Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Are you receiving an "error" mesage when posting?

    Chances are it went through, so check before douible posting.

    We hope to have the situtaion resolved soon, and Happy Thanksgiving to those in the US!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Ever read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • How are famous preachers sometimes effected by sin?

    Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject

    https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

What is the 'mark' of a True Christian

Free said:
So the mark of a Christian is to be born of the Spirit. And those who are, will bring forth the fruit of the Spirit - as Free has pointed out.
That's not exactly what I pointed out. This is why I asked for clarification earlier as to what was originally meant by "mark". Is this a visual mark that distinguishes a Christian from non-Christians? If so, it cannot be merely "born of the Spirit".

Thanks for that Free. What I intended to convey was the latter part that i thought you agreed with. The 'fruit' - which is what we can see - is the evidence of being born again. Sorry if it was not what you were saying. I should take a look at the book you suggested.
 
Absolutely. The Spiritual mark IS being born again, (born in Spirit), but the outward MARK, Physical mark IS the love that one is able to exhibit that SEPARATES those BORN of Spirit FROM the world; the 'Fruit of the Spirit'.

And Free, you are correct in that we MUST be able to discern those born of the Spirit from those that are not for the simple FACT that The Body of Christ CANNOT be determined WITHOUT the ability of the MEMBERS of that body to RECOGNIZE each other.

The BIGGEST problem that exist WITHIN The Body is Pride. That SO many are So insistent and intent on THEIR 'gifts' and understanding to be the ONLY WAY in which God delivers such.

The OTHER major problem is those that would LEAD others in a 'false direction' for the sake of self or profit in the GUISE of the Body.

Is the Body PERFECT? It was SUPPOSE to BE. Not PERFECT in that EVERYONE contained within it IS perfect. But PERFECTLY fitting TOGETHER so that it IS Complete with Christ AS it's HEAD and THROUGH THIS, being a 'perfect Kingdom' within those that TRULY ARE a 'part of the Body'.

MEC
 
Imagican said:
Absolutely. The Spiritual mark IS being born again, (born in Spirit), but the outward MARK, Physical mark IS the love that one is able to exhibit that SEPARATES those BORN of Spirit FROM the world; the 'Fruit of the Spirit'.....

That is all too "subjective", and not "objective". I've met a lot of really nice atheists, and a lot of them give to charities. So what? And anyone can claim to be born again: So what? But in baptism (not that I want to debate baptism here) we have an "objective" fact: The person was baptised. Fact. So if one believes in the sacramental nature of Baptism, as I do, one can point to an objective fact and say, "that person was baptised. He has entered the covenant family of God". You can NOT do that with all this subjective stuff you're throwing out there.
 
Catholic Crusader said:
Maybe they didn't become soldiers because they did not want to serve a pagan emporer who would force them to burn sacrafices. That is different than fighting with honor for a Christian nation if the battle is just.

A battle to protect people from tyranny is not the same as imperial conquests. I would say that when we liberated France from the Nazis, that was a GOOD thing, wouldn't you?

Hello Catholic Crusader,
Those that put into application Jesus words of being "no part of the part of the world", could not involve themselves in any nation's political agenda. At the time Jesus said these words, the Roman Empire was the reigning (sixth) world power,(Rev 17:10) that eventually stretched from from the British Isles down across much of Europe, all the way around the Mediterranean, and beyond Babylon to the Persian Gulf. It was not a matter if a nation was pagan, but rather of obedience to Jesus command, for all nations on the earth are direct opposition to God. He will soon bring to ruin all human governments, for Daniel 2:44, Psalms 2:8,9, Revelation 16:14,16 and Revelation 19:17,18 provides this information.

The nations that call themselves "Christian", are just as bloodguilty as those who are considered "pagan". For example, during World War I, where was it fought ? In nations that considered themselves as "Christian", with some of Christendom's missionaries leading troops into battle. Was it any different with World War II ? Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy were both Catholic nations, and Adolf Hitler himself was a Catholic. During both wars, German soldiers wore belts inscribed with the words "Gott mit uns" (God with us). Was God with them ? Yet, on the Allied side, of which Britain and America were taking the lead, were Catholics who fought against Catholics on the Axis side of Germany, Italy and Japan. On whose side was God on ? Was he on either side ? What did Jesus say ?

