JLB,
The requirements of the law of Moses did not pass away. The literal fulfillment for temple, priest, and sacrifice for sin, and various exclusionary laws are what 'passed away' and are now obsolete. Not abolished, but laws for literal fulfillments that simply do not apply to new creations in Christ, and are fulfilled through faith in Christ. Hardly what some insist is an abolishment of those laws.
As I've shown you, various requirements of the law of Moses were indeed being taught in the early church, and not just to Jews, but gentile congregations, too. From the inspired scriptures of the NT we see the Holy Spirit is in fact writing the requirements of Moses on the hearts of God's people. Don't confuse how those requirements get fulfilled in this New Covenant with those requirements somehow being abolished.
When talking about what 'passed away' in the law of Moses you have to be specific about what that means, and about what did 'pass away' (not abolished) because it is very wrong to broad stroke the argument as the law of Moses completely and totally passing away as if abolished. Simply not true as I've proven to you from the scriptures. We see Paul, John, and James all teaching requirements of the law of Moses through the inspiration, the voice, of the Holy Spirit to multitudes of God's people, Jew and gentile alike, through the centuries. It simply can not be honestly denied.
Thank you for your commentary.
18 For on the one hand there is
an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness, 19
for the law made nothing perfect; on the other hand, there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God.
Hebrews 7:18-19
what part of the law?
The Law!
and again -
In that He says, "A new covenant," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
Hebrews 8:13
What part of the Covenant?
The Covenant!
and again -
8
the Holy Spirit indicating this, that the way into the Holiest of All was not yet made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing. 9
It was symbolic for the present time in which both gifts and sacrifices are offered which cannot make him who performed the service perfect in regard to the conscience-- 10
concerned only with foods and drinks, various washings, and fleshly ordinances imposed until the time of reformation. 11 But Christ came as High Priest of the good things to come, with the greater and more perfect tabernacle not made with hands, that is, not of this creation. 12 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Most Holy Place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption.
Hebrews 9:8-12
and again -
9 then He said, "Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God."
He takes away the first that He may
establish the second.
Hebrews 10:9
Not my words, but the words of the Holy Spirit through the writer of the book of Hebrews.
The result of the meeting in Jerusalem with all the Apostles, Elders and the Holy Spirit -
24 Since we have heard that some who went out from us have troubled you with words, unsettling your souls, saying,
"You must be circumcised and keep the law"--
to whom we gave no such commandment-- Acts 15:24
You must be circumcised and keep the law. We gave no such commandment.
Keep what part of the Law? The Law!
Don't you think we should at least circumcise?
NO!
JLB
The indoctrination that holds the church fast in her ignorance of the law causes so many to think the law of Moses was
only the literal stipulations for worship (Feasts, sacrifices, etc.), those things that really have been set aside in regard to their literal fulfillment because they no longer HAVE to be done to do what faith in Christ now does perfectly, one time, and forever. But the law of Moses was much more than that. But if you don't know that you may well believe the foolish indoctrination in the church that insists the law of Moses has been altogether abolished.
If you would set your indoctrination aside and read the context of Hebrews you'd see that what got set aside as obsolete, not abolished, are the literal stipulations for worship,
not the requirements of the law themselves. You're guilty of not dividing the Word of God correctly by broad stroking the setting aside of the law in Hebrews as obsolete and not needed anymore as meaning all requirements of the law of Moses have been abolished. That is ridiculous and proven from the NT to be utterly false.
The example of the law of the oxen is really what you have to overcome to defend your doctrine. Here we have a law of Moses, written "for us", the requirements of which are being taught to
gentile Christians, outside of Israel, and being
fulfilled (kept, satisfied, etc.) in the new way of the Spirit.
In complete and utter contradiction to everything you've been saying about the law of Moses.
It wasn't abolished. It's for gentiles, too. And it's being taught to us to be upheld by faith in Christ working through love. But you say the law has been abolished. That is hardly an example of that. What you need to be saying is the literal obligation of the old covenant worship laws concerning temple, priest, and sacrifice is what is now obsolete and no longer HAS to be kept in order to be in covenant with God, but which is now clearly upheld and fulfilled through faith in Christ. You have to be specific. The church has been just plain wrong to say that the requirements of the law of Moses have been abolished altogether.
And as far as circumcision goes. You're the one who has to explain, according to your doctrine, why it 'passed away',
yet falls in the category of laws you say haven't passed away because they are eternal and before Moses.
You defeat your very own argument by not saying the Sabbath observance, and circumcision aren't abolished because they are eternal and before Moses like you say about other laws in the law of Moses, like 'love your neighbor as yourself'. Your reasons for the law of Moses being 'abolished' don't hold up to scrutiny since they don't apply evenly. That reason you give for the law of Moses being abolished simply does not hold water.