit, of which He had spoken, He said they would receive the POWER to be His witnesses.
There is a difference between John's baptism, which is an external sign of an internal repentance, and Jesus' baptism, which gives us power and the strength to witness, perhaps both orally and with our actions. (our life).
As to Acts 19:1-7 and being baptized in the name of Jesus.
What is the difference between Mathew 28:19, when Jesus said to baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, and Acts, also Acts 2:38, when peter tells new disciples that they are to be baptized in the name of Jesus?
As to your theory on baptism being of teaching, how can this be if people being baptized were already on their way to being Christians?
In Acts 19:1-7 which you site, it was disciples to whom Paul was speaking when he asked them what type of baptism they had. Not only that, but when they answered "of water" he told them to be baptized again in the name of the Lord Jesus. Acts 19:5.
It doesn't seem to me that baptism has to do with teaching, but with the receiving of a force which is supernatural and which we are commanded to do.
In Acts 19:1-7 which you site, it was disciples to whom Paul was speaking when he asked them what type of baptism they had. Not only that, but when they answered "of water" he told them to be baptized again in the name of the Lord Jesus. Acts 19:5.
OK. So the "dunk" is water baptism.Good question. John's baptism is that of repentance. Jesus' was that of faith. Technically, Jesus' was that of repentance and faith - but specifically, it was that of faith.
Both baptism's are signified with water, but are truly that which is representative of what takes place on the inside. In other words, just being baptized by John in the water was pointless, unless one was coming to do so based on their understanding(true baptism) of the need for repentance.
Mat 3:4-11
Now John wore a garment of camel’s hair and a leather belt around his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey.
Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan were going out to him,
and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bear fruit in keeping with repentance.
And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. “I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
John stopped some of the Pharisees and Sadducess from physically being baptized in the water because he knew they were just doing it to be wet - they had no inward baptism of repentance.
Your last question is a sobering one. Christianity has not failed, the people claiming it has. How have they failed? They do not fully become one in Christ. They do not unite to Him. This is where we find the differences in the 'types' of baptism. One is just a 'dunk' - in and out. The other is when you actually leave a cucumber in a jar of vinegar, and it becomes a pickle - it is transformed from cucumber to pickle.
The transformation does not happen, in the life of a believer, unless he stays inside the 'jar' of faith, 'immersed' in the blood of Christ. When that true baptism takes place, then a believer is transformed.
OK. So the "dunk" is water baptism.
Does water baptism exist today?
The other is the cucumber remaining in the jar of faith.
§This would be baptism by "fire and the Holy Spirit".
The Old dies, the New Comes.
And we have to stay in the faith to become the New self.
We have the new spark of life, and death has been removed from our soul. Our spirit is alive thanks to Christ.
So, if we are to stay in the jar of faith:
1. Present your bodies a living sacrifice, Romans 12:1
2. Renew our mind and thus transform ourselves, Romans 12:2
So is the faith baptism required for this transformation?
Nathan,The reason why there is a marked difference between being baptized 'in' one name of another, is there are different faucets of understanding - and as you allude to - power that comes from that understanding. It is not a 'force' that is given to us, but a power that is available to us.
Think of it this way; in Luke 9 Jesus gave His disciples authority to cast out demons and heal and such. He gave them the power. However, a day or so later, we read this;
Luk 9:37-40
On the next day, when they had come down from the mountain, a great crowd met him. And behold, a man from the crowd cried out, “Teacher, I beg you to look at my son, for he is my only child. And behold, a spirit seizes him, and he suddenly cries out. It convulses him so that he foams at the mouth, and shatters him, and will hardly leave him. And I begged your disciples to cast it out, but they could not.”
Why couldn't they? We read why in Matthew 17;
Mat 17:19-20
Then the disciples came to Jesus privately and said, “Why could we not cast it out?” He said to them, “Because of your little faith. For truly, I say to you, if you have faith like a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move, and nothing will be impossible for you.
Now, by what avenue does faith come? Through hearing the word of God. It comes through teaching.
You said
Except, they did not say "of water", they very specifically said "Into John's Baptism". This is a direct way of saying they were immersed into the teaching of John the baptist, which is that of repentance. They did not understand that repentance is just the beginning of faith, and you must turn from sin to Christ. So that's why Paul said “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus.” And then proceeded to 'baptize' them in the name of the Lord Jesus.
That is to say, Paul immersed them into the teaching of who the Lord Jesus is, which is the teaching of forgiveness of sins and way of righteousness. None of this had to do with water - unless you understand that the word of God is like water to us.
Did they physically get into water after this? Who knows. Maybe, maybe not. It says when he laid his hands on them the Holy Spirit came on them. Think about this, just a little glimpse into what was going on at that time, it says they were "baptized", yet it was not till after this that it says Paul laid his hands on them. If it was speaking about physically dunking them in water, wouldn't it make sense that Paul would have put his hands on them to dunk them in the water?
Were you baptized and did it make a difference?I am transformed very much.
Did you see me before I got saved?