Jesus said his disciples would not be involved in the world's political arena nor side with any human government, but would remain neutral as to it's affairs. When before Pontius Pilate, on the night of Nisan 14, 33 C.E., he said to him, following Pilate's question if he was "king of the Jews", that "my kingdom is no part of this world. If my kingdom were part of this world, my attendants would have fought (as in a war) that I should not be delivered up to you. But, as it is, my kingdom is not from this source."(John 18:36)

Hence, did Jesus command his "attendants" to fight in order that he not be brought before Pilate ? No. Why ? Because his "kingdom" is "no part of this world", but is a "city of the living God, heavenly Jerusalem".(Heb 12:22) Those that become his disciples must imitate him fully.

The apostle Peter said to those Christians that were "scattered about in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, to the ones chosen",(1 Pet 1:1) that "in fact, to this course you were called, because even Christ suffered for you, (of being peaceable and thus "no part of the world") leaving you a model for you to follow his steps closely....When he was being reviled, he did not go reviling in return. When he was suffering, he did not go threatening, but kept on committing himself to the one who judges righteously."(1 Pet 2:21,23)

Soon, all human governments are to be removed at the battle of what the Bible calls Armageddon.(Rev 16:16) These governments have not been seeking "true peace", but rather their own political end. That is why all the nations of the earth are spoken as being a "wild beast".(Rev 13:1,2) Only after their permanent removal, along with the death-dealing effects of sin,(Isaiah 25:7,8) will the earth experience "abundant peace".(Ps 37:11) No human agency can accomplished only what God's kingdom will be able to do. Then, all those who adhered to Jesus commands, will then be truly "liberated", for Jesus said that the "truth will set you free."(John 8:32)
 
So, if we were to see states and nations over-run with armies of Godless Fascists, you think the right thing to do is sit back and watch and do nothing? If that were the case, you would not be sitting behind your comfy computer typing right now: You'd be breaking rocks in a Nazi labor camp.

Sorry: I can't buy into that one. Besides, aren't you the same people who (wrongly) chastise Pope Pius XII for not doing enough to stop the Nazis?

Fighting to protect the those who cannot protect themselves from conquerors and evil men is an honorable battle. Christians were never meant to be cowards who shrink back and watch while evil empires subjugate innocent peoples.
 
Catholic Crusader said:
Imagican said:
Absolutely. The Spiritual mark IS being born again, (born in Spirit), but the outward MARK, Physical mark IS the love that one is able to exhibit that SEPARATES those BORN of Spirit FROM the world; the 'Fruit of the Spirit'.....

That is all too "subjective", and not "objective". I've met a lot of really nice atheists, and a lot of them give to charities. So what?

So, that just goes to PROVE that we were ALL 'created' in the image of LOVE. Even those that ARE NOT 'born of Spirit' often times recognize love and are able to offer it, (to a degree)

But there is also the chance that what YOU percieve as LOVE, in that some are charitable, just because someone GIVES does NOT make them 'righteous'. For MANY give for the SAKE of 'their OWN glory'. Many 'act' how they NEED to 'act' in order to acheive their PERSONAL goals that have absolutely NOTHING to do with 'true love'.

And anyone can claim to be born again: So what?

BINGO!!!!!!, (lights flashing, sirens wailing, DING DING DING!!!!!!!!!)

But in baptism (not that I want to debate baptism here) we have an "objective" fact: The person was baptised.

And this TOO is able to BE DONE by one that is NOT sincere. And 'I' personally BELIEVE that it can BE DONE in the name of FALSE 'Christs' as well.

So if one believes in the sacramental nature of Baptism, as I do, one can point to an objective fact and say, "that person was baptised. He has entered the covenant family of God". You can NOT do that with all this subjective stuff you're throwing out there.

And CC, I can ONLY HOPE and PRAY that ONE DAY you too will be ABLE to PLAINLY SEE and understand what it IS to BE 'born again'. I cannot SAY that 'simply BEING Baptized' is NOT able to 'cleanse one'. I CANNOT SAY. But I believe that there is MUCH more to 'being saved' or 'born again' than simply being subjected to 'water'. For EACH of us is BORN into 'water' upon our 'physical birth'. We ARE, EACH 'floating in water' up until our ACTUAL BIRTH.

I already offered my testimony that it was MANY MANY years AFTER being Baptized that i WAS 'born again'. I THOUGHT at the TIME that I was Baptized that 'my life had changed'. And it DID, for about a WEEK. And then I was 'right back where I started from.

It was NOT until I was ABLE to 'utterly submit' to The Spirit that I was THEN 'truly transformed' into a NEW CREATURE.

The scriptures PLAINLY offer that it is Spiritual Baptizm that TRULY cleanses one's Spiritually. For UNTIL one IS 'born again in Spirit', they probably DO need the assurance of 'something/or someone ELSE' to FEEL/or convince themselves that that they ARE 'forgiven'. Yet UPON the VERY MOMENT of 'being born again', one is ABLE to KNOW WITH ASSURANCE that is 'greater than ANTHING on this PLANET; That they ARE 'truly' forgiven. A NEW Creature. Born of 'another substance' than the simple 'blood and flesh' of this world.

You can 'laugh' at these words or deny them, but that doesn't alter the TRUTH of them in the least.

I'm praying for you, brother, that God WILL 'drop you to your knees' and SHOW you that you DON'T NEED to conform yourself to ANY particular orgainization. That HE IS ENOUGH. And HIS Church is NOT filled with 'DO'S' and "Dont's'', but of LOVE and UNDERSTANDING that goes WAY WAY beyond our ability to discern that which we SHOULD or SHOULDN'T DO.

Not joking, my friend. I can 'feel' your words and plainly SEE that you ARE desirous of the TRUTH. You THINK that you have it NOW. But I can attest that there is an abundance JUST WAITING for you that you CANNOT at this present time even imagine.

Just 'ASK' and you WILL receive. But IF you choose to DENY, then there is NO 'reason' to offer you anything more than you have already RECEIVED.


MEC
 
Imagican said:
....And CC, I can ONLY HOPE and PRAY that ONE DAY you too will be ABLE to PLAINLY SEE and understand what it IS to BE 'born again'.....

I DO understand !!!! I'm not a dummy you know. Its not a matter of understanding what it means. Our difference is about the METHOD one uses to bring this re-birth about. Sheeesh.


(I had more fun in the Graven Images thread. At least I could post pics in there.)
 
Catholic Crusader said:
Imagican said:
....And CC, I can ONLY HOPE and PRAY that ONE DAY you too will be ABLE to PLAINLY SEE and understand what it IS to BE 'born again'.....

I DO understand !!!! I'm not a dummy you know. Its not a matter of understanding what it means. Our difference is about the METHOD one uses to bring this re-birth about. Sheeesh.


(I had more fun in the Graven Images thread. At least I could post pics in there.)

I asked this question of another catholic somewhere else but lost it somewhere. Would you mind telling what the 'catholic' method / process is for being 'born again'.

Thanks
 
mutzrein said:
Catholic Crusader said:
Imagican said:
....And CC, I can ONLY HOPE and PRAY that ONE DAY you too will be ABLE to PLAINLY SEE and understand what it IS to BE 'born again'.....

I DO understand !!!! I'm not a dummy you know. Its not a matter of understanding what it means. Our difference is about the METHOD one uses to bring this re-birth about. Sheeesh.


(I had more fun in the Graven Images thread. At least I could post pics in there.)

I asked this question of another catholic somewhere else but lost it somewhere. Would you mind telling what the 'catholic' method / process is for being 'born again'.

Thanks
water+"I baptize you in the name of the Father, the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen."+chrism+the Holy Spirit=born again

The Holy Spirit brings new life in grace.
 
mutzrein said:
Catholic Crusader said:
Imagican said:
....And CC, I can ONLY HOPE and PRAY that ONE DAY you too will be ABLE to PLAINLY SEE and understand what it IS to BE 'born again'.....