Some people did and then they got saved.
They wanted what I had.
Nathan,
I checked a few bibles and yes, thanks, in Acts 19:6, Paul lays his hands on the disciples, there is no water involved.
So, as you say:
1. John's baptism of water - for repentance and getting ready for the next step.
2. Jesus' baptism - for the forgiveness of sin and for power.
I like what you say here:
there are different faucets of understanding - and as you allude to - power that comes from that understanding. It is not a 'force' that is given to us, but a power that is available to us.
(the highlight and underline in your post is mine)
The force is available to us, but is not forced upon us. One of my main understandings about God. He does not force anything upon us that we do not want.
When I left the Catholic church to go to a Protestant church, I remember thinking, after a while, that I was never taught about the POWER of my beliefs - they were almost dead. I find it very important to learn about the power we have in our faith in Jesus.
"It is impossible to become like something you know nothing about"I believe 100% in water baptism existing today. We are still humans, and as humans we need representations. Water baptism is the representation of the faith that exists in us. The faith of who God the Father is, who God the Son is, and who the Holy Spirit is. It is our way of telling ourselves, and those around us, that we have this faith in our lives now and we are giving ourselves over to it - just like a cucumber gives itself over to becoming a pickle.
If by "faith baptism" you mean the teaching of God, then yes - it is impossible to become like something you have no idea about. If you mean water baptism, then no, it is not required for the transformation - but rather it is a fruit of the transformation. I think that any person who has faith will want to be baptized in water.
Don't mistake that the transformation power comes from yourself though. Just like a cucumber does not have anything in itself to become the pickle, neither do we. The 'power' of the vinegar and the way the jar of cucumbers are handled is what transforms the cucumbers into pickles. The pickles simply soak it all in.
Thanks Wrigley,To me water baptism does not save.
To me water baptism does cause a change of behaviour.
We are saved when we place our faith in Jesus
Romans 10:9-13
that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the Scripture says, “Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.” For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.”
Jesus said
John 16:7-9
Nevertheless I tell you the truth. It is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Helper will not come to you; but if I depart, I will send Him to you. And when He has come, He will convict the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: of sin, because they do not believe in Me;
Sin here is unbelief in him.
When we turn from that sin and believe in him as per Romans 10 quoted above we are saved.
Jesus said
Matthew 28:19-20
Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.
Notice 'make disciples then baptise'
To disciple is to teach preach Jesus, when they come to faith baptise them then further disciple them to be like Jesus, walk like Jesus, be the people he has asked us to be.
To me baptism is a spiritual marker in a believers life, a springboard forward, identifying with Christ.
Good post and I'll not argue with a single word of it gut when the Holy Spirt overcame me, I was not baptized, but sorely needed to make a public profession of my faith in Jesus and when I went under the water in that baptismal I was showing the world that the Oid Man was being buried znd the new man was taking his place. That's what means to me.John baptized with water as an external show of repentance. He was sent to prepare the way.
Just as roads were prepared for kings that were to travel them, so the way was prepared for Jesus.
People prepared their hearts for His message of the Kingdom. Maybe they needed this preparation because they had been ignored for hundreds of years, in between the old and the new testament. No important prophets. The rabbis helped the people, but there was no central voice. So John the Batptist was that central voice and gathered all.
He said the one to come, Jesus, would baptize with the Holy Spirit. Why would we need to be baptized in the Holy Spirit if we receive the Holy Spirit at salvation?
In Acts 1:4-5 Jesus tells the disciples to wait in Jerusalem because they would be baptized with the Holy Spirit, of which He had spoken, He said they would receive the POWER to be His witnesses.
There is a difference between John's baptism, which is an external sign of an internal repentance, and Jesus' baptism, which gives us power and the strength to witness, perhaps both orally and with our actions. (our life).
As to Acts 19:1-7 and being baptized in the name of Jesus.
What is the difference between Mathew 28:19, when Jesus said to baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, and Acts, also Acts 2:38, when peter tells new disciples that they are to be baptized in the name of Jesus?
As to your theory on baptism being of teaching, how can this be if people being baptized were already on their way to being Christians?
In Acts 19:1-7 which you site, it was disciples to whom Paul was speaking when he asked them what type of baptism they had. Not only that, but when they answered "of water" he told them to be baptized again in the name of the Lord Jesus. Acts 19:5.
It doesn't seem to me that baptism has to do with teaching, but with the receiving of a force which is supernatural and which we are commanded to do.
Amen my brotherGood post and I'll not argue with a single word of it gut when the Holy Spirt overcame me, I was not baptized, but sorely needed to make a public profession of my faith in Jesus and when I went under the water in that baptismal I was showing the world that the Oid Man was being buried znd the new man was taking his place. That's what means to me.
Good post and I'll not argue with a single word of it gut when the Holy Spirt overcame me, I was not baptized, but sorely needed to make a public profession of my faith in Jesus and when I went under the water in that baptismal I was showing the world that the Oid Man was being buried znd the new man was taking his place. That's what means to me.