I DO understand !!!! I'm not a dummy you know. Its not a matter of understanding what it means. Our difference is about the METHOD one uses to bring this re-birth about. Sheeesh.


(I had more fun in the Graven Images thread. At least I could post pics in there.)
I asked this question of another catholic somewhere else but lost it somewhere. Would you mind telling what the 'catholic' method / process is for being 'born again'.
Thanks
The normative way is baptism. An increase in the Spirit comes through Confirmation. There are always exceptions though: It is possible to be saved through "baptism of blood," martyrdom for Christ, or through "baptism of desire", that is, an explicit or even implicit desire for baptism. This applies to, say, the Good Thief on the cross. Thus the Catechism of the Catholic Church also states: "Those who die for the faith, those who are catechumens, and all those who, without knowing of the Church but acting under the inspiration of grace, seek God sincerely and strive to fulfill his will, are saved even if they have not been baptized" (CCC 1281; the salvation of unbaptized infants is also possible under this system; cf. CCC 1260–1, 1283).

I suggest you read this link:
http://www.catholic.com/library/are_cat ... _again.asp
 
Catholic Crusader said:
So, if we were to see states and nations over-run with armies of Godless Fascists, you think the right thing to do is sit back and watch and do nothing? If that were the case, you would not be sitting behind your comfy computer typing right now: You'd be breaking rocks in a Nazi labor camp.

Sorry: I can't buy into that one. Besides, aren't you the same people who (wrongly) chastise Pope Pius XII for not doing enough to stop the Nazis?

Fighting to protect the those who cannot protect themselves from conquerors and evil men is an honorable battle. Christians were never meant to be cowards who shrink back and watch while evil empires subjugate innocent peoples.

Hello Catholic Crusader,
When Jesus was arrested, how did he respond ? Did he take up arms ? Have you not read where Peter, in defending Jesus from the crowd that came with swords, cut off the ear of the high priest's slave, Malchus, but Jesus rebuked him and told him to "return your sword to its place, for all who those who take the sword will perish by the sword." Jesus then says: "Or do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father to supply me at this moment more than twelve legions of angels."(Matt 26:52,53)

Why did Jesus not put up a fight, but rather appeal to his Father to annihilate these ones ? Because Jesus set the perfect pattern of genuine love for all those wish to become followers of him. Do you grasp what Peter said concerning Jesus, that "when he was being reviled, he did not go reviling in return. When suffering, he did not go threatening, but kept committing himself to the one who judges righteously" ?(1 Pet 2:23) Obviously not. Why did Jesus put up with the abuse during his ministry and especially on the night before his death ?(Matt 26:27-37) He imitated his Father, whom the apostle John says is "love".(1 John 4:8)

Jesus said: "Come to me, all you are toiling and loaded down, and I will refresh you. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am mild-tempered and lowly in heart, And you will find refreshment for your souls. For my yoke is kindly and my load is light."(Matt 11:28-30) Can one imitate Jesus and yet take up arms ? Recorded history has already shown that the early Christians recognized that one must be "mild-tempered" and not take up arms. These adhered to Jesus words, whereas today, most never get the "sense" of what identifies a true Christian as being "no part of the world."

Please note some more history. In A Short History of Rome, by G. Ferrero and C. Barbagallo, 1919, p. 382, it said that "In the second century, Christianity . . . had affirmed the incompatibility of military service with Christianity." Also, under the subtopic, "Persecution of the Christians in Gaul, A.D. 177,†by F. P. G. Guizot in The Great Events by Famous Historians, edited by R. Johnson, 1905, Vol. III, p. 246, it said that "the Christians . . . shrank from public office and military service." Edward Gibbon, in his book, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, said that "While they [the Christians] inculcated the maxims of passive obedience, they refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defence of the empire. . . . It was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers, of magistrates, or of princes."(Vol I, p. 416)

Another example, is related by Tacitus, a Roman historian born about 55 C.E. He tells of the rumor charging that Nero was the one responsible for burning Rome (64 C.E.), and then says: “Therefore, to scotch the rumour, Nero substituted as culprits, and punished with the utmost refinements of cruelty, a class of men, loathed for their vices [as the Romans viewed matters], whom the crowd styled Christians. . . . First, then, the confessed members of the sect were arrested; next, on their disclosures, vast numbers were convicted, not so much on the count of arson as for hatred of the human race. And derision accompanied their end: they were covered with wild beasts’ skins and torn to death by dogs; or they were fastened on crosses, and, when daylight failed were burned to serve as lamps by night.†(The Annals, XV, XLIV)

Why did these not put up resistance, but rather allow themselves to be "torn to death by dogs" or "burned to serve as lamps" ? Because these looked to Jesus example and not men. Did not Jesus say that those who are adhering to his commands, as being "no part of the world", would also be "hated" just as Jesus himself was hated ?(John 15:18,19) Jesus further said: "Bear in mind the word I said to you, a slave is not greater than his master. If they have persecuted me, they will persecute you also."(John 15:20) This is also an identifying mark of being a Christian, for the apostle Paul wrote that "in fact, all those desiring to live with godly devotion in association with Christ Jesus will also be persecuted."(2 Tim 3:12)

Pliny the Younger, who was governor of Bithynia in 111 or 112 C.E., wrote to Emperor Trajan, about the Christians. He said that there some who professed to be Christian, but when put to the "test", these "denied that they were or ever had been a Christian" for fear of punishment. These would offer up pagan sacrifices, even reviling the name of Christ, then he said that "none of which things, I understand, would any genuine Christian do."(The Letters of Pliny, X, XCVI, 3, 5, XCVII, 1)

Have you not read where the apostle Paul wrote to the congregation in Rome: "Return evil for evil to no one....If possible, as far as it depends upon you, be peaceable with all men. Do not avenge yourselves, beloved, but yield place to the wrath; for it is written: Vengence is mine, I will repay, says Jehovah. But "if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by doing this you will heap fiery coals upon his head."(Rom 12:17-20)
 
Catholic X & C

So let's see if understand what you are saying. You had some water sprinkled on you, and the person who wet you said something like, "I baptise you in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit".

And that was it?
 
What does it mean to be a Christian?

Being a Christian means you believe in Christ. It does not mean you are some kind of saint. We all sin, every single human being sins to some degree, some more than others. The difference is that being a Christian means that you know that your sins are forgiven, after you repent for each one, through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ that day on the cross. In the scripture below, Apostle Paul is speaking about forgiveness of sin through faith in Jesus Christ. The word propitiation means 'payment for sin'. Jesus Christ was that propitiation, Jesus Christ dies that we may live, Jesus Christ is the only door to salvation through His suffering and by the grace of our Lord God to us whom would simply believe.

Rom 3:23-26
23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. (KJV)

You see, God knew that man could never make it on his own, that is why He sent Jesus to 'stand in the gap' for us. We have used the term "believe in Christ" many times in this study, but what exactly does that mean? In the beginning a new Christian is a little unsure of himself, he is a little unsure of his faith. This is normal and it is OK. As you study more of God's Written Word, His letter to you, the Bible, your faith grows. When you study the Bible and ask God to help you understand and increase your faith, He sends His Spirit upon you, the Holy Spirit, and a feeling of assuredness comes into you soul. This is the second birth, it is your spiritual body blossoming with truth. The more you study God's Word the more you grow spiritually.

It's like a little seed when it is watered it grows, but when you cut the water off it shrivels and dies. The spiritual water that you pour on your soul is the True Word of God, it is the knowledge of Jesus Christ and all things God has shown us through the Bible. You gain that knowledge by reading of it in the book that God ensured we would always have - The Bible. Jesus is called the Living Water, for through Him a dormant seed grows into a mighty one of faith. That seed is your soul.

John 4:5-26 (Jesus is the Living Water)
5 Then cometh he to a city of Samaria, which is called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph.
6 Now Jacob's well was there. Jesus therefore, being wearied with his journey, sat thus on the well: and it was about the sixth hour.
7 There cometh a woman of Samaria to draw water: Jesus saith unto her, Give me to drink.
8 (For his disciples were gone away unto the city to buy meat.)
9 Then saith the woman of Samaria unto him, How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans.
10 Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.
11 The woman saith unto him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep: from whence then hast thou that living water?
12 Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well, and drank thereof himself, and his children, and his cattle?
13 Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again:
14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.
15 The woman saith unto him, Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw.
16 Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither.
17 The woman answered and said, I have no husband. Jesus said unto her, Thou hast well said, I have no husband:
18 For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly.
19 The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet.
20 Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.
21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.
22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.
23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.
24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
25 The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things.
26 Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he. (KJV)

Jesus would go on to use that woman to convert her whole village to Christianity while she was yet in sin. (though it wasn't yet called Christianity till after Christ's death). And Jesus died on the cross for us though we were yet in sin. God wants us all to come to Him, God wants us all to be saved and spend the eternity with Him in Heaven. Man complicates God's Word, heaps all kinds of traditions on it, but Jesus makes it simple. God is not sitting up there in Heaven just waiting to zap some poor soul to Hell, if He had wanted that, He would not have sent us Jesus. read the verse below in the simplicity that is Christ:

John 3:16-18 (Jesus speaking of Himself)
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. (KJV)
 
Thanks for that onelove. You've gone 'above and beyond' so to speak. :)

I started this thread so that we could perhaps, hone in on the one thing (or mark) which distinguishes a Christian from any other.

Your thoughts in that respect?
 
mutzrein said:
Catholic X & C

So let's see if understand what you are saying. You had some water sprinkled on you, and the person who wet you said something like, "I baptise you in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit".

And that was it?

You asked me a question and I answered it. Don't get snotty on me. Don't you think God can work through water if He wants too?

Remember Jesus rubbing spit-mud in a guys eyes and curing Him? God always works through "things" throughout the whole Bible. Its part of the Incarnational principle. So let me re-phrase your question if I may:

"So let's see if understand what you are saying. You had some mud rubbed in your eye, and the person who rubbed it said something like, "now open your eyes", and that was it?"

Yep, pretty much. That was it.
 
I think where WE are 'confused' Mutz, is that the CC teaches that one MUST 'rely' on the church in order to BE a 'Christian', (and I don't mean a 'Spiritual church', but a 'physical one'). And in this I have begun to UNDERSTAND exactly how LITTLE responsibility is PLACED on the INDIVIDUAL except to 'conform' to the doctrine and dogma OF their church, (confessing to a priest for forgiveness, giving money to the church, attending mass, and participation in the euchrist, etc......).

So I am 'beginning' to understand that it's NOT the 'saving grace of God through His Son' that matters to the individual, it's the grace and Spirit that God has offered THROUGH the church that is taught.

But what I fear in this is that the individual is LITERALLY placing their FAITH in 'MAN' moreso than God or HIs Son. That the 'rebirth' to which WE refer is ALMOST completely alien to those that have been taught to rely on 'men' to perform FOR them.

So, debates such as this; between the CC and those that are NOT members of it, can only lead to disagreement in that there are MOST definitely TWO distinct methods of Baptism involved and NEITHER is going to accept that what the other BELIEVES.

It's kind of SAD in a way. For when I speak of the experience of BEING 'born again', my Catholic brothers will actually DENY that my words have ANY significance, other than in a 'superficial way' that THEY believe is based on NOTHING other than 'feelings'. A PURE indication that they have NOT experienced what '''''I""" have, and because of that, it's OBVIOUS that their understanding is quite limited in this respect, (perhaps even taught that what I offer IS IMPOSSIBLE). And THAT is SAD.

But I guess that is how 'a church' is able to MAKE those that are their members DEPENDANT upon THEM. For IF they taught that it is NOT 'a church' but THE Church, most would come to an understanding that the 'physical church' is NOT necessarily the 'SAME' as the Spiritual Church that IS the Body of Christ. For the TEMPLE is no longer a 'structure' designed and built by MAN, but the temple is NOW within the HEARTS of those that accept and follow Christ through obedience to His commandments.

No need for anyone to comment on this post. I am simply offering that I 'believe' that I am 'beginning' to ACTUALLY understand the NATURE of the CC. HOW it teaches that one IS 'saved'. And NO WONDER it's HARD for them to accept the 'idea' of a 'personal savior' or 'personal relationship' with God through His Son. For their belief is based on 'someone else' having the relationship and authority to BE their mediator. That their faith is reliant on their BELIEF that the 'clergy' is able to do everything FOR them.

MEC
 
Catholic Crusader said:
mutzrein said:
Catholic X & C

So let's see if understand what you are saying. You had some water sprinkled on you, and the person who wet you said something like, "I baptise you in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit".

And that was it?

You asked me a question and I answered it. Don't get snotty on me. Don't you think God can work through water if He wants too?

Remember Jesus rubbing spit-mud in a guys eyes and curing Him? God always works through "things" throughout the whole Bible. Its part of the Incarnational principle. So let me re-phrase your question if I may:

"So let's see if understand what you are saying. You had some mud rubbed in your eye, and the person who rubbed it said something like, "now open your eyes", and that was it?"

Yep, pretty much. That was it.

CC,

Temper, temper, my brother. I see NOTHING 'snotty' in Mutz's question. All he asked is, "Is that it?" He, like I, were wondering if that's really 'it', so far as your 'faith' is concerned. Being 'sprinkled' and then conforming to the RULES of the 'church' that you follow?

You NEED to understand FIRST, that the CC has chosen to label those that DO NOT accept their teachings as Protestant. An indication that these have PROTESTING against the ONE TRUE CHURCH. In denial of the 'gift' that has been offered THROUGH The Church. And what this offers is that THEY believed that ONLY 'their understanding' is ABLE to offer ANYTHING so far as God is concerned and those that refuse to accept it are PROTESTING not ONLY against the clergy, but against the offerings of God HImself.

With the UNDERSTANDING offered above, you MUST be able to clearly see that there has been created a 'chasm' betwee the TWO 'beliefs' that is VERY wide indeed.

As bizaar and strange as YOU may find the 'beliefs' of 'what you call Protestants', so too do those that you have 'labeled such' find the beliefs of the CC. And for good reason.

You have continuously belittled the beliefs offered here by those that DO NOT accept the Catholic faith. Do you NOT believe that they have the SAME rights that YOU when it comes to UNDERSTANDING and faith? You ask, "is God NOT able to do THROUGH what He chooses?" In the SAME respect it seems that YOU are JUST as confused over this issue as you would accuse others. Is it NOT possible that what YOU have been taught IS INDEED, NOT the complete truth or UNDERSTANDING? Could God NOT offer His grace to ANY that accept His Son REGARDLESS of the 'church' that they attend?

The CC obviously have MANY divisions and 'groups' so it should be surprising that the Protestants DO as well.

MEC
So, NOT in 'defense' of Mutz, for none is NEEDED, I offer this: Shouldn't he be allowed the SAME level of patience and understanding as YOU? And IF he is 'confused' about a reply, shouldn't he be given the opportunity to ask for a 'more precise' answer?

For what you offered immediately brought the SAME question to MY mind: '.....and that's IT?' And by stating this in NO way offers CRITICISM of your answer, just incredulty. For my understanding cried out for 'something more'.

MEC
 
Imagican said:
....All he asked is, "Is that it?" He, like I, were wondering if that's really 'it', so far as your 'faith' is concerned. Being 'sprinkled' and then conforming to the RULES of the 'church' that you follow?....

No, that's not it. Your interior disposition has much to do with it. Sacraments are effective regardless of your interior disposition, yet if your heart is not converted as well, you will not respond properly to the graces God gives you. It is complicated. I was addressing the "method" by which one becomes a Christian, and the normative method is Baptism. But I am not ignorant to the fact that many baptised folks have no conversion of heart and therefore do not walk the Christian walk.

As I have said in other threads, its not an "either/or" matter as it is often posed, but rather a "both/and" matter.
 
Back
Top